The March Jobs Report
by Sinclair Noe
by Sinclair Noe
DOW – 159 = 16,412
SPX – 23 = 1865
NAS – 110 = 4127 (-2.6%)
10 YR YLD - .06 = 2.73%
OIL + .77 = 101.06
GOLD + 15.50 = 1303.30
SILV + .14 = 20.06
SPX – 23 = 1865
NAS – 110 = 4127 (-2.6%)
10 YR YLD - .06 = 2.73%
OIL + .77 = 101.06
GOLD + 15.50 = 1303.30
SILV + .14 = 20.06
Today is a jobs report Friday. Let’s get geeky.
The Labor Department reported nonfarm payrolls increased
by 192,000 jobs last month after rising by 197,000 in February (that’s revised
from 175,000). The prior 2 months were revised to show 37,000 more jobs than
previously estimated; the revisions indicate that the bad winter weather was
not a huge problem for the labor market; it did have an effect but not huge,
and we certainly shouldn’t hear any more weather related excuses. The
unemployment rate was unchanged at 6.7% as more people were looking for jobs. The
consensus estimate was 200,000 jobs, so the figures were a little below
expectations.
Private employment rose to 116.09 million, finally moving
beyond the previous high of 115.98 million recorded at the very start of the
recession in January 2008.Total employment is just a little below the
pre-financial crisis days; we still have about 437,000 fewer jobs than the peak
in 2008, but private employment is now above the peak by 110,000 and at a new all-time
high; the difference is that more than a half million government jobs have been
cut during that time; also, the population and the labor force has grown over
the past 6 years, so the unemployment rate remains fairly high. And the idea is
not just to get back to where we were, but to get back to where we should be.
Keep in mind, we have 15 million more people now than we did then.
The economy added 533 thousand jobs in Q1 this year compared
to 618 thousand in Q1 2013; the bad weather is the excuse for the weaker
performance. Still the unemployment rate has dropped from 8.2% in March 2012 to
6.7% now.
The Labor Force Participation Rate was increased in March
to 63.2%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor
force. And while the participation rate
is still low compared to the past 20 years, it is a positive sign that more
people are looking for jobs, suggesting they were lured back into the job hunt
as openings began to appear. Or possibly, more long-term unemployed were pushed
back into the job market as benefits were cut. The number of long-term unemployed
fell by 110,000, and over the past year, the ranks of the long-term jobless have
dropped by 837,000; meanwhile, the ratio of the population reporting they had a
job ticked up to 58.9% from 58.8%. Much has been made of the multiyear slide in
the labor force participation rate since the financial crisis of 2008. In the
last few months, however, the labor force participation rate has actually
stabilized.
Anyway, about a half million people jumped back into the
labor pool and about that many found jobs; if it were not for the increase in
the size of the labor force, the unemployment rate would have fallen to 6.5%. It
also means that the unemployment rate is unlikely to keep falling as sharply as
it has in the last two years, because people who are again looking for work are
counted as unemployed, while those who have given up and dropped out of the
labor force are not.
There are 7.4 million people working part-time who would
prefer to work full-time, or they are part time because their hours have been
cut back, or they have given up looking for a job. There is a separate measure
for them, known as the U-6 unemployment rate, which comes in at 12.7%; up from
12.6% in February, but down from 13.8% a year ago. The headline unemployment rate
of 6.7% is known as U-3. The U-6 includes all those people in U-3 plus all the
underutilized and discouraged workers. In healthier job markets, the gap
between U-3 and U-6 is closer to 3% or 4%.
After months of declines in the part-time labor force,
the BLS reported a spike of 414,000 new part-time workers in March, which was
the largest monthly increase in nearly two years. This could just as well be an
aberration, as it was a year ago, but the part-time picture in the American
workforce is far from rosy. The financial crisis resulted in a spike in the
number of part-time workers as a percentage of the labor force, and this has
remained elevated ever since.
The increase in jobs was paced by gains in construction,
retail and professional services. Government employment over all remained flat,
with federal and state governments cutting 11,000 jobs even as local
governments added 9,000 positions. Over the past 12 months, total federal
employment has fallen by 85,000. That's pretty much how it has gone throughout
the grinding recovery; private hiring has been slow but steady, while austerity
has led to government job cuts that have helped keep the recovery frustratingly
slow.
The health care sector added 19,000 jobs. Business
services added 57,000 jobs. Food services employment increased by 30,000,
bringing the sector’s gain over the past year to 323,000. The manufacturing
sector lost 1,000 jobs.
While average hourly earnings were basically flat, the
length of the average workweek edged higher. The average work week for private
employees edged up to 34.5 hours, offsetting a net decline over the prior three
months; as a consequence of the bad weather, many people lost time on the job,
but it was made up in March. Average weekly hours, at 34.5 per worker, aren't
far off of the 34.7 hours per worker recorded six years ago, but when you add
up a fifth of an hour across more than 100 million workers, it makes a very big
difference in the amount of time Americans actually spent on the job.
Average hourly earnings for private employees fell by 1
cent to $24.30 from a month earlier. Over the year, average hourly earnings
have risen by 49 cents, or 2.1%. The average weekly wage rose to $838.55 from
$833.83. The reason for this anomaly: a 12-minute increase in the average
amount of time worked each week. Conclusion:
Bargaining power for workers is still subdued. But their services are more in
demand.
The jobs report also provides details about who is benefiting from recovery and who is not. The recovery has been good for
college educated workers and whites. It has been much more difficult for the
long-term unemployed, young adults without a college education, and African
Americans. Among adults 25 and older who have a bachelor’s degree the unemployment
rate is just 3.4%, about half the over-all rate.
The unemployment rate for college graduates never went
above five per cent in the downturn. At the other end of the educational
spectrum, things were very different. For adults 25 and older without a
high-school diploma, the jobless rate hit 15.6% in 2010. Last month, it stood
at 9.6%.
Among white men aged 20 and over, the unemployment rate
is now 5.3%; for African-American men over 20, it is 12.1%. The gap between
white and black females is also very large, 5.3% of white women aged twenty and
over are out of work (the same as the rate for white men), but 11% of black
women in the same age group are jobless. Hispanics also have substantially
higher rates of unemployment than whites, but the differences aren’t as large.
Among Hispanic men aged twenty and over, the jobless rate in March was 6.9%; among
Hispanic women aged twenty and over, the rate was 8.4%.
For teenagers between the ages of 16 and 19 who aren’t in
school or college, the unemployment rate is 20.9%. That’s down from 23.3% a
year ago. It’s still a very high figure, and, among minority teenagers, it’s
even higher.
The stock market moved a little higher this morning
following the jobs report. It wasn’t a bad jobs report that sank the market
today. Most of the stories I read had a theme of not too hot, not too cold, a
Goldilocks report. The Fed uses the jobs report to help determine the timing
and pace of further cuts to its monthly bond-buying program. The central bank
also looks to the unemployment rate as a factor in deciding when to raise its
benchmark interest rate. This report did not sway the Fed one way or the other.
What went wrong on Wall Street? It’s always dangerous to lay
an exact cause on any singular event, but the big damage today was in the Nasdaq
and the tech and biotechs. There’s a little bit of nervousness about some of
the high multiples in the biotech area and computer and Internet-related stocks.
You’re having another wave of selling in that very high-momentum group. When
you’re at record high levels, people start to get a little tentative going into
weekends.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.