Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - Sunlight is the Best of Disinfectants

Sunlight is the Best of Disinfectants

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 59 = 16979
SPX + 4 = 1986
NAS – 1 = 4526
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.42%
OIL + .63 = 93.49
GOLD – 3.80 = 1292.40
SILV + .04 = 19.55

No economic reports today, but the Federal Reserve released the minutes of the July 29-30 FOMC meeting. You will recall that the Fed left interest rates unchanged and continued the taper by reducing large scale asset purchases by $10 billion a month, with the plan to end purchases by October. The Fed had said in its policy statement following the July meeting that there was "significant" labor market slack, but the minutes showed many members of its policy-setting panel thought this characterization "might have to change before long."

Most Fed officials wanted further evidence the labor market and the economy were showing significant improvement before changing their view on raising rates, but they said, "Labor market conditions had moved noticeably closer to those viewed as normal in the longer run," and policymakers "generally agreed" the job market was healing faster than they had expected.

Most Fed policymakers felt any change in their view on when to start raising rates "would depend on further information on the trajectories of economic activity, the labor market and inflation." Well, we got more data yesterday showing that inflation is not a problem yet; so that leaves economic activity and the labor market. The economic trajectory has remained sluggish since the beginning of the recovery; GDP turned negative in the first quarter of this year and then showed a very strong bounce in the second quarter. Is the second quarter bounce sustainable? It seems most Fed officials think it could be. And the Fed minutes almost seem to gloss over this long-term sluggishness, or what the Center for Economic Policy Research callssecular stagnation. What is secular stagnation?

A persistent gap between actual and potential output. Because of an imbalance between saving and investment, the nominal interest rate required to maintain full employment falls to less than zero -- not just briefly, but persistently. Since the rate can't be cut to less than zero, monetary policy (as currently conceived) can't keep the economy running at full potential.

A slowdown in growth of potential output. This may happen because of demographic changes, or because innovation isn't what it used to be, or for other reasons.

An irreversible drop in the level of potential output. Even if the full-employment rate of interest is still positive and the growth in potential output hasn't slowed, the recession may have permanently cut its level -- for instance, by causing workers to leave the labor force and not come back. Even if the economy now grows as fast as it did before, it's on a lower track and won't ever converge with the path it was on pre-crash.

This all means that the Fed’s long awaited economic liftoff might not happen, at least for another 20 years or so. But the Fed doesn’t seem to be concerned with this problem, which means that if the US economy experiences secular stagnation, the condition will be self-inflicted.

That leaves the Fed with the question of the recovery in the labor market. So, it really boils down to jobs. More jobs, and specifically, the quality of the jobs. So far, the average wage is stuck at $24.25 an hour; too many jobs are part-time or temporary. If we start to see some movement on wages, and more full-time positions, that might be a sign for rate increases. One area of remaining slack is the low participation rate, the percentage of working age population that is still in the labor pool; many people got out of the pool. Last month the economy added 209,000 net new jobs. The unemployment rate moved up to 6.2% from 6.1%. The jobless rate can rise for both good reasons (more people looking for work) and bad reasons (fewer people having a job).  Even though the economy added jobs, more people joined the labor force, and that is why the unemployment rate moved higher.

There are many things that could derail the recovery in the labor market, but for now the Fed thinks things are on track, and that means a probable rate increase in the first half of 2015. Any rate increase is likely to be incremental. Right now the fed funds target rate is between zero and 0.25%. It would likely be increased by 25 basis points, with the lower range representing the rate on overnight reverse repurchase operations. In reverse repos, the Fed borrows funds overnight from banks to mop up excess cash in the financial system.

Market reaction to a slightly more hawkish Fed stance: well, the dollar index continued higher, Treasuries dropped but then settled down, precious metals were a little lower, oil was higher, stocks initially threw a little tantrum and then recovered. After all, there were no real surprises.

Elsewhere, we’ve been waiting for the Department of Justice announcement on a settlement with Bank of America. Bank of America has reportedly reached a record $17 billion settlement to resolve an investigation into its role in the sale of mortgage-backed securities before the 2008 financial crisis. The official announcement will come tomorrow. The deal works out to $10 billion in cash, and $7 billion in soft dollar consumer relief - which is really a gift to the bank involving credits for various forms of consumer aid that the bank would or should be doing anyway. So, if you have a BofA mortgage and you’ve been having trouble with a loan mod or a refinance – try again. And by the way, the bank will make money on consumer aid.

The deal requires Bank of America to acknowledge making serious misrepresentations about the quality of its residential mortgage-backed securities issued by itself and by Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch. In exchange, BofA will probably not have to actually admit wrongdoing, and they get a free “get out of jail” card.  

Usually these settlements include a statement of facts which is most notable for its absence of facts and details. That silence means the Department of Justice is essentially protecting the banks from private lawsuits by deliberately withholding evidence which could result in even further disclosure of really bad behavior and even bigger damages and other unexpected outcomes. The biggest unexpected outcome would be that the public finally says to hell with the bankster criminals and we all see through the flimsy apologists in the media and the cronies in politics.

Most people know the banksters got away with murder; and I use the word literally, not figuratively. Most people want to see bankster executives prosecuted. Most people understand that the fines in these settlements are just a slap on the wrist, cost of business paid by shareholders, and taxpayers. Yep, the fines are typically considered tax deductible.

Tomorrow, the DOJ will announce the biggest settlement ever against a bank: $17 billion. But we know, it’s really a little under $10 billion in cash, with all kinds of little gifts to the banksters to soften the blow. And we know this will do nothing to deter future wrongdoing. You can place a huge derivative bet that they’re still committing those same crimes and new ones (such as subprime auto), so the prosecution clock resets daily.

And the crazy part is that the Department of Justice and BofA think we’re all too stupid to understand the cronyism. They will portray the settlement as a get tough stance on the bankers. Hogwash, I know it, you know it.

About 100 years ago, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote his famous statement that "sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants" in a 1913 Harper's Weekly article. He went on to say that transparency is “justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases.” Brandeis actually wrote privately about the idea of transparency 20 years earlier, writing, “about the wickedness of people shielding wrongdoers and passing them off (or at least allowing them to pass themselves off) as honest men."

About 100 years ago, the country was struggling with what was known as the Money Trust, the rough equivalent of today’s systemically important financial institutions, or too big to fail banks. Brandeis asked how the great wealth of his day had been accumulated, and he concluded: “power breeds wealth as wealth breeds power. But a main cause of these large fortunes is the huge tolls taken by those who control the avenues to capital and to investors. There has been exacted as toll literally ‘all that the traffic will bear.’”

Just a reminder, some of the mortgage problems of Bank of America date back to their acquisition of Countrywide; BofA had their own illegal mortgage problems. The guy who started Countrywide and nearly ran it into the ground is Angelo Mozillo. Until now, the harshest penalty imposed on Mozilo has been a $67 million settlement with the SEC from 2010 to resolve allegations that he misled Countrywide investors. Actually, Mozilo was forced to disgorge about $45 million from the sale of stocks, some of which may have been based on insider information; and then Bank of America paid for most of the other penalties; which is to say shareholders and consumers paid for Mozilo’s penalties.

The US attorney’s office in Los Angeles is now preparing a civil lawsuit against Mozilo and as many as 10 other former Countrywide employees. Government attorneys plan to sue Mozilo, Countrywide’s former chairman and chief executive officer, and other individuals using the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act. The law, approved by Congress in 1989 in response to savings-and-loan scandals, gives prosecutors 10 years to bring cases and has less stringent liability requirements than criminal charges.

Prosecutors dropped a criminal probe of Mozilo in early 2011. The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group, sued the Justice Department in June to try to obtain its records detailing investigations of Mozilo and Countrywide. The group faulted the government for failing to prosecute either Mozilo or the company “despite substantial evidence of wrongdoing.”

Friday, August 15, 2014 - Don't Worry

Don’t Worry

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 50 = 16, 662
SPX – 0.12 = 1955
NAS + 11 = 4464
10 YR YLD - .06 = 2.35%
OIL + 1.49 = 97.07
GOLD – 8.40 = 1305.50
SILV - .31 = 19.65

For the week, the Dow rose 0.7%, the S&P 500 gained 1.2% and the Nasdaq climbed 2.2%.

The Federal Reserve said factory production jumped 1.0% last month after rising 0.3% in June. That was the largest gain since February and reflected increases across all major categories. Auto production surged 10.1%, the biggest rise since July 2009. There were also solid gains in the production of machinery and computers and electronic goods; yesterday we talked about the importance of capex and business spending; maybe we’re seeing signs of that.

Or not. In a separate report, the New York Fed said its "Empire State" general business conditions index fell to 14.69 this month from 25.60 in July.

A preliminary August reading on the University of Michigan/Thomson Reuters consumer-sentiment index fell to the lowest level in 9 months, 79.2 down from a final July level of 81.8.

Producer prices, or prices at the wholesale level increased 0.1% in July, with 0.5% growth for transportation and warehousing prices; goods prices were unchanged; food prices rose 0.4%; energy prices dropped 0.6%. Overall producer prices rose 1.7% over the 12 months that ended in July, down from June’s annual-growth rate of 1.9%.

But the economic news carried little weight today, as attention once again focused on geopolitics. That might not be totally accurate; Wall Street looks at geopolitical hotspots but it can’t hold their focus. A new survey of institutional money managers around the world by Bank of America Merrill Lynch has found a sudden surge in worry and fear, and a rise in the number buying “protection” against a crash; which means derivatives such as put options or credit default swaps.

Money managers are worried about the markets and the Fed raising interest rates and geopolitical events and the baggage retrieval system at Heathrow, and so, over the past month they have raised their cash positions from 4.5% to 5.1%. Which doesn’t sound very defensive; in fact, it sounds like money managers are still excessively bullish on stocks.

Yesterday Russian President Putin talked about how he wanted to avoid confrontation in Ukraine. Last night a Russian armored column crossed the border into Ukraine; they started firing artillery at Ukrainian forces, which exchanged shellfire. Ukrainian President Petro said a "significant" part of the Russian column had been destroyed. Russia's government denied its forces had crossed into Ukraine. NATO said there had been a Russian incursion into Ukraine but would not go so far as to call it an invasion.

After Ukraine reported the invasion, Russia's ruble weakened against both the dollar and the euro. Russian shares were also dragged lower. International markets moved lower. European Union governments warned they are ready to expand sanctions against Russia if the conflict in Ukraine intensifies.  US markets initially moved lower. The yield on the ten year treasury dropped 6 basis points to 2.35%; Treasuries are usually considered a safe haven. The yield on German bunds, or 10 year bonds, dropped under 1%. The escalating clash is now haunting the European economy, already on the brink of fresh recession, with a string of southern states in debt-deflation.

All of a sudden, the euro crisis is back, though in truth it never really went away. The latest economic figures from the eurozone make bleak reading. Across the eurozone, which is struggling to get banks lending to businesses, economic growth is expected to be 1.1% this year. All three of the euro area’s biggest economies — Germany, France and Italy — are failing. Germany’s output actually fell in the second quarter. Italy is suffering through a triple dip recession. The French economy has stagnated. Analysts expect it to grow by less than one per cent this year. Italy has dropped back into recession, or maybe it never got out of recession. The closest thing approximating good news was that Spain's dead-cat bounce recovery continued with 0.6% growth. But it still has 24.5% unemployment. The eurozone economy is still far smaller than six years ago, by about 1.9%; unemployment is in double figures and debt burdens in some areas are high.

In June, the ECB cut its key interest rates and introduced a new program of cheap loans to banks that are intended to be passed on to businesses. Some economists say the European Central Bank should go further and engage in large-scale purchases of public and private debt to reduce borrowing costs and add to the money supply. ECB President Mario Draghi is under fire to do more to resuscitate growth. He, in turn, argues that “monetary policy can only achieve so much, with government reform required to do the heavy lifting,” and he is probably right, but there doesn’t seem to be much appetite for reform. Monetary stimulus is simply not remotely an adequate substitute for government spending. Even the austerian IMF has been forced to acknowledge that fact.

The Ukraine crisis has drawn the EU into an economic confrontation with Russia, which is not only the principal supplier of energy to many eurozone countries but is also a significant trading partner and export market for European goods. This is hardly designed to improve the economic outlook, and the eurozone remains too weak to withstand external shocks. And Eurozone weakness was already in place before the most recent economic sanctions against Russia; the unfortunate reality is that nobody really knows how Russian sanctions will play out. There will be costs associated with sanctions; many of them unexpected.

Next week, the Federal Reserve will hold its annual Jackson Hole retreat. Janet Yellen will speak on labor markets. The labor market has improved but still looks weak. Various Fed officials have various theories on the labor markets, but not much in the way of solutions, and so, not surprisingly, they have different views on Fed policy.

Jeremy Stein left the Fed Board of Governors earlier in the year to return to a teaching gig at Harvard. Last week Stein said whatever the Fed does, we can expect less financial stability. Stein says that the process of exiting QE and raising interest rates has “no real precedent”. Yellen devoted an entire speech to the subject of financial stability last month at the IMF, where she said the Fed had devoted “substantially increased resources” to monitoring stability and acknowledged that the Fed’s low-interest rate policy had spurred “households and businesses to take on the risk of potentially productive investments.” But, she went on, “Such risk-taking can go too far, thereby contributing to fragility in the financial system.”

Yesterday, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said he believes financial markets are probably mistaken if they’re counting on Fed interest rate increases to occur more slowly than policy makers forecast. Bullard says the Fed will raise the interest rate target in the first quarter of 2015. Bullard said: “We’re way ahead of where we expected to be” in terms of the Fed’s employment mandate, and “If that strength continues in the second half of the year here, then the conversation on a little more hawkish direction of monetary policy will heat up.”

Today, Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota offered a contrasting view, saying: “The FOMC is still a long way from meeting its targeted goal of price stability” because of excess slack in the job market, and “progress in the decline of the unemployment rate masks continued weakness in labor markets,” which would keep the inflation rate below the Fed’s 2% target until 2018. Kocherlakota pointed to the participation rate among people between the ages of 25 to 54, the prime working years; another especially significant” measure of slack is the “historically high” percentage of workers who would like full-time jobs but can only find part-time work. The U-6 unemployment rate, a broad measure of unemployment that includes people working part time because they can’t find full-time jobs rose to 12.2% in July after declining one percentage point over the first six months of the year.

One of the biggest changes in the US labor market over the past two decades has been the increasing number of people working over the age of 55. From the end of World War II until the early 1990s, a smaller and smaller share remained in the labor force but since the 1990s that trend reversed. In 1993, only 29% of people that age were in the labor force. The vast majority were retired. But participation has been rising and by 2012 more than 41% of people in that age group were still in the labor force, the highest since the early 1960s. Clearly, something has changed about people’s attitudes toward retirement. A survey from the Federal Reserve last week provided some clues. Around 21% of people said their plan for retirement is simply “to work as long as possible” and the number of people giving this response increases by age.

In addition to the Fed’s get-together in Jackson Hole, next week’s economic calendar includes minutes from the Fed’s July 30^th FOMC meeting; on Thursday we’ll get a report on July existing home sales from the National Association of Realtors; Tuesday brings an update on July housing starts. Housing starts tumbled 9.3% in June. The Labor Department will release the consumer price index report on Tuesday; the CPI measures inflation at the retail level; it’s been running near 2%, more or less.

Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - GDP, Fed, Vultures, and Banksters

GDP, Fed, Vultures, and Banksters

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 31 = 16,880
SPX + 0.12 = 1970
NAS + 20 = 4462
10 YR YLD + .09 = 2.55%
OIL - .72 = 100.25
GOLD – 4.30 = 1295.50
SILV + .06 = 20.72

Last week we told you that this week would be very busy. Well, here we are; today we had a big report on second quarter GDP and the Fed wrapped up a policy session, and that’s just the beginning. 

This morning, the Commerce Department reported the gross domestic product grew at a 4% pace in the second quarter. Boom. And first quarter GDP was revised from negative 2.9% to negative 2.1%; but any way you look at it, this was a massive turnaround.

The government also published revisions to prior GDP data going back to 1999, which showed the economy performing much stronger in the second half of 2013, growing at a 4% pace, the strongest 6 months since late 2003. This was the first estimate of second quarter GDP, and the first revision will be released August 28.

Inventories added 1.66 percentage points to this GDP report. Stockpiles were rebuilt at a $93.4 billion annualized pace after a $35.2 billion gain in the first three months of the year. That could mean companies will keep tighter control on the number of goods on hand this quarter, which could cut into economic growth. Or it might mean companies are optimistic about sales.

Consumer spending rose at a 2.5% pace last quarter, which also topped expectations, and more than double the 1.2% advance in the first quarter of 2014, in part due to less spending on healthcare. Purchases of durable goods, including autos, furniture and appliances and recreational vehicles, jumped at a 14% annualized rate, the fastest since the third quarter of 2009. Despite the pick-up in consumer spending, Americans saved more in the second quarter. The saving rate increased to 5.3% from 4.9% in the first quarter as incomes rose, which bodes well for future spending.

Corporate spending on structures, equipment and intellectual property such as software increased at a 5.5% annualized rate after rising at a 1.6% pace in the prior three months. In addition to consumer spending and business investment, growth got a boost from the biggest gain in state and local government expenditures in five years. Congress is still debating spending for infrastructure improvements such as roads and bridges, and if they can’t work out differences that could prove a stumbling block later in the year. A widening trade gap subtracted 0.6% from growth. Excluding inventories and trade, so-called final sales to domestic purchasers climbed at a 2.8% rate, the biggest increase since the third quarter of 2011.

Still, the big swing from negative 2.1% contraction to positive 4% growth seems like a very big swing, almost freakish. We know that the first quarter was hit by bad weather and the polar vortex …, still. So, we can smooth out the numbers by looking at the full year growth rate; over the past 12 months the economy expanded at a 2.4% rate, pretty much in line with the past 3 years; in fact, 2.4% growth would be decent in normal times, but the economy is still in recovery mode, and 2.4% is not enough to achieve “liftoff”. The economy is headed in the right direction, it is gathering momentum, but it is still operating below potential. By the Congressional Budget Office’s estimates, the level of output reported for the second quarter is still $770 billion below the nation’s current economic potential, or 4.2% below. That implies that the nation still has plenty of room to grow if a faster expansion ever kicks in.

The economy is far from perfect, we have a long way to go, but today’s report indicates progress, real, honest to goodness progress.

A price index in the GDP report rose at a 2.3% rate in the second quarter, the quickest in three years, after advancing at a 1.4% pace in the prior period. A core price measure that strips out food and energy costs increased at a 2.0% pace, the fastest since the first quarter of 2012. The inflation picture should lend support to the Fed hawks who want to hike interest rates sooner rather than later, but for now the Fed is standing pat.

The Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee reaffirmed it was in  no rush to raise interest rates, even as it upgraded its assessment of the economy and expressed a level of comfort that inflation was moving up closer to its target, and the taper is  still on track. The Fed has kept overnight rates near zero since December 2008 and has more than quadrupled its balance sheet to $4.4 trillion through a series of bond purchase programs. The Fed announced, as expected, that it would reduce its monthly bond purchases to $25 billion per month, but it gave no indication that recent signs of stronger economic growth had changed its previously announced plan to hold short-term interest rates near zero well into 2015.

The Fed acknowledged both faster economic growth and a decline in the unemployment rate, but expressed concern about remaining slack in the labor market. The Fed’s statement said: "Labor market conditions improved, with the unemployment rate declining further… However, a range of labor market indicators suggests that there remains significant underutilization of labor resources."

Some Fed officials see evidence that the economy is settling into a pattern of slower growth, and that monetary policy has substantially exhausted its power to improve the situation. They want the Fed to retreat more quickly from its stimulus campaign, fearing higher inflation, or that it will encourage bubbles in financial assets. Fed chairwoman, Janet Yellen, and her allies have taken a more cautious view, arguing that the decline in the unemployment rate appears to overstate the improvement in the labor market, because it counts only people who are looking for work. Yellen expects some people who had been discouraged about their job prospects will return to the labor force as the economy continues to improve, and she has pointed to weak wage growth as evidence that it remains easy to find workers.

More optimism for the economy came in a report from ADP, the payroll processing company; private employers added 218,000 jobs last month, which was down from 281,000 in June. It was the fourth straight month of job gains above 200,000. While ADP’s numbers offered reason to be hopeful, the company’s figures cover only private businesses and often do not track with the government’s jobs report, which will be released Friday.

The ratings agency Standard & Poor’s says Argentina has defaulted after it failed to make a $539 million interest payment due on its discount bonds. The downgrade came late this afternoon as representatives for Argentina and New York hedge funds sought to reach a last-minute agreement on Argentina’s debt. Yet after more than five hours of mediated talks, neither side appeared closer to a deal. Standard & Poor’s lowered its rating on the country’s debt to “selective default”, noting that Argentina had a 30-day grace period following the June 30 scheduled interest payment date to make payment.

This story goes back to 2001, when Argentina defaulted on tens of billions of dollars of sovereign bonds. It later exchanged those bonds for discounted ones with most of its bondholders, but a small group of traders, mainly hedge funds, led by Paul Singer’s Elliott Management refused to take the new bonds, even though they had purchased the discounted bonds after the default, at pennies on the dollar, they demanded full payment, and they have not backed down, and they took it to court in the US.

In 2012 a US federal judge ruled that Argentina could not make payments to bondholders who had agreed to discounted bonds, without paying the holdouts. Argentina appealed and took its case to the United States Supreme Court which rejected the appeal last month. Argentina had until the end of the day to pay the holdouts or risk defaulting for a second time in 13 years.

A federal judge has ordered Bank of America’s Countrywide unit to pay $1.27 billion in penalties for defective mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008. US District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan issued the civil penalty against BofA in the first mortgage-fraud case brought by the federal government to go to trial. A jury in Manhattan found Countrywide liable. The judge determined that Fannie and Freddie had paid Countrywide nearly $3 billion for HSSL loans, but determined that 57% of the loans were of acceptable quality. HSSL refers to a Countrywide loan program called the High Speed Swim Lane, which basically fast-tracked almost any loan; it was also known as a “Hustle” loan.

In today’s decision, Judge Rakoff wrote: “While the HSSL process lasted only nine months, it was from start to finish the vehicle for a brazen fraud by the defendants, driven by hunger for profits and oblivious to the harms thereby visited, not just on the immediate victims but also on the financial system as a whole.”

Separately, Bank of America is reportedly nearing a settlement with the Justice Department to resolve an investigation into its sale of mortgage backed bonds centered on faulty loans the company inherited from Countrywide and Merrill Lynch, which it purchased in 2008. The discussions include how much money will be paid in cash and how much in consumer relief. Potential terms have ranged from $13 billion to $17 billion. The DOJ has been trying to work out a settlement for some time, and was reportedly dissatisfied with a $13 billion deal that included $5 billion in consumer relief. The consumer relief portion of these settlements has typically been an easy out for the banks. The amount of any settlement would come on top of the $9.5 billion the bank agreed to pay in March to resolve Federal Housing Finance Agency claims.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 - How Do you Feel?

How Do You Feel?
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 70 = 16,912
SPX – 8 = 1969
NAS – 2 = 4442
10 YR YLD  - .03 = 2.46%
OIL - .63 = 101.04
GOLD – 4.70 = 1299.80
SILV un = 20.66

How are you feeling? Are you confident? Apparently more people are. The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index increase to 90.9 in July, up from 86.4 in June; it’s the highest level in almost 7 years; it marks a significant rebound from the February 2009 low of 25.3. The people who compile the index say: “Strong job growth helped boost consumers’ assessment of current conditions, while brighter short-term outlooks for the economy and jobs, and to a lesser extent personal income, drove the gain in expectations,” and the improved confidence “suggests the recent strengthening in growth is likely to continue into the second half of this year.”

Home prices dropped in May compared to April. The S&P/Case Shiller composite index of 20 metropolitan areas declined 0.3% in May on a seasonally adjusted basis, its first decline since January 2012. Prices in the 20 cities rose 9.3% year over year, the slowest year-over-year gain since February 2013. The Phoenix area posted a 0.4% increase from April to May, non-seasonally adjusted.

In a separate report form the Commerce Department, home ownership rates dropped to 64.8% in the second quarter from 65% in the first quarter.

A fairly startling report was published today by the Urban Institute and TransUnion, the credit reporting firm, showing more than one-third (35%) of Americans with credit files had debt in collections in 2013. Non-mortgage delinquent debt totals $11.23 trillion. Which sounds like a lot, and it is, but it’s down from $12.68 trillion in delinquent debt in 2009; this includes debts such as credit cards, auto loans, student loans, utility bills, or even a phone bill or gym membership.  The study looked at debts that had been reported to a credit bureau as delinquent, and turned over to collection; that means the debt is at least 180 days old, but it also means the debt can stay on the credit report for up to 7 years, maybe longer. The share of people with debt 30 days past due is about 5.3%. What this means is that when a debt becomes past due, it lingers on a credit report.

The report on delinquent debt may tell us more about debt collection methods than about deadbeat American consumers. It is very easy for a company to turn over a debt to a credit rating bureau or a debt collection company; it is very hard for a consumer to get a debt removed from a credit report, even if the debt is disputed, or in many instances, even when the debt is paid. Consumers filed 204,000 complaints with the Federal Trade Commission last year, up nearly 3% from 2012, even though the amount of delinquent debt dropped. The most common complaint concerned debt collectors that lied about the amounts a consumer owed and the nature of the delinquency.

The European Union has imposed new sanctions on Russia for its involvement in supporting separatists in Ukraine. The US also toughened its sanctions further. The latest American actions took aim at more Russian banks and a large defense firm, but they also went further than past moves by blocking future technology sales to Russia’s oil industry in an effort to inhibit its ability to develop future resources. The Euro Union agreed to restrictions on trade of equipment for the oil and defense sectors, and "dual use" technology with both defense and civilian purposes. Russia's state run banks would be barred from raising funds in European capital markets. The measures would be reviewed in three months. Previously Europe had imposed sanctions only on individuals and organizations accused of direct involvement in threatening Ukraine, and had shied away from wider "sectoral sanctions."

The orchestrated actions on both sides of the Atlantic were designed to demonstrate solidarity in the face of what American and European officials say has been a stark escalation by Russia in the insurgency in eastern Ukraine. Until now, European leaders have resisted the broader sorts of actions they agreed to today.

Though Europe’s commerce with Russia will probably slump because of the sanctions, the measures are expected to hit Russia more severely, especially the restrictions on Russian banks’ ability to raise money in Europe and the United States. European companies have been warning for some time that their earnings could suffer because of sanctions against Russia. Today, the oil company BP warned that sanctions could hurt earnings. BP owns a 19.75% stake in the Russian oil company Rosneft.

We are about halfway through second quarter earnings season. Here are a few of today’s reports:

The pharmaceutical company, Pfizer posted earnings that beat estimates, while revenue dropped; they also said they expect earnings to drop in the third quarter. Merck had a similar story, beating earnings estimates while revenue slipped. United Parcel Service missed profit forecasts, even as profits and revenue were higher than a year ago. Herbalife, the multi-level marketed nutritional supplement company posted weak earnings after the close yesterday; shares were clobbered today. Corning, the glass making company reported a sharp drop in earnings due to acquisition costs; also clobbered.

Twitter reported a net loss of $145 million, or 24 cents a share, compared to a loss of $42 million a year ago. More people used the Twitterverse during the World Cup; revenue was up 124%, but then the users fade away; globally, usage was down 7% from a year ago. Twitter shares have jumped about 30% in after-hours trading. Go figure.

The Federal Reserve FOMC started its two-day meeting today. They will issue a statement tomorrow. The Fed is in the midst of reducing the amount of money it is pumping into the financial system by way of large purchases of mortgage backed securities and Treasuries, a process of tapering the Quantitative Easing. So far, the Fed has reduced purchases from $85 billion a month to $35 billion a month, and tomorrow they are expected to drop that down to $25 billion a month. QE is scheduled to end in October.

Then the Fed will shift their focus to raising its target for short-term interest rates, which have been near zero for more than 5 years. The Fed has already said they will take their time in raising rates. That exit from an accommodative policy is considered dangerous, and today the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, said it could reduce output in the United States by as much as 2% through 2016.

Volatility in the US could ripple through to emerging markets and likewise depress growth, but even worse; cutting growth by as much as 9% in more vulnerable developing countries due to higher interest rates and tighter financial conditions; and then it gets worse, with larger declines coming in time due to lower productivity, weaker trade, and falling commodity prices.

In addition to when the Fed will raise rates, it is also important to consider how high they will raise rates, and if they will wait long enough for liftoff to occur first. Liftoff is when the US economy has regained its strength and momentum and is able to cope with higher rates because of its economic strength. Fear of inflation could prompt the Fed to raise rates before liftoff; there is an even greater chance the Fed will raise rates before emerging markets could bear the burden of higher rates. If the Fed gets it wrong, we could end up stuck in sluggish or permanently lower growth.

Swiss bank UBS and German bank Deutsche Bank have disclosed that they are facing inquiries from the New York attorney general’s office. The UBS inquiry deals with dark pools, or alternative trading platforms, generally used by larger institutional clients such as pension funds and hedge funds, trying to hide orders from public observation. At its core, the dark pools are a form of price manipulation. Deutsche Bank is facing inquiry into high frequency trading and dark pools.

The Financial Times reports: “The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is stepping up pressure on the biggest banks to improve their ethics and culture, after investigations into the alleged rigging of benchmark rates led officials to conclude bankers had not learnt lessons from the financial crisis…

“Fed officials were surprised that some of that reported behavior occurred after the 2008 crisis, leading them to believe bankers had not curbed their poor conduct. To make sure the biggest banks are paying enough attention to ethics and culture, NY Fed bank evaluations have begun incorporating new questions emphasizing such issues. Topics include whether the right performance structure is in place to punish bad behavior, especially when it comes to compensation.”

Well, that is just great, the NY Fed suggests banks pay smaller bonuses when they encounter unethical behavior by the banksters. We’ll file that one under “Cruel and Unusual Draconian Punishment”.

But if you’re really looking for a funny story about banksters, check out the New York Times Dealbook. It seems the banksters are cashing in on advising companies how to do inversion deals to evade taxes. Inversions are behind the recent rash of merger deals in which major US corporations have renounced their citizenship in search of a lower tax bill offshore. It is important to understand that inversion does not in any meaningful sense involve American business moving overseas; all they’re doing is dodging taxes on those profits.

Investment banks are estimated to have collected, or will soon collect, nearly $1 billion in fees over the last three years advising and persuading American companies to move the address of their headquarters abroad (without actually moving).

The leaders in this growing field include Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup; they’ve made hundreds of millions aggressively promoting these transactions to major corporations, arguing that such deals need to be completed quickly before Washington tries to block them. These same banks received hundreds of billions from US taxpayers in the form of bailouts. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates these inversion deals are expected to cost taxpayers nearly $20 billion over the next decade.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014 - Forecasts Are Subject to Change

Forecasts Are Subject to Change

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 98 = 16,906
SPX + 14 = 1956
NAS + 25 = 4362
10 YR YLD - .04 = 2.61%
OIL - .15 = 105.72
GOLD + 5.80 = 1278.50
SILV + .14 = 20.00

The Federal Reserve FOMC meeting wrapped up today. The Fed issued a statement that was almost a carbon copy of the April statement. The Fed said that growth “has rebounded in recent months” and the labor market indicators “generally showed further improvement.” The central bankers noted that business fixed investment had “resumed its advance” after saying that it “edged down” in April. The only negative comment was that the housing sector “remained slow.”

The Fed will hold interest rates steady for now, and probably well into next year; and they will continue to cut back on their large scale asset purchase program by another $10 billion per month. So, starting in July, the Fed will only buy $35 billion in Treasuries and mortgage backed securities.

The Fed statement was generally upbeat: "Economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market conditions will continue to improve gradually. Household spending appears to be rising moderately and business fixed investment resumed its advance."

Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen held a press conference and the topic of inflation was brought up. The feeling is that the Fed wants to see solid signs of recovery, and inflation isn’t a concern; those inflation numbers are just “noise”, according to Yellen. Yellen said: “The data we’re seeing is noisy, inflation is rising in line with expectations.”

 So, when you pay 7.7% more for hamburger, or 4.2% more for milk, or 5.8% more for airline tickets, or 5% more for car insurance; don’t worry, it’s just noise. You might want to wear ear plugs the next time you fill up at the gas station.

Yellen figures the stock market valuations are not out of historical norms, so even though the markets are trading around all-time highs, there are no bubbles forming. And the low volatility is not due to complacency, which is the actual definition of low volatility.

The Fed has been forecasting stronger growth right around the corner, and that is still the long range outlook, but the first quarter threw a monkey wrench into the forecast; blame it on the weather, or whatever. They now forecast GDP to rise 2.1% to 2.3%, down from the 2.8% to 3% forecast in March. Once again, strong growth is just over the horizon, like a carrot dangling just in front of a horse.

The markets just love an accommodative Fed. The S&P 500 hit a record high close, the Dow rebounded for nearly a hundred point gain, bond prices move higher, even small caps got dragged along for the ride.

Recessions are often considered to be over when there have been two quarters in a row of positive growth. The euro zone hit that mark when it squeezed out annualized growth of 0.5% in the third quarter after growth of 1.3% in the second quarter. Not so fast, at least according to economists at the Center for Economic Policy Research; they say the Euro-recession is merely hibernating; growth is still too weak and unemployment too high to declare the recession over.

The research group says that economists and policy makers should look more broadly at other indicators, like the sustainability of growth and unemployment. Joblessness in the euro zone is 11.7%, just below a record. The recession that began in mid-2011 is the longest since the group began keeping track in 1970. A committee of the group said in a statement: “Since early 2013 the euro area has witnessed a prolonged episode of extremely weak growth in economic activity. Labor markets have shown little change over that period.”

The International Monetary Fund is warning that the legal defeat Argentina suffered Monday in its decade-long fight against holdout bondholders could ricochet around the world’s sovereign debt markets, saying: “We are concerned about possible broader systemic implications.”

Last year, the IMF warned that if Argentina lost its case against creditors, the case could set a precedent that gives holdouts outsized power over nations struggling to pay back their debts. That, the IMF warned, could undermine sovereign debt restructurings around the globe. Cutting the amount of debt owed to creditors is a last-chance emergency measure sometimes needed to prevent the collapse of entire economies.

The IMF, the Group of Seven leading industrialized economies and others will have to rethink their reliance on sovereign immunity for getting restructurings done and courts around the globe will be forced to resolve conflicts between the Argentina legal case and their own law on sovereign debt. Financial markets are being forced to write new contracts that avoid complicated fights that leave creditors and borrowers in legal limbo for years.

For its part, the IMF is  reassessing how it handles the debt of countries in crisis. If a country can’t pay its debts, the IMF has traditionally only considered forcing a debt restructuring as a condition for an emergency fund loan. Now, it is considering offering an alternative: extending bond maturities.

In the past the IMF said that while bail-in measures would be voluntary (ranging from rescheduling of loans to bond exchanges that result in long maturities), creditors would understand that the success of such measures would be a condition for continued Fund support for the adjustment measures. Later this week, the IMF plans to post its latest policy musings on the issue.

Meanwhile, lawyers for Argentina say they will meet with hedge funds in New York, later this week to negotiate with hedge funds that held out on a partial payment for bonds. Argentine President Cristina Fernandez Kirchner has labeled the holdout investors "vultures" for picking over the carcass of the broken economy in the wake of the 2001-2002 default. In a televised address to the nation yesterday she said Argentina was the victim of "extortion" by the holdouts, but that she was still open to negotiations and insisted she would continue to pay the more than 90 percent of creditors who accepted the restructuring terms in 2005 and 2010.

Mary Barra, chief executive of General Motors, came under renewed attack today from lawmakers who were not satisfied with the company’s investigation into its delayed recall of millions of cars and challenged her on whether its most recent recalls should have been made earlier.

On congressman produced a string of internal emails from 2005 that showed that one GM employee had experienced a stalling problem in a Chevrolet Impala. The employee said in an email that the Impala she was driving had inexplicably shut off when she hit a bump in the road.

“I think this is a serious safety problem, especially if this switch is on multiple programs,” she wrote in an email to another GM employee. “I’m thinking big recall.”

As early as December 2000, drivers of the Chevrolet Impala and the other newly recalled cars began lodging complaints about stalling with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. That vehicle, however, was not recalled until this week, when the Impala was among 3.36 million cars worldwide recalled for a faulty ignition key. Those vehicles recalled were in addition to the 2.6 million Chevrolet Cobalts, Saturn Ions and other small cars with a defective ignition switch that the automaker has linked to at least 13 deaths and 54 crashes.

Barra testified that she did not believe that recalls were routinely avoided in the past. “If there was a serious safety problem, a recall would have been done,” she said.

In the end, the panel said it would continue to investigate G.M., including the role of safety regulators, and may hold more hearings on the subject.

Send in the drones. Iraq has asked the United States for air support in countering Sunni rebels. General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the US military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave no direct reply when asked at a Congressional hearing whether Washington would agree to the request. ISIS has essentially taken over a major oil refinery in northern Iraq, but the Maliki government says they have not lost the refinery and government troops are still holding on; but if they are holding on, it’s by a thread. The big oil companies are evacuating some of their employees from refineries in the south. Iraqi troops are holding off Sunni fighters outside Samarra north of Baghdad.

The stunning and unexpected victories by the Islamists are very worrisome. In a region that is no stranger to conflict, this one is particularly frightening and has far-reaching consequences, including the threat of spin-off groups similar to ISIS taking root in surrounding nations.

A militarily successful Islamist force straddling over parts of Iraq and Syria will pose a real threat to the security and stability of those countries’ immediate neighbors. Even Syria, where government forces are fighting their own civil war, has offered to send troops to Iraq.

What appears to be the most likely scenario at this point is that the rapid Sunni militant advance is likely to be stalemated at or north of Baghdad. They will probably continue to make some advances, but it seems unlikely that they will be able to overrun Baghdad and may not even make it to the capital. This scenario appears considerably more likely than the two next most likely alternative scenarios: that the Sunni militants overrun Baghdad and continue their advance south into the Shia heartland of Iraq; or that the Shia coalition is able to counterattack and drive the Sunnis out of most of their recent conquests. That’s what the markets are betting on right now, but forecasts are subject to change.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - What Could Go Wrong?

What Could Go Wrong?
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 27 = 16,808
SPX + 4 = 1941
NAS + 16 = 4337
10 YR YLD + .06 = 2.65%
OIL - .30 = 106.60
GOLD un = 1272.70
SILV + .09 = 19.86

The FOMC, the Federal Open Market Committee started two days of meetings today; tomorrow they are expected to announce more of the same. The FOMC is largely expected to taper its asset purchase program by $10 billion to $35 billion. Effective July 1, the Fed is expected to lower its asset purchases to $15 billion in agency mortgage backed securities (MBS) and $20 billion in Treasuries. The Fed is also expected to maintain its current forward guidance language on federal funds rate support; in other words, they will keep telling us that rates might increase sometime next year.

The committee is likely to make some upgrades to its description of the economic outlook in its economic projections. The committee will probably need to reduce its 2014 real GDP growth forecast to take into account the Q1 disappointment, and we can probably expect the committee to reduce its unemployment rate forecast and lift its inflation forecast slightly.

The consumer-price index climbed a seasonally adjusted 0.4% in May from a month earlier. It marked the fastest increase since February 2013 and doubled the pace of economists' forecasts. Excluding food and energy components, so-called core prices increased 0.3%, the fastest pace since August 2011. From a year earlier, core prices were up 2%, the most since February 2013, and now match the Fed's target.

Another inflation measure closely watched by the Fed, the core personal-consumption expenditure, has stayed far below 2%. Inflation at wholesale level unexpectedly dropped by 0.1% in May, but remember the PPI rose 0.6% in April, so this is just a leveling out process. Wage pressure remains stubbornly low and consequently, the pace of the economic growth remains uneven. In May, the real average hourly wage fell 0.2%. Real wages have fallen three straight months even as inflation has picked up slightly.

The average hourly wage for a typical American worker registered just $10.28 in May, adjusted for inflation and measured in constant dollars. The real hourly wage totaled $10.31 in June 2009, the last month of the 2007-2009 recession. This is part of a trend that stretches back about 30 years.

Still, with core prices up 2% on an annual basis, the Fed will need to address the topic of inflation tomorrow. Let’s hope they also mention the lack of wage gains.

Another report today shows housing starts posted a bigger-than-forecast 6.5% decline. Housing starts declined to an annual rate of 1 million units last month from 1.07 million in April. What’s more, permits for new construction fell by 6.4% in May to a 991,000 annual pace, the slowest in fourth months.

The situation in Iraq is still bad. The ISIS rebels are about 40 miles north of Baghdad and seem intent on the idea of attacking the capitol city. Or they might attack the major source of revenue for the ruling government, and that means oil. One of three major oil refineries has now fallen under control of ISIS; the other two are in Baghdad and the south and not considered to be threatened at this time. About 2.5 million barrels of oil a day are exported from Basra, Iraq’s main port, located in the south.

The world consumes about 92 million barrels a day, so that would be a major disruption, and it would not be surprising to see prices jump; with price levels increasing along with the severity of the given scenario, running anywhere from a few dollars per barrel to a worst case of $200 a barrel.

Not too long ago, Iraq was claiming that it would be producing 12 million barrels a day by 2017. That now seems a little too optimistic.  At best, the ISIS rebellion guarantees that any potential additional Iraqi oil output gains are not going to materialize in the near future. No oil companies are going to invest in Iraq until and unless the situation stabilizes.

Although the consequences for Iraqi oil production of what has happened so far appear to be minimal, all this comes at a time when the earlier and still ongoing conflicts in Libya and Syria have already disrupted nearly 2 million barrels a day in world oil production. If Iraq’s recent 3 million barrels a day was also taken out, we would be talking about a significant disruption in world oil supplies, and likely an oil price in excess of $150 a barrel.

The worst case scenario sees a regional conflict break out that pits the Middle East’s Shiites (Iran) against the Sunnis (Saudi Arabia), leading to a compromise of the Strait of Hormuz. Forty percent of the world’s exported oil is transported through this waterway.

And if that isn’t enough, focus you attention on Ukraine. Yesterday, Russia announced it was cutting off natural gas shipments to Ukraine; today an explosion destroyed one of Ukraine’s main pipelines for gas headed to Western Europe.

EU-brokered talks failed to reach a compromise between the countries, which remain far apart on a “fair” price for gas. Ukraine’s state-run gas operator filed a suit in an international arbitration court, claiming $6 billion in overpayment for gas since 2010. Its Russian counterpart filed a suit of its own, alleging unpaid debts worth $4.5 billion on gas delivered since 2009. Until these cases are resolved, Ukraine will receive only gas it pays for upfront, and must not impede the flow of gas destined for the EU, which gets around 15% of its gas via pipelines that pass through Ukraine. There is another pipeline running from Russia directly to Germany, but still, the global energy picture looks less and less stable.

On Friday we reported that Tesla, the electric car company started by Elon Musk, was freeing up its patents, making its technology available to competitors. Now Nissan and BMW are considering negotiations for cooperation on charging networks; basically using and enlarging Tesla’s existing network of 97 charging stations in the US. Nissan already produces the electric Leaf and BMW last week unveiled the electric i8 in Germany.

So, why design new chargers and invest in building a whole new infrastructure for BMW and Nissan drivers? The Tesla network already stretches from coast to coast and is expected to expand rapidly over the next year. And Tesla leads in battery technology, with a gigafactory planned to start production in 5 years, which will be the biggest battery making facility in the world, producing 500,000 lithium-ion battery packs per year; more than enough for Tesla and its competition.

SolarCity, the largest US installer of residential solar panels whose largest shareholder is entrepreneur Elon Musk, announced that it plans to acquire solar panel maker Silevo and expand into manufacturing with new panel factories, likely including the world’s largest high efficiency solar panel plants in New York. At a conference call announcing the move, Musk said: "We expect to have to install 10 gigawatts [of high-efficiency panels] a year. If you look at the current capacity in the world, we're not able to do that right now."

It's not just a supply question. Solar panel prices have been falling in recent years thanks to a production boom in China; and the panels getting produced, though cheap, aren't terribly efficient and prices have begun bottoming out anyway. Prices might start climbing soon. Government subsidies for renewables start getting phased out in 2016, and the political environment for rebooting subsidies remains unstable at best. Plus, recent moves by the US to slap tariffs on Chinese panels likely served as a catalyst for looking into building the Silevo plant.

According to a study by two professors at the Stern School of Business at New York University and one professor from McGill University, a quarter of all public company deals may involve some kind of insider trading. The professors examined stock option movements, when an investor buys an option to acquire a stock in the future at a set price, as a way of determining whether unusual activity took place in the 30 days before a deal’s announcement. They determined statistically that the odds of the trading “arising out of chance” were “about three in a trillion.” [...] But, the professors conclude, the Securities and Exchange Commission litigated only “about 4.7 percent of the 1,859 M&A deals included in the sample.”

The study also says: “While the SEC has taken action in several cases where the evidence was overwhelming, one can assume that there are many more cases that go undetected, or where the evidence is not as clear-cut, in a legal/regulatory sense.” Plus another finding from the abstract: “Historically, the SEC has been more likely to investigate cases where the acquirer is headquartered outside the US.”

A new survey by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, on behalf of Better Markets, finds voters regard Wall Street and big banks as “bad actors. A 64% majority believes the “stock market is rigged for insiders and people who know how to manipulate the system. Another 55% believes “Wall Street and big banks hurt everyday Americans by pouring money into ’get rich quick schemes’ rather than real businesses and investments. A 60% majority favors “stricter regulation on the way banks and other financial institutions conduct their business” and just 28% oppose. Support for stricter regulations inspires bipartisan support; most notably voters who own stocks are more likely to support stricter regulation than voters overall. And there is urgency in the issue because 83% of voters believe another crash is likely in the next 10 years.

Monday, June 16, 2014 - Manic Monday

Manic Monday
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 5 = 16,781
SPX + 1 = 1937
NAS + 10 = 4321
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.59%
OIL - .12 = 106.79
GOLD – 4.20 = 1272.70
SILV un = 19.77

It’s Monday, and that means mergers. Today’s acquisition news comes from Medtronics, the medical device maker, announcing it will acquire Covidien for nearly $43 billion. Medtronics was founded in a garage in Minneapolis in 1949, but they will change their headquarters to Ireland, which is where Covidien has been headquartered since 2009. Covidien is actually a Massachusetts company, and they operate out of Massachusetts. Medtronics will continue to operate out of Minneapolis; the whole deal is about a lower tax rate, and for Medtronics, the ability to repatriate $20 billion in offshore profits, without paying tax.

Meanwhile, the IPO market remains white hot, and 14 companies will come to market this week. So far this year 124 companies have priced in the US, up 57% from a year ago. Total proceeds raised come to $25.8 billion, up almost 41% from 2013.

Data today showed industrial production climbed more than forecast in May. Output at factories, mines and utilities rose 0.6% after a revised 0.3% drop in April that was smaller than previously estimated. In a separate report, the New York Fed’s Empire manufacturing report rose to 19.28, better than expectations.

The Fed FOMC meets later this week to determine monetary policy. After their meeting concludes Wednesday, Fed officials will release their updated projections for interest rates, growth, inflation and unemployment, and also are likely to trim their bond-buying program by an additional $10 billion a month.

The latest report from the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, might suggest the Fed doesn’t need to be in a hurry to exit a Zero Interest Rate Policy. Of course, the IMF doesn’t set Fed policy, but the latest IMF forecast for the US economy cuts the outlook for growth to 2% from the 2.8% predicted back in April; the lower forecast is mainly a result of the weakness in the first quarter. The IMF kept if 2015 forecast unchanged at 3%. The forecast says the economy is starting to rebound but will remain below historical averages as the population ages and productivity growth slows. Their forecasts show we won’t return to full employment until the end of 2017, with inflation remaining low.

The IMF suggests the US raise the minimum wage as one way to boost the economy; other suggestions include more spending on infrastructure and education, plus changing parts of its tax system, including boosting the federal gasoline tax and reinstating the tax credit for research and development, to help spur growth. In the future, policymakers should also reform corporate taxes, introduce a carbon tax and move toward a federal value-added tax.

IMF Director Christine Lagarde says the oil shock that could result from the current tension in Iraq might affect the economy but for that to happen, the shock would have to be rather deep and rather long-lasting. You’ll probably start seeing the price increase at the pump, as prices hover just below $107 a barrel. And oil prices are being whipsawed by the headlines; if we see fighting in Baghdad, we could easily see prices pop up to $120 a barrel.

Iraq, excluding the Kurdish region, holds 150 billion barrels in proven crude reserves, the world’s fifth-biggest deposits. A pipeline from the Kirkuk region to Turkey has been shut down since March, and now Kurdish troops are defending the Kirkuk oilfields from ISIL rebels. Even if the rebels are turned back, the Iraqi government in Baghdad may have a hard time displacing Kurdish troops in the future.

Meanwhile, Ukraine said Russia cut natural gas supplies after demanding fuel payments be made in advance, the first time shipments have been affected in this year’s crisis in relations between the two countries. Tensions escalated over the weekend with 49 servicemen killed when pro-Russia fighters shot down an aircraft.

British climate change economist Lord Nicholas Stern says our current models “grossly underestimate” the economic damage that will be wrought by climate change. In 2006 Stern wrote a scientific paper that estimated the externalized costs of burning fossil fuels will impact the world economy by five per cent to 20 per cent of global GDP, which would work out to between $2.3 trillion and $9.1 trillion each year. Now, Stern says he “got it wrong on climate change; it’s far, far worse.”  So, Stern and a colleague, Simon Dietz just published a new preliminary paper that makes a few key updates, and now Stern believes that “climate change is the greatest markets failure the world has ever seen.”

The old model looks at any point in time, measures the economy’s productive capacity, and then gauges how much climate change will dampen that productivity in that moment. But climate change can also reduce that productive capacity itself. Stronger storms can damage infrastructure; sea level rise can force people to abandon homes, businesses or equipment; and climate damage can channel more investment into repairs and away from creating new capital. Stern and Dietz account for that, and the result is a double hit: at any given moment, the effects of climate change are reducing the economy’s ability to produce wealth, but they’re also reducing the economy’s overall capacity to produce wealth at future moments.

Other factors in modeling climate change’s economic effects are what scientists call “tipping points”; moments when global warming kicks off feedback loops in the planetary ecology that cause the effects to speed up. Examples of tipping points include the polar ice melting in a way that results in sudden huge collapses rather than gradual melting; or melting permafrost in the northern hemisphere releasing underground methane that in turn speeds up global warming even more. They can also include second-order social effects that damage economies: drought and food scarcity kicking off wars or mass refugee movements, for instance.

June is a big month for the Supreme Court and several major rulings are expected in the next few weeks, and some cases have already been decided.

Last Thursday, the Supremes announced opinions on only two of the 22 cases it has in front of it: POM Wonderful v. Coca-Cola which deals with whether a company can sue another one for unfair competition based on false or misleading product descriptions; and Clark v. Rameker, which weighs whether individual retirement account (IRA) inheritance can be exempted from Chapter 7 bankruptcy under the “retirement funds” exemption.

In the POM case, the court ruled that POM, a company that makes pomegranate juices, had the right to sue Coca-Cola for falsely advertising one of its juices as being made mostly of pomegranate and blueberry juice when it was actually made of apple and grape juices. POM, which makes a special pomegranate-blueberry juice blend, claimed it lost sales as a result of Cola-Cola’s false labeling. The ruling reversed a decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which essentially said POM lacked the legal standing to sue because of a conflict with state and federal law.

In Clark v. Rameker, the court ruled that IRA inheritance funds do not meet the “retirement funds” exemption and must be included as part of the estate in the bankruptcy process. Because an IRA is intended for the retirement of the person who originally put the funds into the account, and an inherited IRA functions essentially as a fund that can be used at any time and not just for retirement, the exemption does not apply.

Today, the Supreme Court handed Argentina two major defeats in cases brought by bondholders who refused to accept reduced payments after the country’s 2001 default. The Supremes decided against hearing Argentina’s appeal of an order requiring it to pay holders of defaulted notes from 2001 when making payments on its restructured debt. The next payment on those bonds comes due June 30. Shortly after the first decision, the Supremes handed down another ruling allowing the bondholders to issue subpoenas to banks in an effort to trace Argentina’s assets abroad.

The inaction by the Supreme Court is a victory for the minority of investors, led by a hedge fund controlled by billionaire Paul Singer, who have refused to exchange their defaulted bonds for about 30 cents on the dollar. Argentina calls those investors “vultures” because they bought many of the bonds post-default at a discount, angling to eventually collect a windfall; in other words, they bought the bonds for pennies on the dollar, refused to accept 30 cents on the dollar, and the Supremes say they now must be paid the full face amount of the bonds.

In response to today’s decisions, lawyers for Argentina wrote: “Since Argentina lacks the financial resources to pay the holdouts in full (what would amount to $15 billion) while also servicing its restructured debt to 92 percent of bondholders, Argentina will have to face, objectively, a serious and imminent risk of default.”

Argentina claimed that lower-court rulings misread Argentina’s bond agreements and violated its immunity as a sovereign nation. In court filings, the Argentine government has said it would comply with lower-court rulings. But in public pronouncements, Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has vowed not to pay a group of creditors she has referred to as “predators.”

Also today, the Supremes dealt a rare blow to the gun lobby Monday by ruling that purchasers must report when they are buying firearms for other people.

Other rulings expected this week might include Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, which deals with whether a for-profit company has to provide contraceptive care for its employees if the owner has a religious objection, even though the employees are entitled to it through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.

Also, American Broadcasting Company v. Aereo, which should be of interest if you watch TV over the internet. Aereo is a Web startup company that allows consumers to pay an $8 or $12 subscription fee to watch their local TV networks live on any Internet-connected device. The major broadcasters say this amounts to theft of their product.

And a couple of cases that deal with the Fourth Amendment: Riley v. California, and United States v. Wurie; both cases are about whether the police have to obtain a warrant to search an individual's cellphone when an arrest is made.