Daily
Scandals and Distractions
by
Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 19 = 15,335
SPX – 1 = 1666
NAS – 2 = 3496
10 YR YLD + .02 = 1.96%
OIL + .58 = 96.87
GOLD + 33.90 = 1395.10
SILV + .66 = 23.02
SPX – 1 = 1666
NAS – 2 = 3496
10 YR YLD + .02 = 1.96%
OIL + .58 = 96.87
GOLD + 33.90 = 1395.10
SILV + .66 = 23.02
I
suppose we should start with the scandal du jour, since this is where
most of the news has been fixated recently. I'll try to focus on how
it affects the economy and the markets, but it's hard to ignore the
bluster. One quote I heard over the weekend was "add
Watergate and Iran Contra together and multiply by ten" to
calculate the tyrannical evil of the Obama scandals.
Actually,
the current scandals are not even close (I'm old enough to remember
the enemies list and plumbers). I don't think the scandals are
inconsequential but I think some historical perspective might help.
The rhetoric without perspective might actually backfire. But what we
concern ourselves with here is the economic and financial impact. And
it's likely there will be limited economic impact. We've seen worse,
and the markets survived and sometimes even prospered.
Remember
Iran Contra? It happened to coincide with one of the greatest bull
runs the market has ever seen. And remember the Lewinsky scandal? It
coincided with a market that was described as irrationally exuberant;
this is often attributed to gridlock in Washington, or some sort of
moderation. Actually, the old idea of gridlock being good for
markets, doesn't really hold water.
When
one party controls both the White House and Congress – Republicans
or Democrats – the markets perform about 5 times better than when
the president and Congress are from opposite parties. It doesn't seem
to matter for the current administration; the market is enjoying big
gains, with the S&P 500 up 149% since the lows of March 2009. And
when things look bad, the market goes higher.
The
explanation may come from the Federal Reserve. Weak
numbers on any front are viewed as a sign that the Fed will remain
accommodative as will other central banks around the world. The old
adage "don't fight the fed" has really become "don't
fight the feds' -
as in plural. Trillions of dollars on the sidelines have to be put to
work and are hungry for yield, especially from stocks.
The
trillions of dollars worth of central banks stimulus has put into
play the past few years have socialized risk. The game used to be
private gains and private losses. Now it's private gains and
socialized losses. Businesses that have under-invested for years are
beginning to capitalize on a distracted Washington using the
breathing room to make new investments.
Anyway,
the markets appear to be propped up, for now at least.
Remember
the Libor rate rigging scandal? Several of the biggest banks were
rigging Libor, the interest rate that is used worldwide for just
about everything. When the Libor Scandal broke it raised the
question, what else is rigged? We learned that derivatives,
specifically the nearly $400 trillion dollar market in interest rate
swap prices were subject to possible manipulation of the ISDA fix.
The
latest revelation is oil price rigging. A
review ordered by the British government last year in the wake of the
Libor revelations cited “clear”
parallels between the work of the oil-price-reporting agencies and
Libor.
They
are both widely used benchmarks that are compiled by private
organizations and that are subject to minimal regulation and
oversight by regulatory authorities. To that extent they are
also likely
to be vulnerable to similar issues with regards to the motivation and
opportunity for manipulation and distortion.
Last
week, the European Commission raided the offices of Shell, BP and
Norway’s Statoil as part of an investigation into suspected
attempts to manipulate global oil prices spanning more than a decade.
None
of the companies have been accused of wrongdoing, but the controversy
has brought back memories of the Libor rate-rigging scandal.
The
inquiry also involves Platts, the world's largest oil price reporting
agency.
Europeans
have long complained that retail gas prices have not seemed to match
wholesale prices. In fact, complaints that retail prices at gas
stations were noticeably slow to fall when wholesale prices fell
prompted the U.K.-based Office of Fair Trading last year to conduct
a cursory inquiry into
possible anti-competitive behavior in the fuel markets.Early
this year, they announced that they hadn't found enough evidence
to warrant a full-blown investigation. But complaints persisted.
“In Washington, the chairman of the Senate energy committee asked the Justice Department to investigate whether alleged price manipulation has boosted fuel prices for U.S. consumers.
“Efforts to manipulate the European oil indices, if proven, may have already impacted U.S. consumers and businesses, because of the interrelationships among world oil markets and hedging practices,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, wrote in a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. Wyden also asked Justice to investigate whether oil market manipulation was taking place in the United States.”
Not
only are petroleum products a multi-trillion dollar market on their
own, but manipulation of petroleum prices would effect virtually
every market in the world.
There's
a lot riding on the price of oil, including how much money OPEC
nations need to keep their governments funded. At $100 a barrel,
there's enough profit to produce the oil and to fund the governments.
Things get dicey around $80 a barrel; $60 dollar a barrel oil spells
big problems for almost all OPEC countries.
Meanwhile,
the
International Energy Agency (IEA) in its Oil Market Report claimed
that America's shale boom is growing even larger than expected. It's
also set to have a profound effect on OPEC.
OPEC
is also set to produce, or have the capability to produce, a lot more
oil.
One
main driver of that supply growth is Iraq. After a turmoil-filled
decade, Iraq is coming back on line in a big way -- and could add
another 3 million barrels per day to the oil mix by 2018.
So
the U.S. has lots of oil, and we're producing it at an ever-growing
rate. And OPEC has a lot of oil and is either producing it or sitting
on it.
And what's funny is that if OPEC continues to cut supply via quotas, all it will do is help the U.S. oil boom. They'll essentially be crimping supply to boost prices... and we'll benefit. So why are prices still high? Central banks are still printing money. The Fed and the BOJ are printing away, and it's probably only a matter of time before the ECB joins in. Maybe that explains something. Then there is the fear premium. Then there is the idea that prices are rigged. Nobody wants to upset the situation, at least not right now.
And what's funny is that if OPEC continues to cut supply via quotas, all it will do is help the U.S. oil boom. They'll essentially be crimping supply to boost prices... and we'll benefit. So why are prices still high? Central banks are still printing money. The Fed and the BOJ are printing away, and it's probably only a matter of time before the ECB joins in. Maybe that explains something. Then there is the fear premium. Then there is the idea that prices are rigged. Nobody wants to upset the situation, at least not right now.
The
Saudis aren't happy that Iraq is coming online with about 3 million
barrels a day by 2018. This could lead to a round of infighting among
OPEC -- with each nation trying to eke out the most money. Frankly,
the Saudis have massive incentive to see Iraq fail. The same goes for
Iran. There are sanctions against Iranian oil, and that has as much
to do with the price of oil as any specific act of craziness from the
Iranian crazies.
The
U.S. and OPEC are set to produce much more oil. And even though US
and Euro demand is falling, demand from the oil-thirsty East is set
to ramp up. So, we have an uneasy equilibrium in the oil markets
right now.
The
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco points
out:
When
gasoline prices increase, a larger share of households’ budgets is
likely to be spent on it, which leaves less to spend on other goods
and services. The same goes for businesses whose goods must be
shipped from place to place or that use fuel as a major input (such
as the airline industry). Higher oil prices tend to make production
more expensive for businesses, just as they make it more expensive
for households to do the things they normally do.
Oil
prices indirectly affect costs such as transportation, manufacturing,
and heating. The increase in these costs can in turn affect the
prices of a variety of goods and services, as producers may pass
production costs on to consumers. Oil price increases are generally
thought to increase inflation and reduce economic growth.
Oil
price increases can also stifle the growth of the economy through
their effect on the supply and demand for goods other than oil.
Increases in oil prices can depress the supply of other goods because
they increase the costs of producing them. In economics terminology,
high oil prices can shift up the supply curve for the goods and
services for which oil is an input. One major area that could feel
the pinch is agriculture, and the prices of the food we eat.
There
are some important scandals, just don't get distracted.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.