Jobs Report Friday and Aiming Higher
by Sinclair Noe
DOW + 30 = 16,452
SPX + 1 = 1878
NAS - 15 = 4336
10 YR YLD + .05 = 2.79%
OIL + 1.00 = 102.56
GOLD – 9.50 = 1341.90
SILV - .51 = 21.03
SPX + 1 = 1878
NAS - 15 = 4336
10 YR YLD + .05 = 2.79%
OIL + 1.00 = 102.56
GOLD – 9.50 = 1341.90
SILV - .51 = 21.03
This is a jobs report Friday. Here’s
what you need to know. The economy added 175,000 net new jobs in February; this
topped estimates of 150,000. The unemployment rate moved higher to 6.7%, up from
6.6% in January. After two months of very bad jobs reports, we returned to just
below average levels of 189,000 per month; not a great showing but not ugly. The
December and January reports were revised higher by 25,000 jobs. So why did the
unemployment rate go up?
The labor pool got bigger; more people were looking for
work. The ranks of the short-term unemployed declined by 61,000 to 2.3 million,
while the ranks of the long-term
unemployed jumped by 200,000 to 3.85 million, and the labor participation rate
held steady at 63%, just above the generational low of 62.8% in December. That
seems to be a discrepancy, but the unemployment rate is based on a separate
survey of households from the one that tracks hiring by employers, and the
household survey showed an increase of 264,000 in the labor force. The
participation rate is still well below the range of 66% to 67% where it had
been for the past 20 years or so.
The unemployment rate went up slightly because that
264,000 gain swamped an increase of 42,000 in the number of people who were
employed in the survey, but was positive over all because it showed more people
are looking for work. And in the age group of people we expect to be working, the
25 to 54 year olds, participation rate increased in February to 81.2% from
81.1%, and the 25 to 54 employment population ratio was unchanged at
76.5%.
Last month 10.5 million people were unemployed; including
3.8 million who have been out of work for six months or more; while 5.5 million
have moved to retirement, intentional or not; and 3 million are disabled and
the number of people applying for Social Security disability benefits has
spiked in recent years. Even though February saw more people returning to the
labor force, the percent of the population working or looking for work remains
near a 30-year low due to millions of dropouts during the recession. One of the
consequences of long-term unemployment is the loss of job skills, or for
younger workers, they never really develop job skills and may face a lifetime
of lower wages.
Most of the jobs, 162,000 were in the private sector. State
and local governments have been doing a bit of hiring, adding 19,000 jobs last
month, while the federal government continues layoffs, cutting 6,000 jobs. Private
sector payroll employment has now posted gains for 48 consecutive months and with
businesses adding about 8.7 million jobs over that time, private sector payroll
is almost back to the previous peak back in January 2008; just another 130,000
more to go; although that does not account for population growth. So, there’s a
good chance private employment will be at a new high next month. And total employment
will probably be at a new high before the end of summer.
State, local, and federal government had 32,000 fewer
jobs than one year ago. This marks the 56th consecutive month, going back to
July 2009, that government employment was down on a year-over-year basis,
excluding the temporary jobs added for the 2010 census. If you count them, the
string is 43 months, going back to August 2010. Still, by a wide margin, this
is the longest string of government job cuts since the end of World War II. Governments
now employ 15.9 percent of all Americans who have jobs. That is the lowest
proportion since 2001.
The one area of improvement in government jobs seems to be
coming from state governments because their finances are improving. While local
government payrolls are holding steady, state-level payrolls have increased for
seven consecutive months, pulling the number of jobs back up to 2011 levels.
The main sources of new jobs have been education and healthcare.
An alternate measure of employment, the U-6, includes
underutilized workers; the U-6 came in at 12.6%, down from 12.7%, and the
lowest level since November 2008. There are still 7.2 million people working
part-time for economic reasons; because they can’t find full-time employment or
their hours have been cut back.
Once again the report highlighted the deeply uneven
nature of the recovery in the jobs market. The unemployment rate for white
people was 5.8%, for African Americans it was 12%, and Hispanics 8.1%, and unemployment
for teenagers was 21.4%. Of the 175,000 new jobs last month, 99,000 went to
women. Over the 12 months through February, women’s nonfarm employment rose by
1.07 million jobs, half of the total US gain of 2.16 million. A couple of years
ago, women accounted for just 37% of annual job gains.
Here is the full breakdown of "young vs old"
jobs since December 2007: those 55 and older have gained 4.9 million jobs.
Those under 55 are still some 3.1 million jobs below their December 2007 level.
The quality of jobs has been a big concern for some time,
however in February, white-collar professions including accounting, bookkeeping
and consulting led the gains, as the professional and business service sector
gained 79,000 jobs. Here’s the catch; one-third of the professional jobs were
temporary jobs. Blue-collar hiring was
more muted with the manufacturing sector adding 6,000 positions and
construction gaining 15,000. Retailers cut 4,100 jobs as a 12,000 gain in food
and beverage stores was offset by a 12,000 decline in electronics and appliance
stores. The leisure and hospitality sector added 25,000 jobs.
Average hourly earnings rose 0.4%, or 9 cents to $24.31
per hour; bringing the year-over-year gain to 2.2%; not much but a gain. The
average workweek fell to the lowest level since January 2011, which might be
due to the bad winter weather, but the weather-sensitive construction sector
added 15,000 jobs last month. We know that the household survey took place
during a week of storms in the northeast. The Labor Department also reported
that 601,000 people in the household survey said they could not get to work
because of the weather last month, nearly double the number who typically said
that in February on a historical basis. So, weather had an effect, but at some
point we just move beyond the weather excuse.
One interesting point about hours worked and hourly wages
is that we can try to normalize this data by looking at average weekly
earnings. In February, this number dropped slightly to $682.65 from $683.74.
So, hourly wages were up very slightly
and hours worked were down a little, and it might be easy to explain this as
weather related, but then we look at
average weekly earnings over the past
year, which would not be weather related, and earnings grew just 1.3%, which is
the weakest earnings growth in 5 years.
The 175,000 net jobs added in February extrapolates to a
pace of 2.1 million jobs a year, squarely within the long-term range. So we
have a tepid jobs recovery; just enough to call it a recovery, not enough to
call it a good recovery, not enough to instigate action to make it better, and
not enough to see the virtuous cycle of job growth that feeds on its own
strength.
It will likely be good enough for the Federal Reserve to
put taper on auto-pilot. They will continue to trim back monthly bond purchases
by $10 billion at their next FOMC meeting later this month. Yesterday, William
Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, suggested that it
would take either a recession or an economic miracle to shift the Fed from its
course.
Back in December, then-Fed head Ben Bernanke justified the
taper as a program that was intended to foster job growth and that job growth
was on track, so the work of QE bond buying was accomplished. Many Fed
policymakers are still concerned about inflation, even though we’ve had more
disinflation of late; and their thinking is they need to be properly positioned
to raise rates if they need to battle inflation; before they could raise rates,
they want to be out of the bond buying business.
Since the last quarter of 2012, nominal hourly wage
growth has increased from 1.5% to the current 2.2%, while inflation has
decreased from just under 3% to about half that pace now. That means that most
regular workers were losing ground as price growth exceeded hourly wage growth;
that seems to be changing now; wage growth is just a little more than
inflation. That’s good but then we consider weekly earnings growth, which is
around 1.3% annualized, workers are still losing ground to inflation, or at
best – flat. So, this is not a reason to fear inflation, nor is it a reason for
the Fed to raise interest rates.
The Fed’s target for unemployment is 6.5%, which doesn’t
really sound like full employment. It wouldn’t be bad to do better; to get the
unemployment rate below 6.5%; we really shouldn’t worry about the inflationary
pressures of a tighter job market, in part because we haven’t seen any
inflationary pressures, even though we are getting close to the target. Of course,
the Fed may have limited ability to help on the jobs front. It would be nice to
see more fiscal policy aimed at creating jobs. Inflation has not been an issue
at all. The public debt has also not been an issue at all, and attempts to cut
spending have been completely counterproductive and damaging to the short and
long-term health of the economy.
Real wage gains for low and middle income workers would
be a good thing. If people can start to get ahead, just a little, from their
hard work, they are likely to take a more active role in the economy and that
might mean we could eventually see some momentum in the economy. In other
words, we still need to aim higher.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.