Economic Wallbanger
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 208 = 15,115
SPX – 23 = 1630
NAS – 35 = 3455
10 YR YLD + .04 = 2.16%
OIL – 1.98 = 91.63
SPX – 23 = 1630
NAS – 35 = 3455
10 YR YLD + .04 = 2.16%
OIL – 1.98 = 91.63
GOLD
– 25.40 = 1389.30
SILV - .51 = 22.37
SILV - .51 = 22.37
We
finish the month of May with the Dow Industrials up 1.9% on the
month; the S&P 500 posted a monthly gain of 2.1%, and the Nasdaq
Composite added 3.8% for the month. With this week's declines, the
MACD indicator for the Sell in May strategy, finally turned negative,
just in case you had been waiting. The
S&P 500 marked seventh monthly advance, its longest monthly
winning streak since one ending in September 2009. The Dow
industrials recorded their sixth straight monthly gain.
Treasury
prices dropped again today to finish their worst monthly performance
since December 2010; the yield on the 10-year note climbed 46 basis
points on the month. At one point during today's trading, the yield
topped 2.20%.
Next
week, we'll see how the labor market is behaving. Today we found out
that the unemployment rate for the 17 nation Eurozone has increased
to 12.2%, the highest level since data has been compiled starting in
1995. Consumer
price inflation was far below the ECB’s target of just below 2%,
coming in at 1.4% in May, slightly above April’s 1.2% rate.
Price
increases may
quiet concerns about deflation, but the deepening unemployment crisis
is a threat to the social fabric of the eurozone, with almost
two-thirds of young Greeks unable to find work exemplifying southern
Europe’s threat of creating a ‘lost generation’.
In
France, Europe’s second largest economy, the number of jobless rose
to a record in April, while in Italy, the unemployment rate hit its
highest level in at least 36 years, with 40% of young people out of
work. Youth
unemployment across the Eurozone came in at 24.4%, double the wider
jobless rate and up from 24.3% in March.
In
the past, the eurozone has needed economic growth of around 1.5% to
create new jobs. With the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development forecasting this week that the eurozone economy would
contract by 0.6% this year, unemployment is set to worsen long before
it turns around.
The
next formal meeting of the ECB is June 6. EU leaders are scheduled to
meet in Brussels at the end of June. Rate cuts and quantitative
easing might be on the agenda, but it will take much more than that.
The main problem for the Eurozone economy is no longer market driven
factors, but the possibility of social breakdown.
Several
thousand protesters blocked the ECB offices in Frankurt today. The
subway workers were on strike in Lisbon yesterday. Portuguese
teachers are scheduled to strike next month. It
is a similar story across large parts of the eurozone. There have
been mass protests in Madrid, Dublin and Athens against policies
designed to reduce budget deficits and bring about economic reform.
The
European commission has told six countries – France, Spain,
Portugal, Poland, the Netherlands and Slovenia – that they will
have up to two extra years to put their public finances in order. In
truth Brussels had little choice, because weak growth had reduced tax
revenues and made it impossible for exacting budget targets to be
met. The continued depression in parts of the Eurozone means that
people think austerity on its own is a doomed strategy. And so the
IMF, spurred on by an Obama regime deeply troubled by the depression
in the Eurozone, has been advising member governments to ease up.
Politically, austerity is no longer feasible. Of course, that doesn't
mean that the Eurozone governments have adopted pro-growth policies;
they haven't moved from a pro-cyclical fiscal stance to a neutral
one, let alone a counter-cyclical position. There are still big
differences between the French, Spanish, and Italians on one side and
the Germans and a few other countries on the other side. For now it's
a standoff, and not much is getting done. Eurozone austerity isn't
dead, they just pressed the pause button.
Deficit
reduction efforts in the rest of the world seem to clearly show that
austerity efforts have been unsuccessful nearly always and everywhere
in that their costs in economic damage have been far greater than any
gains that have been made by nations purposefully pursuing these
efforts. In the Eurozone, deficit reduction efforts have actually
made debt problems worse than they were before austerity cuts were
made, because their negative effects on national economies and
employment have also reduced tax revenues by more than the savings
achieved from cutting government programs.
Austerity
in the US is far from dead. In the US, our cuts have been shallow but
wide; meaning the cuts have been scheduled to be spread out over
several years. Which means the economy has been improving, but not
enough to reach solid, sustainable growth. Sometimes the absence of
pain feels like pleasure. Today's economic reports are the case in
point.
The
final
May reading of the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters
consumer-sentiment index jumped to 84.5 — the highest level since
July 2007 — from 76.4 in April. That puts
consumer-sentiment back to the level of 2007.
Meanwhile,
the Commerce Department reports consumer spending fell 0.2% in April.
Income growth was flat in April. Adjusted
for inflation, disposable income declined by 0.1% last month.
Disposable income is the money left after people pay taxes. Soft
consumer spending in April points to a weaker reading on second
quarter gross domestic product, barring a sharp uptick in May and
June. GDP is expected to slow to 1.9% from 2.4% in the first quarter.
The
personal savings rate has dropped to 2.5%, which means consumers have
very little room to increase spending unless they get more income, or
more wealth, or more debt. Most consumers don't want more debt or
find it difficult to get more debt. The fiscal policy out of
Washington has been pushing down income, as we're just starting to
see the effects of sequester cuts. The Federal Reserve is finding
there are limits to the possible benefits of the wealth effect to
stimulate the economy.
And
when we have semi-decent economic reports, like today, it just
worries the market that the Fed will take away the stimulus and cut
the $85 billion per month in bond purchases. If the absence of pain
starts to feel too pleasurable, just bang your head against the wall
for a while.
And
now, the latest on Monsanto. Last
month an Oregon farmer sprayed one of his fields with Roundup weed
killer, only to find that several wheat plants survived. He had the
wheat tested, and the Department of Agriculture determined that the
plants were an unapproved genetically modified strain made by the
biotech giant Monsanto. So-called “Roundup Ready” modifications
allow farmers to apply much higher levels of pesticides without
harming crops, and are common in soy and corn; the thinking is that
those plants are used more for animal feed; of course, humans then
feed on the animals, but don't let that stop you. Wheat is ingested
directly, and most people aren't ready to go there. No GM wheat is
currently approved for sale or production in the US, or anywhere else
in the world.
The
wheat is probably not harmful to humans—although since testing was
never completed, we can’t be sure. Nevertheless, most of Asia
(not to mention Europe and a certain portion of the United States) is
firmly opposed to GM crops made for human consumption. Where did the
wheat come from? Well, in the 1990s Monsanto conducted field tests of
wheat in 16 states. Monsanto dropped the wheat project. It never
asked for government approval, and it ended its field trials of wheat
in 2005. The last field test in Oregon stopped in 2001. The reality
of GM testing a product in open fields is that it’s quite easy for
cross-contamination. It’s like the dinosaurs in “Jurassic
Park”—no matter how well-designed the safeguards, life always
finds a way to jump the fence.
Japan
has canceled its imports of some types of US wheat. Japan imports
around five million tons of wheat a year, 60 percent of which is from
the US, making it one of the largest importers of the crop. It does
not allow GM wheat. Imports make up 90 percent of the wheat the
country consumes.
China,
South Korea and the Philippines have all said that they are
monitoring the ongoing US investigation, and the European Union said
it was stepping up testing. The US supplies about 20% of the global
supplies of wheat.
Extra Notes:
The
financial crisis destroyed some $16
trillion in
household wealth. Americans have only recovered 45 percent of that
amount, according to the Fed report. But when you break down that
wealth recovery by income level, it gets worse. The Fed estimates
that 62 percent of that wealth people have regained since the depths
of the recession has come in the form of higher stock prices. And 80
percent of
stock wealth is held by people in the top 10 percent of the income
distribution. "Recent gains in the stock market mean that the
recovery of wealth is nearly complete for white and Asian households
and older Americans,"
But
many families have not experienced any recovery at all, and some are
still losing wealth, William Emmons, chief economist for at the St.
Louis Fed’s Center for Household Financial Stability, told
the Post.
"The families that lost homes are not the families making money
off stocks," Mui notes. Though the number of foreclosures has
dropped off a lot, it is still more
than double what
it was pre-crisis.
The
report found that the most vulnerable households tended to be either
relatively young and/or black or Hispanic, and not well-educated.
Those families had low savings and high debt and had gained most of
their wealth through their homes.
It
gets worse. Because the housing market is improving overall, there is
less of an incentive for the government to push any new measures to
help underwater homeowners. Prominent
economists say
that allowing initiatives that would reduce borrowers' loan principle
balances is the single most important thing the administration could
do to help the Americans who lost all that home wealth. But for more
than a year, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency
(FHFA), which oversees the government-backed home-loan giants
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, blocked initiatives
that would have done just that. President Barack Obama has nominated a
new FHFA director, but as a report released
Friday by the Progressive Policy Institute notes, it might be too
late: "US housing markets have come roaring back to life, and
while that's great news, it has probably closed the window for
principal reduction."
The
wealthiest 1 percent now control 39 percent of the world's wealth,
and their share is likely to grow in the coming years, according to a
new report.
The
world's total private wealth grew 7.8 percent last year to $135
trillion, according to the Boston Consulting Group's Global Wealth
report. The top 1 percent control $52.8 trillion, and those worth $5
million or more control nearly a quarter of the world's wealth.
That
concentration is likely to increase in the coming years as the wealth
of the wealthy grows faster than overall global wealth. The number of
millionaires in the world surged by 10 percent year, reaching 13.8
million. The study predicts that global wealth will grow around 4.8
percent a year over the next five years-though millionaires will see
their wealth grow nearly twice as fast.
Those
worth $5 million or more will see their wealth grow 8 percent, while
those worth more than $100 million will see their wealth grow 9.2
percent. The $100-million-plus group will see their share of global
wealth grow to 6.8 percent in 2017 from the current 5.5 percent.
What's
driving the wealth of the wealthy? It depends on the country. In the
developed world-the U.S. and Europe- it's mainly stocks. And stocks
have been on a tear this year in the U.S., which has mainly benefited
the top 5 percent, who own 60 percent of all individually held
stocks.
In
developing markets, the main wealth creator is economic growth and
savings. Yet the amount of wealth held in stocks and in offshore
wealth (again mainly held by the wealthy) in developing countries is
also growing. The amount of wealth held in equities in Asia
(excluding Japan) surged by 21.9 percent in 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.