Blood Moon and More
by Sinclair Noe
DOW + 146 = 16,173
SPX + 14 = 1830
NAS + 22 = 4022
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.64%
OIL - .11 = 103.63
GOLD + 8.20 = 1327.60
SILV un = 20.07
SPX + 14 = 1830
NAS + 22 = 4022
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.64%
OIL - .11 = 103.63
GOLD + 8.20 = 1327.60
SILV un = 20.07
Here’s what you can expect; the Earth will eclipse the
moon tonight about 10:58PM pacific time, adjust according to your time zone.
The eclipse will take some time, a few hours. The moon will shift color from
orange to blood red to brown, again depending on you locale and the weather. It
should be interesting.
The stock markets started the day in positive territory
and as trading dragged on, the major indices moved lower on the very cusp of
turning red, almost as if they were being eclipsed, and then positive again,
right at 3:15 PM eastern time, everything just picked up. Now, you might think
the markets are rigged. You might.
A group of traders has sued CME Group Inc, accusing the
operator of the world's largest derivatives exchange of selling market data to
high frequency traders, cheating other investors who lacked such access. The
suit says the CME and its Chicago Board of Trade unit have been giving high-frequency
traders early access to buy and sell orders.
They said this deprived other investors of the transparent, real-time
data on futures and interest rate contracts that they thought they were
getting, and were paying for.
Volume was down from Friday; that’s a nasty trend,
lighter volume on up days, heavier volume on down days.
The economic calendar includes the March Consumer Price
Index tomorrow; Wednesday brings an update on housing starts and building
permits, plus the Federal Reserve will release its Beige Book; Friday, the
markets are closed for Good Friday.
This morning the Commerce Department reported retail
sales increased 1.1% last month; February’s sales numbers were revised higher
to 0.7% from a previously reported 0.3%. An important subset of the report
showed retail inventories, excluding automobiles, rose 0.2% in February. You
will recall that businesses accumulated too much inventory in the fourth
quarter of last year, and we have seen fewer orders as the businesses work
through unsold goods and try to clear their shelves. That has left the
inventory to sales ratio at its highest level since September 2009. Now, it looks
like the buyers are back.
A separate report from the New York Fed showed people
grew more confident in the labor market last month, with younger workers in
particular seeing a greater chance of finding work should they lose their
current job.
Earnings reporting season continues with Citigroup
posting better than expected net income under of $3.9 billion, or $1.23 per
share, from $3.8 billion, or $1.23 per share. Citi Holdings, which holds the
bank's portfolio of troubled assets left over from the financial crisis, posted
a loss of $292 million, down from $798 million a year earlier. For all of
Citigroup, adjusted revenue dropped 2% to $20.1 billion. Citi still has
problems with its Mexican unit, which is accused of making fraudulent loans.
Also, Citi flunked the recent Fed stress tests for capital reserves. So, here
we are nearly 6 years after the financial meltdown and Citi is still cleaning
up its books, still exhibiting signs of structural damage, and unable to put
money to productive purpose.
The Congressional Budget office says the deficit isn’t as
bad as they thought. For the fiscal year 2014 ending September 30, CBO said,
the deficit would fall to $492 billion from a $514 billion February estimate -
and nearly a third lower than last year's $680 billion deficit. And CBO lowered
its cumulative deficit forecast for fiscal years 2015 through 2024 by $286
billion, to a mere $7.6 trillion; the reason for the lower deficits, is that
subsidies for health care costs will be less than previously guesstimated.
Deficits will reach a low point of $469 billion, or 2.6%
of US gross domestic product, in fiscal 2015, then gradually start to rise,
topping $1 trillion again in 2023 and 2024, a level that would be near 4% of
GDP.
Last week the IMF and the World Bank held their Spring
Meeting in Washington DC. Here’s a snippet from a panel discussion featuring Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans and Citigroup chief economist
Willem Buiter.
Charles Evans said: “In the U.S. monetary policy is using
the standard transmission mechanism. We’re trying to reduce financing costs.
Auto rates are down and the auto sector is way back compared to where it was.
Housing is better. Mortgage rates are down. And if you have the ability to
refinance, or get a mortgage – it’s tougher these days because of the standards
- then you can do that. So it’s the standard transmission mechanism. And we are
indeed trying to get inflation up because we’re below target. What comes with
that is wage increases, also up to where they ought to be. Wages are a symptom
of inflation – using a lagging indicator – and they’re down around 2 to 2.25%
right now. When they’re at a steady growth part of the cycle they ought to be
about 3.5% - 1.5% productivity and 2% inflation target. So getting everything
up – and getting inflation up to where it is supposed to be is an important
part of all of this. So that benefits everybody.”
Citigroup chief economist Willem Buiter responded:
“Monetary policy works with asset prices. By boosting equities, raising bond
prices, weakening the currency and that’s exactly how it has happened. Not very
effectively, because we have poor man’s monetary policy. Which is what
unconventional monetary policy is. But it’s all we have. I would have preferred
to see some additional measures on the fiscal side, which could have mitigated
some of the income distributional consequences…”
Over the weekend we saw the investment game plan detailed
on Sunday morning talk shows. Did you catch it? The climate is changing; we can
still fix it; it will require massive investment. According to the most recent Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change report, keeping global warming down to a level people
can live with means cutting carbon emissions to "near zero" by the
end of the century, even in an increasingly industrialized world. That may be
doable, but it will take "substantial investments" in everything from
planting more trees to replacing fossil fuels with low-carbon power sources
like solar, wind and nuclear energy. The report clearly shows that the
challenges to resolve the global common problem are huge, but also this report
shows that there are some steps to resolve this issue.
And the longer we wait, the more expensive it becomes,
and if we wait too long, the Earth and all of us who are too miserly to invest
now, will cook.
Any hope will require more than tripling the share of
electricity produced by renewable sources or nuclear power, along with refining
the still-evolving technology of capturing carbon emissions and storing them
underground. And it will take a coordinated global effort, likely including
taxes on emissions. No direct price tag was attached to that scenario, but the
IPCC authors indicate it would require "substantial investments," and
more delays just drive up the expected cost. The impact could amount to shaving
the projected average growth of the global economy by six-hundredths of a
percentage point, from about 2% per year to 1.94%, over the coming century. The
total global economy was about $72 trillion in 2012, according to World Bank
figures.
Secretary of State John Kerry, who in February called the
issue "the greatest challenge of our generation," said Sunday's
report is an economic opportunity.
Kerry said in a written statement: "So many of the
technologies that will help us fight climate change are far cheaper, more
readily available, and better performing than they were when the last IPCC
assessment was released less than a decade ago. These technologies can cut
carbon pollution while growing economic opportunity at the same time. The
global energy market represents a $6 trillion opportunity, with 6 billion users
around the world."
Despite more than two decades of efforts to restrain
carbon emissions, not only are emissions still going up, they're going up faster
than ever. Though there's been an increased emphasis on generating power from
renewable sources, the use of coal has gone up in the past 10 years.
The Washington Post and the Guardian captured coveted
Pulitzer Prizes for public service for their revelations about the US
government's massive surveillance programs. The newspapers' stories were based
on thousands of secret documents obtained from Edward Snowden, the former
National Security Agency contractor who is living in Russia after fleeing the
United States. The Post also won a Pulitzer this year for explanatory
reporting. The New York Times won two Pulitzers, both for photography. No award
was handed out for feature writing. The Boston Globe won for breaking news for
its coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing. Reuters won an award for its
coverage on the persecution of a Muslim minority in Myanmar who in efforts to
flee often fall into the hands of brutal human-trafficking networks. The prize
for investigative reporting went to The Center for Public Integrity for reports
on how some lawyers and doctors rigged a system to deny benefits to coal miners
stricken with black lung disease. The prize for explanatory reporting went to the
Washington Post for work on the prevalence of food stamps in post-recession
America. The prize for local reporting went to the Tampa Bay Times for an
investigation into squalid housing conditions for the city's homeless
population. The prize for national reporting went to The Gazette in Colorado
Springs, Colorado, for his examination of how wounded combat veterans are
mistreated.
I know what you’re thinking; this is a shocking
development. Who knew there were still newspapers?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.