The 11th Anniversary
by Sinclair Noe
DOW – 26 = 13,583
SPX – 5 = 1455
NAS - 23 = 3112
SPX – 5 = 1455
NAS - 23 = 3112
10 YR YLD
OIL+.30 = 89.63
GOLD – 5.80 = 1776.50
SILV - .53 = 34.08
PLAT -12.00 = 1699.00
OIL+.30 = 89.63
GOLD – 5.80 = 1776.50
SILV - .53 = 34.08
PLAT -12.00 = 1699.00
Due to the Columbus Day holiday, US bond markets were closed and there was no interesting data to speak of. Trading volume was on the lighter side. After equity futures opened the day 5 points lower in the S&P 500, stocks drifted slightly higher on the day. This was also an important anniversary; yesterday actually. When the Taliban refused to give up the al-Qaida leaders who orchestrated 9/11, the US invaded Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001.
With any luck our troops will be out of there by the end of 2014. When the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan in the 1990s, the country fell apart and eventually fell under the control of the Taliban. In time we'll learn how the country will manage after the US leaves. The Afghan people already view their government as weak and corrupt and those doubtful of a peaceful future say that if the upcoming presidential election is rigged and yields an illegitimate leader, civil war could erupt between ethnic groups backed by neighboring countries trying to influence Afghanistan's future.
We don't speak much about war. We have had very little public discourse on the longest war in US history. War, for some, is a business. And across this country we have a strong infrastructure of military industries that produce instruments of war, or are involved in financing war. As of last week, we have lost 2,000 in Afghanistan and tens of thousands have been injured. Last Saturday, Sgt. 1st Class Riley G. Stephens, 39, was shot and killed by an Afghan National Army soldier at a highway checkpoint in Wardak Province. The Airborne Special Forces member had three children and a wife. Residents in his tiny hometown, Tolar, Texas, gathered on the local high school football field, burning candles in his honor. Sargeant Stephens was number 2,000. I don't know the name of the guy who was 1,999. I apologize. I mean no disrespect. Someone whose life story and profound sacrifice may get far less acclaim. Meanwhile, the first casualties of the conflict get shoved deeper into the nation's collective memory.
Obviously somebody was just killed in action there and that person should be remembered and celebrated. But we’ve also got to remember there are widows who have been dealing with this since 2001. They still need support and their families need care and their kids need to figure out how they’re going to school. The price those families pay impacts generations.
We have a huge disconnect in this country. You probably don't think about Afghanistan unless you have a family member serving there. You probably don't know what to do about Afghanistan when you do think about it. So, what you do is you remember the fallen, you remember the families, you remember the soldiers that return, and you absolutely honor their service by keeping our oath that we will take care of them and their families. And never forget.
Political pressures are rising again in Europe. Political pressure, riots, and protests are part and parcel to hard times. These developments change nothing of significance in the calculus concerning the eventual success of the Eurozone crisis response.
After a quiet few weeks, political pressures are rising again in Europe. Molotov cocktails exploding in Athens and news reports of mounting support for the rightist Golden Dawn party bring into questions the durability of the summer stabilization in the Euro-Zone.
In fact the only example of public outrage having an impact recently has come in Portugal, where protests spread spontaneously against the government’s new proposal to shift social security contributions from firms to workers. The furor forced the government to withdraw this step, which had been aimed at increasing competitiveness by an ‘internal devaluation’.
Today, the European Central Bank urged euro-zone states to implement further “major” reforms of their labor markets in order to combat rising unemployment and bolster growth. The ECB report says: “Major labor market reforms in euro area countries are essential to foster job creation, bring down unemployment and restore competitiveness, while also lowering the risks of a permanent decrease in potential output growth.” We'll see who's buying it.
As German Chancellor Angela Merkel travels to Greece tomorrow for her first visit since the turmoil began in 2009, European finance ministers gathered in Luxembourg today to discuss Spain’s overhaul effort. Spain doesn’t need an assistance program. That’s what the Spanish government is saying again and again. But there seems to be insistence to put a program in place.
Joseph E. Stiglitz says the Fed and ECB can’t revive the economy on their own. “For both Europe and America, the danger now is that politicians and markets believe that monetary policy can revive the economy. Unfortunately, its main impact at this point is to distract attention from measures that would truly stimulate growth, including an expansionary fiscal policy and financial-sector reforms that boost lending. The current downturn, already a half-decade long, will not end any time soon. That, in a nutshell, is what the Fed and the ECB are saying. The sooner our leaders acknowledge it, the better.”
To better calculate the true idleness and “wasted youth” phenomenon in advanced economies, the OECD calculates the share of youth “not in employment, education, or training” among the total in the 15- to 24-year-old age group. This is the so-called NEET ratio, which comprises “idle youth” in the labor force (looking for work, but unable to find it) and outside the labor force (inactive). Idle youth are associated with long-term scarring effects; the euro area peripheral countries look less bad than other OECD countries. Yes, there have been significant increases in Ireland and Spain during the crisis, but the Q1 2011 NEET ratio of these two countries was still only 2.8 percentage points higher at 17.6 percent than the corresponding 14.8 percent in the United States.”
Robert Shiller writes about the social epidemic behind housing. “People waiting to buy a home may be waiting for a sense that prices have a rosy long-term future. Home prices in the United States have been rising for several months, and that is generating some optimism that now is the time to buy. However, the social waves also carry other, less encouraging stories that compete with such optimism — for example, foreclosures, unemployment, Europe’s troubles and the Asian slowdown. Will optimism about real estate emerge as a leading story?”
A single mysterious computer program that placed orders - and then subsequently canceled them - made up 4 percent of all quote traffic in the U.S. stock market last week. Still don't know what was behind it.
The program placed orders in 25-millisecond bursts involving about 500 stocks, according to Nanex, a market data firm. The algorithm never executed a single trade, and it abruptly ended at about 10:30 a.m. Friday. Just goes to show you how just one person can have such an outsized impact on the market. Exchanges are just not monitoring it.
Maybe, the ultimate goal of many of these programs is to gum up the system so it slows down the quote feed to others and allows the computer traders (with their co-located servers at the exchanges) to gain a money-making arbitrage opportunity. The scariest part of this single program was that its millions of quotes accounted for 10 percent of the bandwidth that is allowed for trading on any given day. Regulators are trying to see how they can rein in the practice, which accounts for 70 percent of trading each day. Think transaction tax.
This quarterly earnings season, which kicks off in the US with aluminum producer Alcoa’s figures on tomorrow night, will be the first since 2009 in which the profits of corporate America are forecast to turn negative compared with the same quarter a year ago. With China slowing, a “fiscal cliff” of towering tax rises looming in the US and the eurozone crisis little closer to resolution, it is hard to believe chief executives will up their earnings guidance for the near future, either.
At the start of July, Wall Street analysts predicted the S&P 500 companies would post quarterly earnings up 1.9 per cent on a year ago, according to FactSet. Now the consensus shows a 2.7 per cent drop. The S&P 500 has risen 7.3 per cent over the same period. What gives?
Maybe, just maybe, weak demand has finally caught up with chief executives who previously found other ways to boost earnings. Earnings cannot keep growing faster than revenues. The latest data shows productivity plunged, which means that all the fat has already been cut. Profit gains earned through job cuts and factory closings in the absence of a global economic recovery are starting to reach their limit. A lot of the earnings growth that we’ve seen has been related to cost reductions. Now many of those cost reduction efforts have run their course. Without revenue growth, there is no room for profit to expand further.
Materials companies, metals producers and miners, in particular, are among those expected to post the worst earnings drops because of crumbling demand in Asia, along with energy companies suffering from falling natural gas prices.
Many have asked us if there can be an earnings recession without an economic recession, and today’s environment answers the question. Roughly, 50% of the companies are expected to experience YoY contraction in net margins during the quarter, including heavyweights like CVX, MFST and GOOG. While revenue growth expectations have largely held up, earnings estimates for the quarter have seen sharp downward revisions in the last two months hurt by the highest ratio of negative-to-positive guidance any time in this cycle.
A different sampling of analysts performed by Convergex arrived at a different conclusion:
The upcoming earnings season will have the 30 companies of the Dow Jones Industrials showing an average revenue decline of 0.7%.
Analysts have been cutting their top line expectations for the companies of the Dow every month for the last half-year. Back in January, for example, they thought revenues could grow at a very healthy 4%. By May, the analyst community began to realize that macroeconomic conditions were going south pretty quickly and cut expectations to 3%. Starting in August, analysts’ financial models pointed to an average decline for the Dow companies. The most recent numbers, as of Friday, now show that 0.7% average decline.
Among the reasons for the slowdown in revenue growth per share are slowing emerging markets growth and recession throughout Europe.