Sometimes
I Forget What I'm Supposed To Remember
by
Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 205 = 13,343
SPX – 24 = 1433
NAS – 67 = 3005
10 YR YLD -.06 = 1.77%
SPX – 24 = 1433
NAS – 67 = 3005
10 YR YLD -.06 = 1.77%
OIL
– 1.96 = 90.14
GOLD – 21.10 = 1721.50
SILV - .75 = 32.17
PLAT – 29.00 = 1625.00
GOLD – 21.10 = 1721.50
SILV - .75 = 32.17
PLAT – 29.00 = 1625.00
Today
is the 25th anniversary of Black Monday, and the markets
paid homage with a 205 point drop, nothing close to the 508 point
drop in 1987. On a percentage basis, 1987 was 16 times worse than
today. The Crash of 1987 would be about a 3,100 point drop in today's
markets. That would get your attention. Still, the more things
change the more they stay the same.
Back
in 1987, the Crash was blamed, at least in part, on program trading,
based on portfolio insurance and a process called dynamic hedging. I
remember computers back then that weren't fast enough to play Pong,
much less cause a crash. Maybe the Wall Street crowd had really fast
floppies. Today we have high frequency trading or HFT, and they can
whip out trades in milliseconds; and if you're looking for a market
crash in the future, don't be surprised if it comes from HFT. The
whole idea of HFT is legalized theft and it doesn't
add to market liquidity, stability or efficiency. They are not
market-makers. They are market-manipulators. They have no obligation
to make a market in any stock. The never have to post a market or
ever honor the bids and offers they post. In fact, their game is to
post fake bids and offers that they have no intention of honoring.
High-frequency
traders send out tens of millions, if not billions, of orders to
exchanges that are never meant to be executed. They are fake orders
designed to manipulate prices on the nation's exchanges. And while
other market participants are not actually forced to adjust their
bids and offers or engage in any of these trades, allowing access to
the exchanges to manipulate anybody in any way is something that
ought to be outlawed. The main advantage of HFT is that the traders
are fast and they are so fast they can jump in front of your trade
and skim off a tiny fraction
The
SEC allows exchanges to serve high frequency traders by leasing them
co-location space next to the exchange's servers. It's kind of like
allowing pickpockets to come into the bank and stand at the tellers'
window and steal from the customers, as long as they only steal
pocket change and not folding money. The problem is that all that
pocket change adds up the real money. HFT activity is responsible
for at least half of the daily 6.8 billion shares traded across
America's exchanges, and may be as much as 80% by some measures. And
when HFT accounts for more than 50% of trades it means the high
frequency traders are playing with themselves. This means liquidity
is an illusion.
Remember
the Flash Crash of 2010? The Dow dropped 1,000 points in 10 minutes.
Remember the Knight Capital fiasco a few months back? Remember Kraft
Foods a few weeks ago? A computer algorithm has a minor glitch and
in the blink of an eye tens of millions of dollars is wiped out;
trillions could vanish in the time it takes to stir your coffee. So,
do you trust the stock market?
The
problem today was largely blamed on earnings. Of
the 116 S&P 500 companies that have reported results so far, 58
percent have missed on revenue expectations. Note, we're not talking
about bottom line profits, we're talking top line revenue; and in
some ways that is far more frightening. Today it was GE, McDonald's
and Microsoft. Yesterday it was Google, with premature earnings.
Google is groping for ways to grow revenue. That puts Google in the
same position as Microsoft, trying to find a way to extend its
reach.
Google
and Microsoft together have over $100 billion of cash on their
balance sheets. Judging by the earnings misses that both turned in
last night, Google and Microsoft are both willing to take a step back
on earnings to invest in the "next big thing." The question
for investors is whether or not either or both companies can find
that elusive second act. The problem is not the prowess and
expertise of these two high tech giants. They continue to create and
refine. The problem is demand. We've seen it before.
Remember
back in the 80's when Japan was known for its electronic prowess? In
1990 Japanese products represented nearly 30% of the world's total
export value. Now that figure is closer to 14%. Remember back in the
80's when the Japanese started an aggressive expansion, buying up all
things American. Now, they're on the hunt for growth anywhere they
can find it and in any sector that grows. For example: Talkeda
Pharmaceuticals has been on a $15 billion buying binge, scooping up
Swiss, Brazilian, and a couple of US companies. Daikin Industries
just spent nearly $4billion to buy the US airconditioning
manufacturer, Goodman. In the financial services sector, Mitsubishi
UFJ Lease and Finance is purchasing Jackson Square Aviation for $1.3
billion. Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance bought
Delphi Financial Group last year for $2.7 billion. And earlier this
week, Softbank said it would purchase a 70% stake in Sprint Nextel
for $20 billion. That's the biggest M&A deal of the year.
Japanese
companies have more than $2 trillion in cash on their balance sheets
and some very powerful motivation. The Japanese economy is lousy; the
demographics are old; private, corporate, and government debt is 500%
of Japanese GDP; and Japanese companies just can't seem to drum up
business in Japan.
Of
course, back in 1987, the economy recovered pretty quick after the
Crash. I don't think that would happen today. The main reason is that
the financial sector has changed. Back then we had traditional banks
and there were investment banks; and there was a brick wall between
them. Back then we had Glass-Steagall. We should resurrect it. It
was good policy.
Five
years ago Wall Street’s excesses almost ruined the economy.
Bankers, hedge-fund managers, and private-equity traders speculated
on the upside, then shorted on the downside — in a vast zero-sum
game that resulted in the largest transfer of wealth from average
Americans to financial elites ever witnessed in this nation’s
history.
Average
Americans lost big; including over $7 trillion of home values, a
$700-billion-dollar bailout of Wall Street, and continuing high
unemployment. The top one-percent, the financial elites made out
fine. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer; maybe some things
never change. The stock market has about caught up to where it was
before the crash of 2008; this time it was a far different rebound
than the rebound following the Crash of 87. The pay and bonuses on
the Street are once again sky-high. So are the pay and perks of top
corporate executives. This country has had a hard row to hoe, but
some folks have made out like bandits. The problem is that there
just aren't enough of them to increase demand. That should be one of
the lessons we learned from the Japanese.
In
the 1980s the ten biggest banks had less than 30 percent of bank
depositary assets. Now they have 54 percent. And the four biggest now
dominate the Street almost completely. Because lenders and investors
know they’re too big to fail, the four biggest banks have a
competitive advantage over smaller rivals that pose larger financial
risks. That means they’ll only get bigger.
Breaking
up the biggest banks and capping the size of all banks is hardly a
radical suggestion these days. There's a long list who think we should. We
need to restore trust to Wall Street, and that means we should outlaw
the High Frequency Trading bandits; that's one of the lessons we
should have learned back in 1987. We need to break up the biggest
banks and resurrect Glass-Steagall. That's one of the lesson we
actually learned back in 1929. And then we forgot it. "Those who
cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.