Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - Hype is Hurting

Hype is Hurting

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 9 = 16,560
SPX – 3 = 1933
NAS – 12 = 4389
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.44%
OIL - .15 = 97.22
GOLD + .60 = 1309.50
SILV - .10 = 20.02

The Dow Industrial Average has now gone negative year-to-date. Seven of the 10 main groups in the S&P 500 declined, with energy companies dropping 0.7 percent to lead the slide as Brent crude settled at the lowest level since July 2013. The International Energy Agency said a supply glut was shielding the market against threats in the Middle East.

As we wrap up earnings season, 73% of companies have beaten earnings estimates, slightly above the 1-year average of 72%, but “beating estimates” this time doesn’t mean what it did in recent quarters. For the past few years, analysts have ratcheted down their estimates in the run-up to earnings season, setting the bar lower and lower—and setting up an easy beat. Companies are beating by an average of 4.2%, above the 1-year average of 3.2%. Q2 earnings growth is 8.4%, up from an expected 4.9% on June 30. This is the second-highest earnings growth rate since Q4 2011. Revenues are now up for 5 consecutive quarters and at all-time highs, and it now looks like revenues might be driving earnings. The strongest sectors for upside earnings surprises have been telecom services, health care (especially biotech), and information technology; while consumer staples is the weakest. US banks and thrifts had their second best quarter in 2 decades, with more than $40 billion in net income.

Profit margins have soared. Net profit margins more than doubled from 4.6% in March 2009 to 9.8% at the end of the first quarter. Margins could come in just shy of 10% when all the second-quarter results are in. The problem is that high margins tend to mark a peak rather than a normal level of profitability. In other words, it’s tough to keep the margins high, and there are several reasons: most of the fat has been cut and it is difficult to further improve labor efficiencies and that’s confirmed by last week’s productivity report showing that the real output of nonfarm business has been hovering around 3% year to year since Q2-2010, consistently higher than real GDP growth; capital spending has been low, but is likely to rebound; and with interest rates near all-time lows, companies will find it difficult to find better financing to boost margins. As margins stagnate or slip, the best defense is to look for companies that are growing revenues.

Actually, the best defense might be to discount analysts’ expectations; something that Wall Street is doing with greater frequency. The problem is that analysts issue glowing earnings growth expectations for the next few quarters, based on pro forma estimates, minus the bad stuff, and heavily adjusted; which in turn drives up share prices. Traders buy in. As the distant quarters get closer and closer, the analysts ratchet down expectations, making for a bar that is easy to hurdle, and again the traders buy in.

In its latest report on earnings expectations and reported earnings, FactSet found a startling change in how the market reacts to these fabricated earnings beats. Over the past five years, companies with upside earnings surprises saw their stock prices rise on average 1% from two days before the announcement to two days afterwards; and downside earnings surprises were punished with a 2.3% decline in stock price over the four-day window. So far in the second quarter earnings season, companies have been crushing earnings, and the market is languishing. FactSet found that this time around the market didn’t reward these juicy earnings surprises at all. Stocks of these companies actually dropped 0.1% over the four-day window. And downside earnings surprises got hit with a 3% decline. The hype is hurting.

The share of unemployed Americans competing for each open job hit a six-year low in June. The Labor Department's monthly Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, or JOLTS report, showed the number of unemployed job seekers per open job fell to 2.02 in June, the lowest level since April 2008. Job openings, a measure of labor demand, increased to a seasonally adjusted 4.67 million in June, the highest level since February 2001. At the same time, hiring reached its highest point since February 2008. Much of the increase in employment growth since the 2007-2009 recession ended had been driven by a sharp decline in the pace of layoffs, as opposed to a higher rate of hiring.

Job growth has topped 200,000 in each of the past six months, a stretch last seen in 1997. The unemployment rate has declined to 6.2 percent from 6.7 percent at the end of 2013. The JOLTS report shows some of the slack is coming out of the labor market, and the next sign of a tightening labor market is if we start to see wage growth. Meanwhile, a gauge of small businesses’ intentions to hire has also surged to a fresh post-crisis high, with 13% of respondents to a survey by the National Federation of Independent Business indicating their intentions to hire. That’s the largest percentage since September 2007. The problem is they aren’t actually hiring. The JOLTs hiring rate is nowhere near as buoyant as the job opening rates. The US hiring rate, hires as a share of total employment, hit 3.5% in June. You might expect businesses to intend to hire before they actually hire, but there is also a disconnect; and it might be in a skills mismatch or it might be in a wages mismatch.

During the Great Recession and its aftermath, the federal government acted to help victims of the severe downturn by funding programs that extended unemployment benefits—to up to 99 weeks in some cases, up from the standard 26 weeks. As the economic recovery continued, weak as it was for many in the working class, many lawmakers on the right began to believe that these extended benefits were a drag on employment—the theory being that government checks reduced the incentive for recipients to find a job, and that cutting off this lifeline would compel unemployed workers to look harder for work and perhaps take jobs they may not have accepted if the benefits had continued. Relying on this premise, Congress allowed the federally-funded Emergency Unemployment Compensation program to lapse last December.

Now, more than seven months later, data are available to test this idea. Coming from perspectives that diverge greatly along the ideological spectrum, scholars at both AEI and EPI, the Economic Policy Institute and the American Enterprise Institute, a couple of think tanks at opposite ends of the spectrum, have come to the conclusion that this “bootstraps” theory is incorrect—curtailing jobless benefits did not boost employment. Because unemployment benefits are contingent upon the people who receive them proving that they are looking for a job, receiving jobless benefits appears to make recipients at least just as likely, and certainly not less likely, to rejoin the ranks of the employed.

The US budget deficit was $95 billion at the end of July, down 3 percent from the same period last year. The fiscal year-to-date deficit at the end of July was $460 billion, the lowest level since the same period in fiscal year 2008, compared with a deficit of $607 billion for the same period in fiscal year 2013.

The National Association of Realtors released metro area home-price data for the second quarter, and it looks like growth in home prices is slowing, especially in the East. Nationwide, the median existing single-family home price in the second quarter was $212,400, up 4.4% from the second quarter of 2013. The median existing home price for the Phoenix area is $198,600, up 8.6% from one year ago.

The inventory of all existing homes for sale rose 6.5 percent in June from a year earlier to 2.3 million, an increase from a 13-year low of 1.8 million in January 2013. That’s a 5.5-month supply at the current sales pace, less than the six months that is considered equilibrium between buyers and sellers. Breaking it down further, inventory tightened at the market’s low end and grew at the top. The number of U.S. homes for sale in the bottom third of the market -- below $198,000 -- fell 17 percent in June compared with a year earlier, according to a Redfin analysis of 31 large U.S. metropolitan areas. The supply was up 3 percent in the middle market and jumped 15 percent at the top. The rising inventory of more expensive properties is giving a boost to sales. At the bottom of the market, first-time buyers, even those with the credit, savings and income to overcome tougher underwriting requirements, must face off against other bidders. First-time purchasers accounted for 28 percent of all sales of previously owned homes in June, down from about 40 percent historically.

A funny thing happened in New York yesterday; Manhattan prosecutors filed criminal charges against a dozen payday lending companies and their owner, accusing them of making payday loans that defied New York's limits on interest rates, or usury laws. The defendants in the case tried to cover their tracks with a maze of offshore corporations, to make it look like they weren’t doing business in New York. Under New York state law, the maximum interest rate that can be charged is 9 percent annually and the general usury limit is 16%, with a bunch of exemptions. The defendants in this case are accused of charging between 300% and 700% interest. Remarkably, most states still have usury laws on their books, but not all. In Arizona the legal rate of interest is 10%.

You may very well have a credit card that charges more than 10%, and the reason that is not considered usury is federal court decisions and statutes have virtually exempted credit card companies by allowing them to charge customers, regardless of their state of residence, the interest rates allowed by the state in which they are incorporated. This means that there are no limits on credit card interest rates in practice, even if certain limits remain on the books, the only exception being the 18 percent interest limit for federally chartered credit unions. And so it is a very rare event when anyone faces a criminal charge of usury.

Tuesday, July 09, 2013 - What's It All About?

What's It All About?

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 75 = 15,300
SPX + 11 = 1652
NAS + 19 = 3504

10 YR YLD -.01 = 2.63%
OIL + 1.38 = 104.52
GOLD + 13.40 = 1251.70
SILV + .18 = 19.36

It's earnings reporting season. The stock market is feeling happy for the moment. Second quarter earnings are expected to be soft, but expectations have been ratcheted down, so there is potential for upside surprises. That's the game that's played on Wall Street to siphon a little bit of trading profit. Anywhere else, they'd call it price fixing.

But this game of diminished expectations may have some basis in reality. The top line numbers more than likely suck. Analysts expect the 30 companies in the Dow Industrial Average to see revenue growth of just 0.7%; that number could be ratcheted down into negative territory; that follows a 0.6% drop in revenue in the first quarter.

What do you call it when there are two consecutive quarters of economic contraction? Recession. That's a bit of a non sequitur, but the logical conclusion is not too far removed from the premise. After all, we're talking about 30 of the biggest, most powerful companies in the world and they are struggling to grow sales. They're still reporting profits, but that comes from cost cutting, which tends to fall on the labor force. There are limits to cost cutting as a business strategy for growing profits.

No worries. The S&P 500 closed above 1650 and looks poised to make a run at those record highs of May; remember the days of milk and cookies, before Bernanke started talking about taper. Well tomorrow the minutes of last month's FOMC meeting will be released, and we'll see if they're still talking taper, and we'll see if the markets can remain exuberant if the Fed is still talking taper.

Of course the Fed looks at more than just the headline unemployment rate, even if they have set a target of 6.5% based upon that rate. They also look at broader views of the labor markets. After all, the Fed will make its decision based on the outlook for labor markets, not what happened a month ago. One such report, know as “Jolts” looks at job openings and labor turnover. In May, businesses posted more job openings and gross hiring also picked up. But the rates remain well below those seen before the most recent recession.

May also saw a small increase in job separations. A sizeable part of the gain in separations came from people quitting their jobs. That’s a positive for the labor market outlook since workers tend to give notice only when they are confident they will quickly land another job.

Before you think that is overly optimistic, the Conference Board employment trend index, a compilation of job indicators designed to foreshadow changes in nonfarm payrolls, edged up a mere 0.05% in June. Its growth rate for the second quarter moderated. The report said that suggests “acceleration in the employment growth is unlikely in the near future.”

Part of the problem is that for every job opening, there are 3 people looking for a job, and since people aren't really leaving their current jobs, because of the tight labor market, that means people aren't moving up; they aren't leaving a job for a better job. The ratio of unemployed workers to job openings is the highest in the 13 years the BLS has been collecting the data. Not coincidentally, most of the industries with the highest numbers of job openings in May, according to the JOLTS data, were lower-paying sectors, including health-care services, retail sales and restaurants.

Another consideration in the jobs market is that one of the most consequential effects of the sequester began just this week: weekly unpaid furlough days for more than 650,000 civilian workers at the Defense Department, who will effectively see their pay cut by 20 percent for the  final 11 weeks of this budget year. A little back-of-napkin math shows 20% of 650,000 jobs is kind of like losing 130,000 jobs.

All the commissaries at domestic military installations will be closed every Monday through the end of September. (Most agencies within the department have decided to salve the economic sting a tiny bit by setting the furloughs on Mondays and Fridays, so that workers might at least enjoy a series of long weekends.)

But the visuals of closed cafeterias, equipment maintenance sheds, supply warehouses, payroll offices and the like will have absolutely no effect on the pace of congressional effort toward untangling the budget morass. Whatever work is taking place on that score is totally out of view. And none of the congressional leadership is suggesting this will change before Congress returns from its August recess a full week after Labor Day, when there will be 23 days left before this fiscal year gives way to the next.

Some agreement on spending will need to get done by then to forestall a partial government shutdown, which is in neither party’s political interest to permit. Odds are that the first month or so, at a minimum, will be covered by a temporary patch in the form of a continuing resolution that keeps agencies spending at their across-the-board budget cut levels.

But any longer-term agreement already seems destined to be delayed until the end of the year, by which time the debt ceiling will also be nearing. And if they can't find agreement, then the budget would require layoffs – probably a mix of civilian, active-duty military, National Guard and Reserves.

As expected, the IMF cut its forecast for world economic growth for the third time this year. The IMF now expects global output to expand by 3.1%, down from 3.3% forecast in April, and down from 3.5% forecast growth back in January. The revision means the global economy will have failed to pick up pace over the past two years, although the IMF expects a slight acceleration in growth in 2014 to 3.8%, subject to revisions, of course.

The IMF said: "While old risks remain, new risks have emerged, including the possibility of a longer growth slowdown in emerging market economies." They pointed to the slowdown in China which is also affecting emerging markets such as Brazil and South Africa; also, the ongoing slowdown in the Euro-zone. One country that is expected to show growth – Japan, which should see growth of 2%, up from earlier forecasts of 1.6%, due to the success of Abenomics.

The FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency are proposing raising the leverage ratios on the largest US banks to 5% from the 3% agreed upon by international regulators as part of Basel III. The insured bank subsidiaries of those firms would be subject to a 6% leverage ratio to be considered well-capitalized. That basically means the banks would have to hold a little more in the way of reserves.

While the proposed changes would not take effect until 2018 if finalized, the rules as proposed represent the latest attempt by regulators to address lingering concerns that certain large, complex banks remain too big to fail. Of course, that still leaves a 5 year window, and considering the extreme leverage, it is doubtful that a 5% cushion could save us from a bank crash, but it's a start I suppose.

FDIC staff said market perceptions that certain banks would be protected by the government poses a threat to the financial system, allowing these firms to obtain cheaper funding and eliminating checks on excessive risk taking by the banks. The banks don't want to be forced to hold more reserves, even if it would mean they are a bit safer. And the reality is that it would not make them much safer. If we really have concerns about too big to fail, we could start by regulating derivatives trading and reinstating Glass-Steagall.

Yesterday, Fortune released its list of the world's 500 largest corporations, ranking them by revenue for the fiscal year ended on or before March 31. In total, the 500 largest global corporations reported $30.3 trillion in 2012 revenue, nearly a 3 percent increase from the year before, with profits of $1.5 trillion. There are 132 US companies on the Global 500 list; China had the second most with 89 companies. Seven of the top ten companies by revenue were in the energy business. Royal Dutch Shell topped the revenue list with $481 billion, followed by Walmart with $469 billion and Exxon Mobil with revenue of $449 billion. Exxon Mobil was the most profitable at $44.9 billion, followed by Apple at $41.7 billion.

Oil closed at $104.52. Fill up the gas tank now.

Thousands of people gathered in Prescott Arizona today to honor the 19 members of the Granite Mountain Hotshot squad who died fighting the Yarnell fire. Vice president Biden lead a list of dignitaries on hand. Biden referred to an old saying: “All men are created equal - then a few became firefighters.”

Over the years I've raised a question from time to time on this program: “What's the economy for?” Why do we get up each day and do the work we do? What is the purpose of our labors? Well, for the Yarnell 19 their mission was to save lives and protect property, and their jobs weren't jobs, but a duty to their fellow citizens. Sometimes I wonder about the purpose of our labors, but I'm quite certain the Yarnell 19 had figured out the right answer.