Friday, August 08, 2014 - Rocky Relations

DOW + 185 = 16,553
SPX + 22 = 1931
NAS+ 35 = 4370
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.41%
OIL + .01 = 97.35
GOLD – 3.90 = 1310.10
SILV - .03 = 20.02

The S&P and Dow both posted their best day since March. For the week, the Dow rose 0.4%, the S&P 500 gained 0.3%, and the Nasdaq rose 0.4%.

The Pentagon says US warplanes have dropped bombs on an ISIS artillery positon in northern Iraq, near Erbil, the Kurdish regional capital. US military planes have also carried out air drops of food and water to displaced refugees. Last night, President Obama announced the plan for assisting Iraqi religious refugees stranded on a hilltop in northern Iraq, and also authorizing limited airstrikes to protect US personnel in Erbil. The air strike is the first time the US has been directly involved in a military operation in Iraq since American troops withdrew in late 2011. No time limit has been set for air strikes.

In very short order, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, ISIS, captured one-third of Syria and about one-quarter of Iraq, and they continue to expand their frontiers. Just to put it in perspective, they now control a land mass larger than Great Britain, with a population bigger than Denmark. In northern Syria some 5,000 ISIS fighters are using tanks and artillery captured from the Iraqi army in Mosul to besiege half a million Kurds on the Turkish border. ISIS has also built a huge war chest by looting Iraqi banks of perhaps half a billion dollars, making ISIS the world's richest terrorist organization, by some estimates. And they have been gathering weapons, US weapons left behind by the Iraq army.

ISIS now controls most of Syria’s oil and gas production. In northern Iraq, ISIS now controls a 750 megawatt dam near the city of Mosul. The Mosul Dam is considered one of the most dangerous dams in the world; it was poorly constructed, leaks constantly, and requires near constant maintenance to avoid collapse. In addition to controlling the electric output of the dam, the militant group now has a real weapon of mass destruction, capable of extreme destruction along the Tigris River, including possibly flooding Baghdad under 15 feet of water.

The Iraq army shows no signs of recovering from its earlier defeats and has failed to launch a single successful counter-attack. The only large-scale counter-attack launched by the regular army and the newly raised Shia militia was a disastrous foray into Tikrit on 15 July that was ambushed and defeated with heavy losses. There is no sign that the dysfunctional nature of the Iraqi army has changed. Iraqi politicians have gone on playing political games as they move, ever-so-slowly, towards replacing the discredited prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki.

Iraq’s Shia majority seems to believe the present situation is not as dangerous as it looks. They argue that Iraq’s Sunnis have risen in revolt and ISIS fighters are only the shock troops of an uprising provoked by the anti-Sunni policies and actions of Maliki. Once he is replaced, as is almost certain, Baghdad will offer the Sunnis a new power-sharing agreement with regional autonomy similar to that enjoyed by the Kurds. Despite all signs to the contrary, Shia at all levels are putting faith in this myth.

The foster parents of ISIS and the other Sunni jihadi movements in Iraq and Syria are Saudi Arabia, the Gulf monarchies and Turkey. The rise of ISIS was crucially supported by outside Sunni powers. It’s unlikely the Sunni community as a whole in Iraq would have lined up behind Isis without the support Saudi Arabia gave directly or indirectly to many Sunni movements. The same is true of Syria. The Saudis now seem fearful of the monster they helped create, and they have pulled support from the jihadi opposition, but it may be too late. For the US, Britain and the Western powers, it makes for rocky relations with major oil suppliers. And then, to complicate matters further, Israel and Gaza resumed throwing bombs at each other after a nearly 3-day ceasefire.

You may remember that oil prices had spiked to $108 a barrel in June, but then ISIS failed to attack Baghdad, and ISIS did little that threatened oil infrastructure affecting deliveries outside Iraq, and oil prices slipped. The price at the pump is down 15 cents a gallon since July 4^th; down 35 cents per gallon since mid-June. And now that the US has re-entered the battle, it is widely anticipated that the craziness in Iraq will be defeated and oil prices will stabilize, but it would be foolish not to expect ISIS to retaliate against US aerial attacks.

In economic news today:
Wholesale inventories grew by 0.3% in June, while sales increased 0.2%.

Productivity in the second quarter increased 2.5%, compared with a revised 4.5% drop in the first quarter. Cold weather in the first quarter hurt output, but workers produced more in the spring, proving that 90% of the difference is just showing up. Unit-labor costs increased 0.6% in the second quarter, and inflation adjusted hourly wages were up just 0.1%.

White House economic officials say the labor market is about 80% back to the level before the financial crisis, an indication the economy is steadily healing. It just doesn’t feel that way for many Americans. As the US economy recovers, hirings increase and people are encouraged to look for jobs again; at least that’s how things are supposed to work.  Instead, the ratio of the adult population with jobs, or looking for one; what’s called the labor force participation rate, has been falling, standing at 62.9% in July 2014. This represents a 3 percentage point decline since the financial crisis and the lowest rate since 1978. Gains in participation rates between 1960 and 2000 were largely driven by sweeping social changes such as the post-war baby boom and the entry of women into the work force, but in the past 7 years half of those gains have been reversed; the equivalent of 7.5 million workers have been lost from the US labor force.

The shrinking pool of workers in the job market is due in part to demographic shifts as the boomer generation moves into retirement, but today the International Monetary Fund, the IMF said more needs to be done to strengthen the labor market, raise wages, and bring people back into the labor force. The IMF says up to one third of the post-2007 decline in participation rates is reversible and we need to look at economic policies to turn things around. Suggestions include better job training, employment search assistance programs, affordable child care, and immigration reform.

The Federal Reserve has released a nationwide survey, the first of its kind, designed to get a better understanding of how households view their own financial situation and economic well-being. The short answer is “not so good”. Just 30% of survey respondents described themselves as better off than they were in 2008, with 34% saying they were doing about the same and 34% saying they were worse off. Some 77% of respondents said they either didn't expect a raise in the next 12 months or expected their income to decline. About 30% of Americans said their household income for 2012 was lower than what they'd expect in a normal year.

About 40 million Americans have student loan debt totaling more than $1.3 trillion, and only 40% of them think the education was worth the cost. Some 35% of survey respondents who are paying back student loans said they had to cut spending by "a little" over the past year to keep up with their student debt payments, and another 11% said they had to cut back their spending by "a lot." One finding of the survey is that debt can affect your health. Some 44% of Americans with student debt said they avoided medical treatment because they couldn't afford it, while only 30% of Americans without student loans said the same thing.

Almost half the participants said they were not saving any portion of their income, and roughly one-fifth said they're spending more money than they are currently taking in. Only 39% of people reported having a rainy-day savings fund that would cover at least three months of expenses. A combined 25% of households who told the Fed they'd had savings prior to 2008 reported having used up "all" or "nearly all" of their savings as a result of the recession. And just 48% of people said they would be able to completely cover a $400 hypothetical emergency expense without selling something or borrowing money. Just under a third of non-retired households reported having no retirement savings or pension, including just under 20% of households aged 55 to 64. A quarter of the respondents said they had done no retirement planning at all.  Of those who have given some thought to retirement planning and plan to retire at some point, 25% didn’t know how they will pay their expenses in retirement.

Next week’s economic calendar includes a look at July retail sales on Wednesday. The recent drop in gas prices may actually dampen the real outlook for retail sales. On Tuesday we’ll get a look at the strength of the labor market in the JOLT report, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover survey measures workers who are quitting their jobs; the thinking is that when workers are confident about their job prospects they’re more willing to jump ship. The quit rate has edged up in the past couple of years but is still well below the rates posted in the last expansion. Another measure of strength in the labor market is hiring activity among small businesses. On Tuesday, we’ll get the Small Business Optimism survey. In June, 26% of small businesses surveyed said they had at least one job opening they could not fill.  On Thursday, the New York Fed will release its second-quarter Household Debt and Credit Report. The New York Fed reported that in the first quarter, households increased their total borrowings (including mortgages, credit cards, student loans and auto loans) for the third quarter in a row, led by gains in mortgages and student loan debt.

Thursday, July 03, 2014 - Jobs Report Thursday

Jobs Report Thursday

DOW + 92 = 17,068
SPX + 10 = 1985
NAS + 28 = 4485
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.65%
OIL - .42 = 104.06
GOLD – 7.60 = 1320.60
SILV - .02 = 21.23

Record high closes for the Dow and the S&P 500.

The first Friday of each month is typically a big day for economic data because the Labor Department releases the nonfarm employment report. I have always considered this to be one of the most important economic reports because jobs make everything happen; it’s the stuff of work and production and a driver of capital, and sweat and blood. So, we spend extra time to really dig into the jobs report, which was released today because tomorrow is a holiday.

This was a very good jobs report. The economy added 288,000 net new jobs in June and the unemployment rate dropped from 6.3% to 6.1%; that’s the lowest unemployment rate since September 2008. The report topped estimates of 215,000 jobs. The jobs reports for April and May were revised higher; April was revised from 282,000 to 304,000 net new jobs; May was revised from 217,000 to 224,000 new jobs; meaning there were 29,000 more jobs than previously reported.

June marked the best five-month stretch of job creation since early 2006; for the past five months the economy has added at least 200,000 jobs per month. The three-month average rate of hiring in the second quarter now stands at 272,000, compared with 190,000 a month in the first quarter.

The economy has added private sector jobs for 52 straight months. During this span, 9.7 million private sector jobs have been created. Over the past 12 months, the economy has added 2.495 million jobs; and year-to-date the economy has added 1.385 million job; and 2014 is on track to be the best year for job growth since 1999.

Total employment is now 415,000 above the pre-recession peak; and private employment is now 895,000 above the previous peak; the difference between private and total is the loss of government jobs, which has been like an anchor dragging down total employment. State and local governments added 24,000 jobs last month; state and local government employment is up 138,000 from the bottom but still more than 600,000 below the peak. The federal government added 2,000 jobs in June but federal employment is still down 23,000 for the year.

Breaking down the government jobs a bit further, the improvement likely reflects a stabilizing financial outlook for municipalities. When home prices crashed, it cut into the tax base of cities and counties, and the response was to lay off workers. A return to government hiring, even a modest increase could have long term benefits from investment in education and infrastructure.

More than 7.5 million people are employed part-time for economic reasons; this number is up 275,000 in June, although the trend has been and remains down for the year. People who are working part-time because their hours have been cut back or they can’t find full-time employment are included in an alternate measure known as labor underutilization or U-6. The U-6 rate decreased to 12.1% in June from 12.2% in May; and this is the lowest U-6 reading since October 2008.

Full-time employment suffered its third-largest single month-over-month decline since the recession ended; 523,000 full-time jobs were lost while a stunning 799,000 new part-time jobs were added in June. Part-time workers again account for more than 18% of the total workforce, a level that has remained relatively stable since the recession, despite efforts to deny the truth that this is a "part-time" recovery. Part-time jobs had been in rapid decline over the past year, but June's spike cancels out that shift. There are now almost exactly as many part-time workers (28 million) as there were a year ago.

The Labor Force Participation Rate was unchanged in June at 62.8%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force.  We would like to see the participation rate increase, meaning more people are looking for jobs, but a large portion of the recent decline in the participation rate is due to demographics; people are retiring and won’t be re-entering the labor force. The Employment-Population ratio increased in June to 59.0%.

The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the number of people who are unemployed by the total number of people working or looking for work. The best way for the rate to fall is for the number of unemployed to drop because more people found a job, but it can also decline when people give up looking for work altogether. Still, the jobless rate dropped to 6.1% and that’s because more people found work, not because more people were dropping out of the labor pool; so the jobless rate fell for the right reasons.

As the labor market recovers, it creates a challenge of more people re-entering the labor pool. If more people re-enter the labor pool, the unemployment rate could go up, even as the economy adds jobs. But that hasn’t happened; rather, the number of unemployed who were re-entering the labor pool actually fell in June.

The number of long term unemployed workers has dropped by 1.2 million over the past year but there are still just over 3 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and they are still trying to find work; this is down from over 3.3 million people in May. There are many long term unemployed who may never get jobs again, and the longer they go without jobs, the tougher it will be. And more jobseekers gave up looking for work than found a job, for the 49^th time in the past 50 months. This is surely a demographic shift, but it also means we’re losing the skills and productivity of some of the most experienced workers.  For people who are finding jobs, the median duration of unemployment continues to drop rapidly, from 25 weeks coming out of the recession to just 13.1 weeks today.

Long term unemployment and underutilization indicate that there is still significant slack in the labor market, even though some companies are now beginning to report that they are having to compete to find workers.

So far, the trend has not resulted in higher incomes. Average pay has grown just 2% during the recovery, barely matching inflation and below the long term trend of 3.5%. Last month, the average hourly wage for private-sector workers rose six cents to $24.45. If workers earn more money, they’ll spend more money and that is a boost to the overall economy. The silver lining to the weak wages is that there is no wage inflation, so even though the jobs picture is improving, wage inflation should not influence the Federal Reserve.  Even if hourly wages aren’t moving much, there was a small pickup in the average work week and aggregate hours worked grew by a fairly strong 3.8% annual rate in the last quarter.

Job gains in June were widespread. Retailers added 40,200 workers last month. Financial and insurance firms increased their payrolls by 17,000. Restaurants and bars employed nearly 33,000 more people. Higher-paying sectors continued to lag behind in the jobs recovery. Factories added 16,000 workers, and construction added 6,000 workers, which would not be considered particularly strong. Factory payrolls have increased for 11 consecutive months, adding a total of 139,000 new jobs, well below the target of one million manufacturing jobs for the year. Factory payrolls remain a shadow of their former selves, but the revival in manufacturing is finally creating more job opportunities on the factory floor.

Shrinking unemployment and growing payrolls are always good signs for a stronger economy. However, the nature of these changes matters. If unemployment is low primarily due to labor force dropouts, and if employment growth is being driven by hundreds of thousands of low-earning part-time workers rather than growth in valuable and decent paying full-time positions, it means that the economic recovery still faces a hard slog.

The jobs report was far from perfect but it was very good and it should lead to growth in the economy for the second quarter. So today, stocks had another good day. The Dow closed above 17,000 for the first time ever. The S&P 500 is closing in on 2000. The Nasdaq is back to its highest level since 2000. Bonds dropped. And that is an ongoing trend, the markets race along while workers trudge.

Friday, June 06, 2014 - Jobs Report Friday

Jobs Report Friday
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 88 = 16,924
SPX + 8 = 1949
NAS + 25 = 4321
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.59%
OIL + .31 = 102.79
GOLD - .90 = 1253.30
SILV - .02 = 19.11

Another record high close for the Dow Industrial Average and the S&P 500.

It’s said that it takes a war to end a war; 70 years ago, 150,000 soldiers invaded Normandy, and it’s estimated that about 4,400 lost their lives in the biggest military assault in history, D-Day. There were ceremonies on the beach today, as well as locations around the world, to honor the soldiers lost and the veterans still with us; their numbers are dwindling with the passage of time, but about 3,000 made the pilgrimage to Normandy today.  For the rest of us, it’s hard to imagine what happened 70 years ago, but whatever difficulties we may face in our day to day lives seem small compared with what those men faced. This is a special day, one that should never be forgotten.

Each month we analyze the jobs report. The jobs number came in about as expected. Non-farm payrolls added 217,000 jobs in May. The unemployment rate, which is drawn from a different survey of households, remained unchanged at 6.3%.

April’s employment numbers were revised down to 282,000 jobs added from 288,000. March payroll figures were not revised, remaining at 203,000 jobs added. This is the fourth consecutive month that non-farm payrolls increased more than 200,000. That is the first time that we have seen four consecutive months of 200,000 or more since October of 1999.

The labor force participation rate also remained unchanged from the 62.8% rate reported for April. The participation rate has shown no clear trend since this past October but is down by 0.6% over the year. At 62.8%, the labor participation rate remains at lows not seen since the late 1970s, a sign that many Americans have given up the search for work entirely and remain wary about their prospects of getting a job, not even bothering to look for one. There are 3.37 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and still want a job; this is down from 3.45 million in April. Long-term unemployment is trending down; now at the lowest level since March 2009, but still high.

There are many reasons why the participation rate is low, and one key factor that we’ve heard repeated is that it is simply a case of demographics, or older workers who are near retirement age. However, according to data from the OECD, the employment to population ratio for workers between ages of 25-54 is down by 3.5 percentage points from its pre-recession level; and for workers between the ages of 55-64 it is only down by 0.9 percentage points.

With today’s jobs report, the US economy is now back to pre-recession peak levels of employment; we have recovered the number of jobs that were lost, and employment is now at an all-time high. This is the longest post-World War II recovery the US has experienced. The US lost 8.7 million jobs in the recession. Through the first five months of 2014, the economy has added 1,068,000 payroll jobs - slightly better than during the same period in 2013 even with the severe weather early this year. From the period between World War II and the 1980s there was a fairly predictable pace for recoveries. It took roughly six months for US employment levels to recover after each post-war recession through the 1980s. Then, things changed. It took 15 months after the 1990–91 recession for employment to reach its pre-crisis levels, and 39 months after the 2001 recession.

While the addition of nearly nine million jobs since hiring bottomed out in February 2010 is certainly good news, the number is still far from what is necessary to accommodate new graduates and millions of others who have entered the work force since payrolls last peaked in January 2008 at 138,365,000 jobs. We now have about the same number of jobs as we did then, but millions more who might wish to hold them. So, we’re back to where we were but not where we should be.

Here's one way of looking at that. There were 7.6 million unemployed people in the US in January 2008, and the unemployment rate was 4.9%. Today, there are 9.8 million unemployed Americans, well over 2 million more than before the recession, and the unemployment rate is much higher.

Another important milestone as today’s report marks the 51^st consecutive month of private sector job gains, which matches the longest previous string of consecutive employment gains. Our current streak matches the one that ran from February 1996 to April 2000. These two milestones give us an indication of how deep the losses were, but also how much further we need to go to get back to a solid economy.

The number of persons working part time for economic reasons declined in May to 7.26 million from 7.46 million in April.  These workers are included in the alternate measure of labor underutilization, known as U-6, which decreased to 12.2% in May from 12.3% in April. This is the lowest level for U-6 since October 2008, and down from the peak of 17.2%, but still high by historical standards.

Within various job segments, the business and professional services segment added 55,000 jobs, the same as its average monthly job gain over the prior 12 months. The healthcare industry added 34,000 jobs for the month, twice its average monthly gain for the prior twelve months. Retailers added 12,500 jobs and the transportation and warehousing sector added 16,400. The manufacturing sector added 10,000 jobs, and the length of the typical workweek for manufacturing workers increased slightly to just over 41 hours, a sign factory managers would rather add overtime instead of hiring additional workers. By contrast, the workweek for all employees in the private sector, including white-collar workers, was unchanged at 34.5 hours.

In May, average hourly earnings rose 5 cents to $24.38; over the past twelve months, average hourly earnings have risen 2.1%. We frequently hear that employers would hire more workers but the workers lack the skill set for the jobs. If employers were actually having difficulty finding workers with the necessary skills we should expect to see occupations or industries in which wages are rising rapidly. That is how employers attract workers for positions they have trouble filling. We are not seeing any major sectors of the economy with significant increases in wages, so that tends to invalidate the issue of a skills mismatch.

Even as private employers have gradually increased hiring in the recovery, the work force at government agencies and the Postal Service has shrunk dramatically. Total government employment is still down by more than one million from where it was four years ago. State and local governments added 6,000 jobs.  State and local government employment is now up 107,000 from the bottom, but still 637,000 below the peak. It appears state and local employment is now increasing.  Federal government layoffs are ongoing, with another 5,000 jobs lost in May.

Unlike previous reports, the gains have been broad based—there were new jobs created in many sectors, including higher paying and important ones like manufacturing and construction. But 50% of all the jobs being created in this country are still in the low-wage category: retail clerk positions, home heath aids, waitresses and the like. And more importantly, pay isn’t going up much. While it is certainly better to have a job compared to no job, better still to have a job that pays decent wages, and that is still missing. 

Friday, May 02, 2015 - April Jobs Report

April Jobs Report

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 45 = 16,512
SPX – 2 = 1881
NAS – 3 = 4123
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.59%
OIL + .57 = 99.99
GOLD + 15.70 = 1301.60
SILV + .44 = 19.56

Today is another Jobs Report Friday. We will go into quite a bit of detail here because really, most everything we talk about in regard to economics begins with work and jobs. It is my hope that you will join us here on the first Friday of each month to get your comprehensive, fact based coverage of the jobs report.

Last month the economy added 288,000 net new jobs, and the unemployment rate dropped to 6.3%. April marked the biggest monthly gain in jobs since January 2012, when the economy added 360,000 jobs. Employment gains for February and March were revised higher by a combined 36,000; that raised the monthly average to 214,000 jobs a month since the start of the year. Through the first 4 months of 2014, the economy has added 857,000 payroll jobs, slightly better than the first 4 months of 2013, despite the harsh winter this year.

In the current 58 month expansion, employers have added more than 200,000 jobs per month in 38% of the months. Current job creation performance is stronger than it was in the business-cycle expansion that occurred during the recovery in the early 2000s, even when a real estate construction bubble fueled growth.  Today’s job creation pace lags well behind previous recent economic recoveries, such as 1970, or 1975 that saw job creation above 200,000 in about 60% of months. Needless to say, 200,000 jobs a month means a lot less today with a population that is more than 100 million people larger than it was in 1970. Total employment is now only 113,000 below the previous peak, so we should top that next month; however, the overall population has increased in the past 6 years, so there are still millions of people without jobs.

The report came in far above expectations. The consensus estimates called for 210,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate inching down to 6.6%, however there was a wide range of estimates.

The drop in the unemployment rate to 6.3% was the biggest monthly drop in 31 years and the unemployment rate is at the lowest level since 2008, but the drop in the headline rate was for the wrong reasons; the participation rate declined to 62.8% from 63.2%, meaning the labor pool fell by 806,000 workers. The unemployment rate is measured against a labor pool of people who are considered actively looking for work or working. When someone stops looking for work, they stop being counted, although it doesn’t necessarily mean they wouldn’t like work.

There are 2 major reasons why the participation rate has dropped: the first reason is demographics, and the second is the economic downturn.

Looking at demographics, the baby boomers are retiring in massive numbers, and not always voluntarily. However, many boomers are re-entering the workforce in a stealthy manner; the highest rate of entrepreneurship activity belongs to the 55-64 age group. It turns out the recession spurred new-business formation. In a "necessity is the mother of invention" scenario, it appears that many people who lost jobs started their own businesses. Of course, it might take some time for a new venture to be profitable and in the meantime, those people might not be counted as actively seeking jobs.

Meanwhile, younger people are staying in school, either going back to school for training or re-training, or dragging out school because of the high cost of education. An interesting point here is that unemployment for young adults age 20-24 dropped from 12.2% to 10.6% in April. Millennials getting jobs; or dropping out of workforce. We don’t know for certain, but one possible explanation is that graduates from the Class of 2013, that have been biding their time looking for a job or just unable to find a job, suddenly got very serious about taking any kind of job as the Class of 2014 prepares to enter the workforce.

Another age group we watch is the 25 to 54 year olds; they’re in their prime working years, too young to retire and unlikely to be in school. The 25 to 54 participation rate declined in April to 80.8% from 81.2% in March, and the 25 to 54 employment population ratio decreased to 76.5% from 76.7%. The participation rate for this age group should increase as the economy improves.

The other reason is the economic downturn, many people lost jobs and have had a very difficult time finding work, driving long term unemployment to unacceptable levels. The recent loss of unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed is another way in which people fell from the ranks; in order to receive unemployment benefits, one has to actively look for work. As the benefits were cut, people still unemployed were cut from the ranks. Extended benefits were cut off beginning in late December. If the expiration of benefits was causing hundreds of thousands of people to drop out of the labor force, it should have showed up in the data in January, or February. It didn’t. Maybe the unemployment rate fell because of 806k drop in labor force, a lagged effect from expiration of unemployment insurance, or maybe there is just some statistical noise. We won’t know for sure until we see a few more months data.

What’s also odd about the decline in the labor force is how it happened. The number of so-called re-entrants, unemployed workers who have started looking for jobs again, fell by 417,000. That’s the biggest drop since the government began keeping records in 1967.  And new entrants into the labor force, such as graduates or immigrants, fell by 126,000. That’s the biggest decline in more than five years. Put another way, two-thirds of the drop in the labor force stemmed from people choosing not to enter in the first place. Normally a decline takes place when workers exit the labor force.

According to the BLS, there are 3.452 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and still want a job. This was down from 3.739 in March. This is trending down, but is still very high. And it does not mean that 300,000 long term unemployed workers found jobs; they just stopped being counted.

And there is still quite a bit of slack in the labor market, with approximately 7.5 million workers employed part-time for economic reasons; people who have had their hours cut back or people working part-time because they can’t find full-time work. When you add in those under-utilized workers, you get a different measurement known as U-6, which dropped to 12.3% from 12.7% in March. The number of people holding multiple jobs jumped by 133,000 from April 2013 to April 2014. Women almost entirely led this statistic, with the number of employed single mothers increased 1.4% over the past year.

Hiring was widespread and it doesn’t look like there was any one industry or sector that had an unusual jump. Professional services added 75,000 jobs, but about one-third were temporary positions. Employment and temporary help services added 28,000 jobs. Retailers added 35,000 jobs, bars and restaurants added 33,000 and the construction industry hired 32,000 workers. Industries where minimum-wage employment is most prevalent in the economy, accounted for 40% of total new private-sector job creation in April, excluding health care. Manufacturers generated 12,000 jobs, but this was disappointing in light of recent economic data pointing to increased manufacturing activity; yesterday, the ISM reported it manufacturing index had increased to 54.9 last month, up from 53.7 in March. Government also added 15,000 jobs, with state and local governments adding 18,000 jobs and federal cutting 3,000 positions.

Average hourly wages were unchanged at $24.31, reducing the year-over-year gain to just 1.9%. Consumer spending has been outpacing income growth, resulting in low saving rates, meaning workers have less discretionary funds, meaning a dwindling likelihood they will go out and spend at an increasing rate. Paychecks have actually become leaner since the recession officially ended. Real median weekly earnings for full-time wage and salary workers during the first three months of this year were down 3% from the end of the recession.

Looking at the types of jobs making up employment also provides a cause for concern. Among 13 industries that make up total US private-sector employment, the 5 with the lowest nominal average weekly earnings represented about 52% of private-sector employment gains over the past year. Leisure and hospitality employment showed the strongest growth among low-earning industries, added 412,000 jobs over the year through April, representing about 17% of total private-sector job gains.

Middle-earning industries, professional and business services, construction and manufacturing, represented about 40% of annual job gains. While higher-earning industries made up about 8% of added employment. Among the five industries with the highest weekly earnings, private-sector employers added about 194,000 of these jobs over the past year. Longer-term trends show lopsided jobs growth, with lower-wage employment ramping up in recent years. During the recession, lower-wage industries made up 22% of job losses. But over the past four years, these jobs made up 44% of employment growth, according to a recently released report from the National Employment Law Project. One indication that workers aren’t particularly confident is that quitting is below pre-recession levels, signaling that many workers are unwilling to trade some job stability and security to advance their careers.

Today’s jobs report was good, one of the best months we’ve seen in a long time, and we have a 58 month trend of job gains, which is a heck of a lot better than bleeding jobs, but the trend is still not strong enough. Nearly five years since the economy began expanding, the labor market continues improving, but at a frustrating pace for the 10 million unemployed workers and 3 million people not counted as unemployed who still currently want a job. Ongoing elevated unemployment is not only a serious drag for those families enduring it, but it will continue to drag on the overall economy until lawmakers get serious about full employment and creating quality jobs that deepen and secure the middle class. 

Friday, April 04, 2014 - The March Jobs Report

The March Jobs Report
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 159 = 16,412
SPX – 23 = 1865
NAS – 110 = 4127 (-2.6%)
10 YR YLD - .06 = 2.73%
OIL + .77 = 101.06
GOLD + 15.50 = 1303.30
SILV + .14 = 20.06

Today is a jobs report Friday. Let’s get geeky.

The Labor Department reported nonfarm payrolls increased by 192,000 jobs last month after rising by 197,000 in February (that’s revised from 175,000). The prior 2 months were revised to show 37,000 more jobs than previously estimated; the revisions indicate that the bad winter weather was not a huge problem for the labor market; it did have an effect but not huge, and we certainly shouldn’t hear any more weather related excuses. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 6.7% as more people were looking for jobs. The consensus estimate was 200,000 jobs, so the figures were a little below expectations.

Private employment rose to 116.09 million, finally moving beyond the previous high of 115.98 million recorded at the very start of the recession in January 2008.Total employment is just a little below the pre-financial crisis days; we still have about 437,000 fewer jobs than the peak in 2008, but private employment is now above the peak by 110,000 and at a new all-time high; the difference is that more than a half million government jobs have been cut during that time; also, the population and the labor force has grown over the past 6 years, so the unemployment rate remains fairly high. And the idea is not just to get back to where we were, but to get back to where we should be. Keep in mind, we have 15 million more people now than we did then.

The economy added 533 thousand jobs in Q1 this year compared to 618 thousand in Q1 2013; the bad weather is the excuse for the weaker performance. Still the unemployment rate has dropped from 8.2% in March 2012 to 6.7% now.

The Labor Force Participation Rate was increased in March to 63.2%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force.  And while the participation rate is still low compared to the past 20 years, it is a positive sign that more people are looking for jobs, suggesting they were lured back into the job hunt as openings began to appear. Or possibly, more long-term unemployed were pushed back into the job market as benefits were cut. The number of long-term unemployed fell by 110,000, and over the past year, the ranks of the long-term jobless have dropped by 837,000; meanwhile, the ratio of the population reporting they had a job ticked up to 58.9% from 58.8%. Much has been made of the multiyear slide in the labor force participation rate since the financial crisis of 2008. In the last few months, however, the labor force participation rate has actually stabilized.

Anyway, about a half million people jumped back into the labor pool and about that many found jobs; if it were not for the increase in the size of the labor force, the unemployment rate would have fallen to 6.5%. It also means that the unemployment rate is unlikely to keep falling as sharply as it has in the last two years, because people who are again looking for work are counted as unemployed, while those who have given up and dropped out of the labor force are not.

There are 7.4 million people working part-time who would prefer to work full-time, or they are part time because their hours have been cut back, or they have given up looking for a job. There is a separate measure for them, known as the U-6 unemployment rate, which comes in at 12.7%; up from 12.6% in February, but down from 13.8% a year ago. The headline unemployment rate of 6.7% is known as U-3. The U-6 includes all those people in U-3 plus all the underutilized and discouraged workers. In healthier job markets, the gap between U-3 and U-6 is closer to 3% or 4%.

After months of declines in the part-time labor force, the BLS reported a spike of 414,000 new part-time workers in March, which was the largest monthly increase in nearly two years. This could just as well be an aberration, as it was a year ago, but the part-time picture in the American workforce is far from rosy. The financial crisis resulted in a spike in the number of part-time workers as a percentage of the labor force, and this has remained elevated ever since.

The increase in jobs was paced by gains in construction, retail and professional services. Government employment over all remained flat, with federal and state governments cutting 11,000 jobs even as local governments added 9,000 positions. Over the past 12 months, total federal employment has fallen by 85,000. That's pretty much how it has gone throughout the grinding recovery; private hiring has been slow but steady, while austerity has led to government job cuts that have helped keep the recovery frustratingly slow.

The health care sector added 19,000 jobs. Business services added 57,000 jobs. Food services employment increased by 30,000, bringing the sector’s gain over the past year to 323,000. The manufacturing sector lost 1,000 jobs.

While average hourly earnings were basically flat, the length of the average workweek edged higher. The average work week for private employees edged up to 34.5 hours, offsetting a net decline over the prior three months; as a consequence of the bad weather, many people lost time on the job, but it was made up in March. Average weekly hours, at 34.5 per worker, aren't far off of the 34.7 hours per worker recorded six years ago, but when you add up a fifth of an hour across more than 100 million workers, it makes a very big difference in the amount of time Americans actually spent on the job.

Average hourly earnings for private employees fell by 1 cent to $24.30 from a month earlier. Over the year, average hourly earnings have risen by 49 cents, or 2.1%. The average weekly wage rose to $838.55 from $833.83. The reason for this anomaly: a 12-minute increase in the average amount of time worked each week.  Conclusion: Bargaining power for workers is still subdued. But their services are more in demand.

The jobs report also provides details about who is benefiting from recovery and who is not. The recovery has been good for college educated workers and whites. It has been much more difficult for the long-term unemployed, young adults without a college education, and African Americans. Among adults 25 and older who have a bachelor’s degree the unemployment rate is just 3.4%, about half the over-all rate.

The unemployment rate for college graduates never went above five per cent in the downturn. At the other end of the educational spectrum, things were very different. For adults 25 and older without a high-school diploma, the jobless rate hit 15.6% in 2010. Last month, it stood at 9.6%.

Among white men aged 20 and over, the unemployment rate is now 5.3%; for African-American men over 20, it is 12.1%. The gap between white and black females is also very large, 5.3% of white women aged twenty and over are out of work (the same as the rate for white men), but 11% of black women in the same age group are jobless. Hispanics also have substantially higher rates of unemployment than whites, but the differences aren’t as large. Among Hispanic men aged twenty and over, the jobless rate in March was 6.9%; among Hispanic women aged twenty and over, the rate was 8.4%.

For teenagers between the ages of 16 and 19 who aren’t in school or college, the unemployment rate is 20.9%. That’s down from 23.3% a year ago. It’s still a very high figure, and, among minority teenagers, it’s even higher.

The stock market moved a little higher this morning following the jobs report. It wasn’t a bad jobs report that sank the market today. Most of the stories I read had a theme of not too hot, not too cold, a Goldilocks report. The Fed uses the jobs report to help determine the timing and pace of further cuts to its monthly bond-buying program. The central bank also looks to the unemployment rate as a factor in deciding when to raise its benchmark interest rate. This report did not sway the Fed one way or the other.

What went wrong on Wall Street? It’s always dangerous to lay an exact cause on any singular event, but the big damage today was in the Nasdaq and the tech and biotechs. There’s a little bit of nervousness about some of the high multiples in the biotech area and computer and Internet-related stocks. You’re having another wave of selling in that very high-momentum group. When you’re at record high levels, people start to get a little tentative going into weekends.

Thursday, April 03, 2014 - Tomorrow, Tomorrow, It’s Only a Day Away

Tomorrow, Tomorrow, It’s Only a Day Away

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 0.45 = 16,572
SPX – 2 = 1888
NAS – 38 = 4237
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.79%
OIL + .73 = 100.35
GOLD – 3.10 = 1287.80
SILV - .16 = 19.92

Forget about today; at least in terms of Wall Street trading. Tomorrow is more important. The first Friday of each month is always a big day because of the monthly jobs report; tomorrow, maybe more than most. The consensus estimates called for 200,000 net new jobs in March and the unemployment rate is expected to drop to 6.6% from 6.7%. Then there is the whisper number. Many people believe the harsh winter weather has held back hiring, like a balloon trapped under water by a thin sheet of ice, and when the ice melts, as it did in March, the balloon will jump out of the water like a salmon swimming upstream. Weather sensitive industries such as retail, construction and manufacturing might be especially strong performers.

A March jobs report that shows a broad increase in hiring across most or all industries would show the economy is recovering and everything, including the Fed, is on track. A disappointing number, though, would bolster the case of the increasingly famished Wall Street bears that bad weather alone is not the source of weak economic growth so far in 2014.

And if the number comes in right at expectations, we’ll have to go to the tiebreakers. We will look at the number of hours worked, In February, inclement weather kept people from getting to work, at least for a few days. The result: The average workweek slipped by 0.1 hour to 34.2 hours in February, the lowest level since January 2011. Fewer hours mean less take-home pay for many, translating into weaker consumer demand and slower economic growth. The wintry mix continued to hit parts of the country in March but the effect shouldn’t be as bad as earlier in the winter. Even a partial reversal of the weather distortion should generate a rebound in average weekly hours worked, which have slumped from 34.5 last November.

We’ll also look at the U-6 underutilization rate. Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen this week highlighted the 7.2 million people who would like a full-time job but instead are working only part time. It’s a sign of slack in the labor market and one reason the Fed is likely to keep rates low for a long time. “This number is much larger than we would expect at 6.7% unemployment, based on past experience, and the existence of such a large pool of ‘partly unemployed’ workers is a sign that labor conditions are worse than indicated by the unemployment rate.”

And we’ll look at the participation rate, the share of working-age adults who have a job or are looking for work, held steady at 63% in February, near a 35-year low. That’s partly because baby boomers are retiring in greater numbers but may also indicate some people are frustrated with their job prospects and have dropped out of the labor force. Greater labor-force participation would be welcome, even if that keeps the unemployment rate from falling further.

Of course, that 200k jobs figure is just a guess, an arbitrary number pulled out of a hat. Total private employment reached 115,848,000 in February, close to the seasonally adjusted record of 115,977,000 from January 2008. If the private sector added more than 129,000 payroll jobs in March, the US will be back to its peak level of private-sector employment. Of course, a lot has changed since the prior peak. State local and federal governments have shed more than half a million jobs, leaving total employment still shy of its all-time high. The population is bigger: The civilian labor force has expanded by 1.6 million since then. And the mix of private-sector jobs has changed. For example, more people work in temp and health care jobs, while fewer are in construction and manufacturing.

With the Federal Reserve in the process of tapering down its bond purchases, big surprises on either side of the forecasts could upend expectations about the pace of the Fed’s stimulus withdrawal and the timing of eventual rate hikes. As important as the jobs figure is, it is also important to remember that, as Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen has noted, unemployment isn’t the only number policy makers will consider.

It would take a really big number to move the bond market, but something north of 250,000 jobs could push the yield on the 10 year Treasury note above 2.8%. Market expectations appear to be biased toward higher yields.

A strong jobs report would also be bullish for the dollar. Today the dollar moved higher against the Euro as European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said policy makers were discussing the possibility of using quantitative easing and other unconventional stimulus measures to counteract extremely low inflation.

The ECB's governing council held its key interest rates unchanged for the fifth month in a row, despite an unexpected slowdown in area-wide inflation and worries about deflation.  Of course, Draghi has been trying to jawbone the Eurozone into economic growth for a couple of years, vowing to do whatever it takes but never actually doing whatever it takes, even as the destructive spiral of falling prices pushes consumers to put off purchases, thus destroying salaries, jobs and investment.

Meanwhile, International Monetary Fund Director Christine Lagarde was railing against the deflation ogre again, and warning the ECB about the dangers of “low-flation”, which is apparently a freshly minted economic term, and calling for more monetary easing by the ECB and the Bank of Japan. Draghi said the IMF has been “extremely generous” in suggesting what the ECB should or shouldn’t do. In fact, he urged the IMF to share the generosity “with other monetary policy jurisdictions, like for example issuing statements just the day before a (Fed) meeting.”

Which also means the ECB will not do whatever it takes to stoke the economic engine. And Lagarde was wrong; they don’t face “low-flation”; prices are falling.  The European Central Bank has let it happen. Deflation has been running at an annual rate of -1.5% in the Eurozone over the past five months, when adjusted for austerity taxes. Prices have dropped more than 6% in Greece, more than 5% in Italy, more than 4% in Spain and Portugal, 3% in Slovenia, and 2% in Holland. A little bit of stimulus would push the currency lower and goose exports and economic activity, but Draghi does nothing but jawbone; his constant promises to do whatever ring hollow.

Deflation can create some serious conundrums for debt. When a country’s debt burden rises faster than nominal GDP, it could engulf the private sector as well; tightening the vice on households and companies with fixed-rate debts; it would erode bank assets; risk fresh bank failures and hit life insurers through a mismatch in maturities.

An International Monetary Fund study detailed this week, that there's still a running assumption that governments would again rescue the biggest banks in the event of another panic. The IMF found that at least through 2012 the euro zone's biggest banks still benefited from an implicit taxpayer subsidy of $90 billion to $300 billion. Subsidies for UK and Japanese banks may have been as high as $110 billion and they ranged from $20 billion to $70 billion in the United States. So the risk, you might assume, is still loaded on the government's tab. Yet government borrowing costs across the western world and beyond have rarely, if ever, been lower.

Eurozone loans to businesses are contracting at a rate of 3%. The ECB is missing its 2% inflation target by 150 basis points, and will continue to miss it badly in 2015 and 2016 based on its own forecasts. Despite Draghi’s incessant and unbelievable jawboning, the ECB has consistently refused to offset the contractionary effects of austerity with enough monetary stimulus to keep GDP growing faster than the debt of the southern nations; and the more austerity the more the debt burden to GDP ratio has climbed. In Italy the debt climbed from 119% to 133% since 2010 despite harsh fiscal policy.

Say what you will about the Fed, and I have said plenty; their QE policy has been misdirected and has led to greater inequality, but at least the US maintains its global position as the cleanest shirt in the dirty clothes hamper because we weren’t hit with the double whammy of tight monetary policy and draconian fiscal austerity. (just the fiscal part)

The ECB insists that the latest dip in Euro inflation is due to falling energy costs, and therefore transient. That could all change if Russia decides to ramp up the use of natural gas as an economic weapon, and a precedent was set earlier this week. Rising energy prices in combination with falling prices for almost everything else would make for a really ugly mess in Euroland, and might force Draghi to stop sitting on his hands.

While offering her advice on “low-flation” to the ECB today, IMF chief Lagarde also spoke about other threats to global growth. Another threat is high corporate leverage in emerging economies, which if not adequately addressed will be worsened by the turmoil from eventual monetary tightening in advanced economies, especially the US. Yet another obstacle is the rise of geopolitical tensions, which could cloud the global economic outlook. "The situation in Ukraine is one which, if not well managed, could have broader spillover implications."

Monday, March 17, 2014 - Empty Chambers and the Tools in the Toolbox

Empty Chambers and the Tools in the Toolbox

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 181 = 16,247
SPX + 17 = 1858
NAS + 34 = 4279
10 YR YLD + .05 = 2.70%
OIL- .90 = 97.99
GOLD – 14.50 = 1368.50
SILV - .27 = 21.29

Russia held a referendum vote on taking Crimea from Ukraine. Crimean voters approved the takeover with 98% voting in favor; the 2% of voters who opposed the take-over are probably on a slow train to Siberia. Global financial markets ignored the annexation, and they went up in what was described as a “relief rally”.  Stock markets in the US, Europe, and even Russia all moved higher.

The United States and European Union countries imposed a new round of sanctions on 11 Russian and Ukrainian political figures, freezing assets and banning visas for Russians deemed responsible for interfering in Ukrainian sovereignty. The order means that any assets owned by the targeted Russians in the United States will be frozen and Americans will not be allowed to do business with them.

Few Americans are truly concerned about Ukraine, nor should they be. The United States has no real national interests there, and whether Crimea becomes part of Russia is irrelevant to broader US national security issues.

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t pay attention; annexation of Crimea by Russia, and especially a further push by Moscow into Ukraine, would poison US-Russian relations for many, many years to come, and it will make cooperating with Russia on Syria, Iran and Afghanistan much more complicated. The cause for concern is that ill will between Washington and Moscow and a spiraling down of relations will have a devastating ripple effect on much else in international relations. It will also intensify pressure on the White House to halt the cuts in the Pentagon’s budget that Obama and Secretary of Defense Hagel have already proposed.

In this game of Russian roulette, the trigger was pulled and the chamber was empty. So, the referendum played out as expected; sanctions are in place; it’s an ugly spat, but no bombs are flying; what a relief; the Dow Industrials jump 181. I don’t know if there is any connection, or if the stocks moved higher because they’ve been down for the last 6 sessions.

The Federal Reserve FOMC is meeting this week to determine monetary policy. We will get the FOMC statement on Wednesday and Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen will hold a press conference. It is widely anticipated the Fed will continue to taper off its bond purchase program by about $10 billion; the Fed is also expected to reiterate its commitment to keeping interest rates low for a long time. The Fed’s current pledge is to hold rates steady until “well past” the point when the unemployment rate falls below 6.5%. The unemployment rate is currently 6.7%, so the Fed might want to rethink that 6.5% unemployment target because we are so close to it. Most likely, the Fed will stay the course, with just minor nuances in their statement giving hints to the direction of the economy.

And that is the important thing to remember: the economy. Everybody is trying to figure out if it has gained some traction. For the past few months we’ve heard the argument that the weather has been hampering the economy; maybe, when the never-ending winter ends the economy will blossom; on the flip side, if the economy really has underlying strength then we shouldn’t have to listen to all these excuses about the weather.  

Whether it feels like it or not, the economy is improving; government is cutting a little less, businesses are hiring a little more, and consumers are spending a little more; not exactly the formula for an economic blastoff, but things are getting better. Even so, much of the American public is still not over the financial downturn. A Pew Research Center January survey found 16% of people rate the national economy as excellent or good while 83% rate it as fair or poor; that is pretty much in range with our opinions on the economy for the past 6 years. And only 39% rated their own personal financial situation as excellent or good. There has clearly been some improvement in the economy in the last 5 years, but our mood remains dark.

Whether you are optimistic or pessimistic depends in part on your partisan politics. Through George W. Bush’s two terms, Democrats were much less likely than others to say the economy was in excellent or good shape. Then, with Obama’s election, the reverse became true. Republicans became less positive and more pessimistic than Democrats. In Pew Research’s February poll, fully 47% of Republicans but only 17% of Democrats said they were hearing mostly bad economic news.

Another factor is your personal income; if your household earns north of $100,000 per year, the chances are you feel pretty good; less than that, not so much. In 2008, 53% of families felt they were in the middle class; that has now dropped to 43%. How can the economy be getting better when so many are families are falling out of the middle class?

Clearly the economic recovery has been uneven. Clearly the stock market is higher than it was 5 years ago, but if you don’t own stocks and if you don’t have a job, the stock market is not an important part of your life. Clearly housing prices have increased but if you lost your house to foreclosure 4 years ago, the housing recovery is working against you. Clearly the unemployment rate has dropped from 10% to 6.7%, and that’s good, but it doesn’t reflect the quality of jobs, the loss of benefits, and the stagnation of wages.

There are plenty of reasons for Americans to feel bad about the economy, but the pessimism started before the Great Recession or small “d” depression. Back in January 2000, 52% of all Americans termed economic conditions as good, and an additional 19% rated the economy as excellent. No more. By the end of 2000, the markets took a hit, and another hit in 2001; in 2006, the housing market bubble started to burst; and then the financial meltdown of 2008. That boom bust cycle has grown tiresome and debilitating.

So, the Federal Reserve is meeting this week and part of their challenge is to avoid booms and busts; part of their challenge is to equalize the recovery, and the simple fact is that their toolbox of quantitative easing and Zero Interest Rate Policy is ill-suited for the job. In the past year, as we’ve watched the Fed think about taper, threaten taper, head fake on taper, and then actually start to taper, we’ve seen some securities prone to large price movements related to the Fed’s maneuvers. Some of the securities that load on Fed risk are somewhat obvious: investment grade corporates and US government bonds are exposed primarily to interest rate and inflation risk, which the Fed can impact directly. Others are not so obvious: emerging market equity funds, consumer staples, and utilities, for example.

What we haven’t seen is the Fed being able to change the jobs picture, which is part of their dual mandate. Former Fed Chair Bernanke tried to take credit for the lower unemployment rate but it is questionable that the Fed’s policy had as much impact on the labor market as it did on the stock and bond markets.

And now we’re starting to hear some Fed policymakers talk about tight labor markets. It's hard to believe that this is even a debate when unemployment is still at 6.7% and inflation is about 1%. The new inflation hawks argue that these headline numbers overstate how much slack is left in the economy; that the labor force is smaller than it sounds, because firms won't even consider hiring the long-term unemployed; that our productive capacity is lower than it sounds, because we haven't invested in new factories for too long. And that wages and prices will start rising as companies pay more for the workers and work that they want. In other words, they think that the financial crisis has made us permanently poorer. That the economy can't grow as fast as it used to, so inflation will pick up sooner than it used to, and we need to get ready to raise rates. Welcome to the new normal.

If tighter labor markets were causing wage inflation, they'd have caused wage inflation, but that hasn't happened. There was a minor uptick in wages in February, but that was almost certainly weather related. The bad weather kept people off the job, and that tends to affect hourly workers more than salaried ones. So higher-paid people probably made up a bigger share of the workforce last month, and voilà, it looked like wages rose. But that was just statistical noise, and if you look at the bigger picture, wage growth is still stagnant and actually a little lower than before the financial meltdown.

Nobody knows how many of the people who stopped looking for work the past five years will start looking again now. Some of them retired, and won't return. But others just went back to school or temporarily gave up looking because things seemed so hopeless—and will come back sooner or later. A strong job market sucks workers back in. Look at the participation rate, and it is clear that isn’t happening.

At some point the Fed will need to look beyond their inflation fears and try to come up with some new tools to fulfill their dual mandate; and if they don’t have the tools in the toolbox, maybe they can shame the politicians into enacting fiscal policy to get people back on the ladder of opportunity. 

Friday, March 07, 2014 - Jobs Report Friday and Aiming Higher

Jobs Report Friday and Aiming Higher

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 30 = 16,452
SPX + 1 = 1878
NAS - 15 = 4336
10 YR YLD + .05 = 2.79%
OIL + 1.00 = 102.56
GOLD – 9.50 = 1341.90
SILV - .51 = 21.03

This is a jobs report Friday. Here’s what you need to know. The economy added 175,000 net new jobs in February; this topped estimates of 150,000. The unemployment rate moved higher to 6.7%, up from 6.6% in January. After two months of very bad jobs reports, we returned to just below average levels of 189,000 per month; not a great showing but not ugly. The December and January reports were revised higher by 25,000 jobs. So why did the unemployment rate go up?

The labor pool got bigger; more people were looking for work. The ranks of the short-term unemployed declined by 61,000 to 2.3 million, while the ranks of the  long-term unemployed jumped by 200,000 to 3.85 million, and the labor participation rate held steady at 63%, just above the generational low of 62.8% in December. That seems to be a discrepancy, but the unemployment rate is based on a separate survey of households from the one that tracks hiring by employers, and the household survey showed an increase of 264,000 in the labor force. The participation rate is still well below the range of 66% to 67% where it had been for the past 20 years or so.

The unemployment rate went up slightly because that 264,000 gain swamped an increase of 42,000 in the number of people who were employed in the survey, but was positive over all because it showed more people are looking for work. And in the age group of people we expect to be working, the 25 to 54 year olds, participation rate increased in February to 81.2% from 81.1%, and the 25 to 54 employment population ratio was unchanged at 76.5%. 

Last month 10.5 million people were unemployed; including 3.8 million who have been out of work for six months or more; while 5.5 million have moved to retirement, intentional or not; and 3 million are disabled and the number of people applying for Social Security disability benefits has spiked in recent years. Even though February saw more people returning to the labor force, the percent of the population working or looking for work remains near a 30-year low due to millions of dropouts during the recession. One of the consequences of long-term unemployment is the loss of job skills, or for younger workers, they never really develop job skills and may face a lifetime of lower wages.

Most of the jobs, 162,000 were in the private sector. State and local governments have been doing a bit of hiring, adding 19,000 jobs last month, while the federal government continues layoffs, cutting 6,000 jobs. Private sector payroll employment has now posted gains for 48 consecutive months and with businesses adding about 8.7 million jobs over that time, private sector payroll is almost back to the previous peak back in January 2008; just another 130,000 more to go; although that does not account for population growth. So, there’s a good chance private employment will be at a new high next month. And total employment will probably be at a new high before the end of summer.

State, local, and federal government had 32,000 fewer jobs than one year ago. This marks the 56th consecutive month, going back to July 2009, that government employment was down on a year-over-year basis, excluding the temporary jobs added for the 2010 census. If you count them, the string is 43 months, going back to August 2010. Still, by a wide margin, this is the longest string of government job cuts since the end of World War II. Governments now employ 15.9 percent of all Americans who have jobs. That is the lowest proportion since 2001.

The one area of improvement in government jobs seems to be coming from state governments because their finances are improving. While local government payrolls are holding steady, state-level payrolls have increased for seven consecutive months, pulling the number of jobs back up to 2011 levels. The main sources of new jobs have been education and healthcare.

An alternate measure of employment, the U-6, includes underutilized workers; the U-6 came in at 12.6%, down from 12.7%, and the lowest level since November 2008. There are still 7.2 million people working part-time for economic reasons; because they can’t find full-time employment or their hours have been cut back.

Once again the report highlighted the deeply uneven nature of the recovery in the jobs market. The unemployment rate for white people was 5.8%, for African Americans it was 12%, and Hispanics 8.1%, and unemployment for teenagers was 21.4%. Of the 175,000 new jobs last month, 99,000 went to women. Over the 12 months through February, women’s nonfarm employment rose by 1.07 million jobs, half of the total US gain of 2.16 million. A couple of years ago, women accounted for just 37% of annual job gains.

Here is the full breakdown of "young vs old" jobs since December 2007: those 55 and older have gained 4.9 million jobs. Those under 55 are still some 3.1 million jobs below their December 2007 level.

The quality of jobs has been a big concern for some time, however in February, white-collar professions including accounting, bookkeeping and consulting led the gains, as the professional and business service sector gained 79,000 jobs. Here’s the catch; one-third of the professional jobs were temporary jobs.  Blue-collar hiring was more muted with the manufacturing sector adding 6,000 positions and construction gaining 15,000. Retailers cut 4,100 jobs as a 12,000 gain in food and beverage stores was offset by a 12,000 decline in electronics and appliance stores. The leisure and hospitality sector added 25,000 jobs.

Average hourly earnings rose 0.4%, or 9 cents to $24.31 per hour; bringing the year-over-year gain to 2.2%; not much but a gain. The average workweek fell to the lowest level since January 2011, which might be due to the bad winter weather, but the weather-sensitive construction sector added 15,000 jobs last month. We know that the household survey took place during a week of storms in the northeast. The Labor Department also reported that 601,000 people in the household survey said they could not get to work because of the weather last month, nearly double the number who typically said that in February on a historical basis. So, weather had an effect, but at some point we just move beyond the weather excuse.

One interesting point about hours worked and hourly wages is that we can try to normalize this data by looking at average weekly earnings. In February, this number dropped slightly to $682.65 from $683.74. So, hourly wages were up  very slightly and hours worked were down a little, and it might be easy to explain this as weather related, but then we look  at average weekly earnings over  the past year, which would not be weather related, and earnings grew just 1.3%, which is the weakest earnings growth in 5 years.

The 175,000 net jobs added in February extrapolates to a pace of 2.1 million jobs a year, squarely within the long-term range. So we have a tepid jobs recovery; just enough to call it a recovery, not enough to call it a good recovery, not enough to instigate action to make it better, and not enough to see the virtuous cycle of job growth that feeds on its own strength.

It will likely be good enough for the Federal Reserve to put taper on auto-pilot. They will continue to trim back monthly bond purchases by $10 billion at their next FOMC meeting later this month. Yesterday, William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, suggested that it would take either a recession or an economic miracle to shift the Fed from its course.

Back in December, then-Fed head Ben Bernanke justified the taper as a program that was intended to foster job growth and that job growth was on track, so the work of QE bond buying was accomplished. Many Fed policymakers are still concerned about inflation, even though we’ve had more disinflation of late; and their thinking is they need to be properly positioned to raise rates if they need to battle inflation; before they could raise rates, they want to be out of the bond buying business.

Since the last quarter of 2012, nominal hourly wage growth has increased from 1.5% to the current 2.2%, while inflation has decreased from just under 3% to about half that pace now. That means that most regular workers were losing ground as price growth exceeded hourly wage growth; that seems to be changing now; wage growth is just a little more than inflation. That’s good but then we consider weekly earnings growth, which is around 1.3% annualized, workers are still losing ground to inflation, or at best – flat. So, this is not a reason to fear inflation, nor is it a reason for the Fed to raise interest rates.

The Fed’s target for unemployment is 6.5%, which doesn’t really sound like full employment. It wouldn’t be bad to do better; to get the unemployment rate below 6.5%; we really shouldn’t worry about the inflationary pressures of a tighter job market, in part because we haven’t seen any inflationary pressures, even though we are getting close to the target. Of course, the Fed may have limited ability to help on the jobs front. It would be nice to see more fiscal policy aimed at creating jobs. Inflation has not been an issue at all. The public debt has also not been an issue at all, and attempts to cut spending have been completely counterproductive and damaging to the short and long-term health of the economy.

Real wage gains for low and middle income workers would be a good thing. If people can start to get ahead, just a little, from their hard work, they are likely to take a more active role in the economy and that might mean we could eventually see some momentum in the economy. In other words, we still need to aim higher.