Saturday, December 31, 2011

December, Friday 30, 2011



DOW – 69 = 12,217
SPX –5.42 = 1257.60
NAS – 8 = 2605
10 YR YLD -.03 = 1.87%
OIL -.65 = 99.00
GOLD =20.90 = 1567.40
SILV +.09 = 27.96
PLAT +30.00 = 1403.00


One year ago
DOW = 11,577.51
SPX = 1257.64
NAS = 2652.87
10 YR YLD =3.31%
OIL =79.36
GOLD = 1410.25
SILV =30.63
PLAT =1731.00

US Dollar Index 78.22 on 12/31/2010  & 80.57 on 12/30/2011

Auld Ange Syne – the song always make me miss people, though I’m not sure whom I’m to be missing specifically; I suppose there’s always somebody, isn’t ther?

The Pacific island nation of Samoa is taking 186,000 citizens through a national time warp by moving west of the international dateline, forfeiting the last Friday of 2011 and jumping straight from Thursday into Saturday. So, it’s Saturday in Samoa. It never was Friday.
For Samoans, this solves a practical question: Why remain 18 to 23 hours behind chief trade partners Australia and New Zealand? Of course, it doesn’t answer the question: Why didn’t they do this on a Monday?

The worst performer among the Dow 30 industrial stocks? Bank of America – which isn’t really an industrial stock to begin with. BofA was down 58% for the year, wiping out $80 billion of shareholder value. The bank also ended 2011 last in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Financials Index and the KBW Bank Index. It was BofA’s worst annual performance since 2008, when it dropped 66 percent. Other big banks performed poorly. Citigroup dropped 44%, JPMorgan Chase dropped 22%, Goldman Sachs dropped 46%, AIG, the insurer fell 52%. The best performer in the Dow was McDonalds – up 31%.

World stocks have lost more than 9 percent for the year. The darlings in the emerging markets fared the worst. China's Shanghai Composite index .SSEClost 22 percent, India's BSE .BSESN sank 25 percent, and Brazil's Bovespa .BVSP dropped 18 percent.

The S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio - what investors are willing to pay for a dollar of earnings - is under 12, below the 25-year average of 15. In weaker markets like Germany's DAX, the figure is below 9.
Benchmark 10-year Treasuries returned nearly 17 percent in 2011, their largest gain since 2008. 

In a normal year predicting economics is like predicting the outcome of a coin toss or the flip of a card: there are too many variables and the only certainty being that the suckers will lose and the stealthily self-interested will win.
In 2012 however, the shape of the crisis is heavily predetermined: there are a series of crucial stages the eurocrisis has to go through and the way they're resolved will affect everything else.
Starting from where we are now, there are three big questions:
·         Is the ECB's unofficial money printing operation - a massively expanded bond-buying venture combined with unlimited provision of cash by global central banks - going to be enough to prevent a second credit crunch, centred on Italy?
·         Does Greece spiral finally into default, social crisis and chaos, raising the prospect of the near-dictatorial economic policies needed if you have to exit the Euro?
·         Do the French banks take so many losses on the sovereign debt of southern Europe that they have to be part nationalised, thus removing the country's AAA credit rating and the all-important financial parity between Germany and France that lies at the heart of the European system?
Right now my answers to these questions would be yes, yes and yes.
That is: yes, a liquidity splurge is going to be enough to prevent a credit crunch - though it will later have to be acknowledged as a massive and unconstitutional policy shift, forcing the ECB to become lender of last resort.
And yes, Greece will default. Its 50% haircut is proving hard to make stick; its coalition government is unstable and cannot collect enough tax; its people are increasingly destitute; its rich elite has, functionally, scampered in anticipation of the pain to come. But given that the majority of Greeks still don't want to leave the Euro, and the eurozone leaders won't force them out, we will end up with a defaulted country using the Euro on sufferance, which is another de-facto step towards fiscal union.
And again yes: France will lose its AAA credit rating - causing problems for President Sarkozy and huge soul-searching in Germany, where those close to Chancellor Angela Merkel believe Franco-German apparent equality of status is crucial to selling any future fiscal union.





Despite assertions from Federal Reserve officials that the United States would not play a role in bailing out European banks, that is exactly what has happened — again.
Earlier in the month, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told the U.S. Senate that the Fed had no intention of bailing out the European banks, indicating that he “doesn’t have the intention or the authority” to do so.
As it turns out, however, the Fed is in fact doing just that. The Wall Street Journal reports:
The Fed is using what is termed a "temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap arrangement" with the European Central Bank (ECB). There are similar arrangements with the central banks of Canada, England, Switzerland and Japan. Simply put, the Fed trades or "swaps" dollars for euros. The Fed is compensated by payment of an interest rate (currently 50 basis points, or one-half of 1%) above the overnight index swap rate. The ECB, which guarantees to return the dollars at an exchange rate fixed at the time the original swap is made, then lends the dollars to European banks of its choosing.
The Journal outlines the reason for such secrecy:
Why are the Fed and the ECB doing this? The Fed could, after all, lend directly to U.S. branches of foreign banks. It did a great deal of lending to foreign banks under various special credit facilities in the aftermath of Lehman's collapse in the fall of 2008. Or, the ECB could lend euros to banks and they could purchase dollars in foreign-exchange markets. The world is, after all, awash in dollars.
The two central banks are engaging in this roundabout procedure because each needs a fig leaf. The Fed was embarrassed by the revelations of its prior largess with foreign banks. It does not want the debt of foreign banks on its books. A currency swap with the ECB is not technically a loan.


If you are in the United States or Western Europe, chances are incredibly high that your bank is simply not safe. In other words, your money is at risk. Big time. Let’s review some of the chief concerns:
1) A black box of assets
Banking is a complicated industry… and especially when larger banks are concerned, nobody really knows what’s under the hood. Can we say with any accuracy what’s on Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, or Citi’s balance sheets?
No way. There’s $8.5 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities floating around the system. Not to mention, tens of trillions of dollars worth of derivatives contracts tied to mortgage-backed securities on top of that.
These assets are all highly susceptible to downturns in housing, a rise in interest rates, and a host of other systemic risks. Yet we have no earthly idea who owns what, or who the counterparties are. It’s all a black box of assets.
In a world where the most basic foundations of the financial system can no longer be accepted as truth, we cannot assume away that bank balance sheets are healthy without more careful investigation and transparent information.
2) The assets that we do know about aren’t winning any beauty prizes
When governments auction-off tens of billions of dollars worth of bonds, it’s often the banks that buy. Large banks wielding hundreds of billions, trillions of dollars have few options where they park capital. They require enormous liquidity, and it’s ironic that the most liquid bond markets are the most dangerously indebted nations.
When $13 billion worth of 30-year bonds were sold last week at record low yields, your bank may very well have been one of the buyers.
In the all-too-likely event that price inflation surpasses 2.815% thanks to all the easing, twisting, and printing going on, your bank will essentially be sitting on even more worthless paper. And this doesn’t take into account the possibility of an all-out default.
3) Core banking business has all but shuttered
Do you remember the good old days when banks used to be responsible stewards of capital, paying depositors a fair rate (which exceeded inflation) and making sensible loans to creditworthy businesses and individuals?
I don’t either. But I’m told that’s how banking used to be. These days, banks hardly loan to anything that doesn’t come with a government guarantee.
This is not a well-functioning system. “Safe” banks are profitable… and in order to be profitable in the long-term, banks must engage in sound deposit and lending practices. This is no longer part of the banking landscape.
4) Lies, regulatory loopholes, and accounting tricks
Banks are adept at hiding the true nature of their financial condition. They conjure fake profits out of thin air and stuff their liabilities into off-balance sheet entities. And it’s all legal.
Much of the activity in the banking sector is aimed at nothing more than exploiting these accounting rules to register inflated fake profits and hence convert shareholders’ equity and, debt-holders’ and taxpayers’ funds into executive bonuses.”
Government legislators and regulators are willing accomplices in the game. For example, risk-weighted capital adequacy ratios are the industry standard in assessing a bank’s safety. Even the Federal Reserve acknowledges that insufficient capital ratios portend bank failure.
Current regulations, however, allow banks to materially misstate the real risks on their books. Government bonds are assigned a risk weighting of zero… hardly a fair assessment in today’s environment.
As such, a bank filled with worthless government paper can legally tell its depositors, “we are completely safe.”
5) The backstops need backstopping
Today, “government-guaranteed” anything is a joke. Federal deposit funds are even more poorly capitalized than the banks, and the ultimate backstop is the taxpayer – back to that same old story – privatized profits and socialized losses.
6) No one is isolated
Even if your bank has acted responsibly, the issues are global. Given the derivatives exposure that cascades across the entire system, no bank is credibly isolated from the misfortunes of the others.
You could also consider physical precious metals as they carry no counterparty risk. There are security risks with gold and silver, however such risks pale in comparison to the systemic risks in today’s banking environment.



 Mish 2011 Predictions Review 

Looking ahead to 2102, I see a continuation of the same themes, but a few new ideas as well.

Ten Themes for 2012
1.   Severe European Recession as the sovereign debt crisis escalates: Austerity measures in Italy, Greece, Spain, and Portugal plunges all of Europe into a major recession. Spain and Portugal will follow Greece into an outright depression.

2.   Political Crisis in Europe: French President Sarkozy loses to socialist challenger Francois Hollande. German Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition collapses. The Merkozy agreement is either modified to do virtually nothing or is not ratified at all. This chain of events will not be good for European equities or European bonds.

3.   Relatively Minor US Economic Recession: The US will not avoid a recession in 2012. Retail spending ran its course with the tail-off into Christmas of 2011. The Republican Congress has little incentive for fiscal stimulus measures in 2012 so do not expect any. However, with housing already limping along the bottom in terms of construction and investment (not prices), a US GDP decline will not be severe. The US may see a recession even if GDP barely drops. Certainly the US recession will be far less severe than the recession in Europe and Australia.

4.   Major Profit Recession in US: Profit margins in the US will be torn to shreds as businesses will be unable to reduce costs the same way they did in 2008 and 2009 (by shedding massive numbers of employees).

5.   Global Equity Prices Under Huge Pressure: Don't expect the same degree of reverse decoupling of US equities we saw in 2011. The US economy will be better than Europe, but equities globally will take a hit, including the US. Simply put, stocks are not cheap.

6.   Fiscal Crisis in Japan Comes to Forefront: Japan's fiscal crisis and debt to the tune of 200+% of GDP finally matters. The crisis in Japan will start out as a whimper not a bang, but will worsen as the year wears on. If Japan responds by monetizing debt, not a remote possibility at all, Japanese equities will massively outperform in nominal and perhaps even in real terms. "Real" means "yen-adjusted", not "inflation-adjusted" terms.

7.   Few Hiding Spots Other than the US Dollar: US treasuries and German bonds were safe havens in 2011, but with yields already depressed don't expect huge gains. Expect to see a strengthening of the US dollar across the board against all major currencies. Moreover, cash (one the most despised asset classes ever), may outperform nearly everything, even if the dollar goes virtually nowhere. Hiding places will be few and far between for much of 2012.

8.   US Public Union Pension Plans Under Attack: States finally realize the need to rein in pension plans much to the dismay of public unions. Social and economic tensions in the US rise.

9.   Regime Change in China has Major Ramifications: China will start a major shift from a growth model dependent on housing and infrastructure to a consumer-driven model. The transition will not be smooth. Property prices in China will collapse and commodity prices will remain under pressure.

10.         Hyperinflation Calls Once Again Will Look Laughable: Unless there is a major disruption in the Mideast (which I do not rule out by any means), oil prices will drop and food prices will follow. If so, we will once again see silly talk from the Fed about preventing "unwelcome drops in inflation". As always, the deflation key is not prices at all but rather credit and credit marked-to-market. Expect credit in all forms to come under attack and expect junk bonds take a hit as well. By the way, regardless of what happens to oil prices, hyperinflation calls will look silly.

Gerald Celente of Trends Research International has a habit of predicting nasty events before they happen. He just emailed us his selection of 12 things we’d rather not see in 2012:
One megatrend looms on the near horizon. And we forecast that when it strikes, it will be a shock felt around the world. Hyperbole it’s not! Our research has revealed that at the very highest levels of government this megatrend has been seriously discussed. Read on:
1. Economic Martial Law: Given the current economic and geopolitical conditions, the central banks and world governments already have plans in place to declare economic martial law … with the possibility of military martial law to follow.
2. Battlefield America: With a stroke of the Presidential pen, language was removed from an earlier version of the National Defense Authorization Act, granting the President authority to act as judge, jury and executioner. Citizens, welcome to “Battlefield America.”
3. Invasion of the Occtupy: 15 years ago, Gerald Celente predicted in his book Trends 2000 that prolonged protests would hit Wall Street in the early years of the new millennium and would spread nationwide. The “Occtupy” is now upon us, and it is like nothing history has ever witnessed.
4. Climax Time: The financial house of cards is collapsing, and in 2012 many of the long-simmering socioeconomic and geopolitical trends that Celente has accurately forecast will come to a climax. Some will arrive with a big bang and others less dramatically … but no less consequentially. Are you prepared? And what’s next for the world?
5. Technocrat Takeover: “Democracy is Dead; Long Live the Technocrat!” A pair of lightning-quick financial coup d’├ętats in Greece and Italy have installed two unelected figures as head of state. No one yet in the mainstream media is calling this merger of state and corporate powers by its proper name: Fascism, nor are they calling these “technocrats” by their proper name: Bankers! Can a rudderless ship be saved because technocrat is at the helm?
6. Repatriate! Repatriate!: It took a small, but financially and politically powerful group to sell the world on globalization, and it will take a large, committed and coordinated citizens’ movement to “un-sell” it. “Repatriate! Repatriate!” will pit the creative instincts of a multitude of individuals against the repressive monopoly of the multinationals.
7. Secession Obsession: Winds of political change are blowing from Tunisia to Russia and everywhere in between, opening a window of opportunity through which previously unimaginable political options may now be considered: radical decentralization, Internet-based direct democracy, secession, and even the peaceful dissolution of nations, offering the possibility for a new world “disorder.”
8. Safe Havens: As the signs of imminent economic and social collapse become more pronounced, legions of New Millennium survivalists are, or will be, thinking about looking for methods and ways to escape the resulting turmoil. Those “on-trend” have already taken measure to implement Gerald Celente’s 3 G’s: Gold, Guns and a Getaway plan. Where to go? What to do? Top Trends 2012 will guide the way.
9. Big Brother Internet: The coming year will be the beginning of the end of Internet Freedom: A battle between the governments and the people. Governments will propose legislation for a new “authentication technology,” requiring Internet users to present the equivalent of a driver’s license and/or bill of health to navigate cyberspace. For the general population it will represent yet another curtailing of freedom and level of governmental control.
10. Direct vs. Faux Democracy: In every corner of the world, a restive populace has made it clear that it’s disgusted with “politics as usual” and is looking for change. Government, in all its forms – democracy, autocracy, monarchy, socialism, communism – just isn’’t working. The only viable solution is to take the vote out of the hands of party politicians and institute Direct Democracy. If the Swiss can do it, why can’t anyone else?
11. Alternative Energy 2012: Even under the cloud of Fukushima, the harnessing of nuclear power is being reinvigorated by a fuel that is significantly safer than uranium and by the introduction of small, modular, portable reactors that reduce costs and construction time. In addition, there are dozens of projects underway that explore the possibility of creating cleaner, competitively priced liquid fuels distilled from natural sources. Plan to start saying goodbye to conventional liquid fuels!
12. Going Out in Style: In the bleak terrain of 2012 and beyond, “Affordable sophistication” will direct and inspire products, fashion, music, the fine arts and entertainment at all levels. US businesses would be wise to wake up and tap into the dormant desire for old time quality and the America that was.



Thursday, December 29, 2011

December, Thursday 29, 2011



DOW +135 = 12287
SPX +13 = 1263
NAS +23 = 2613
10 YR YLD -.01 = 1.90
OIL +.45 = 99.81
GOLD – 10.80 = 1546.50
SILV +.62 = 27.87
PLAT –18.00 = 1377.00

You always have to be careful when you read the news or watch it on TV or listen to it on the radio or the web of internets. Take this snippet from the AP:
“The European Central Bank said banks had parked $590.72 billion with it overnight, surpassing the record set only Monday. That means European banks were less willing to take the risk of making short-term loans to each other, opting instead to earn low interest rates from the ECB.
The move shook confidence in the euro currency, which dropped to $1.2910 at one point on Wednesday — its lowest level against the dollar in nearly a year.”
It seems fairly straightforward, however the big problem is that the bankers aren’t earning anything – they are being given a gift – a gift of money stolen from taxpayers. The banks are not working for the money, they are not producing anything, and you would have to be brain dead to believe the banks are “earning” anything in this situation. The next problem is that European banks aren’t making short-term loans to each other because they all know what they have on their own books, and if the other banks hold the same garbage on their books (and they do) then all the banks are essentially insolvent and only being kept afloat by central bankers.
Investors are aware that in a crisis: Investors will fail to roll debt if they are not confident in the health of an institution; and if sufficiently many investors fail to roll an institution’s debt, then that institution may fail. This means that the key question for a funder is not Is the institution I am considering funding solvent? but rather Will most other potential funders consider the institution solvent?
And then you say, “So what? Je ne suis pas un European taxpayer. Nao e importante. Capito?”
So, what is the Federal Reserve’s role in this mess? Well, the Fed has opened up swap lines and the discount window to banks, both foreign and domestic – and how many taxpayer dollars is the Fed willing to risk $50 billion, $500 billion, more? We may only find out in the richness of time. By some estimates, there are 6 European sovereigns in serious trouble to the tune of $6 trillion. Of course, that is not all at risk, unless it all goes terribly wrong – and it almost certainly will not go terribly wrong. The new $650 billion dollar Long-Term Refinance Operation rolled out last week, and it will probably give the banks enough funds to keep the doors open for a year or two- maybe three. European banks have borrowed 5% of GDP from the new ECB loan plan, a sort of back door QE. Most banks will use the funds to roll debt in 2012.
That’s all fine and good, but this is nothing more than slow motion devaluation and sure enough, the Euro is falling – new lows for the year.
Notice the last few weeks: The euro and gold falling in tandem.  This is not a coincidence.

We have to remember the situation we are currently in. Apart from a sovereign debt crisis, we have a financial crisis in Europe: The European banks are in terrible shape. They are all in terrible condition, one and all. But then so are the American banks.

Because of this, when the euro falls against the major currencies, banks around the world are forced to shore up their capital requirements: The falling euro hits their capital tiers, forcing them to sell off assets in order to cover the hole in their balance sheet.

What commodity or investment has been rising steadily over the past three years? What asset class is the only sure bet against currency collapse? Gold, obviously—and gold is fungible with any currency, instantly.

And what we will see again—is major players exiting gold positions in order to cover holes in their balance sheets. In fact, from here on out, every time there is a big fall in any major currency, we can expect an attendant fall in the price of gold and silver.

Right now, we are seeing this in the eurozone: The euro broke through that magic $1.30 barrier—and gold fell like a rock. This is the bad news.

The good news? These falls are technical, predictable, momentary, and they are an opportunity.

The fundamentals of the situation are unchanged: The major countries are over-indebted, with over-leveraged banks on the edge of insolvency. The only solution is for currency devaluation, in order to cut the real cost of these massive loans without causing an outright default or bankruptcy.

Gold and silver will counteract this currency devaluation; they serve as hedges.

Pullbacks in gold are fairly predictable. These pullbacks will be because of two reasons: One is speculators—who are obviously riding the precious metals bandwagon—who will periodically get spooked and decide to cash out their winnings. The second reason for these jolting pullbacks in precious metals will be because large institutions will need to cover their capital requirements, in the face of the collapse in the currencies.

When this happens, you have to remember two things: One, it is momentary, and two, it is a time to buy – or at least gold is setting up as a buy – I can’t tell you the exact timing on when to buy – I can only tell you that you will most probably look back on this as a time you should’ve bought. Think back a year: Gold finished out 2010 at $1380 per ounce, today gold finished around 1550 corresponding to just shy of 12%. I’ll take that. Remember that no investment ever goes up in a straight line.
Gold and silver remain as sound an investment in the current macroeconomic climate as ever. If you want to trade volatility in the market, go for it. If you want the longer-term gains, just be patient.

Of course, there’s always the chance that 2012 will turn out to be a drab, boring walk in the park; pleasant and uneventful; balanced and controlled growth; no chaos, no calamity, no craziness.

New claims for jobless benefits rose by 15,000 to 381,000 in the week ending December 24, it was the fourth straight week that the figure remained below the key 400,000 level.
The number of Americans signing contracts to buy existing homes increased in November to the highest level in 19 months.
And here we have the talking points moving into the new year: stronger prospects for U.S. economic growth (not really stronger growth, but stronger prospects for growth), more confirmation that we are in a sustainable albeit modest recovery (I suppose it could be worse)  We still have resilience in the face of setbacks (we’re not dead yet). The economy may actually decline in 2012, but anything short of a catastrophic crash will be labeled as modest improvement – on the road to recovery.


World markets may be riddled with uncertainty, but billionaire investor Jim Rogers anticipates gains in one sector for years to come. “If I were buying anything I’d be buying agricultural commodities,” he says. “Going forward we’re going to have huge shortages of everything – including farmers – I think ag will be a great place for the next 10-20 years,” he says. … “I’m short emerging markets, short American technology, short European stocks – I don’t see much reason to own equities,” he says. …If his thesis doesn’t hold and the economies of the world improve, “I’ll make money in commodities because (increased demand will generate) shortages,” he says. “But if the world doesn’t get better, then governments print money and the way to protect against that is to own real assets.”
Top 10 most shoplifted items of the holiday season in full. Merchants, you have been warned.
 
1. Filet Mignon
2. Jameson whisky
3. Electric tools
4. iPhone4
5. Gillette Mach 4 Razor blades
6. AXE products
7. Polo Ralph Lauren clothing
8. Let's Rock Elmo
9. Chanel No. 5
10. Nike sneakers

 
The tiny South Pacific nation of Samoa and its neighbor Tokelau will jump forward in time on Thursday, crossing westward over the international date line to align themselves with their other 21st century trading partners throughout the region. At the stroke of midnight on Dec. 29, time in Samoa and Tokelau will leap forward to Dec. 31 — New Year’s Eve. For Samoa’s 186,000 citizens, and the 1,500 in Tokelau, Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, will simply cease to exist. … Under a government decree, all those scheduled to work on the nonexistent Friday will be given full pay for the missed day of labor.
I think this might be proof that the world is what we make of it. And if you’re listening in Samoa – Happy New Year.


Picture of the day



SOPA is a bill currently pasBillboardsing through the bowels of Congress (H.R. 3261) introduced by Lamar Smith (R-TX) that would expand the role of law enforcement in protecting the rights of copyright holders. On the surface, that doesn't sound like a terrible thing, but when you dig a little deeper, the problem becomes clear.
SOPA would empower people who own copyrights -- film companies, record labels, television networks, in particular -- to not only go after people who individually steal their content, but to go after anyone who aids them. In this case, that includes the hosting companies that unwittingly host the content, internet service providers (Comcast, AT&T, etc) who unknowingly provide access, search engines like Google for linking to them, advertising services for running ads on their sites and online banking services like PayPal for allowing them to do business through them.
If they cooperate, however, they get immunity.
In essence, it turns the internet into a police state where every company is constantly searching for potential legal issues. Not only is it inefficient, but it creates the very real probability that things that aren't illegal will be shut down simply to protect the overseers from liability.
Now, what is GoDaddy?
GoDaddy is a domain name registrar. Domain names like HoustonPress.com cannot be purchased. All domain names are public property, but they can be essentially leased on a yearly basis. Registrars like GoDaddy, Network Solutions, Register.com and others allow individuals and companies to lease domain names through them.
Without registrars, web surfers would have to memorize number combinations called IP addresses to find sites. Imagine trying to remember 12.333.44.179 instead of Yahoo.com.
And why are they involved with SOPA?
GoDaddy set itself apart as one of the very few online services to show support for SOPA. Most of the major online players -- Google, Ebay, AOL, Twitter, Facebook -- are in opposition, as are thousands upon thousands of nerds and they are the last ones GoDaddy wanted to piss off.
When web users heard of GoDaddy's stance, they immediately began transferring domains from GoDaddy to other registrars. At last count, more than 70,000 customers had moved their domains, costing GoDaddy a serious chunk of change when you consider the average domain owner spends at least $10 per year on a domain and many of them have multiple domain names under a single account. Do the math.
GoDaddy reversed itself and withdrew its support this week, but geeks weren't buying it and continued the mass exodus. As Zed in Men in Black said, "It's like the last one out gets stuck with the check."

What does this mean to you?
If you don't own domain names, it probably means a little less to you, but as someone who visits the internet, you need to pay attention. This law is being pushed through Congress by monied lobbyists who represent some of the biggest names in the entertainment industry as a way of propping up flagging sales. Yes, their losses are, at least in the case of the music industry, largely due to piracy, but forcing the very companies that provide unfettered access to the web to act as its moral and ethical guardians would force them to put the kind of clamps on it none of us want.
Imagine if every blog that occasionally used photos it found from a Google search -- fyi, it happens a lot -- was shut down simply out of fear they might be in violation of federal law. The chilling effect could be incalculable.
No one is clear on what the outcome will be at this point. The bill is still bouncing around Washington and could go either way. But, nerd or not, everyone has a vested interest in both protecting legitimate copyrights as well as keeping the internet open and free from restriction. SOPA is not the answer.