Roll
With It
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 58 = 12,756
SPX – 5 = 1374
NAS – 20 = 2883
10 YR YLD -.02 = 1.59%
OIL -.20 = 85.37
GOLD – 3.90 = 1725.90
SILV +.08 = 32.60
SPX – 5 = 1374
NAS – 20 = 2883
10 YR YLD -.02 = 1.59%
OIL -.20 = 85.37
GOLD – 3.90 = 1725.90
SILV +.08 = 32.60
Both
sides in the "fiscal cliff" debate stood their ground today
as they gathered in Washington for the first time since the
elections. It's a high stakes game of chicken. The
White House made clear it was ready to negotiate with Republicans on
taxes and spending, but a spokesman for President Obama said he will
not budge on insisting that the wealthy's tax rates must rise in
2013. The president wants to extend low individual income tax rates
beyond year's end for 98 percent of Americans. On the Senate floor,
Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said his party was open to
discussing new government revenues, but not raising tax rates.
Groups
concerned with protecting entitlements such as Social Security and
Medicare are finding themselves at odds over whether an overarching
fiscal deal during Congress’s end-of-year session would help or
hurt their cause. A “grand bargain” to prevent the year-end onset
of tax hikes and spending cuts “could cut Social Security, Medicare
and Medicaid benefits, all to give tax cuts to the wealthiest
Americans.” I seriously doubt Republicans have the clout, following
the elections, to make a full-on attack against the entitlement
programs. In fact, it seems the only one who could attack the social
safety net programs is President Obama.
He
may have been convinced by Wall Street that it is necessary to begin
to unravel the safety net in order to save it. But the result would
be to declare open season on the safety net by legitimizing the
claims that the safety net is unsustainable and harms the nation.
Wall Street's greatest frustration is that they have been unable to
unravel or discredit the safety net. Wall Street's unholy grail is
privatizing Social Security.
Wall
Street salivates at the prospect of any privatization of social
security. This would be the Mississippi River of cash flow. This
would lead to them being able to charge tens of billions of dollars
in fees annually. The banks that administered the privatized program
would be Too Big to Fail; the new term is SIFI, or "systemically
important financial institution." If privatization takes place,
these SIFIs would not just be a threat to the financial system but to
the very fabric of the country because the consequences of allowing
bank failures to cause tens of millions of Americans to lose their
retirement savings would require either that all such deposits be
federally insured or that the failing banks be bailed out by the
federal government. Privatization, therefore, is a convenient
fiction. The banks' profits will be private; any catastrophic losses
will be borne by the public. We've seen this story
before, and it didn't end well.
There
is either going to be a big betrayal or a big showdown on the
horizon. We've seen that story before; it happened in 2011 with the
debt ceiling debacle; we survived that one because they kicked the
can down the road; it happened twice in the 1990's and the government
was shut down for a while; we survived those. This might turn into a
big battle; let's roll.
This
story is still playing out in Europe. The latest news from the
Euro-group meeting is euro-zone finance
ministers agreeing to extend Greece’s fiscal adjustment period by
two years but deciding to put off until next week final decisions on
the disbursement of the next Greek bailout tranche and the method to
make the country’s debt sustainable.
Apparently,
the Grand Plan in Europe is to make debt sustainable, not to
eliminate debt, not to build a righteous circle of growth and
prosperity, but rather sustainable debt. Just enough debt to make
sure millions of people faced with desperation will keep paying the
debt and won't take desperate measures in retaliation.
Meanwhile,
German Chancellor Angela Merkel visited Portugal where the mood has
darkened. Portugal faces a general strike on Friday and the
government there might be losing its resolve for deepening austerity.
Spain's
largest banks say they've agreed to a 2-year freeze on evictions of
homeowners in extreme financial need. The decision by the Spanish
banking association followed the suicides of two homeowners facing
eviction and a subsequent public uproar. Public uproar in Spain is
probably one of the most under-reported stories of the year.
Spaniards take to the streets, and there have been rallies of more
than one million people. You don't hear about that because, well,
they wouldn't want you to get any bright ideas.
Societies
in a credit based world tend to favor rules that protect the debtor -
the risk is always there of 1-2% of the population going mad and
making debt peons out of everybody else. This is the great social
evil everybody was afraid of throughout history — people would fall
so deeply in debt they'd sell their wives, their children and
themselves into slavery. The American situation isn't that different,
we just rent ourselves out instead of selling ourselves into slavery
- the ancient Greeks would not have noticed that much of a
difference. So they set up some mechanism to make sure things didn't
go crazy and everything broke down and one of these mechanisms was
jubilee. The Mesopotamians used to do this, they'd say "ok, all
debts are canceled, all the debt peons go home." In the Bible
it was a fixed rule, every 7 years and every 49 years. And nothing
bad happened, the economy kept right on growing.
Here's
a bright idea. Banks sell debt for pennies on the dollar on a shadowy
speculative market of debt buyers who then turn around and try to
collect the full amount from debtors. Some of the tactics of debt
collectors are downright ruthless, the phone calls can be full-on
harassment, sometimes they try going through the courts; there have
been examples of people who don't pay a utility bill; the debt is
sold off; the debt collectors place a lien on the home and there have
been people who lose their homes for an unpaid utility bill. If you
have never had an unpleasant experience with a debt collector,
consider yourself lucky because most people have. There may be an
answer, and it is coming from the Occupy movement. Yep, they're still
out there. The idea is called The Rolling Jubilee, and they intervene
by buying debt, keeping it out of the hands of collectors, and then
abolishing it.
Rolling
Jubilee has already raised $115,000 — which they say is enough
money to buy and cancel more than $2.3 million of debt. If you want
to find out more or even donate, the website is strikedebt.org.
Here's how they explain it: As individuals, families, and
communities, most of us are drowning in debt to Wall Street for the
basic things things we need to live, like housing, education, and
health care. Even those of us who do not have personal debt are
affected by predatory lending. Our essential public services are cut
because our cities and towns are held hostage by the same big banks
that have been bailed out by our government in recent years.
Now,
they don't buy out any one individual's specific debt, instead they
buy up pools of debt, usually more than a few months delinquent, and
then they just forgive the debt. There are no tax consequences. The
Rolling Jubilee will earn no income from the lending of money and is
therefore exempt from filing a Form 1099-C under the Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050P. You do not have income from canceled debt if the
cancellation or forgiveness of the debt is a gift. What’s more,
Strike Debt won’t report the cancellation to the IRS, and the
debtor will probably not know that their debt has been forgiven.
Given all that, the chances of the IRS coming after the debtor for
income tax on the forgiven debt are exactly zero.
Strike
Debt is trying to build what it calls “a growing collective
resistance to the debt system” — and this exercise is part of
what you might consider a broad politically-motivated deleveraging, a
way of taking power back from the creditor classes. The scheme isn't conceptually perfect: as Strike Debt themselves say, the very fact
that they can buy up debt for pennies on the dollar in the first
place is “part of the scandal that we are trying to highlight”,
and yet it’s also something they are ratifying with their
participation. At some point, the Rolling Jubilee will likely
end up paying banks for debts which aren't legitimate at all:
indeed, if they’re looking for the debt which trades at the lowest
levels on the pennies-per-dollar market, they’re likely to be
buying the most dubious debts.
For
instance, it’s alleged that Chase systematically shredded incoming
correspondence such as records of borrower payments and
counter-judgments extinguishing debts, before selling those debts on
to collectors. Just at Chase alone, it's estimated that billions of
dollars of outstanding claims have highly questionable legitimacy. Of
course, the banks know that some percentage of their loans will go
bad, and, especially in the case of credit card debt, they will often
have made a net profit on the account long before they sell off the
dregs for 5 cents on the dollar. But even if the banks aren't being
hurt at all, it might put a dent in the debt collection business, and
that is a start.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.