Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - Hype is Hurting

Hype is Hurting

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 9 = 16,560
SPX – 3 = 1933
NAS – 12 = 4389
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.44%
OIL - .15 = 97.22
GOLD + .60 = 1309.50
SILV - .10 = 20.02

The Dow Industrial Average has now gone negative year-to-date. Seven of the 10 main groups in the S&P 500 declined, with energy companies dropping 0.7 percent to lead the slide as Brent crude settled at the lowest level since July 2013. The International Energy Agency said a supply glut was shielding the market against threats in the Middle East.

As we wrap up earnings season, 73% of companies have beaten earnings estimates, slightly above the 1-year average of 72%, but “beating estimates” this time doesn’t mean what it did in recent quarters. For the past few years, analysts have ratcheted down their estimates in the run-up to earnings season, setting the bar lower and lower—and setting up an easy beat. Companies are beating by an average of 4.2%, above the 1-year average of 3.2%. Q2 earnings growth is 8.4%, up from an expected 4.9% on June 30. This is the second-highest earnings growth rate since Q4 2011. Revenues are now up for 5 consecutive quarters and at all-time highs, and it now looks like revenues might be driving earnings. The strongest sectors for upside earnings surprises have been telecom services, health care (especially biotech), and information technology; while consumer staples is the weakest. US banks and thrifts had their second best quarter in 2 decades, with more than $40 billion in net income.

Profit margins have soared. Net profit margins more than doubled from 4.6% in March 2009 to 9.8% at the end of the first quarter. Margins could come in just shy of 10% when all the second-quarter results are in. The problem is that high margins tend to mark a peak rather than a normal level of profitability. In other words, it’s tough to keep the margins high, and there are several reasons: most of the fat has been cut and it is difficult to further improve labor efficiencies and that’s confirmed by last week’s productivity report showing that the real output of nonfarm business has been hovering around 3% year to year since Q2-2010, consistently higher than real GDP growth; capital spending has been low, but is likely to rebound; and with interest rates near all-time lows, companies will find it difficult to find better financing to boost margins. As margins stagnate or slip, the best defense is to look for companies that are growing revenues.

Actually, the best defense might be to discount analysts’ expectations; something that Wall Street is doing with greater frequency. The problem is that analysts issue glowing earnings growth expectations for the next few quarters, based on pro forma estimates, minus the bad stuff, and heavily adjusted; which in turn drives up share prices. Traders buy in. As the distant quarters get closer and closer, the analysts ratchet down expectations, making for a bar that is easy to hurdle, and again the traders buy in.

In its latest report on earnings expectations and reported earnings, FactSet found a startling change in how the market reacts to these fabricated earnings beats. Over the past five years, companies with upside earnings surprises saw their stock prices rise on average 1% from two days before the announcement to two days afterwards; and downside earnings surprises were punished with a 2.3% decline in stock price over the four-day window. So far in the second quarter earnings season, companies have been crushing earnings, and the market is languishing. FactSet found that this time around the market didn’t reward these juicy earnings surprises at all. Stocks of these companies actually dropped 0.1% over the four-day window. And downside earnings surprises got hit with a 3% decline. The hype is hurting.

The share of unemployed Americans competing for each open job hit a six-year low in June. The Labor Department's monthly Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, or JOLTS report, showed the number of unemployed job seekers per open job fell to 2.02 in June, the lowest level since April 2008. Job openings, a measure of labor demand, increased to a seasonally adjusted 4.67 million in June, the highest level since February 2001. At the same time, hiring reached its highest point since February 2008. Much of the increase in employment growth since the 2007-2009 recession ended had been driven by a sharp decline in the pace of layoffs, as opposed to a higher rate of hiring.

Job growth has topped 200,000 in each of the past six months, a stretch last seen in 1997. The unemployment rate has declined to 6.2 percent from 6.7 percent at the end of 2013. The JOLTS report shows some of the slack is coming out of the labor market, and the next sign of a tightening labor market is if we start to see wage growth. Meanwhile, a gauge of small businesses’ intentions to hire has also surged to a fresh post-crisis high, with 13% of respondents to a survey by the National Federation of Independent Business indicating their intentions to hire. That’s the largest percentage since September 2007. The problem is they aren’t actually hiring. The JOLTs hiring rate is nowhere near as buoyant as the job opening rates. The US hiring rate, hires as a share of total employment, hit 3.5% in June. You might expect businesses to intend to hire before they actually hire, but there is also a disconnect; and it might be in a skills mismatch or it might be in a wages mismatch.

During the Great Recession and its aftermath, the federal government acted to help victims of the severe downturn by funding programs that extended unemployment benefits—to up to 99 weeks in some cases, up from the standard 26 weeks. As the economic recovery continued, weak as it was for many in the working class, many lawmakers on the right began to believe that these extended benefits were a drag on employment—the theory being that government checks reduced the incentive for recipients to find a job, and that cutting off this lifeline would compel unemployed workers to look harder for work and perhaps take jobs they may not have accepted if the benefits had continued. Relying on this premise, Congress allowed the federally-funded Emergency Unemployment Compensation program to lapse last December.

Now, more than seven months later, data are available to test this idea. Coming from perspectives that diverge greatly along the ideological spectrum, scholars at both AEI and EPI, the Economic Policy Institute and the American Enterprise Institute, a couple of think tanks at opposite ends of the spectrum, have come to the conclusion that this “bootstraps” theory is incorrect—curtailing jobless benefits did not boost employment. Because unemployment benefits are contingent upon the people who receive them proving that they are looking for a job, receiving jobless benefits appears to make recipients at least just as likely, and certainly not less likely, to rejoin the ranks of the employed.

The US budget deficit was $95 billion at the end of July, down 3 percent from the same period last year. The fiscal year-to-date deficit at the end of July was $460 billion, the lowest level since the same period in fiscal year 2008, compared with a deficit of $607 billion for the same period in fiscal year 2013.

The National Association of Realtors released metro area home-price data for the second quarter, and it looks like growth in home prices is slowing, especially in the East. Nationwide, the median existing single-family home price in the second quarter was $212,400, up 4.4% from the second quarter of 2013. The median existing home price for the Phoenix area is $198,600, up 8.6% from one year ago.

The inventory of all existing homes for sale rose 6.5 percent in June from a year earlier to 2.3 million, an increase from a 13-year low of 1.8 million in January 2013. That’s a 5.5-month supply at the current sales pace, less than the six months that is considered equilibrium between buyers and sellers. Breaking it down further, inventory tightened at the market’s low end and grew at the top. The number of U.S. homes for sale in the bottom third of the market -- below $198,000 -- fell 17 percent in June compared with a year earlier, according to a Redfin analysis of 31 large U.S. metropolitan areas. The supply was up 3 percent in the middle market and jumped 15 percent at the top. The rising inventory of more expensive properties is giving a boost to sales. At the bottom of the market, first-time buyers, even those with the credit, savings and income to overcome tougher underwriting requirements, must face off against other bidders. First-time purchasers accounted for 28 percent of all sales of previously owned homes in June, down from about 40 percent historically.

A funny thing happened in New York yesterday; Manhattan prosecutors filed criminal charges against a dozen payday lending companies and their owner, accusing them of making payday loans that defied New York's limits on interest rates, or usury laws. The defendants in the case tried to cover their tracks with a maze of offshore corporations, to make it look like they weren’t doing business in New York. Under New York state law, the maximum interest rate that can be charged is 9 percent annually and the general usury limit is 16%, with a bunch of exemptions. The defendants in this case are accused of charging between 300% and 700% interest. Remarkably, most states still have usury laws on their books, but not all. In Arizona the legal rate of interest is 10%.

You may very well have a credit card that charges more than 10%, and the reason that is not considered usury is federal court decisions and statutes have virtually exempted credit card companies by allowing them to charge customers, regardless of their state of residence, the interest rates allowed by the state in which they are incorporated. This means that there are no limits on credit card interest rates in practice, even if certain limits remain on the books, the only exception being the 18 percent interest limit for federally chartered credit unions. And so it is a very rare event when anyone faces a criminal charge of usury.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 - How Do you Feel?

How Do You Feel?
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 70 = 16,912
SPX – 8 = 1969
NAS – 2 = 4442
10 YR YLD  - .03 = 2.46%
OIL - .63 = 101.04
GOLD – 4.70 = 1299.80
SILV un = 20.66

How are you feeling? Are you confident? Apparently more people are. The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index increase to 90.9 in July, up from 86.4 in June; it’s the highest level in almost 7 years; it marks a significant rebound from the February 2009 low of 25.3. The people who compile the index say: “Strong job growth helped boost consumers’ assessment of current conditions, while brighter short-term outlooks for the economy and jobs, and to a lesser extent personal income, drove the gain in expectations,” and the improved confidence “suggests the recent strengthening in growth is likely to continue into the second half of this year.”

Home prices dropped in May compared to April. The S&P/Case Shiller composite index of 20 metropolitan areas declined 0.3% in May on a seasonally adjusted basis, its first decline since January 2012. Prices in the 20 cities rose 9.3% year over year, the slowest year-over-year gain since February 2013. The Phoenix area posted a 0.4% increase from April to May, non-seasonally adjusted.

In a separate report form the Commerce Department, home ownership rates dropped to 64.8% in the second quarter from 65% in the first quarter.

A fairly startling report was published today by the Urban Institute and TransUnion, the credit reporting firm, showing more than one-third (35%) of Americans with credit files had debt in collections in 2013. Non-mortgage delinquent debt totals $11.23 trillion. Which sounds like a lot, and it is, but it’s down from $12.68 trillion in delinquent debt in 2009; this includes debts such as credit cards, auto loans, student loans, utility bills, or even a phone bill or gym membership.  The study looked at debts that had been reported to a credit bureau as delinquent, and turned over to collection; that means the debt is at least 180 days old, but it also means the debt can stay on the credit report for up to 7 years, maybe longer. The share of people with debt 30 days past due is about 5.3%. What this means is that when a debt becomes past due, it lingers on a credit report.

The report on delinquent debt may tell us more about debt collection methods than about deadbeat American consumers. It is very easy for a company to turn over a debt to a credit rating bureau or a debt collection company; it is very hard for a consumer to get a debt removed from a credit report, even if the debt is disputed, or in many instances, even when the debt is paid. Consumers filed 204,000 complaints with the Federal Trade Commission last year, up nearly 3% from 2012, even though the amount of delinquent debt dropped. The most common complaint concerned debt collectors that lied about the amounts a consumer owed and the nature of the delinquency.

The European Union has imposed new sanctions on Russia for its involvement in supporting separatists in Ukraine. The US also toughened its sanctions further. The latest American actions took aim at more Russian banks and a large defense firm, but they also went further than past moves by blocking future technology sales to Russia’s oil industry in an effort to inhibit its ability to develop future resources. The Euro Union agreed to restrictions on trade of equipment for the oil and defense sectors, and "dual use" technology with both defense and civilian purposes. Russia's state run banks would be barred from raising funds in European capital markets. The measures would be reviewed in three months. Previously Europe had imposed sanctions only on individuals and organizations accused of direct involvement in threatening Ukraine, and had shied away from wider "sectoral sanctions."

The orchestrated actions on both sides of the Atlantic were designed to demonstrate solidarity in the face of what American and European officials say has been a stark escalation by Russia in the insurgency in eastern Ukraine. Until now, European leaders have resisted the broader sorts of actions they agreed to today.

Though Europe’s commerce with Russia will probably slump because of the sanctions, the measures are expected to hit Russia more severely, especially the restrictions on Russian banks’ ability to raise money in Europe and the United States. European companies have been warning for some time that their earnings could suffer because of sanctions against Russia. Today, the oil company BP warned that sanctions could hurt earnings. BP owns a 19.75% stake in the Russian oil company Rosneft.

We are about halfway through second quarter earnings season. Here are a few of today’s reports:

The pharmaceutical company, Pfizer posted earnings that beat estimates, while revenue dropped; they also said they expect earnings to drop in the third quarter. Merck had a similar story, beating earnings estimates while revenue slipped. United Parcel Service missed profit forecasts, even as profits and revenue were higher than a year ago. Herbalife, the multi-level marketed nutritional supplement company posted weak earnings after the close yesterday; shares were clobbered today. Corning, the glass making company reported a sharp drop in earnings due to acquisition costs; also clobbered.

Twitter reported a net loss of $145 million, or 24 cents a share, compared to a loss of $42 million a year ago. More people used the Twitterverse during the World Cup; revenue was up 124%, but then the users fade away; globally, usage was down 7% from a year ago. Twitter shares have jumped about 30% in after-hours trading. Go figure.

The Federal Reserve FOMC started its two-day meeting today. They will issue a statement tomorrow. The Fed is in the midst of reducing the amount of money it is pumping into the financial system by way of large purchases of mortgage backed securities and Treasuries, a process of tapering the Quantitative Easing. So far, the Fed has reduced purchases from $85 billion a month to $35 billion a month, and tomorrow they are expected to drop that down to $25 billion a month. QE is scheduled to end in October.

Then the Fed will shift their focus to raising its target for short-term interest rates, which have been near zero for more than 5 years. The Fed has already said they will take their time in raising rates. That exit from an accommodative policy is considered dangerous, and today the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, said it could reduce output in the United States by as much as 2% through 2016.

Volatility in the US could ripple through to emerging markets and likewise depress growth, but even worse; cutting growth by as much as 9% in more vulnerable developing countries due to higher interest rates and tighter financial conditions; and then it gets worse, with larger declines coming in time due to lower productivity, weaker trade, and falling commodity prices.

In addition to when the Fed will raise rates, it is also important to consider how high they will raise rates, and if they will wait long enough for liftoff to occur first. Liftoff is when the US economy has regained its strength and momentum and is able to cope with higher rates because of its economic strength. Fear of inflation could prompt the Fed to raise rates before liftoff; there is an even greater chance the Fed will raise rates before emerging markets could bear the burden of higher rates. If the Fed gets it wrong, we could end up stuck in sluggish or permanently lower growth.

Swiss bank UBS and German bank Deutsche Bank have disclosed that they are facing inquiries from the New York attorney general’s office. The UBS inquiry deals with dark pools, or alternative trading platforms, generally used by larger institutional clients such as pension funds and hedge funds, trying to hide orders from public observation. At its core, the dark pools are a form of price manipulation. Deutsche Bank is facing inquiry into high frequency trading and dark pools.

The Financial Times reports: “The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is stepping up pressure on the biggest banks to improve their ethics and culture, after investigations into the alleged rigging of benchmark rates led officials to conclude bankers had not learnt lessons from the financial crisis…

“Fed officials were surprised that some of that reported behavior occurred after the 2008 crisis, leading them to believe bankers had not curbed their poor conduct. To make sure the biggest banks are paying enough attention to ethics and culture, NY Fed bank evaluations have begun incorporating new questions emphasizing such issues. Topics include whether the right performance structure is in place to punish bad behavior, especially when it comes to compensation.”

Well, that is just great, the NY Fed suggests banks pay smaller bonuses when they encounter unethical behavior by the banksters. We’ll file that one under “Cruel and Unusual Draconian Punishment”.

But if you’re really looking for a funny story about banksters, check out the New York Times Dealbook. It seems the banksters are cashing in on advising companies how to do inversion deals to evade taxes. Inversions are behind the recent rash of merger deals in which major US corporations have renounced their citizenship in search of a lower tax bill offshore. It is important to understand that inversion does not in any meaningful sense involve American business moving overseas; all they’re doing is dodging taxes on those profits.

Investment banks are estimated to have collected, or will soon collect, nearly $1 billion in fees over the last three years advising and persuading American companies to move the address of their headquarters abroad (without actually moving).

The leaders in this growing field include Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup; they’ve made hundreds of millions aggressively promoting these transactions to major corporations, arguing that such deals need to be completed quickly before Washington tries to block them. These same banks received hundreds of billions from US taxpayers in the form of bailouts. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates these inversion deals are expected to cost taxpayers nearly $20 billion over the next decade.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - A Funny Thing Happened

A Funny Thing Happened
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 119 – 16,818
SPX – 12 = 1949
NAS – 18 = 4350
10 YR YLD - .04 = 2.58%
OIL + .81 = 106. 84
GOLD + .70 = 1320.00
SILV + .03 = 21.03

Let’s start with a couple of reports on housing; the Commerce Department says new home sales increased 18.6% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 504,000 units, the highest level since May 2008. The increase in sales was the biggest since January 1992. Compared to May of last year, sales were up 16.9%.

Meanwhile, the S&P/Case-Shiller index of existing home prices rose 0.2% in April; the smallest gain since March of last year, with the year-on-year increase slowing to 10.8%.

Today’s reports seem to indicate a strong new home market and a weak existing home market, but that’s probably not quite accurate. Homebuilders are working through inventory, while existing home inventories are low and starting to rise; for existing homes that means we’ve mainly worked through most of the distressed sales that were out there. The housing market is moving forward modestly, but also in fits and starts.

The Conference Board said its index of consumer confidence rose to 85.2 from 82.2 in May, with optimism about the labor market. June's reading was the highest since January 2008. Consumers think jobs are more widely available. The survey found 14.7% of consumers think jobs are “plentiful,” the best reading since May 2008, while the share characterizing jobs as “hard to get” fell to a three-month low of 31.8%.

While government data showed confidence at January 08 highs, Gallup's latest survey shows, only one in five Americans (22%) say the economy is excellent or good, while 34% say it is poor; and worse still, Americans continue to be less optimistic about the economy's future:  38% say the economy is getting better, while 58% say it is getting worse; the worst differential since 2013. Gallup's US Economic Confidence Index lost another point last week, the third week in a row, dropping to its lowest in over 2 months.

Not much confidence in the equity markets today. I haven’t seen anything earth shattering that would explain why stocks moved from positive to negative territory, and even with the rollover, the major indices still didn’t drop a full percentage point; 119 points ain’t what it used to be. The S&P 500 closed down more than half a percent for its sharpest loss since June 12, after setting a fourth record high in five sessions. Maybe its concern about Iraq, maybe the high frequency traders ran out of shorts to squeeze.

A funny thing happened in Russia today; President Putin appeared to back away from the fight with Ukraine; Putin asked Russia’s upper house to revoke the right it had granted him to order military intervention in Ukraine. At the same time, pro-Russian insurgents in eastern Ukraine shot down a Ukrainian helicopter killing 9 servicemen.

There is no backing off the fighting in Iraq, where a dire situation has gone from bad dream to nightmare in two weeks of fighting that have seen Sunni Muslim gunmen assert control over a growing area, including at least two towns that lie on a crucial supply route linking Baghdad, the capital, with the mostly Shiite Muslim south.

Secretary of State John Kerry urged Kurdish leaders to remain part of Iraq, as fighters from local Sunni tribes wrested control of at least part of Iraq’s largest oil refinery after battling for days with government troops over the key facility. Armed tribal factions from the Baiji area breached the refinery complex 140 miles northwest of Baghdad.  Kerry flew to the Kurdish region on a trip through the Middle East to rescue Iraq following a lightning advance by the Sunni fighters led by jihadis of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. U.S. officials believe that persuading the Kurds to stick with the political process in Baghdad is vital to keep Iraq from splitting apart. Washington has placed its hopes in forming a new, more inclusive government in Baghdad that would undermine the insurgency. Kerry aims to convince Kurdish leaders to join it. Something will likely tip one way or the other in the next week or two.

The spike in instability in several oil producing regions around the world is threatening to knock some production offline, but it is also boosting profits for drillers operating in trouble-free zones. Oil prices have hit their highest levels in almost 9 months as places like Iraq, Syria, Ukraine and Libya continue to experience violence and political upheaval. For companies with heavy investments in these regions, the situation is perilous, but for oil companies elsewhere, the higher price is good news.

Oil markets could be looking at an extended period of elevated prices, which is bad news for companies with billions invested in Iraq. ExxonMobil and BP already started evacuating some of their workers from southern Iraq, despite the fact that militants remain north of Baghdad. But for companies drilling far from the violence – in Texas for example – a $5 per barrel increase in prices can be the difference between whether or not an oil project is economically viable. Oil companies are using the opportunity to step up drilling. The Eagle Ford shale in southern Texas, for example, saw four more oil rigs and one gas rig come into operation over the past week. Across the U.S., the number of oil rigs in use reached 1,545 -- the highest level since record keeping began in 1987.

The Supreme Court has ruled on the case of Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund. Halliburton is trying to block a class-action lawsuit claiming the company inflated its stock price. A group of investors claims they lost money when Halliburton's stock price dropped after revelations the company misrepresented revenues, understated its liability in asbestos litigation and overstated the benefits of a merger.

Writing for the court, Chief Justice John Roberts said companies should have a chance in the early stages of a lawsuit to show that any alleged fraud was not responsible for a drop in the company's stock price. The Supremes did not overturn a precedent setting case that might have ended class action suits completely. The old case is Basic v.  Levinson, and it established the theory of “fraud on the market”, or the idea that shareholders who claim fraud don’t need to show they relied on specific false statements. The theory presumes a company’s false statements inflated its stock price. This seems to make sense; if a company lies about its revenue, lies about its liabilities, lies about the benefits of a merger that will inflate the stock price; but I suppose you could also argue the stock price might be inflated because the economy improves or because algorithmic traders inflated the price or maybe the moon and stars were aligned in a particular way.

The truth is that it is nearly impossible to pinpoint exactly why stock prices go up; but it is possible to identify when a corporation lies about revenues, liabilities, and benefits. The Supreme Court seems to be saying that it’s O.K. for corporations to lie, so long as nobody can prove a direct link between the lies and the share price.

The case now goes back to the lower courts, where Halliburton will have another chance to block the investors from joining together as a class.

Just a reminder, the Sabanes Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act, was supposed set a new standard for all public companies, and top management to certify the accuracy of financial information or face possible punishment of up to 20 years in prison. When President Bush signed it into law he said: “The era of low standards and false profits is over; no boardroom in America above or beyond the law.”

A funny thing happened over the past 14 years: nobody has been convicted of criminal wrongdoing under Sarbanes Oxley, at least as best we can tell. There may have been some civil charges, but the “Justice Department doesn’t directly track Sarbanes-Oxley prosecutions, so there may be another case here or there. Even four or five SOX criminal cases in 10 years, though, makes them as rare as a blue moon.” (see Reuters)

There’s a new report on climate change predicting serious consequences, especially for American businesses. The funny thing about this report is that it comes from a panel chaired by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and hedge fund manager turned climate activist Tom Steyer. It includes devastating forecasts for American companies, including dramatic declines in agricultural yields, loss of productivity due to intense heat and up to $35 billion spent dealing with coastal storms.

Bloomberg said “Climate change is costing governments and businesses billions of dollars,” and he hopes it "will mobilize the business community and forge a consensus for leadership across the aisle." Paulson says he now believes that “climate change is the existential issue of our age." Paulson also penned an op-ed in the New York Times last weekend warning of a "climate bubble" that poses risks to the economy just like the credit bubble did in 2008.

Steyer, a billionaire who has pledged to spend millions electing pro-climate-action politicians, said he hopes that the report will help "change the spreadsheet for American business" as companies calculate risks and opportunities. The business community, he said, should "get to a point where calculation of the value of a company includes how they are responding to this problem."

Tuesday, May 06, 2014 - Quickly Aging Here

Quickly Aging Here
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 129 = 16,401
SPX – 16 = 1867
NAS – 57 = 4080
10 YR YLD  - .02 = 2.59%
OIL + .38 = 99.86
GOLD – 1.80 = 1308.90
SILV - .04 = 19.65

There was a pretty broad selloff on Wall Street today. AIG posted lousy earnings late yesterday, and today they dragged down most of the financials. Twitter proved a drag on the tech stocks. Twitter reached the 6 month expiration of a lock-up period that had restricted sale of about 82% of its outstanding stock. Share prices dropped about 18% today, but home prices in Silicon Valley are likely to move a bit higher in the next month. After the close, Disney posted better than expected earnings.

Let’s start with economic data; the trade deficit narrowed in March, down 3.6% to $40.4 billion. March exports came in at about $193 billion and imports were around $234 billion, resulting in a $40 billion shortfall. Exports are 17% above the pre-recession peak, while imports are about 1% above the pre-recession peak. Exports of capital goods, industrial supplies and materials, and automobiles increased in March. Exports of services hit a record high, while those of non-petroleum goods were also the highest on record. Exports to Canada, South Korea and Germany all touched all-time highs in March. Imports of food and non-petroleum products hit record highs in March.

Last week we saw the estimate for first quarter gross domestic product showing 0.1% growth; that estimate worked with an assumption that the trade deficit for March would come in at $38.9 billion, not the $40.4 billion reported today. So, this implies that the GDP number could be re-estimated by two-tenths, which would mean a negative -0.1% GDP for the first quarter, or maybe just a bit worse. There will be other data considered in the final GDP number, but it now looks like a negative number. And most economists are calling for a bounce back in the second quarter.

Corelogic reports home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 11.1% in March 2014 compared to March 2013. This change represents 25 months of consecutive year-over-year increases in home prices nationally. On a month-over-month basis, home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 1.4% in March 2014 compared to February 2014.

Excluding distressed sales, home prices nationally increased 9.5% in March 2014 compared to March 2013 and 0.9% month over month compared to February 2014. So, home price increases are slowing, and this might also prove a drag on GDP, but it doesn’t necessarily mean the housing market is in the dumps. One of the bright points in the report is that there are fewer distressed sales, that means there is also less inventory, and there is less negative equity.

A separate report from Black Knight Financial, a mortgage research firm finds the number of mortgages on which lenders initiated foreclosure in March fell to the lowest level in more than 7 years. Banks initiated foreclosure on 88,000 properties in March, down more than 27% from a year ago, and well below the high of more than 316,000 in March 2009.

Foreclosures should continue to trend down because the share of mortgages that are behind on their payments is also declining. Around 2.1% of all loans were in some stage of foreclosure in March, the lowest level since late 2008, and another 5.5% of all borrowers were 30 days or more past due on their loans but not yet in foreclosure, the lowest since late 2007. Both of those are still well above pre-crisis levels but they are down sharply from a few years ago.

Growth in the services sector accelerated in April, rising at the fastest pace in eight months as new orders jumped and overall activity quickened by the most since early 2008. The ISM said its services sector index rose to 55.2 in April from 53.1 in March, topping expectations for a read of 54.1. The data provides further evidence that economic activity is regaining momentum after lagging through much of the winter.

Today is the anniversary of one of the scariest days in market history. On May 6, 2010, the Dow plunged nearly 1,000 points in a matter of minutes in what became known as the flash crash. The crash wiped out $1 trillion in wealth in the blink of an eye, only to recover, kinda, sorta. High-frequency computerized trading was believed to at least be part of the cause of the technical breakdown. And the regulators have not figured it out to this day, and yes it could happen again.  

Last week, SEC Chair Mary Jo White testified before Congress that the markets were not rigged. Today, the SEC announced they have sent out subpoenas demanding records from brokerage companies to try and figure out how customers’ orders are routed, and how firms are being paid for order flow. The good news is the SEC is investigating; the bad news is that dark pool and high frequency trading has been going on for years and the SEC appears totally clueless.

Institutional Investor released its Rich List, a list of the 25 top income generating hedge fund managers. David Tepper of Appaloosa Management topped the list with $3.5 billion in earnings. Second on the list was Steven Cohen of SAC Capital, who might have fared better if his firm hadn’t been guilty of insider trading. Just for reference, $3.5 billion works out to $400,000 an hour.

I also ran across an article that puts the Fed’s QE into perspective. The Federal Reserve has spent approximately $3.2 trillion in the post-Crisis era, with most of the money being dropped from helicopters hovering over Wall Street banks. The Fed mainly bought Treasuries and mortgage backed securities, but they could have mailed a check for $10,223 to every person in the US; they could have bought back all the US debt owned by China, Japan, and Belgium; they could have created 12.8 million jobs in 2009, each paying $50k a year, and still be making payroll for them today – which actually would have met their mandate. And that’s just based upon large scale asset purchases under QE; by some estimates the Fed has dished out my than $17 trillion to prop up the financial order. A trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.

The Census Bureau released a report on the demographic makeup of the US; the population is aging rapidly; about 1 in 5 Americans (21%) will be 65 years old and up by 2050, compared with just 13% in 2010 and less than 10% in 1970. It sounds like a lot of old people, but it seems less so when compared with other countries. In 2050, around 40% of Japan’s population will be 65-plus, up from 24% in 2012. In Germany, Italy, Spain, and Poland over 30% will be 65 plus. China will have about 26% of its population over the age of 65, which amounts to more old people in China than the entire population of the US.

The concern with an aging population is that there will be a much slower economy: less spending, less saving, lower economic output, and slower growth; fewer working age people paying taxes, less money going into social programs like Social  Security and Medicare, and more money coming out of those programs. But the Census report also finds that the working age population will increase, mainly due to immigration.

The White House today released the 2014 National Climate Assessment, written by 300 climate experts and reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The full report, at more than 800 pages, is the most comprehensive look at the effects of climate change in the US to date. Don’t worry, they also provided a Cliff Notes version that weighs in at a mere 137 pages, thereby killing fewer trees. The short and sweet is that we’re all going to fry; it’s too late, climate change is here and now, and it will just get worse and worse.

Average temperatures in the US have increased 1.3 degrees to 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit (depending on the part of the country) since people began keeping records in 1895, and about 80% of that warming has come in the past 20 years. The period from 2001 to 2012 was warmer than any previous decade on record, across all regions of the country. And it will keep getting hotter. If we really get very serious about cutting emissions, temperatures will rise by 3 to 5 degrees, depending on location, over the next 80 years; if we keep going the way we’re going, temperatures will rise 5 to 10 degrees, and maybe by 15 degrees in some places. That means 115 degree days in the desert southwest could be 125 to 130 degrees.

In addition to extreme heat, you can add wildfires, and drought, and hurricanes, and extreme downpours – real gulley washers, plus rising sea levels. The report says that in much of the US, especially the Midwest and Northeast, more rain is falling in short-duration, heavy bursts, leading to more flooding. The Northeast and Midwest may continue to get wetter, while the Southwest becomes even more parched, raising water supply and energy concerns there.

The report warns the Southwest to prepare for major disruptions ahead due to climate change: "Increased heat and changes to rain and snowpack will send ripple effects throughout the region’s critical agriculture sector, affecting the lives and economies of 56 million people –- a population that is expected to increase 68% by 2050, to 94 million. Severe and sustained drought will stress water sources, already over-utilized in many areas, forcing increasing competition among farmers, energy producers, urban dwellers, and plant and animal life for the region’s most precious resource."

The report says the Southwest will be plagued by drought, which is not really uncommon, but the droughts will be hotter and drier and longer and will lead to a big increase in wildfire activity, which has already started to take place.

The report notes that American society and its infrastructure were built for the past climate, not the future. It highlights examples of the kinds of changes that state and local governments can make to become more resilient. One of the main takeaways is that you don't want to look at the weather records of yesteryear to determine how to set up your infrastructure.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014 - Helicopter Drops Were Successful, and Other Revisions

Helicopter Drops Were Successful, and Other Revisions

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 65 = 16,514
SPX + 7 = 1879
NAS + 39 = 4161
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.73%
OIL – 1.77 = 101.88
GOLD – 6.60 = 1284.70
SILV - .05 = 19.49

Sales of previously owned homes fell in March for a third consecutive month as rising prices and a lack of inventory discouraged would-be buyers. The National Association of Realtors reports closings, which usually take place a month or two after a contract is signed, fell 0.2% to a 4.59 million annual rate, the lowest level since July 2012. It was the seventh drop in the last 8 months pushing sales down 8.5% compared with the same month last year before adjusting for seasonal patterns.

The drop in demand might not lead to a flat-line in home prices. That’s because one obstacle to lower sales is the low number of homes on the market. The number of houses for sale at the end of last month rose to 1.99 million compared with 1.93 million a year earlier. At the current pace, it would take 5.2 months to sell houses compared with 5 months at the end of February.

There are some positives in the housing market: distressed sales are down; delinquencies are down; negative equity has declined; and even though inventory is up slightly, that is a positive because inventory had been too tight.

The median price of an existing home climbed 7.9% from March 2013 to $198,500. The appreciation was led by a 12.6% year-to-year advance in the West, while the Northeast posted a more moderate 3.2% increase. As prices increased, sales dropped, with the biggest 12-month drop coming in the West at 13.5%, and the smallest in the Northeast, with a 4.4% decrease.

Million-dollar home sales are on the rise, while deals for cheaper homes are dropping. In March, sales of single-family existing homes priced at $1 million and above were up 7.8% from the year-earlier period. Meanwhile, sales of homes that cost between $100,000 and $250,000 fell 9.9% over the past year. This might say something about the weak labor market and eroding income levels; it also speaks to mortgage lending practices, which remain strict for all but the jumbo market, where standards have eased; and it screams about the growing divide in America.  

Meanwhile, each month Bloomberg conducts a survey of 67 economists and one of the questions is where yields on the 10-year Treasury note are headed for the next six months; and the answers have overwhelmingly been that yields are headed higher. This month’s survey was more than overwhelming, it was unanimous; 100% say yields will be up by the end of the year. The last time the survey had that result was in May 2012, when benchmark yields were well below 2%.

Of course the Federal Reserve has said they intend to keep their target for Fed Funds rate right at zero; that has been the policy since the aftermath of the 2008 meltdown and Janet Yellen has let the markets know that there is no reason to expect a change in the policy “for a considerable time” after it ends its QE bond buying program, which means no change until around the Spring of 2015; and even then, it will be dependent on data showing the economy has improved. So, what has unanimously convinced economists that yields are going higher, faster than the Fed has plotted? What is wrong with the current, low interest rate environment?

Fed Governor Jeremy Stein delivered a speech last month arguing that the Fed should withdraw stimulus or raise interest rates, even if that means allowing a higher-than-normal unemployment rate, all to prevent the growth of a bubble in the bond market. Stein points to three things: first, the rising level of private-sector debt as a percentage of the US economy; second, narrowing spreads between risk-free Treasuries and corporate bonds; and third, the growing proportion of corporate debt going to riskier companies, or junk bonds going to companies that have a greater likelihood of defaulting on their loans.

Private sector, non-financial debt has now grown to 55% of gross domestic product. Meanwhile, low rates may have distorted the proper evaluation of risk; the spread between Baa rated corporate debt and risk-free Treasuries has dropped. Those spreads were high during the financial crisis but have since dropped down below pre-crisis levels. Total corporate bond issuance hit $1.3 trillion last year, not just recovering but surpassing pre-crisis levels and a big chunk of that issuance, $336 billion, is going to junk bonds.

The housing market has seen some recovery, depending on location, but the latest data on new and existing sales shows a market that is slowing for now. The market for debt has been expanding much faster than seems reasonable, and might indicate an area of concern for the Fed. Or maybe the Fed is realizing that their policy just hasn’t worked and they are now sitting on a huge balance sheet that can’t be artificially propped up indefinitely.

Meanwhile, the former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was speaking today at the Economic Club of Toronto and he said the Fed could have done a better job communicating during the financial crisis. He said the public incorrectly believed the Fed’s emergency-lending programs benefited Wall Street over Main Street. Bernanke also said, “There will be a time coming soon when inflation will improve and when central banks will move to a more normal monetary-policy road.”

Of course, that might be part of the problem; the markets always expected the Fed to have their helicopter drops directly over Wall Street and then get back to more normal monetary policy. In other words, the Fed never truly committed to all out monetary stimulus, and the result was a prolonged economic slump as the velocity of money slowed to a crawl. Bernanke would like to say everything worked out for the better, but that wasn’t really the case.

Bernanke likes to think Fed policies helped Main Street as much as Wall Street, but we all know better and now we have facts to refute Bernanke. The New York Times reports the American middle class is no longer the most affluent in the world; we have lost that distinction even as the wealthiest Americans outpace their global peers and most American families are paying a steep price for high and rising income inequality.

After-tax middle-class incomes in Canada are now higher than in the United States. The poor in much of Europe earn more than poor Americans. The data on Europe is a bit tricky as some countries such as Portugal and Greece have seen income fall sharply in recent years, while other countries, such as Sweden and the Netherlands have narrowed the gap. One large European country where income has stagnated over the past 15 years is Germany, but even poor Germans have fared better than poor Americans.

The struggles of the poor in the United States are even starker than those of the middle class. A family at the 20th percentile of the income distribution in this country makes significantly less money than a similar family in Canada, Sweden, Norway, Finland or the Netherlands. Thirty-five years ago, the reverse was true. The top 5% of American income earners still top their global counterparts, and for those well-off families, the US still represents the world’s most prosperous economy. The US still holds the title of the world’s richest large country based upon per capita gross domestic income, but those numbers are averages which don’t capture the distribution of income.

The results of the 35 year study compiled by LIS recognize 3 major factors behind the weak income performance in the US. First, educational attainment in the US has risen far more slowly than in much of the industrialized world, and especially among younger workers. Literacy, numeracy, and technology skills of younger Americans have fallen well behind counterparts in Canada, Australia, Japan, and Scandinavia, and close to those in Italy and Spain.

Another factor is the distribution of income in the US; it has been growing faster for the top earners, but shrinking for the middle class and poor. Yet the American rich pay lower taxes than the rich in many other places, and the United States does not redistribute as much income to the poor as other countries do. As a result, inequality in disposable income is sharply higher in the United States than elsewhere.

So despite Bernanke’s assertions that the Fed helicopter drops benefitted all American, we know better. And we also know that there are some policy tools that haven’t been used that could change the situation. The best place to start would seem to be the financial industry, since this is the sector that benefitted most from Fed policy and has continued to act as a drain on the productive economy.

A new IMF analysis found the value of the implicit government insurance to backstop too big to fail banks, just the idea that the government would not allow the mega-banks that have been labeled systemically important would not be allowed to fail, that subsidy is pegged at $50 billion a year in the US, and about $300 billion a year in the Eurozone.

Maybe the Fed could even act like a regulator and break up the biggest banks, cut them into small pieces; and in that way, if there was a failure, it wouldn’t represent a threat to the broader economy; as long as that threat hangs over our heads, it is hard to accept Bernanke’s assurances that Fed policy benefits all equally.

March, Tuesday 27, 2012

DOW – 43 = 13, 197
SPX – 3 = 1412
NAS – 2 = 3120
10 YR YLD -.06 = 2.19%
OIL - .52 = 106.81
GOLD – 9.30 = 1681.60
SILV -.25 = 32.69

PLAT + 6.00 = 1656.00

A flat trading day on Wall Street; weakness in financials compared to a little strength in tech; the weakness carried the day.

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index of 20 American cities fell 0.8% from December to January and 3.8% from January 2011. Sixteen cities tracked by the index posted declines. Eight cities saw average home prices hit new lows. Home values fell for the fifth-straight month and prices dropped to their lowest levels since 2003. In January, Washington, Miami and Phoenix were the only metro areas that posted monthly gains. Robert Shiller, a professor of economics at Yale University and co-creator of the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller Index, says the market has "a chance" of rebounding even though the downward momentum in the real estate market has accelerated in the past five years. Shiller says the problems facing mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac must be resolved before housing can bottom. There is speculation that Fannie and Freddie could sell bundles of foreclosed homes to hedge funds; both Fannie and Freddie are reportedly leaning toward principal mortgage write-downs and loan forgiveness, but don't hold your breath on that.

Of course you don't make your home buying decisions based on national averages. All real estate is local. There have been several calls of a housing bottom in the past few weeks. Maybe, maybe not; part of that is local. There is a better chance of a bottom in Phoenix than in Atlanta. A market bottoming out never feels like a buying opportunity, not unless you like the feeling of having your stomach twisted in knows, and certainly not with 28% of all mortgaged homes underwater, and certainly not with the prospect of rising foreclosures. Still, everybody has to live somewhere.

The nationwide average for a gallon of gas is $3.99, lots more in some places, like the gas station where you just filled up. And when you watch the numbers spinning at the pump, how does it make you feel? The Conference Board's monthly consumer confidence index slipped to 70.2 from 71.6 in February, mainly because of the rising gas prices. With more of their money spilling into their gas tanks, consumers may be less likely to spend.

The head of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development says the Euro-zone is not out of the woods despite signs of steadiness in the financial markets, and keeping the Euro-zone financially stable will require a bailout fund of at least $1.3 trillion -- "the mother of all firewalls". At least it will be the mother of all firewalls until the flames lap over the top. OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria says the  current $664-billion commitments to the buffer funds won’t do the trick. Debt levels in Europe remain high, banks are vulnerable, austerity programs are difficult to implement and are likely to reduce economic output, add in high unemployment and weak consumer and investor confidence. Some nations' risk spreads are at unsustainable levels and "have showed signs of creeping up in the last few days." Gurria says a bigger bailout fund would give governments the breathing room to focus on jump-starting growth and competitiveness. So far, the proposals from the World Bank, the IMF, and the OECD haven't been so great at jump-starting anything.

Spain will present a new budget on Friday; the prime minister promises it will be very very austere. Spain is facing soaring unemployment and rising borrowing costs, and the prospect of a lost decade of growth. Spain has public debt at almost 70 percent of gross domestic product and one of the highest levels of private debt in the euro zone. The economy is more than twice the size of Ireland Greece and Portugal combined, and is seen as too large for the euro zone to let it fail. Spanish government borrowing costs have fallen from 14-year highs reached last year but with economic fears resurfacing the risk premium over German bonds has started to rise again.

Meanwhile, the Spanish private sector is deleveraging at the same time the government is pushing austerity. If someone thinks Spain is going to grow its way out of the economic problems, I'm not seeing how that can happen. There is a risk that eventually Spain will need to seek a bailout to borrow at reasonable rates of interest. And so, the mother of all firewalls might not be enough.

The Federal Trade Commission is calling for a new law that would allow people to review the vast amounts of information being collected about them as the Internet, smartphones and other technology make it easier to create digital dossiers of just about anyone's life.

The proposal comes a month after the Obama administration issued a proposed "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" and urged technology companies, consumer groups and others to work together on developing more safeguards.

The FTC said Congress needs to impose more controls over "data brokers" that profit from the collection and sale of files containing sensitive information that can affect people's ability to get a job or find a place to live. These data brokers range from publicly traded companies to a hodgepodge of small, regional services that may only have two or three employees.

An investigation by The Associated Press last year found that data brokers often store incorrect or outdated information, including criminal records. In some cases, people are denied jobs because data brokers incorrectly report them as convicted felons. Widespread complaints about inaccurate records triggered a class-action lawsuit that culminated in one database company, HireRight Solutions, to settle the case for $28.4 million last year.

The FTC is pushing for a law that would let consumers see their files and dispute personal data held by information brokers. It would be similar to current federal laws that guarantee consumers free access to their credit reports once a year.