Monday, July 07, 2014 - Small Steps

Small Steps

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 44 = 17,024
SPX – 7 = 1977
NAS – 34 = 4451
10 YR YLD - .03 = 2.62%
OIL - .67 = 103.39
GOLD - .50 = 1321.00
SILV - .10 = 21.15

It was a long holiday weekend that was over way too fast. And the problems of the world haven’t gone away. Let’s get caught up on some of the big stories.

In Iraq, the situation is deteriorating. There had been muted hope for some sort of an inclusive government to hold the country together. Don’t count on it. Iraq’s new parliament has called a recess and they won’t meet again for 5 weeks. So Iraq is now politically paralyzed. Meanwhile, a Sunni Islamist insurgency killed an army general near Baghdad.  It looks like Prime Minister Maliki is digging in his heels, raising the risk that Iraq will fragment along ethnic and sectarian lines.

ISIS, the Sunni insurgents are holding territory in western Iraq and just north of the capitol. The Iraqi military, backed by Shi'ite militias and volunteers, has yet to take back any major cities but is trying to advance on Tikrit. Kurds in northern Iraq have taken advantage of the chaos to expand their autonomous territory in northern Iraq. Most Sunnis and Kurds walked out of the last parliament, saying they believed the prime minister and president should be chosen along with the speaker as a package, not one at a time. They could not resolve the impasse, so the acting speaker postponed the meeting.

In eastern Ukraine, pro-Russian rebels built barricades in the streets of Donetsk and it looks like they will try to make a stand. Although most shops and businesses in Donetsk were still open, some were shut, and residents are concerned that government forces could soon attack. Rebels have been barricaded into government buildings in Donetsk, which they declared capital of an independent "people's republic", but until now the city mostly functioned normally.

You may recall there was an election in Afghanistan last month. They announced preliminary results today. The losing presidential candidate is now saying the results of the election were improperly counted and he is describing it as a “coup” against the people. His rejection of the election results sets the stage for a possible bloody standoff between ethnic groups or even secession of parts of the fragile country, which is already deeply divided along tribal lines. The vote to pick a successor to Hamid Karzai was intended to mark the first democratic transfer of power in Afghan history, a crucial step towards stability as the US prepares to withdraw the bulk of its troops by the end of the year. Not so great.

Hamas stepped up rocket fire at southern Israeli towns and Israel called up reserve troops today in anticipation of a possible escalation of hostilities. Hamas has vowed revenge for what it saw as Israel's deadliest attacks in which six Palestinian militants died, though Israel denied any involvement. The surge in violence has raged since the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli youths last month and a Palestinian teen last week. Israel said more than 40 rockets were launched as militants' funerals were held in Gaza. Thirty struck inside Israel and the rest were shot down by rocket interceptors. Air raid sirens wailed as far north as the outskirts of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

And then there’s Chicago, where the Fourth of July holiday resulted in widespread violence that left 80 people wounded and 14 dead.

On the economic calendar, Alcoa will kick off the earnings reporting season after the close of trade tomorrow. Alcoa has long held the ceremonial role for starting earnings season because it was in the Dow Industrials and it had the ticker symbol AA. Alcoa is no longer one of the Dow 30 stocks, but the tradition holds. Actually, we’ve already seen about 25 companies from the S&P 500 report earnings.

Second-quarter profit growth is expected to come in at 6.6% for the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, which would be an improvement over the 5.6% growth in the first three months of 2014. Revenues are expected to grow 3%. While negative second-quarter profit warnings have outpaced positive ones by a 4.2 to 1 margin — well above the 2.6 to 1 negative-to-positive ratio since 1995 — the future outlooks from CEOs are far more bullish than the first quarter, when there were nearly 7 negative profit pre-announcements for every positive one.

With stocks at all-time highs and no longer cheap after a five-year bull run, Wall Street wants to see companies deliver profit and revenue growth in the coming second-quarter earnings season sizable enough to warrant the market’s big move. Indeed, the bull market’s continued health will hinge on vibrant corporate profitability. Whether or not stocks continue trending higher will likely depend on second-quarter earnings reports, as well as management’s guidance of full-year earnings.

Currently, the S&P 500 is trading at nearly 16 times its estimated earnings over the next four quarters, which is a tad above the long-term average. Heading into the season, analysts are upbeat, with more analysts’ raising profit forecasts than lowering them for the first time since the first quarter of 2012, but more upbeat analysts could result in a more downbeat market reaction.

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will release the minutes of its last meeting, held June 17-18. Wall Street will again be looking for any clues related to the timing of the first interest rate hike by the Fed. After the strong jobs report Thursday, some Wall Street firms revised their rate-hike timetables, warning that rates could start rising earlier-than-expected next year. However, the Fed might not be so positive about jobs. There’s been concern about the degree to which a falling unemployment rate is overstating labor-market strength.  You’ll likely see general agreement that the labor market has been improving, but there will be difference in opinion about the drop in the unemployment rate. Officials have also been eyeing tepid wage growth.

That’s one of the strange things about the jobs report; it does a poor job of measuring the strength of the jobs created. When we try to measure performance in the stock market, we don’t look at the number of new stocks available to investors, instead we measure the price of the stocks, the value of the stocks. But when we look at jobs, we don’t look at the value those jobs bring. One of the things we’ve seen is that many of the jobs being created are part-time.

So, it's interesting that the recent news of job market "improvement" doesn't mention that of the 10 occupation categories projecting the greatest growth in the next eight years, only one pays a middle-class wage. Four pay barely above poverty level, and five pay beneath it, including fast food workers, retail sales staff, health aids, and janitors. The job expected to have the highest number of openings is "Personal Care Aide" – taking care of aging baby boomers in their houses or in nursing homes. The median salary of an aid is under $20,000.

We’re starting to see some improvement as the job market gains traction; more than half the jobs the economy has added so far this year are in positions that pay higher than the hourly wage. Some 58% of the new jobs created in 2014 pay above the average hourly wage of $24.45. By contrast, about 48% of the new jobs created in 2013 paid above the national average. Businesses in 2014 are hiring more white-collar employees, construction is on the mend (at least compared to the first quarter), health care is going strong and even the long-downtrodden financial industry is finally getting into the act. About 42% of the new jobs, meanwhile, fall into categories that pay less than the average wage.

Still there is a general lack of upward wage pressure; workers demanding more money as the labor market improves and the pool of potential employees shrinks. Wages have risen just 2% over the past year and weekly wages have actually fallen in the past two months. Part of the problem is part-time work; part of the problem is that the good paying jobs are limited to certain sectors. The bigger problem is that the increase in the number of jobs is not translating to higher wages and that, in turn does not translate to faster economic growth.

This week’s economic calendar also includes reports on small businesses, job turnover, and consumer credit. There was a 10.2% surge in consumer credit in April. The growing dependence on debt could prolong consumer spending a few more months, but in the absence higher real wages, this type of consumption cannot last much longer, certainly not if we see both gas prices and inflation-driven interest rates edge higher later this year.

It’s unlikely we’ll get any big pronouncements from the Fed. They probably talked about how the economy has rebounded from the terrible slump of the 1^st quarter, but if you read the minutes for any major move on interest rates, don’t hold your breath. Neither short-term nor long-term rates will go significantly higher in the next few years. More likely, modest increases that might even be quickly reversed. The implications of another extended period of depressed rates would be bad news for savers and pension funds, but it should help the stock market.

After the Fed’s June meeting, they made clear that they expected to finally begin lifting their benchmark rate in 2015, if the economy continues to expand and unemployment continues to decline. Even so, 12 of the 16 members of the policy committee expected the Fed's rate to be no higher than 1.5% by the end of 2015 — a full 18 months from now. Asked for their rate prediction for the end of 2016, the majority of the Fed panel expected 2.5% or less. And because the Fed's rate influences all other interest costs, that would suggest still-low rates across the board.

What we are learning about this version of the Fed is they move slow and in small steps.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013 - Fed Minutes, Fed Conundrum

Fed Minutes, Fed Conundrum

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 66 = 15,900
SPX – 6 = 1781
NAS – 10 = 3921
10 YR YLD + .09 = 2.79%
OIL - .01 = 93.33
GOLD – 32.40 = 1243.80
SILV - .49 = 19.95

The Federal Open Market Committee, Federal Reserve policy makers, met October 29-30, and to no one's surprise they did not change monetary policy. Today, minutes of that meeting were released. The policy makers “generally expected that the data would prove consistent with the Committee’s outlook for ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and would thus warrant trimming the pace of purchases in coming months.”

They think the economy is improving, despite the government shutdown and ongoing political dysfunction, the economy is getting better and the FOMC is considering how and when they can exit Quantitative Easing; they would like to scale back $85 billion per month in purchases of Treasuries and mortgage backed securities without triggering a rise in interest rates that could slow economic growth and wipe out gains in the labor market. That is not to say they are ready to raise their Fed Funds target for interest rates. That target has been right at zero and will likely remain at zero for at least a year or more.

They want to get out of the bond buying business without the market noticing, and independently pushing interest rates higher. It'll be a fine trick if they can pull it off.

In a speech to the National Economists Club, Ben Bernanke said: "I agree with the sentiment, expressed by my colleague Janet Yellen at her testimony last week, that the surest path to a more normal approach to monetary policy is to do all we can today to promote a more robust recovery," and he says, "The FOMC remains committed to maintaining highly accommodative policies for as long as they are needed."

Exactly how long the accommodative policies will remain in place is the $85 billion dollar question; the market is now guesstimating the Fed won't taper till March or maybe January. The idea is that they will wait for signs that the economy is strong enough to finally reach escape velocity. We're not there yet.

The National Association of Realtors reported that home re-sales fell 3.2 percent last month from September to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 5.12 million. That's down from a 5.29 million pace in September and the slowest since June. A healthy pace is around 5.5 million. Sales of single family homes declined 4.1 percent, while condominium sales rose 3.3 percent. The median sales price of an existing home was $199,500 in October, up 12.8 percent from a year earlier and the 11th straight month of double-digit annual increases.

The 16-day partial government shutdown pinched home sales last month by creating uncertainty about the economy and slowing loan approvals: 13 percent of real-estate agents reported that transactions had been delayed. Now, that might just mean that sales were postponed, and they'll pick up in the next report, or it might signal a plain old slowdown.

The Fed's bond purchases have kept long-term interest rates low. Mortgage rates are still low by historical standards, but interest rates began to rise in late May on speculation the Fed would slow its bond purchase program. Add to that the idea that many younger potential home buyers, or first time buyers saw the carnage of 2006 and 2007 and they just aren't interested. In this past month's report, first time buyers accounted for 28% of sales, down from around 40% in healthier housing markets.

Cash purchases made up 31 percent of October's sales. This might indicate that the Fed's easy monetary policy has only been easy between the Fed and the banks. So, this gets right to the Fed policy makers' conundrum; how can they withdraw easy money from the markets without creating a slowdown; if the Fed stops buying mortgage backed securities, that would almost certainly make it even tougher to get a mortgage and the housing market would surely suffer.

One idea is to counter any taper of asset purchases by reducing the interest rate on funds that banks keep on deposit with the Fed. That's right, the Fed not only buys mortgage backed securities from the banks, but then they pay the banks to keep funds on deposit with the Fed, essentially discouraging the banks from taking the money and lending it out in the community and into the economy. This is something that might be a small step, worth considering, but the reality is that any Fed taper from QE will be met with a taper tantrum, and for now the Fed doesn't want to rile the markets.

This is not to suggest the economy is horrible; the Fed's assessment of a growing economy was reinforced with a report this morning that consumer spending rose in October, despite the shutdown, and suggesting upside momentum heading into the fourth quarter. Retail sales excluding automobiles, gasoline and building materials increased 0.5 % last month after advancing 0.3% in September. Overall retail sales rose 0.4% after being flat in September. Core retail sales last month were bolstered by gains in receipts at clothing, furniture, electronics and sporting goods shops, among others. Sales at electronics and appliance stores rose by the most since April.

Meanwhile, the Labor Department reported that inflation is a bit less than optimal; the Consumer Price index dipped 0.1% last month as gas prices dropped, after rising 0.2% in September; this was the first decline in 6 months. In the 12 months through October, the CPI increased 1.0%, the smallest gain since October 2009.

Stripping out the volatile energy and food components, the core CPI edged up 0.1%, rising by the same margin for a third consecutive month. Over the past 12 months, the core CPI increased 1.7%, matching the previous month's rise. A reminder that the Fed targets inflation at 2%; that's the level they want; less than 2% indicates a greater concern that disinflation could lead to deflationary pressures. All the more reason for the Fed to continue with its easy money policies.

The other target, or guidance, offered by the Fed is that they will stick with easy money until the unemployment rate hits a target of 6.5%; in last night's speech, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke, indicated that it is still a target but it doesn't mean that if the target is hit, it will automatically change anything. Bernake said:

“In the judgment of the Committee, the unemployment rate--which, despite some drawbacks in this regard, is probably the best single summary indicator of the state of the labor market--is sufficient for defining the threshold given by the guidance. However, after the unemployment threshold is crossed, many other indicators become relevant to a comprehensive judgment of the health of the labor market, including such measures as payroll employment, labor force participation, and the rates of hiring and separation. In particular, even after unemployment drops below 6-1/2 percent, and so long as inflation remains well behaved, the Committee can be patient in seeking assurance that the labor market is sufficiently strong before considering any increase in its target for the federal funds rate.”

Bernanke went on to say:

“When, ultimately, asset purchases do slow, it will likely be because the economy has progressed sufficiently for the Committee to rely more heavily on its rate policies, the associated forward guidance, and its substantial continued holdings of securities to maintain progress toward maximum employment and to achieve price stability. In particular, the target for the federal funds rate is likely to remain near zero for a considerable time after the asset purchases end, perhaps well after the unemployment threshold is crossed and at least until the preponderance of the data supports the beginning of the removal of policy accommodation.”

The Dow just skirted 16K and virtually the entire run-up of the stock market is based on one thing, and one thing only, the Fed pumping money into the markets.  That is it, that is all.  Since the market bottom the market has more than doubled, but jobs aren’t even close to recovering as a percentage of the population, Europe is still in crisis, and oil prices are still ludicrously high. You cannot have profits higher than actual productivity increases plus inflation plus population increase.  Anything more than that is not profit, it is fraud, underinvestment in real capital or it is diverting future profits to the present.

 The problems the economy has cannot be fixed by giving more money to banks and rich people and attempting to turn the housing market into a cash cow again. The economy requires targeted spending, to get off oil, to break up the big banks and other oligopolies, to open up the economy to actual competition, and to increase the pricing power of labor and reduce the pricing power of employers while making sure they don't run up against supply bottlenecks.  It does not require giving money to people who will simply use that money for more leveraged financial plays or to bury bad assets on balance sheets at mark to make believe.

To the extent a market works it must be regulated to be competitive, and assets must not be allowed to pile up in a few hands.  Financial profits cannot be allowed to be higher than non-financial profits, and the labor market must be tight, so that people are free to move away from jobs they hate (if your employees hate their jobs they should either be very well paid because the job is absolutely necessary, or it shouldn’t exist at all.) And the employees who are actually working need enough to actually live on. Did you hear about the Wal-Mart in Ohio that held a Thanksgiving food drive – for their own employees?

Whatever the Fed is doing or thinking about doing, the first step should be acknowledgment that the trickle down wealth effect from the housing market and the stock market is limited, very limited. As for the stock market, it is in fantasy land, entirely a creature of the Federal Reserve, almost completely divorced from the actual economy. Of course, the stock market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. 

Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - QE Soon, Inequality Grows

QE Soon, Inequality Grows
- by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 30 = 13,172
SPX + 0.32 = 1413
NAS + 6 = 3073
10 YR YLD -.09 = 1.72%
OIL - .28 = 96.40
GOLD + 15.50 = 1655.10
SILV + .50 = 29.93
PLAT + 26.00 = 1541.00

The Federal Reserve released minutes of their most recent Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Here’s the money quote from the FOMC minutes: “Many members judged that additional monetary accommodation would likely be warranted fairly soon unless incoming information pointed to a substantial and sustainable strengthening in the pace of the economic recovery.”

In other words, a majority of the FOMC members think it is time for QE3, unless we see an economic miracle, say hallelujah! So, when will they make an announcement? Well, there is a symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming on August 31. There is another FOMC meeting September 12 and 13. The language in today's minutes is not a guarantee of QE3, but if they do not make an announcement of QE3, then the lack of action will be interpreted as highly political and obstructionist. They have now obligated themselves to some sort of accommodation; it might not be called QE3, but a rose by any other name...

The economy is ready for help; GDP is growing at less than 2%; inflation is running less than 2%; unemployment is lingering at 8.3%; Europe could implode and hurt the US economy. So, what will happen when the Fed provides additional monetary accommodation? Kansas City Federal Reserve President Esther George thinks more easing won't work. She asks: “Is there anyone not borrowing today or purchasing a house because interest rates aren’t low enough? Do we expect that businesses will hire if their long-term rates are lower?”  And of course, the answers are no and no. 

That means the Fed had better go big, real big. Extending their zero interest rate policy another year is not enough. Revisiting the tired old bond buying program of QE 1&2 will likely fall flat. Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren thinks the new accommodation should be open-ended, with no specific time frame. How about adding a reduction in interest paid to member banks to park money with the Fed? What other tricks does the Fed have up its sleeve? If they have more tools in the toolbag, why haven't they used them? What are they waiting for? 

We have known and we have told you the Fed would have another round of accommodation; the only question was when. We now know the answer is sooner rather than later. 

There are, of course, limits to the efficacy of monetary policy. The Fed can't rescue Americans from the  fiscal follies of a dysfunctional Congress, hell bent on cliff diving. The Congressional Budget Office issued a fresh warning today on the fiscal cliff. They say the economy will grow at a 2.1% clip in 2012, but fall by 0.5% between the fourth quarter of 2012 and the fourth quarter of 2013 under the fiscal cliff scenario. If Congress can't get its act together, the unemployment rate will rise from 8.3% to 9.1%. Of  course, that is the worst case scenario for the fiscal cliff; that is when the politicians can't find any common ground, all the tax cuts expire and all the automatic spending cuts take effect. It could happen that way. If Congress manages to avoid the fiscal cliff altogether, then the CBO sees the economy growing by 1.7 percent next year and unemployment drifting lower to 8 percent. There is actually a solution that involves some tax increases and some spending cuts and life is beautiful and easy. 

It could happen.

I have a dream.

A new report from the Pew Research Center shows inequality increasing, the middle class shrinking and wealth concentrating at the top. Surprise, surprise.

The study shows that for the roughly 50 percent of adults defined as middle class, with household incomes ranging from $39,000 to $118,000, the past ten years were the "worst decade in modern history," as income dropped for the first time since the end of World War II.

Most middle class Americans say they have been forced to reduce spending in the past year; fewer now believe that hard work will allow them to get ahead in life. Families are now more likely to say their children's economic future will be the same or worse than their own. In all, 85 percent of middle class Americans say it is more difficult now than a decade ago to maintain their standard of living. 

In 1970, the share of income that went to the middle class was 62 percent, while wealthier Americans received 29 percent. But by 2010, the middle class earned just 45 percent of the nation's income, tying a low first reached in 2006, compared to 46 percent for upper-income Americans. 

Since 2000, the median income for America's middle class has fallen from $72,956 to $69,487.Median net worth for the middle class fell 28 percent over the last decade, from $129,000 in 2001 to $93,000, wiping out two decades of gains. Among upper-income families, net worth edged higher from $569,000 to $574,000. Lower-income families saw net worth fall 45 percent to $10,000. 

Roughly 42 percent of middle-class adults say their household's financial situation is worse now than before the recession began, compared to 32 percent who reported they are now better off and 23 percent who said their finances are unchanged. Of those who said they were worse off now, about 51 percent said it will take at least five years to recover, including 8 percent who said they will never recover.

Who's to blame?  By a wide margin, 62 percent say the blame lies with Congress. About 54 percent blame  banks and financial institutions, while 47 percent say large corporations, 44 percent point to the Bush administration, 39 percent cite foreign competition, and 34 percent find fault with the Obama administration. About 8 percent say the middle class itself deserves a lot of the blame.

One area where the middle class was hammered in the past few years was real estate; the dream of home ownership turned into an underwater nightmare. The National Association of Realtors reported today that July sales of existing homes increased to an annual rate of 4.47 million. They say the housing market is constrained by unnecessarily tight lending standards and shrinking inventory supplies. So, it is stabilizing but not close to normal. 

Public pension funds from Arkansas, Ohio, Oregon and Sweden will be lead plaintiffs in a group lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase over trades made by Bruno Iksil, also known as the London Whale. A district judge in New york ruled the lawsuits could be consolidated into a class action. The lead plaintiffs are the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Ohio Public Employee Retirement System, School Employees Retirement System of Ohio, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund and a Swedish pension fund. The pension funds allege they lost as much as $52 million because of fraudulent activities by JPMorgan’s London chief investment office, and that they were given false information that hid the nature of the bank's trades.