The
Real Question on the Economy
by
Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 128 = 14, 802
SPX + 19 = 1587
NAS + 59 = 3297
10 YR YLD +.06 = 1.80%
OIL +.35 = 94.55
GOLD – 25.70 = 1560.30
SILV - .33 = 27.75
SPX + 19 = 1587
NAS + 59 = 3297
10 YR YLD +.06 = 1.80%
OIL +.35 = 94.55
GOLD – 25.70 = 1560.30
SILV - .33 = 27.75
The
Federal Reserve released the minutes of their Federal Open Market
Committee meeting held March 19-20. The minutes leaked out 5 hours
early. The Fed inadvertently sent the report to congressional aides
and trade organizations yesterday, and since the details are actually
trade-able information, they had to make it public quicker than not.
Make no mistake, this was a serious breach of protocol.
Once
the minutes were made public, it depressed bond prices, mainly
because of disagreements among
the Fed's 19 policymakers about carrying on with buying $85 billion
in Treasury and mortgage bonds per month to stimulate the economy. Of
the 12 officials who have a vote on monetary policy this year, "a
few" expected to taper the purchases around midyear and to end
them later this year. "Several others thought that if the
outlook for labor market conditions improved as anticipated, it would
probably be appropriate to slow purchases later in the year and to
stop them by year-end.” Proving once again that the prognosticating
skills of the Federal Reserve are roughly equal to the singing skills
of a fish on a bicycle.
Just
like the release of the minutes, their ideas about exiting QE seem a
bit premature, especially in light of last week's jobs report, which
you recall, was a stinker. And yesterday we talked about job cuts at
the big banks; here's the actual quote from a Bloomberg news article:
“Rising stock prices, rebounding profits, restored dividends and a
growing economy are signaling to US banks it's time for more job
cuts.”
The
FOMC did have a revelation; for the first time they recognized that
$1.1 trillion in unpaid student loans might just constitute a wee bit
of a problem for the economy. Rates on the majority of student loans
taken out by undergraduates from the Education Department have
remained since 2006 fixed by law at 6.8 percent. The spread between
the two, which is an appropriate way to measure relative rates, since
student loans are generally repaid in about 10 years, has ranged from
4.5 percentage points to 5.27 percentage points since August 2011,
the highest gap on record.
And
the final report from the FOMC is to stay the course of Quantitative
Easing until unemployment hits 6.5% or inflation hits 2.5%; so,
nothing really changed. What it reveals is the Fed is getting nervous
about watching their balance sheet balloon to $4trillion or more;
they're nervous about asset bubbles; they're nervous about how to
exit without crashing the party; and they're nervous because this
really is a grand experiment in central banking.
Anyway,
the stock market moved higher today, and perhaps the best reason I
can offer for the big, record breaking day on Wall Street is just
that the trend is up.
President
Obama sent a $3.8 trillion budget to Congress today calling for more
tax revenue and slower growth for Social Security benefits. The
president is proposing to replace across-the-board sequester cuts
with $1.8 trillion in additional specific deficit reduction over 10
years that includes collecting more taxes from the wealthy and
trimming some federal programs. For the first time, Obama is
including in his budget an offer made last year to congressional
Republicans to change the cost-of-living calculation to a Chained CPI
formula for Social Security and tax brackets, which would increase
benefits more slowly and subject more income to taxation.
The
president’s plan to raise taxes on wealthy individuals and to close
loopholes for corporations drew immediate condemnation from
Republicans. Actually, the Republicans are licking their chops at the
Chained CPI on Social Security. They're already characterizing the
President's plan as a way to "save” Social Security, they're
just not going to go along with his tax increases. And the plan to
change the Social Security formula drew fire from fellow Democrats.
I'm not sure what classes Obama actually took at Harvard, but I think
he missed Negotiating 101. He apparently wants to show a willingness
to compromise, but the Republicans seem unwilling to take yes for an
answer.
Now,
I'm thinking back to maybe last week, when Obama sent new Treasury
Secretary Jack Lew to Brussels to tell the Europeans to ease up on
austerity because its bad for growth; or at least it's bad for growth
in Europe but apparently it's good for the US. Austerity is an
anti-growth policy. It frequently makes the debt-to-GDP ratio larger
because it causes such a large fall in GDP, but it's bad for Europe
and good for the US. Must have missed that class on Consistency 101.
Now,
if you're neck brace hasn't already gone flying off due to the
tremendous torque exerted by today's news, let's put a cherry on top.
Obama is proposing a new $2 billion infrastructure investment or jobs
program that can overcome the damage to the economy caused by
austerity in the form of a combined $300 billion in reduced spending
and increased tax revenues.
Anyway,
let's get back to the Federal Reserve minutes on how they will
continue to juice the economy and the president's budget, which
nobody likes and is likely DOA, and let's ask – what's wrong with
this picture?
If the economy is getting better, then why does poverty in America continue to grow so rapidly? Yes, the stock market has been hitting all-time highs recently, but also the number of Americans living in poverty has now reached a level not seen since the 1960s. Yes, corporate profits are at levels never seen before, but so is the number of Americans on food stamps. Yes, housing prices have started to rebound a little bit, but there are also more than a million public school students in America that are homeless. That is the first time that has ever happened in U.S. History. Do we measure our economic progress by the false stock market bubble that has been inflated by the Fed's money dump on their Wall Street cronies, or should we measure our economic progress by how the poor and the middle class are doing?
Even
as the markets hit new highs, the most explosive growth is in
poverty; now at the highest levels since the 1960s. One out of every
six Americans now live in poverty; 146 million are considered poor or
low income; one in every five children live in poverty; one in five
households with children are considered food insecure – meaning the
kids are going hungry; and nearly 3 million children in this country
live on less than $2 dollars a day, which is the global standard for
extreme poverty.
At
some point, maybe the President and the Republicans and the Federal
Reserve could just stop for a moment and ask the question: What's the
economy for anyway?
A
side note: I've been talking about cyber attacks as a major trend for
a couple of years now. Obama's budget proposes to boost Defense
Department spending on cyber efforts to $4.7 billion, $800 million
more than current levels, even as it plans to cut the Pentagon's
overall spending by $3.9 billion; the idea is to protect computer
networks from internet base attacks. Intelligence officials said last
month that cyber attacks and espionage have supplanted terrorism as
the top security threat facing the United States.
This
was one of the trends I talked about at the recent Wealth protection
Economic Conference. If you would like to hear the entire Conference, including nine CDs, or the MP3 recordings are now available. Contact Resource Consultants
at 800-494-4149 for purchase information.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.