We Have Met the Enemy
by
Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 111 = 15,237
SPX + 10 = 1703
NAS + 31 = 3791
10 YR YLD un = 2.68%
OIL – 1.22 = 101.79
GOLD – 13.20 = 1274.20
SILV - .34 = 21.44
SPX + 10 = 1703
NAS + 31 = 3791
10 YR YLD un = 2.68%
OIL – 1.22 = 101.79
GOLD – 13.20 = 1274.20
SILV - .34 = 21.44
The
Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the OPCW, the Organization for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international chemical weapons
watchdog helping to eliminate the Syrian army's stockpiles of poison
gas.
Its
inspectors have just begun working in the active war zone, and the
Norwegian Nobel Committee said it hopes the award offers "strong
support" to them as they face arduous and life-threatening
tasks.
Overall
consumer confidence decreased from 77.5 in September to 75.2 in
October, according to the Index of Consumer Sentiment published by
Thomson Reuters and the University of Michigan. The economic
expectations index in the survey also fell from 67.8 in September to
63.9 for October, reaching the lowest level so far this year as
consumers reported less optimism about the course of the economy for
the next 12 months.
In
what has become an almost daily occurrence, Thursday night brought
another poll, this one from NBC and the Murdoch Street Journal,
showing that Americans really don't like the politicians.
A
recap: Only 24% of Americans had a favorable view of Republicans, the
lowest figure in the poll’s multi-year history and four percentage
points lower than last month. Another low: only 21% had a favorable
view of the tea party. Obama's standing was relatively stable,
moving from 45% favorable last month to 47% now, within the poll’s
margin of error of 3.5 points. Democrats overall were at 39%
positive, with congressional Democrats at 36%. And 70% of Americans
said Republicans were putting politics ahead of what was best for the
country. A lesser 51% said that about Obama.
The
poll also shows the GOP-Tea Party efforts to defund or delay
Obamacare—the demand which directly led to the government
shutdown—has brought about a seven point increase in
popularity of the law. Immediately prior to the shutdown, only 31
percent of Americans believed Obamacare was a good idea. Today, that
number is 38 percent.
To
paraphrase Pogo, the GOP has met the enemy, and they are it.
It
looks like the politicians might be getting closer to some sort of
deal to avoid throwing Treasury bonds into a financial abyss. The
idea is to combine a government funding bill (which would end the
shutdown) along with a debt-ceiling increase (which would avoid a
default) along with a repeal of the medical device tax in Obamacare
(which has nothing to do with Obamacare and is just a bone to throw
at the GOP). The deal would avert default for 6 weeks, and would
demand negotiations on a variety of issues including spending levels,
means testing for entitlements, chained CPI for Social Security.
President
Barack Obama has been adamant that he will not negotiate over
anything while the government is shut down and the debt limit is held
hostage. According to a New York Times report, Obama thinks the
Republicans are demanding too much, saying “The only thing not on
their list is my own resignation.” The paper also reported that
Obama told a group of Democrats that “If he gives in now,
Republican demands would be endless.” The sides would have to
figure out some sort of agreement to get past that obstacle.
If the House Republicans don't move
fast to cut a deal with themselves that the White House can support,
the Senate appears ready to step in and take over.
Something
might get done. That's what Wall Street traders were betting on
yesterday and today. But the important point is that it hasn't
happened yet. Which means that average ordinary citizens need to
maintain pressure on the politicians, and there are two ways to do
that: get drunk and then drink coffee.
Now
you can get drunk and dial up Congress in a very random way and spout
something so intelligent that your representative will feel compelled
to end the partisan nonsense.
Drunkdialcongress.org connects the disgruntled to the House of Representatives. You can enter your phone number into the website and an inebriated voice from a 1-800 number will call you back and ask, “Is this government shutdown making you want to drink?” before transferring to Capitol Hill so that you can “tell them what’s on your mind and tell them to get back to work.”
The
site, created by the mobile ad firm, Revolution Messaging, offers
talking points like “I can’t watch the panda!” or “Why don’t
you make yourself useful and at least mow the lawn?” For those who
need help selecting their form of liquid courage, there are also
recipes for drinks like “the bad representative” (three parts
liquor, one part lemon juice).
After
you sober up, you can go get a coffee at Starbucks and sign a
petition begging Washington to end the shutdown. Yea, this isn't such
a great idea either. I've always thought there was a problem with
Starbucks' semantics: “grande” means medium, “tall” means
small, and “magna cum laude” means barista, and “barista”
means someone who works slightly less than full-time and therefore
does not qualify for corporate health insurance. Plus, I'm not sure
if the long term solution that Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz wants is
the same solution I want. Plus, the coffee tastes like it's been
burned.
It's
earnings reporting season and today JPMorgan Chase reported a loss of
$380 million. This is the first quarterly loss for JPMorgan under the
reign of Jamie Dimon. The loss was connected to legal expenses. Dimon
tried to explain that, “While we had strong
underlying performance across the businesses, unfortunately, the
quarter was marred by large legal expense.” The
financial press picked up on that and the refrain was … leaving
regulatory problems aside... JPMorgan would have turned a profit. But
it was more than regulatory problems, it was legal problems. Big
difference.
Of
course that is a problem encountered by illegal enterprises of all
stripes; crime doesn't pay; not in the long run. Earlier
this year, when Dimon faced a shareholder referendum over his fitness
to serve as both chairman and CEO of the legally besieged bank, some
big Wall Street names came to his defense with a flawed rationale:
the company was booking record profits; who cares about anything
else? Maybe it's time to rethink.
Today,
I saw Maria Bartiromo on CNBC trying to say the banks had done
everything right and we should blame the regulators for not doing
their jobs. That debate should be laid to rest. Just because the cops
don't stop the crime, it doesn't mean the criminal is innocent.
And
even if you get past the multi-billion dollar legal problems, the
banks still have another problem. Mortgage production at JPMorgan
Chase and Wells Fargo fizzled in the last quarter as fewer borrowers
sought to refinance their home loans amid rising interest rates.
Wells Fargo felt the most pain from rising rates. The bank reported
$1.6 billion in mortgage banking income for the third quarter, a 43
percent drop from the same period one year earlier. The
slowdown reflects a shift in the housing recovery, which has largely
been relying on refinance activity. The number of loans eligible for
interest rate reductions dropped and interest rates have been higher,
and if the Fed tapers, rates will move higher still. And if the
politicians can't come up with some sort of deal over the weekend and
if we actually see a default, you don't even want to imagine what
will happen to rates.
About
one week ago, it started to snow in South Dakota, the wind kicked up
to 60 mph, and there was more snow; blizzard conditions; five feet of
snow in some places. Cattle ranching is big business in South Dakota,
about a $5.2 billion dollar industry. When the freak early snowstorm
hit, the cattle hadn't yet grown a winter coat; it killed a lot of
cattle, maybe 20,000, plus a yet to be determined number of horses,
sheep, and other livestock. Losses like this would be enough to
cripple many ranchers even in the best of times, especially with the
loss of future calves next spring whose would-be mothers were killed,
but with the federal Department of Agriculture still shut down,
ranchers are cut off from the livestock insurance that would normally
keep them afloat following a disaster like this.
The
federal Farm Service Agency's livestock indemnity program, which
offers compensation for lost livestock. As long as the government
stays shut, FSA offices nationwide will be shut too, leaving ranchers
without support. Even before the shutdown, the insurance
program was already threatened by delayed passage of the new
farm bill, which allocates money for a wide range of programs
including food stamps and farm subsidies and what is basically
insurance for farmers. While the shutdown debate rages, the Senate
and House are still hashing out the farm bill, leaving the livestock
indemnity program in midair.
There
are about 8.5 million people in Switzerland, and of that total more
than 100,000 have signed a petition which should result in a vote by
the Swiss parliament on a modest proposal to provide a basic monthly
income of about $2,800 to each adult in the country. The idea is
called universal basic income and the basic idea is, no matter what
you do, if you’re a resident, or a citizen you get a certain amount
of money each month. And it’s completely unconditional: If you’re
rich you get it, if you’re poor you get. If you’re a good person
you get it, if you’re a bad person you get it. And it does not
depend on you doing anything other than making whatever effort is
involved to collect the money.
So
far, the biggest opposition to universal basic income is from the
left. They fear it threatens the existence of the existing social
welfare systems there, because it’s very hard to finance both the
full set and full range of social welfare institutions that exist
already, and side by side to give people $2,800 a month.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.