Friday, August 01, 2014 - Jobs, Mainly

Jobs, Mainly

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 69 = 16,493
SPX – 5 = 1925
NAS – 17 = 4352
10 YR YLD - .05 = 2.50%
OIL - .32 = 97.88
GOLD + 13.70 = 1295.20
SILV - .09 = 20.40

The first Friday of each month brings us what I consider one of the most important economic reports we can cover, the jobs report; and so we provide comprehensive (wonkish) coverage.

The economy added 209,000 net new jobs in July. The unemployment rate moved up to 6.2% from 6.1%. Even though the economy added jobs, more people joined the labor force, and that is why the unemployment rate moved higher. The 209,000 new jobs was below estimates of about 230,000. The report from June was revised from 288,000 to 298,000; the May report was revised from 224,000 to 229,000 for a net 15,000 in upward revisions.

Employment is up 2.57 million year over year. We have regained the jobs lost in the downturn, and total employment is 639,000 above the pre-recession peak. Total employment is up 9.35 million from the lows of the recession, and private employment is up almost 9.9 million from the lows; the difference reflects the job losses in government related jobs.

So far this year an average of 229,000 new jobs a month have been created. That’s a significantly higher pace than in 2010 when a mere 88,000 jobs a month on average were added. Since the start of the year the economy has added 1.6 million jobs.  At the current pace, the economy could add 2.75 million jobs this year, which would be the best year for total and private job growth since 1999.

This was the sixth month in a row with more than 200,000 jobs added, and that hasn’t happened since 1997. It was probably a bigger achievement 17 years ago, because the economy and the labor force was smaller back then, but the employment recovery has been chugging along through a first quarter that was frozen by the polar vortex and rebound in the second quarter. And the private sector has been adding jobs consistently since the first quarter of 2010.

The unemployment rate was up to 6.2%. The jobless rate can rise for both good reasons (more people looking for work) and bad reasons (fewer people having a job). This month, more people were looking for work. The Labor Force Participation Rate increased to 62.9% in July; this is a measure of how many people who are of working age are actually in the labor force and working or looking for work. The idea that the pool of labor is increasing is a positive; the idea is that some people who have been unemployed for a long time are now finding jobs. The trend in employment growth remains more than strong enough for the unemployment rate to keep trending down, even though the rate rose a tenth this month

Part of the decline in the participation rate was due to demographics; many older workers retired, whether they wanted to or not, while many younger workers stayed in school or returned to school. So, it’s helpful to look at people aged 25-54, in their prime working age; among this group, the participation rate declined slightly; this confirms that younger and older workers were jumping back into the labor pool.  Still, the employment to population rate, which measures the country’s population that reported having a job in July was unchanged at 59%, a number that was up only barely from its 58.7% level of a year ago.

There are still more than 3.1 million workers who have been unemployed more than half a year. And there are just over 7.5 million people working part-time for economic reasons. These workers are included in an alternate measure of unemployment known as the U-6, which includes unemployed and underutilized workers; U-6 increased from 12.1% to 12.2%.

Many people think the U-6 is a more accurate measure of the jobs market, but let’s dig a little deeper. There are 9.6 million people unemployed and actively looking for a job. There are more than 2 million people who have stopped looking for a job within the past year. When you start adding all the unemployed workers who want a job, plus involuntary part-time, plus discouraged workers, you come up with about 23 million people that could possibly move into the labor pool. There is still massive slack in the labor market, and it will take a long time to take up the slack. For now, it is a slow, steady slog.

Where is the job growth coming from? Professional and business services added 47,000 jobs. Retail employment gained 27,000 jobs. Manufacturing added 28,000 jobs last month but the sector has recovered only 30% of the jobs lost during the recession. Construction added 22,000 jobs. Leisure and hospitality gained 21,000. Education and health services added 17,000. Government added 11,000. State and local government employment is now up 151,000 from the bottom, but still nearly 600,000 below the peak. Federal government jobs have dropped by 22,000 since the start of the year. The loss of government jobs is one of the major factors in the slow jobs recovery. In previous downturns, government did not have layoffs, and sometimes increased hiring. In this downturn government jobs were cut in a wave of austerity measures.

Even though the economy has been adding jobs, it has not been enough to push a recovery in wages. In July, average hourly wages rose a penny to $24.45, a disappointing result after strong gains in June and May. In 23 of the past 24 months, the yearly increase in hourly pay has ranged from 1.9% to 2.2%, or about one-third less than usual during an economic recovery. The 12-month increase in wages as of July was just 2%; and inflation wiped out about three-fourths of that gain. There’s been no change since the start of 2014. While it might seem counterintuitive that wages are flat while jobs are being added, the likely reason is that there are a lot of poor paying jobs plus a few very good paying jobs. The average length of the workweek for private sector workers was unchanged at 34.5 hours.

Stronger than expected US growth figures on Wednesday showed second quarter GDP up 4% on an annualized basis, along with hawkish comments from US Federal Reserve board member Charles Plosser, it prompted fears that the central bank may increase the cost of borrowing sooner than expected. Today’s non-farm payroll numbers were just weak enough to ease concerns about possible tightening from the Fed, yet not so awful as to indicate a downturn. It still points to a job market and an economy that is improving, but there is no real wage pressure and nothing to indicate inflation is a concern.

We had a couple more economic reports today. The Institute for Supply Management said its index of national factory activity rose to 57.1 in July, the highest since April 2011, from 55.3 in June. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the manufacturing sector.

The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's final July reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment came in at 81.8, down from the final June reading of 82.5. The surveyors report that consumers’ attention has been dominated by jobs and income growth.

For the week, the S&P 500 fell 2.7%, its biggest weekly percentage loss since the week ending June 1, 2012, while the Nasdaq fell 2.2%. The Dow ended down 2.8% for the week. The Dow's losses dragged it further into negative territory for the year. For the year-to-date, it is down 0.5%.

Markets have suffered a turbulent few days, hit by a combination of interest rate concerns and growing geopolitical worries. The violence in Gaza also added to the sense of events escalating out of control; a proposed 72 hour cease fire didn’t last one day. An Israeli soldier was captured, and it looks like violence will escalate over the weekend. The week saw Argentina defaulting for the second time in 12 years, while continuing tensions with Russia over the Ukraine led to the imposition of further sanctions which could hit businesses and put the brakes on global growth.

It was a big week for US economic activity, with jobs and GDP statistics and a Fed meeting, but it was European equity markets that took a real tumble. Portugal was a big loser, as Banco Espírito Santo reported the largest-ever loss for a Portuguese company, sending its shares spiraling and prompting probes into possible accounting fraud at the bank.

Portugal’s major stock index dropped 10% for the week. German stocks were hit following stepped up sanctions against Russia, a major supplier of natural gas to Germany; the DAX index slipped 4.5%. Greece, Austria, Spain, UK, and France all saw declines of 3% or more. The major Russian index dropped about 1%.

Europe posted its own jobs report. Eurozone unemployment dropped to 11.5%, which is absolutely horrible, but getting better. Meanwhile, the region continues to flirt with the prospect of deflation, with euro zone wide prices rising a scant 0.4% in July from the prior year. So, there is still plenty the ECB can do to stimulate the economy over there.

Meanwhile, Congress is calling a 5 week recess, an extended summer vacation, which even Europeans think is excessive. They managed to get a few things done before running away. They passed a $16 billion VA bill to help deal with extensive treatment delays and a recent record-keeping scandal. They cobbled together a patch for highway funding, just a temporary patch. This Congress has only managed to pass 142 bills into law, which puts the legislative branch on pace for its least productive session in modern history. And now they’re heading out for a 5 week vacation. Maybe we’ll get lucky and they won’t come back.

Monday, July 28, 2014 - You Might Not Like the Solution

You Might Not Like the Solution
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 22 = 16,982
SPX + 0.57 = 1978
NAS – 4 = 4444
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.47%
OIL - .52 = 101.57
GOLD – 4.80 = 1304.50
SILV - .18 = 20.67

This will be a busy week for economic reports. Today’s reports included the National Association of Realtors’ index of pending home sales for June; it dropped 1.1%. This index looks at contracts signed, and usually about 80% of signed contracts result in a sale within 2 months. The pending home sales index is up 9% from February, but it is down 7.3% compared to June a year ago. The blame can be placed at the usual suspects: tough credit requirements, rising home prices, and weak wage growth.

In a separate report the Markit preliminary services Purchasing Managers Index for July was 61, unchanged for June; a reading above 50 indicates expansion. The services sector continued to add employees, though at a slower pace. The employment index fell from 56.1, the fastest rate on record, to 52.8 in July.

Wednesday morning brings the first estimate of second quarter gross domestic product. It is widely anticipated the economy grew at about a 3% pace in the second quarter, following a 2.9% contraction in the first quarter, largely blamed on bad winter weather combined with the expiration of long term unemployment benefits and working through excess inventory accumulation. So, the first quarter and second quarter will kind of cancel each other out and result in a flat first half. If the economy can maintain 3% growth for the next couple of quarters, it will result in annualized growth a little below 2%. Wednesday’s GDP report will include revisions to output for the past 3 years.

A few hours after the GDP report, the Federal Reserve FOMC will wrap up a 2 day meeting on monetary policy, and issue a statement. However, the Fed will not update its economic forecast, nor will they hold a press conference until the September 17^th FOMC meeting; so don’t expect any major changes to Fed policy this week. Still, Fed watchers will look for nuances to the Fed statement for any hint of policy changes, specifically when the Fed will start to raise interest rates.

Friday brings the non-farm payroll report for July. It is expected the economy added about 235,000 net new jobs in July; anything close is in the ballpark; anything under 200,000 or over 300,000 would shock the markets. The unemployment rate is expected to drop to 6%, but the unemployment rate has quite a few variables to consider, including the participation rate – the percentage of the population still looking for work or working. The participation rate has dropped from 65.8% in 2007 to 62.8% last month. This means that a lot of people have dropped out of the labor market. If some of those people re-enter the labor market and start looking for jobs, the unemployment rate could move higher, even if the economy adds a bunch of new jobs.

We kick off the week with a Merger Monday. Zillow will buy Trulia for $3.5 billion. Zillow and Trulia are No. 1 and 2 in the online real estate market, followed by No. 3 Move Inc. Zillow reported nearly 83 million monthly unique visitors in June. Trulia reported 54 million. The combination would create something like a monopoly in the online home hunting market.

Dollar Tree has agreed to buy Family Dollar Stores for $8.5 billion. The deal was pushed forward by investor Carl Icahn, who had built up a 9.5% stake in Family Dollar, and with the bump up in price from the merger, Icahn pockets a cool $150 million increase this weekend. The new Dollar Tree, or maybe Dollar Family Tree, would keep operating separate chains, but would have about 13,000 locations across the US and Canada, with 145,000 employees and about  $18 billion in revenue.

Tesla and Panasonic have reached a deal for Panasonic to invest in Tesla’s gigafactory. The initial Panasonic investment will be about $200 to $300 million, but could grow to $5 billion. The gigafactory would make battery packs for cars. Panasonic is the main supplier of battery cells for Tesla. Tesla has said it is evaluating sites in Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas to place its massive battery factory. The electric car maker would break ground on the gigafactory later this year. Tesla is scheduled to report earnings on Thursday.

Lloyds Banking Group has agreed to pay $370 million to US and British regulators to resolve investigations into manipulating interest rates or Libor rate rigging. There were 2 main issues with Lloyds: rigging Libor, for which seven other institutions have already been punished; and for the first time, manipulating another rate, known as the repo rate. This repo rate was used to calculate the scale of the fees paid to the Bank of England for its special liquidity scheme (SLS), which was created in April 2008 to cheapen the prices at which money could be obtained by banks as the credit crisis unfolded; in other words, Lloyds manipulated their own bailout. The British lender is the latest big bank to admit criminal wrongdoing, and they entered into a deferred prosecution agreement. Under that agreement, Lloyds will avoid criminal charges if it stays out of trouble for the next two years.

Plenty of banks have entered into deferred prosecution agreements but I have never heard of one that violated a deferred prosecution agreement; and it isn’t because the banksters keep their nose clean; it’s because the regulators never apply the DPA.

Taking a look at geopolitical hotspots. Israel had agreed to a 12 hour ceasefire, but Hamas continued to fire rockets into Israel, so the ceasefire is off. Palestinian fighters launched a cross-border raid. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is now warning of a protracted war in Gaza.

The Ukrainian government said today its troops had taken more territory from the rebels and were moving towards the site of the Malaysian airlines crash which international investigators said they could not reach because of the fighting. Meanwhile, US and European leaders agreed to impose wider sanctions on Russia's financial, defense and energy sectors.

Separately, an international arbitration court at The Hague ruled that Russia must pay $50 billion for expropriating the assets of Yukos, the former oil giant. Finding that Russian authorities had subjected Yukos to politically-motivated attacks, the panel made an award to a group of former Yukos shareholders that equates to more than half the entire fund Moscow has set aside to cover budget holes. The ruling hit back at decisions made under President Vladimir Putin's rule during his first term as president to nationalize Yukos and jail Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who had criticized him. The hardline approach was seen by Kremlin critics at the time as a stark message to oligarchs to stay out of politics. Khodorkovsky, who used to be Russia's richest man, was arrested at gunpoint in 2003 and convicted of theft and tax evasion in 2005. Yukos, once worth $40 billion, was broken up and nationalized, with most assets handed to Rosneft, an energy company run by an ally of Putin.

And don’t forget Libya. Two rival brigades of former rebels fighting for control of Tripoli International Airport have been throwing bombs at each other’s positions; then somebody bombed a huge nearby fuel depot, and that is now burning out of control. The conflict has forced Tripoli International Airport to shut down. Airliners were reduced to smoldering hulks on the tarmac and the aviation control center was knocked out. Libya's government has asked for international help to try to contain the disaster at the fuel depot on the airport road, close to other tanks holding gas and diesel. With Libyan security deteriorating, the United States evacuated its embassy in Tripoli on Saturday; British, Italian, Philippine, and Australian embassies have followed suit.

The typical American household has been losing ground. According to a new study by the Russell Sage Foundation the inflation-adjusted net worth for the typical household was $87,992 in 2003. Ten years later, it was only $56,335, or a 36% decline. Even as the average American household’s wealth declined, the net worth of wealthy households increased substantially. The average wealth of the American household in the 95th percentile was $1,192,639 in 2003, and $1,364,834 ten years later, an increase of 14%.

The authors of the study said the reason for the disparity was that affluent households were able to ride the success of the surging stock market after the 2008 crash, while middle class families were severely impacted by the decreasing value of their homes. Wealth declined for everyone in the aftermath of the Great Recession, but better-off families were able to rebound. Households at the bottom of the wealth distribution, on the other hand, lost the largest share of their wealth.

So, as we look at the economic news this week, the GDP estimate and the jobs report, it’s a little hard to imagine sustainable economic growth without a strong middle class. The lesson of the past 10 years, and we might even say the past 30 years, is that pumping up the upper echelons of the economy and hoping it trickles down to the rest, doesn’t work. The middle class gets clobbered, small businesses are being knocked out of the competition; in the early 1980s small business startups accounted for 50% of all business growth, but that dropped to 35% by 2010, and more small businesses are closing than are being created; and yes, that equates to fewer jobs being created by small businesses.

Back in 1929, the top 10% earned nearly 50% of the income. Today, income inequality is even wider. In 2012, the top 10% surpassed 50% of the total US income for the first time, and the problem has only grown in the past 2 years. Wealth disparity alarms often coincide with major financial peaks, such as 1929, 1999, 2007, and today; that’s because wealth disparity and income inequality are not sustainable, and there are only 2 solutions: the first is to grow the middle class, encourage small business, lift people out of long term unemployment; the second solution, is that the wealth distribution problem tends to be solved by falling markets.

Monday, July 07, 2014 - Small Steps

Small Steps

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 44 = 17,024
SPX – 7 = 1977
NAS – 34 = 4451
10 YR YLD - .03 = 2.62%
OIL - .67 = 103.39
GOLD - .50 = 1321.00
SILV - .10 = 21.15

It was a long holiday weekend that was over way too fast. And the problems of the world haven’t gone away. Let’s get caught up on some of the big stories.

In Iraq, the situation is deteriorating. There had been muted hope for some sort of an inclusive government to hold the country together. Don’t count on it. Iraq’s new parliament has called a recess and they won’t meet again for 5 weeks. So Iraq is now politically paralyzed. Meanwhile, a Sunni Islamist insurgency killed an army general near Baghdad.  It looks like Prime Minister Maliki is digging in his heels, raising the risk that Iraq will fragment along ethnic and sectarian lines.

ISIS, the Sunni insurgents are holding territory in western Iraq and just north of the capitol. The Iraqi military, backed by Shi'ite militias and volunteers, has yet to take back any major cities but is trying to advance on Tikrit. Kurds in northern Iraq have taken advantage of the chaos to expand their autonomous territory in northern Iraq. Most Sunnis and Kurds walked out of the last parliament, saying they believed the prime minister and president should be chosen along with the speaker as a package, not one at a time. They could not resolve the impasse, so the acting speaker postponed the meeting.

In eastern Ukraine, pro-Russian rebels built barricades in the streets of Donetsk and it looks like they will try to make a stand. Although most shops and businesses in Donetsk were still open, some were shut, and residents are concerned that government forces could soon attack. Rebels have been barricaded into government buildings in Donetsk, which they declared capital of an independent "people's republic", but until now the city mostly functioned normally.

You may recall there was an election in Afghanistan last month. They announced preliminary results today. The losing presidential candidate is now saying the results of the election were improperly counted and he is describing it as a “coup” against the people. His rejection of the election results sets the stage for a possible bloody standoff between ethnic groups or even secession of parts of the fragile country, which is already deeply divided along tribal lines. The vote to pick a successor to Hamid Karzai was intended to mark the first democratic transfer of power in Afghan history, a crucial step towards stability as the US prepares to withdraw the bulk of its troops by the end of the year. Not so great.

Hamas stepped up rocket fire at southern Israeli towns and Israel called up reserve troops today in anticipation of a possible escalation of hostilities. Hamas has vowed revenge for what it saw as Israel's deadliest attacks in which six Palestinian militants died, though Israel denied any involvement. The surge in violence has raged since the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli youths last month and a Palestinian teen last week. Israel said more than 40 rockets were launched as militants' funerals were held in Gaza. Thirty struck inside Israel and the rest were shot down by rocket interceptors. Air raid sirens wailed as far north as the outskirts of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

And then there’s Chicago, where the Fourth of July holiday resulted in widespread violence that left 80 people wounded and 14 dead.

On the economic calendar, Alcoa will kick off the earnings reporting season after the close of trade tomorrow. Alcoa has long held the ceremonial role for starting earnings season because it was in the Dow Industrials and it had the ticker symbol AA. Alcoa is no longer one of the Dow 30 stocks, but the tradition holds. Actually, we’ve already seen about 25 companies from the S&P 500 report earnings.

Second-quarter profit growth is expected to come in at 6.6% for the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, which would be an improvement over the 5.6% growth in the first three months of 2014. Revenues are expected to grow 3%. While negative second-quarter profit warnings have outpaced positive ones by a 4.2 to 1 margin — well above the 2.6 to 1 negative-to-positive ratio since 1995 — the future outlooks from CEOs are far more bullish than the first quarter, when there were nearly 7 negative profit pre-announcements for every positive one.

With stocks at all-time highs and no longer cheap after a five-year bull run, Wall Street wants to see companies deliver profit and revenue growth in the coming second-quarter earnings season sizable enough to warrant the market’s big move. Indeed, the bull market’s continued health will hinge on vibrant corporate profitability. Whether or not stocks continue trending higher will likely depend on second-quarter earnings reports, as well as management’s guidance of full-year earnings.

Currently, the S&P 500 is trading at nearly 16 times its estimated earnings over the next four quarters, which is a tad above the long-term average. Heading into the season, analysts are upbeat, with more analysts’ raising profit forecasts than lowering them for the first time since the first quarter of 2012, but more upbeat analysts could result in a more downbeat market reaction.

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will release the minutes of its last meeting, held June 17-18. Wall Street will again be looking for any clues related to the timing of the first interest rate hike by the Fed. After the strong jobs report Thursday, some Wall Street firms revised their rate-hike timetables, warning that rates could start rising earlier-than-expected next year. However, the Fed might not be so positive about jobs. There’s been concern about the degree to which a falling unemployment rate is overstating labor-market strength.  You’ll likely see general agreement that the labor market has been improving, but there will be difference in opinion about the drop in the unemployment rate. Officials have also been eyeing tepid wage growth.

That’s one of the strange things about the jobs report; it does a poor job of measuring the strength of the jobs created. When we try to measure performance in the stock market, we don’t look at the number of new stocks available to investors, instead we measure the price of the stocks, the value of the stocks. But when we look at jobs, we don’t look at the value those jobs bring. One of the things we’ve seen is that many of the jobs being created are part-time.

So, it's interesting that the recent news of job market "improvement" doesn't mention that of the 10 occupation categories projecting the greatest growth in the next eight years, only one pays a middle-class wage. Four pay barely above poverty level, and five pay beneath it, including fast food workers, retail sales staff, health aids, and janitors. The job expected to have the highest number of openings is "Personal Care Aide" – taking care of aging baby boomers in their houses or in nursing homes. The median salary of an aid is under $20,000.

We’re starting to see some improvement as the job market gains traction; more than half the jobs the economy has added so far this year are in positions that pay higher than the hourly wage. Some 58% of the new jobs created in 2014 pay above the average hourly wage of $24.45. By contrast, about 48% of the new jobs created in 2013 paid above the national average. Businesses in 2014 are hiring more white-collar employees, construction is on the mend (at least compared to the first quarter), health care is going strong and even the long-downtrodden financial industry is finally getting into the act. About 42% of the new jobs, meanwhile, fall into categories that pay less than the average wage.

Still there is a general lack of upward wage pressure; workers demanding more money as the labor market improves and the pool of potential employees shrinks. Wages have risen just 2% over the past year and weekly wages have actually fallen in the past two months. Part of the problem is part-time work; part of the problem is that the good paying jobs are limited to certain sectors. The bigger problem is that the increase in the number of jobs is not translating to higher wages and that, in turn does not translate to faster economic growth.

This week’s economic calendar also includes reports on small businesses, job turnover, and consumer credit. There was a 10.2% surge in consumer credit in April. The growing dependence on debt could prolong consumer spending a few more months, but in the absence higher real wages, this type of consumption cannot last much longer, certainly not if we see both gas prices and inflation-driven interest rates edge higher later this year.

It’s unlikely we’ll get any big pronouncements from the Fed. They probably talked about how the economy has rebounded from the terrible slump of the 1^st quarter, but if you read the minutes for any major move on interest rates, don’t hold your breath. Neither short-term nor long-term rates will go significantly higher in the next few years. More likely, modest increases that might even be quickly reversed. The implications of another extended period of depressed rates would be bad news for savers and pension funds, but it should help the stock market.

After the Fed’s June meeting, they made clear that they expected to finally begin lifting their benchmark rate in 2015, if the economy continues to expand and unemployment continues to decline. Even so, 12 of the 16 members of the policy committee expected the Fed's rate to be no higher than 1.5% by the end of 2015 — a full 18 months from now. Asked for their rate prediction for the end of 2016, the majority of the Fed panel expected 2.5% or less. And because the Fed's rate influences all other interest costs, that would suggest still-low rates across the board.

What we are learning about this version of the Fed is they move slow and in small steps.

Thursday, July 03, 2014 - Jobs Report Thursday

Jobs Report Thursday

DOW + 92 = 17,068
SPX + 10 = 1985
NAS + 28 = 4485
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.65%
OIL - .42 = 104.06
GOLD – 7.60 = 1320.60
SILV - .02 = 21.23

Record high closes for the Dow and the S&P 500.

The first Friday of each month is typically a big day for economic data because the Labor Department releases the nonfarm employment report. I have always considered this to be one of the most important economic reports because jobs make everything happen; it’s the stuff of work and production and a driver of capital, and sweat and blood. So, we spend extra time to really dig into the jobs report, which was released today because tomorrow is a holiday.

This was a very good jobs report. The economy added 288,000 net new jobs in June and the unemployment rate dropped from 6.3% to 6.1%; that’s the lowest unemployment rate since September 2008. The report topped estimates of 215,000 jobs. The jobs reports for April and May were revised higher; April was revised from 282,000 to 304,000 net new jobs; May was revised from 217,000 to 224,000 new jobs; meaning there were 29,000 more jobs than previously reported.

June marked the best five-month stretch of job creation since early 2006; for the past five months the economy has added at least 200,000 jobs per month. The three-month average rate of hiring in the second quarter now stands at 272,000, compared with 190,000 a month in the first quarter.

The economy has added private sector jobs for 52 straight months. During this span, 9.7 million private sector jobs have been created. Over the past 12 months, the economy has added 2.495 million jobs; and year-to-date the economy has added 1.385 million job; and 2014 is on track to be the best year for job growth since 1999.

Total employment is now 415,000 above the pre-recession peak; and private employment is now 895,000 above the previous peak; the difference between private and total is the loss of government jobs, which has been like an anchor dragging down total employment. State and local governments added 24,000 jobs last month; state and local government employment is up 138,000 from the bottom but still more than 600,000 below the peak. The federal government added 2,000 jobs in June but federal employment is still down 23,000 for the year.

Breaking down the government jobs a bit further, the improvement likely reflects a stabilizing financial outlook for municipalities. When home prices crashed, it cut into the tax base of cities and counties, and the response was to lay off workers. A return to government hiring, even a modest increase could have long term benefits from investment in education and infrastructure.

More than 7.5 million people are employed part-time for economic reasons; this number is up 275,000 in June, although the trend has been and remains down for the year. People who are working part-time because their hours have been cut back or they can’t find full-time employment are included in an alternate measure known as labor underutilization or U-6. The U-6 rate decreased to 12.1% in June from 12.2% in May; and this is the lowest U-6 reading since October 2008.

Full-time employment suffered its third-largest single month-over-month decline since the recession ended; 523,000 full-time jobs were lost while a stunning 799,000 new part-time jobs were added in June. Part-time workers again account for more than 18% of the total workforce, a level that has remained relatively stable since the recession, despite efforts to deny the truth that this is a "part-time" recovery. Part-time jobs had been in rapid decline over the past year, but June's spike cancels out that shift. There are now almost exactly as many part-time workers (28 million) as there were a year ago.

The Labor Force Participation Rate was unchanged in June at 62.8%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force.  We would like to see the participation rate increase, meaning more people are looking for jobs, but a large portion of the recent decline in the participation rate is due to demographics; people are retiring and won’t be re-entering the labor force. The Employment-Population ratio increased in June to 59.0%.

The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the number of people who are unemployed by the total number of people working or looking for work. The best way for the rate to fall is for the number of unemployed to drop because more people found a job, but it can also decline when people give up looking for work altogether. Still, the jobless rate dropped to 6.1% and that’s because more people found work, not because more people were dropping out of the labor pool; so the jobless rate fell for the right reasons.

As the labor market recovers, it creates a challenge of more people re-entering the labor pool. If more people re-enter the labor pool, the unemployment rate could go up, even as the economy adds jobs. But that hasn’t happened; rather, the number of unemployed who were re-entering the labor pool actually fell in June.

The number of long term unemployed workers has dropped by 1.2 million over the past year but there are still just over 3 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and they are still trying to find work; this is down from over 3.3 million people in May. There are many long term unemployed who may never get jobs again, and the longer they go without jobs, the tougher it will be. And more jobseekers gave up looking for work than found a job, for the 49^th time in the past 50 months. This is surely a demographic shift, but it also means we’re losing the skills and productivity of some of the most experienced workers.  For people who are finding jobs, the median duration of unemployment continues to drop rapidly, from 25 weeks coming out of the recession to just 13.1 weeks today.

Long term unemployment and underutilization indicate that there is still significant slack in the labor market, even though some companies are now beginning to report that they are having to compete to find workers.

So far, the trend has not resulted in higher incomes. Average pay has grown just 2% during the recovery, barely matching inflation and below the long term trend of 3.5%. Last month, the average hourly wage for private-sector workers rose six cents to $24.45. If workers earn more money, they’ll spend more money and that is a boost to the overall economy. The silver lining to the weak wages is that there is no wage inflation, so even though the jobs picture is improving, wage inflation should not influence the Federal Reserve.  Even if hourly wages aren’t moving much, there was a small pickup in the average work week and aggregate hours worked grew by a fairly strong 3.8% annual rate in the last quarter.

Job gains in June were widespread. Retailers added 40,200 workers last month. Financial and insurance firms increased their payrolls by 17,000. Restaurants and bars employed nearly 33,000 more people. Higher-paying sectors continued to lag behind in the jobs recovery. Factories added 16,000 workers, and construction added 6,000 workers, which would not be considered particularly strong. Factory payrolls have increased for 11 consecutive months, adding a total of 139,000 new jobs, well below the target of one million manufacturing jobs for the year. Factory payrolls remain a shadow of their former selves, but the revival in manufacturing is finally creating more job opportunities on the factory floor.

Shrinking unemployment and growing payrolls are always good signs for a stronger economy. However, the nature of these changes matters. If unemployment is low primarily due to labor force dropouts, and if employment growth is being driven by hundreds of thousands of low-earning part-time workers rather than growth in valuable and decent paying full-time positions, it means that the economic recovery still faces a hard slog.

The jobs report was far from perfect but it was very good and it should lead to growth in the economy for the second quarter. So today, stocks had another good day. The Dow closed above 17,000 for the first time ever. The S&P 500 is closing in on 2000. The Nasdaq is back to its highest level since 2000. Bonds dropped. And that is an ongoing trend, the markets race along while workers trudge.

Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - Milk and Cookie Binge

Milk and Cookie Binge
by Sinclair Noe 

DOW + 20 = 16,976
SPX + 1 = 1974
NAS – 0.92 = 4457
10 YR YLD + .07 = 2.63%
OIL – 1.18 = 104.16
GOLD + 1.10 = 1328.20
SILV + .18 = 21.25

Record highs for the Dow and the S&P 500. We celebrate with milk and cookies. It’s good, it’s wholesome.

Unlike Goldman Sachs, which apparently likes to celebrate with binge drinking at strip clubs; at least that’s the accusation by 2 former Goldman employees suing Goldman for discrimination against women. Support for their claims includes statements of former Goldman Sachs employees, expert statistical analyses and evidence on earnings and promotions from the firm’s own records. According to filings with the court, female vice presidents earned 21 percent less than men and female associates made 8 percent less, the former employees claimed; about 23 percent fewer female vice presidents were promoted to managing director of the bank relative to their male counterparts.

We’ll stick with milk and cookies.

Tomorrow we’ll get the monthly jobs report, one day early due to the holiday shortened weekend. Today we got the ADP Employment Report showing private nonfarm payrolls increase 281,000 in June. That’s the best ADP report since the fall of 2012. That would be a very good number indeed if it translates to the government report tomorrow. The ADP report should not be used as a predictor of the government jobs report. Both reports tend to move in the same direction in the long term, but month to month fluctuations can be quite pronounced. It is expected tomorrow’s report will show 215,000 net new jobs in June.

Here’s another indicator; the ISM manufacturing employment index was unchanged in June at 52.8%; the historical correlation between the ISM employment index and the BLS employment report suggest the economy lost about 5,000 manufacturing jobs in June; the ADP report showed the economy added 12,000 manufacturing jobs last month.

The best way to boost the economy is to have more people working, which then equates to more people spending. Even though the unemployment rate has dropped to 6.3%, that’s still high; and long term unemployment is still a problem, and indicates there is still slack in the labor market. Just as important as the number of jobs created is the quality of the jobs created. For several years, the trend has been for lower paying jobs, where wages are below the average of $24.38 an hour. There has been some improvement this year, with 61% of the 1.07 million new jobs in 2014 paying above the average hourly wage. So, keep an eye on wage growth in tomorrow’s report; it will be a critical component in overall GDP growth.

So, as we wait for the jobs report, we are left to question whether the economic recovery is really gaining traction. Dr. Copper says yes. Copper closed at its highest price in more than 4 months. Copper for September delivery gained 6 cents, or 1.9 percent, to settle at $3.27 a pound. Since copper is an industrial metal used in everything from buildings to cars, it’s considered a good economic indicator, however it might be a better indicator of growth in China, the world’s largest buyer  of copper.

Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen delivered a speech to the International Monetary Fund and she says the Fed has the right focus on jobs and inflation, and should leave stability concerns to regulation. Many economists and investors are concerned the Fed’s policies have fostered potential financial asset bubbles. Yellen said today: “I do not presently see a need for monetary policy to deviate from a primary focus on attaining price stability and maximum employment, in order to address financial stability concerns.”

Yellen said she saw pockets of increased risk-taking across the financial system that could warrant a more "robust macroprudential approach" if those concerns grew.

BNP agreed on Monday to pay almost $9 billion while admitting criminal violations of United States sanctions. BNP admitted to funneling and hiding some $30 billion in transactions to Iran, Sudan, and Cuba. The bank will also be barred from clearing any financial transactions in dollars for a year starting in January. Credit Suisse and a subsidiary of UBS also pleaded guilty recently to tax avoidance and interest-rate rigging, respectively. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and other United States banks have paid billions of dollars in penalties but have, so far, avoided criminal liability. The French government says that’s not fair.

And while it might be easy to dismiss the French for whining, they are correct. New research suggests that overseas firms like BNP Paribas do in fact pay bigger fines and plead guilty more often than United States companies. United States criminal fines from 2001 to 2010 were about five times greater on average for foreign firms than for their American counterparts. The average penalty was 22 times bigger for foreign companies after adjusting for the type of crime and whether the company was listed. One reason may be that prosecutors single out only the most serious cases abroad. Another reason might be because prosecutors are afraid of hurting a domestic business. Another reason might be that prosecutors are spineless wimps in the face of the political clout of US banks.

What we have learned is that businesses and investors don’t seem to care about the criminal convictions of Credit Suisse and BNP and that might signal that if a conviction will not shut down the company, then there’s no reason not to convict, international or domestic.

Yesterday we told you about that creepy experiment by Facebook, designed to make you feel good or bad by filtering out good or bad content. Facebook faces a government investigation in Europe over its study of whether manipulating people's news feeds could change their emotions. Facebook won't be helped by the fact that the company didn't alter its terms of service to disclose to users that their posts would be used for research until four months after the experiment took place.

The implementation of the European Union's so-called "right to be forgotten" policy is already having a worrying impact on the media, with at least two outlets revealing on Wednesday that links to articles of theirs have been scrubbed from Google. A European court ruled in May that Google must remove links to articles from its search engine if the subjects of the post asked it to. The court specified that links could be scrubbed if they were "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed."

When the ruling came down, some worried that it would place too much power in the hands of public figures who wished to have unflattering information about themselves hidden. On Wednesday, the Guardian and the BBC both disclosed that just such an occurrence seemed to have taken place with stories of theirs. The Guardian case involved 6 articles that were taken down from Google’s European platforms. The BBC case involved Stan O’Neal, the former head of Merrill Lynch, implicated in the subprime mortgage scandal. Is the data in the BBC report "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant"? Hmm.

Solar installers SolarCity and SunRun have filed a lawsuit against Arizona’s revenue department over the state’s decision to apply property taxes to third-party solar-power systems. SolarCity and SunRun have popularized leasing, rather than owning, residential rooftop systems. The companies install and maintain the systems in return for monthly payments that are generally less than a homeowner’s monthly power bill. 

Arizona’s revenue department last year decided to tax leased solar panels, resulting in $152 extra in property taxes for the first year of a homeowner’s leased $34,000 solar panel array, a charge that would decrease as the value of the array goes down; still it’s a large enough increase to wipe out most or all of the savings from going solar. Until last year, both owners and leasers of solar panels didn’t have to pay property taxes. There are concerns that applying taxes on systems would wipe out the savings from solar leasing and stunt solar-power growth in Arizona.

Friday, June 06, 2014 - Jobs Report Friday

Jobs Report Friday
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 88 = 16,924
SPX + 8 = 1949
NAS + 25 = 4321
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.59%
OIL + .31 = 102.79
GOLD - .90 = 1253.30
SILV - .02 = 19.11

Another record high close for the Dow Industrial Average and the S&P 500.

It’s said that it takes a war to end a war; 70 years ago, 150,000 soldiers invaded Normandy, and it’s estimated that about 4,400 lost their lives in the biggest military assault in history, D-Day. There were ceremonies on the beach today, as well as locations around the world, to honor the soldiers lost and the veterans still with us; their numbers are dwindling with the passage of time, but about 3,000 made the pilgrimage to Normandy today.  For the rest of us, it’s hard to imagine what happened 70 years ago, but whatever difficulties we may face in our day to day lives seem small compared with what those men faced. This is a special day, one that should never be forgotten.

Each month we analyze the jobs report. The jobs number came in about as expected. Non-farm payrolls added 217,000 jobs in May. The unemployment rate, which is drawn from a different survey of households, remained unchanged at 6.3%.

April’s employment numbers were revised down to 282,000 jobs added from 288,000. March payroll figures were not revised, remaining at 203,000 jobs added. This is the fourth consecutive month that non-farm payrolls increased more than 200,000. That is the first time that we have seen four consecutive months of 200,000 or more since October of 1999.

The labor force participation rate also remained unchanged from the 62.8% rate reported for April. The participation rate has shown no clear trend since this past October but is down by 0.6% over the year. At 62.8%, the labor participation rate remains at lows not seen since the late 1970s, a sign that many Americans have given up the search for work entirely and remain wary about their prospects of getting a job, not even bothering to look for one. There are 3.37 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and still want a job; this is down from 3.45 million in April. Long-term unemployment is trending down; now at the lowest level since March 2009, but still high.

There are many reasons why the participation rate is low, and one key factor that we’ve heard repeated is that it is simply a case of demographics, or older workers who are near retirement age. However, according to data from the OECD, the employment to population ratio for workers between ages of 25-54 is down by 3.5 percentage points from its pre-recession level; and for workers between the ages of 55-64 it is only down by 0.9 percentage points.

With today’s jobs report, the US economy is now back to pre-recession peak levels of employment; we have recovered the number of jobs that were lost, and employment is now at an all-time high. This is the longest post-World War II recovery the US has experienced. The US lost 8.7 million jobs in the recession. Through the first five months of 2014, the economy has added 1,068,000 payroll jobs - slightly better than during the same period in 2013 even with the severe weather early this year. From the period between World War II and the 1980s there was a fairly predictable pace for recoveries. It took roughly six months for US employment levels to recover after each post-war recession through the 1980s. Then, things changed. It took 15 months after the 1990–91 recession for employment to reach its pre-crisis levels, and 39 months after the 2001 recession.

While the addition of nearly nine million jobs since hiring bottomed out in February 2010 is certainly good news, the number is still far from what is necessary to accommodate new graduates and millions of others who have entered the work force since payrolls last peaked in January 2008 at 138,365,000 jobs. We now have about the same number of jobs as we did then, but millions more who might wish to hold them. So, we’re back to where we were but not where we should be.

Here's one way of looking at that. There were 7.6 million unemployed people in the US in January 2008, and the unemployment rate was 4.9%. Today, there are 9.8 million unemployed Americans, well over 2 million more than before the recession, and the unemployment rate is much higher.

Another important milestone as today’s report marks the 51^st consecutive month of private sector job gains, which matches the longest previous string of consecutive employment gains. Our current streak matches the one that ran from February 1996 to April 2000. These two milestones give us an indication of how deep the losses were, but also how much further we need to go to get back to a solid economy.

The number of persons working part time for economic reasons declined in May to 7.26 million from 7.46 million in April.  These workers are included in the alternate measure of labor underutilization, known as U-6, which decreased to 12.2% in May from 12.3% in April. This is the lowest level for U-6 since October 2008, and down from the peak of 17.2%, but still high by historical standards.

Within various job segments, the business and professional services segment added 55,000 jobs, the same as its average monthly job gain over the prior 12 months. The healthcare industry added 34,000 jobs for the month, twice its average monthly gain for the prior twelve months. Retailers added 12,500 jobs and the transportation and warehousing sector added 16,400. The manufacturing sector added 10,000 jobs, and the length of the typical workweek for manufacturing workers increased slightly to just over 41 hours, a sign factory managers would rather add overtime instead of hiring additional workers. By contrast, the workweek for all employees in the private sector, including white-collar workers, was unchanged at 34.5 hours.

In May, average hourly earnings rose 5 cents to $24.38; over the past twelve months, average hourly earnings have risen 2.1%. We frequently hear that employers would hire more workers but the workers lack the skill set for the jobs. If employers were actually having difficulty finding workers with the necessary skills we should expect to see occupations or industries in which wages are rising rapidly. That is how employers attract workers for positions they have trouble filling. We are not seeing any major sectors of the economy with significant increases in wages, so that tends to invalidate the issue of a skills mismatch.

Even as private employers have gradually increased hiring in the recovery, the work force at government agencies and the Postal Service has shrunk dramatically. Total government employment is still down by more than one million from where it was four years ago. State and local governments added 6,000 jobs.  State and local government employment is now up 107,000 from the bottom, but still 637,000 below the peak. It appears state and local employment is now increasing.  Federal government layoffs are ongoing, with another 5,000 jobs lost in May.

Unlike previous reports, the gains have been broad based—there were new jobs created in many sectors, including higher paying and important ones like manufacturing and construction. But 50% of all the jobs being created in this country are still in the low-wage category: retail clerk positions, home heath aids, waitresses and the like. And more importantly, pay isn’t going up much. While it is certainly better to have a job compared to no job, better still to have a job that pays decent wages, and that is still missing. 

Monday, June 02, 2014 - Clean Power Plan

Clean Power Plan

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 26 = 16,743
SPX + 1 = 1924
NAS – 5 = 4237
10 YR YLD + .07 = 2.53%
OIL - .31 = 102.40
GOLD – 7.80 = 1244.50
SILV - .05 = 18.86

The ISM got it wrong this morning. The Institute for Supply Management reported its May manufacturing index came in at a weaker than expected 53.2, but there was a software problem that didn’t properly reflect season adjustments; the ISM issued a revision; the May index was 56.0; but for some reason, that wasn’t correct, so they issued another revision. The May manufacturing index was 55.4; that’s the number and they’re sticking with it. Embarrassing? Yes.

Meanwhile, stocks and bonds were all over the board. Stocks fell into negative territory early on, but bounced back as revisions were issued. Bonds are hyper sensitive to economic growth, and the yield on the 10 year note moved higher and stayed higher, despite the initial numbers and the revisions. And if you look past the revisions, and you should, because it appears to be nothing more than an honest mistake, caught quick and corrected; the bottom line is a pretty strong number for manufacturing, more or less in line with the idea of a second quarter bounce in the economy.  

The bigger story this week will be the jobs report on Friday. It is widely expected the economy added about 200,000 to 215,000 jobs in May, which would be down from a very strong report of 288,000 net new jobs in April. The unemployment rate is expected to tick up from 6.3% to 6.4% as more people enter the labor force.

We also expect some big economic news out of Europe this week, and we’re likely to see a small announcement instead. You will recall that European Central Bank President Mario Draghi announced back in the summer of 2012 that he would do “whatever it takes” to save the euro. And then he spent the following two years doing nothing. This week he’s expected to actually do something, specifically he’s expected to unveil a package of measures to fight deflation. Analysts expect the ECB to cut both its main interest rate and reduce its deposit rate to below zero, meaning the central bank would charge lenders to hold money with it overnight. Although any reduction will be modest, a negative deposit rate has never been introduced by a major central bank; and the thinking goes, this will force the banks to start lending.

It doesn’t take much to see the flawed logic. Many countries in the Euro periphery are still struggling with Great Depression level unemployment. As long as unemployment remains as high as this, it’s nearly impossible for countries to generate the internal demand necessary for durable growth. The biggest obstacle to a bold move would seem to be Germany, which is enjoying a pretty strong economy, but even there, the inflation rate has dipped down to 0.6%. The ECB seems to think a little fine tuning will right the ship and then a rising tide will lift all boats. Doubtful. 

As expected, the EPA today issued the "Clean Power Plan" proposal, calling it "a commonsense plan to cut carbon pollution… Climate and weather disasters in 2012 cost the American economy more than $100 billion," the agency says in a document accompanying the proposal.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said: "We don't have to choose between a healthy economy and a healthy environment. Our action will sharpen America's competitive edge, spur innovation and create jobs."

The regulations would force power plants to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 30% by 2030. The rules would set guidelines that states could choose how to follow. Under the plan, each state would have its own goal within the overall national pollution reduction effort. That’s an attempt to be politically and practically flexible in implementation. The EPA would set targets for each state for carbon emissions reductions. Then state governments would come up with their own plans for hitting these targets. The proposed regulation in essence gives them four different approaches they could try. They could renovate existing coal-fired plants with newer, more clean-burning technology; they could switch coal plants to natural gas, which produces much less carbon; they could try to persuade residents to be more efficient in their use of electricity; or they could band together with other states in a cap-and-trade network for emission reductions.

In a cap-and-trade network, companies would buy and sell permits allowing them to produce a certain amount of carbon emissions. Clean producers would be the sellers, while dirtier producers would be the buyers.

Almost a third of America's carbon emissions comes from electricity generation. EPA officials concede some of the dirtiest power plants now operating, such as older coal-fired plants, will end up shuttered as the nation shifts its reliance from traditional fossil fuel sources to cleaner alternatives. Coal supplied 37% of US electricity in 2012, compared to 30% from natural gas, 19% from nuclear power plants, 7% from hydropower sources such as dams and 5% from renewable sources such as wind and solar. By 2030, just over 30% of US electricity will come from coal and about the same amount from natural gas, with wind, solar and other alternative sources providing about 9%.

According to the EPA, the proposed new rules would reduce carbon pollution by the same amount as removing two-thirds of all cars and trucks form American roads. It put the cost as high as $8.8 billion a year, but noted health gains such as fewer premature deaths and respiratory diseases along with other benefits would be worth tens of billions of dollars to the US economy. Recent analysis quantifies the benefits in health, air quality and clean water at $63 billion a year. Since 1970, every dollar invested in compliance with Clean Air Act standards has yielded $4 to $8 in economic benefits.

Will this move actually clean up global pollution? Not really. No matter what the US does, global emissions will keep skyrocketing in the near future. This is because most of the rise in emissions is being driven by China. China’s carbon pollution has soared in the last 15 years, and is now about double the US level. The rest of the increase has come from oil-producing countries and from other, more slowly developing Asian nations; but China overshadows all of the other sources.

American per capita emissions, of course, are still more than twice as large as China’s. And the simple fact is that we won’t get far trying to tell China they have to cut emissions if we aren’t willing to cut our own emissions. Of course, if we unilaterally cut our emissions, that doesn’t mean China will be willing to follow our lead. Self-restraint might do nothing more than push down the price of high carbon energy sources, allowing China to burn more for less. What this move really does is position the US as a leader in cleaner energy technology, and even if we can’t export natural gas to China or many other parts of the globe, we could export cleaner energy technology and expertise.

One way to do this is to tax carbon intensive imports; something not included in today’s proposal. The US is still China’s most important export market, so a US carbon-import tax will provide a huge incentive for Chinese companies to reduce emissions.

Another specific not included in today’s proposal would be to implement a carbon tax or equivalent here in the US. This won't cut worldwide emissions enough to make a dent in global warming, but the funds could be used to spur research and development into things like gas, solar, wind and energy efficiency. We should think of carbon taxes mainly as incentives for the private sector to discover all the carbon-cutting technologies, and fund the research that will make green energy cheaper than coal.

Fortunately, renewable energy is up to the challenge of replacing those dirty fuels. In just the last three years, solar panels have gotten 60% cheaper and the price of wind energy has fallen more than 40%. Far from being expensive, clean energy is already beating both coal and natural gas on price in many parts of the country.

Coal and oil are low tech fuels whose time has passed, just as surely as the days of using whale oil to light our lamps, but the transition won’t be easy. The apprehension in coal country to leave this current path is understandable. We would all feel it if we were in their shoes. Outsiders can't ignore the plight of the families and the affected communities. And there will be massive political opposition, especially from the politicians backed by coal and big oil, which is most of the politicians. And most of these new regulations won’t go into effect until 2015, and there will be legal challenges, but the future is changing.

ISM, manufacturing index, jobs report, ECB, Mario Draghi, Gina McCarthy, EPA, Clean power Plan, record high close, Sinclair Noe, 

Friday, May 30, 2014 - Record Highs, Bonds, Coal Mines

Record Highs, Bonds, Coal Mines
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 18 = 16,717
SPX + 3 = 1923 (another record)
NAS – 5 = 4242 (not a record)
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.45%
OIL - .71 =  102.87
GOLD – 4.60 = 1252.30
SILV - .23 = 18.91

For the week, the Dow rose 0.7%, the S&P 500 gained 1.2% and the Nasdaq added 1.4%. For the month of May, the Dow gained 0.8%, the S&P 500 rose 2.1% and the Nasdaq climbed 3.1%. Meanwhile, if you are looking for action, the bond market is the place; the yield on the 10 year note has dropped from 2.65% to 2.45% this month.

Nearly everyone is looking for an explanation as to why longer-term interest rates continue to fall in the face of reduced Fed support and what is being hyped as better economic data. This wasn’t supposed to happen. The Federal Reserve has been propping up Treasury bond prices, and suppressing yields, for the past several years by buying large quantities of bonds each month in an effort to increase investment and consumption, and force investors into riskier assets. To some extent, the Fed’s QE purchases have worked; ultra-low interest rates have supported housing price increases and have led to skyrocketing stock prices.  Household net worth has increased by $25 trillion from the financial-crisis lows in the first quarter of 2009.  However, these gains in net worth have overwhelmingly accrued to the well-to-do while low- to moderate-income folks continue to suffer from poor employment opportunities, stagnant incomes, inadequate retirement savings, and rising costs for everything from food and energy to health care and education.  In other words, the economy hasn’t really improved but the Fed may have created financial asset bubbles.

Last December the Fed began winding down its large scale asset purchases by tapering, or incrementally reducing the amount of purchases over a scheduled period of a year or so. Back in December the Fed was buying $85 billion a month in mortgage backed securities and treasuries; they have now cut that to just $45 billion a month, and by the end of the year they anticipate they will end the large scale asset purchases. This means that demand for treasuries and MBS has, or should have dropped significantly. If there is less demand and the supply stays the same, then prices should fall and bond yields should be moving higher. The exact opposite has been happening; long term bond prices have increased and bond yields have been falling; and the timing of this increase in prices and drop in yields coincides with the start of the Fed taper.

Is there something wrong with the supply/demand equation? Is there invisible demand out there? Well, treasuries are considered a safe haven investment, and if we saw volatility in the stock market, we might expect a move to the safe haven of treasuries. Right now the CBOE Volatility Index known as the VIX, is down. As the 10-year yield touches the 2.4% level, its lowest in nearly a year, the VIX is hovering around 11.5, near its lowest levels since before the financial crisis.

The VIX measures volatility in the US market, so maybe we need to broaden out horizons. Europe is experiencing low-flation, and in some Euro countries the low-flation has turned to deflation; as a consequence, the rates in Europe are very low: German 10 year bonds yield 1.36%, France yields 1.75%, Spain 10 year notes yield 2.86%. In a global market there is something wrong with pricing. Why is the US bond yield higher than the French bond yield? That does not compute.

Of course, one explanation is that foreign investors are looking for a place to park money and if you can get a better yield on US treasuries compared to French bonds, it just makes sense that you wouldn’t buy the French bonds; add in the idea that buying US treasuries serves as an effective hedge against home currency depreciation and treasuries should be attracting money that might be held in emerging market economies.

In general, if economic growth is expected to accelerate, interest rates should rise as well.  The reason for this is fairly straightforward.  Increased demand for goods and services should lead to price increases.  Inflation is one component of "nominal" interest rates.  The other component is called the "real" rate of interest, and it is determined by the demand for money.  As economic growth accelerates, the demand for money should increase as people become more confident in making spending and investment decisions.  Therefore, higher inflation expectations and higher demand for money should lead to higher interest rates in a strengthening economy; but they haven't. Perhaps the weak economy of the Eurozone is holding back rates in the US, or maybe the US economy isn’t as strong as we imagine.

Another consideration has us going back to the supply-demand equation; if supply dries up faster than demand dries up, then that would push prices higher. Remember that the federal deficit has been trimmed to the lowest levels in about 13 years and that means the government isn’t issuing as much new debt. And the housing market has slowed and that means there should be less in the way of mortgage backed securities.

That was certainly the case for the first quarter; the US economy shrank. And there are no real signs of inflation in the US, or at least we didn’t see inflation for quite some time. That may be changing; the April CPI and PPI showed a minor pop in prices; the low interest rate environment has boosted financial asset prices, so stocks and housing prices have moved higher; food prices are also higher but they tend to be overlooked as a weather related aberration, although I doubt that is temporary; the labor market is still weak and despite the unemployment rate dropping to 6.3% there is tremendous slack and little participation and there doesn’t seem to be any wage inflation. The Fed might claim the economy is getting stronger and the Fed might not consider deflation to be a problem, but the bond market seems to be saying the recovery is sick. At least for the Main Street economy.

Further proof today showing American shoppers dialed it back in April. Household purchases fell 0.1%, the first decrease in a year, and following a 1% gain in March; that was the bounce back from the pent up demand of the frozen winter. After adjusting the figure to account for inflation, the news was worse; spending dropped by the most since September 2009 as income growth cooled. Incomes advanced just 0.3% in April, and without pay gains, consumers lack confidence. Consumer sentiment dropped from 84.1 in April to 81.9 in May. What we’re seeing is the failure of trickledown. The stock market may be strong, the well-off may be better off, but it doesn’t trickle down. The economy is never going to recovery without broad based demand, and that will only happen when the labor market gets strong, until then, the Fed is pushing on a string with QE and the Zero Interest Rate Policy.

There are many possible reasons behind the move in bonds, but a big part still has to do with the economy, even with all the subplots of the international markets and the inflation-deflation debate, we get back to the idea that the economy is weak, and the recovery is uneven. The first quarter GDP contraction was certainly weather related but that doesn’t mean the economy will bounce like a quarter on a trampoline. Second quarter GDP should be positive but probably not sizzling hot. I don’t buy that story, and apparently the bond market isn’t buying it either.

Next week’s economic calendar includes the ISM surveys of business activity in the manufacturing and services sector. What will be important to the outlook is what the surveys say about employment, export prospects and inventories. On Wednesday the Fed will release its Beige Book of regional economic reports. The next Fed FOMC meeting is June 17-18. Next Friday is the monthly jobs report; the unemployment rate, the headline number is at 6.3%, but that’s based on a participation rate at 62.8%. If the participation rate moves higher, look for the unemployment rate to jump.

Another big event next week, President Obama on Monday will unveil a plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants and promote cap-and-trade, undertaking the most significant action on climate change in American history. The proposed regulations could cut carbon pollution by as much as 25% from about 1,600 power plants in operation today. Power plants are the country's single biggest source of carbon pollution; responsible for up to 40% of the country's emissions.

The rules, which were drafted by the Environmental Protection Agency and are under review by the White House, are expected to put America on course to meet its international climate goal, and put US diplomats in a better position to leverage climate commitments from big polluters such as China and India. The plan is certain to result in political backlash with critics making doomsday claims about the costs of cutting carbon. Coal mining companies, power plant operators and others are already lining up for legal challenges to the executive action, claiming the approach oversteps the EPA’s authority.