Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - Reflecting the Economy

Reflecting the Economy
by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 42 = 16,633
SPX – 2 = 1909
NAS – 11 = 4225
10 YR YLD - .08 = 2.43%
OIL – 1.03 = 103.08
GOLD = 4.70 = 1259.60
SILV - .01 = 19.13

The major stock market indices were lower, but it wasn’t a big move, and we’ve been 4 up days, so today’s pullback was nothing but a pause. What was interesting today was the move in the bond market. The yield on the 10 year treasury dropped all the way to 2.43%; that’s the lowest rate in almost a year. The 10 year treasury has dropped 22 basis points this month, meaning treasuries are on track for the best month since January. Now, remember that the Federal Reserve is supposed to be tapering, cutting back on large scale purchases of treasury bonds.  

What’s fueling the move? It’s hard to pinpoint one thing. Europe is facing some sort of monetary stimulus package from the ECB next week; meanwhile, a report showed German unemployment rose and that pushed yields on the 10 year bund to 1.28%; that trade then spilled over to the US markets, toss in end of month window dressing and there was likely a short squeeze. There are some big short positions on treasuries right now; more shorts than longs.

At the end of the day, the bond market is supposed to reflect the economy; not an exact image but rather a mirror image. And the US economy is probably not as strong as expected. Tomorrow, we’ll get a revised look at first quarter GDP. The initial estimate on GDP showed just 0.1% growth; a pathetic rate blamed on bad weather; the revision is expected to show the economy contracted by 0.6%, maybe worse. Since the recession ended in June 2009, US GDP growth has dipped into the red only once: the first quarter of 2011, when economic output contracted at a 1.3% rate. It appears likely to happen again. The economy was repeatedly disrupted by cold and snowy weather in the first quarter and much of the activity that did not take place then is occurring now during the warmer spring months. Wall Street expects second-quarter growth to snap back with a 3.8% gain.

But where will the springtime burst of growth come from? Exports? Not to Europe and not to emerging markets. The initial GDP report said net exports subtracted 0.83 percentage point from the GDP growth rate in the first quarter. It may be a bigger drag on growth in Thursday’s update. Construction? A bit, yes, but we continue to see the housing market looking soft. Construction lending is seeing a slow, steady recovery, but it remains 66% below its boom-era peak of $631 billion in outstanding loans in early 2008. Companies restocking their shelves? Not likely. Inventories subtracted 0.57 percentage point from GDP growth, according to the first estimate, and that could grow with this week’s revision; inventories remain high and consumer spending sluggish. Corporate profits? Yes sir that is an area of strength but it’s also a two-edged sword.

The Commerce Department is starting to release a new report on corporate profits. Pretax profits adjusted for depreciation and the value of inventories climbed 1.9% in the fourth quarter to a record $2.13 trillion on a annualized basis. Corporate profits as a percentage of GDP stood at 10.2% in the fourth quarter, just a touch below a record high. Corporate profits are now higher than they’ve ever been before.

Here’s the problem; whenever profit margins reach a high, they tend to peak and then rollover, with the stock market and the economy dragging behind in like manner. It’s tough to keep pumping out record profits, in part because profit margins often depend on cost cutting, not just revenue; there are limits to how much fat a company can trim and there are limits to how much a company can increase sales while simultaneously cutting back on R&D and capital expenditures. Right now, stocks are priced to reflect very high corporate profits. Any disappointment would shake that pricing structure and translate into big stock market losses.

Like any individual indicator, this is not an absolute. Corporate profit margins can remain at elevated levels anywhere from a single quarter to multiple years and don’t typically present an imminent warning threat to the stock market or economy until forming a major peak and sudden decline. Profit margins peak on average before the stock market by more than a year and before recessions by more than two years. It doesn’t work out this way all the time; in the early 70’s profits peaked with the market, and in the early 80’s profits peaked after the stock market, and it is possible that the lag time stretches out so far as to make the indicator more or less worthless.

The point is that there are other factors that must be considered. Think of profits as one measurement of the business cycle. So, despite the Fed taper, there is increasing likelihood that interest rates will remain low and possibly decline a bit; if rates decline, stocks are likely to move up with bonds, as we’ve seen can happen; and if falling long-term yields flatten the yield curve, that would increase the risk of a market crash. In a low-yield, low inflation environment, there is a good opportunity to grow profits and so those crashes tend to be preceded by periods of very strong returns. So the current bull market is likely to remain in place until inflation picks up or low-flation/deflation drags down profits.

Falling yields tend to be somewhat more bullish than bearish, but it’s a poor indicator for how the stock market will react. Falling yields are good especially when we are in a bull market, but they can be dangerous if they should drive down the yield curve spread to an unusually low level and then there is the lag effect I mentioned earlier. When the long end of the yield curve comes down that is good for stocks for a while; it can even result in parabolic increases in the short term, but it also indicates bad news for the broader economy, and eventually the bill comes due.

Yesterday we talked about the proposed new EPA regulations on coal fired power plants. Today we’ll talk about the backlash to those proposals; which, by the way, have not been officially proposed yet. It’s anticipated that the new EPA guidelines will try to reduce the percentage of US electricity generated by coal to 14% by 2030 from about 37% right now. Coal is the single biggest source of electricity generation in the US and has been for more than 60 years. The amount of electricity generated by natural gas would rise to 46% by 2030 from about 30% now under the EPA plan. That would make it the biggest generator of the nation’s electricity.

Meanwhile, opponents of the plan say it will increase the cost of electricity and cost jobs. The US Chamber of Commerce released a study showing it would cost the economy $50 billion a year and destroy a quarter million jobs. Sometimes they just pull numbers out of the air; these reports tend to overlook the externalities associated with a dirty fuel like coal, and also overlook the positive impact of cleaner fuels. Anyway, the mudslinging has started.

And a follow-up on the Detroit bankruptcy story. A task force has issued the most detailed study yet of blight in Detroit and recommended that the city spend at least $850 million to quickly tear down about 40,000 dilapidated buildings, demolish or restore tens of thousands more, and clear thousands of trash-packed lots. It also said that the hulking remains of factories that dot Detroit, crumbling reminders of the city’s manufacturing prowess, must be salvaged or demolished, which could cost as much as $1 billion more.

If carried out, the recommendations by the Detroit Blight Removal Task Force would drastically alter the face of the nation’s largest bankrupt city. They would also cost significantly more than the approximately $450 million that the city already plans to spend on blight, raising questions about the feasibility of the vast cleanup effort, which is part of its larger campaign to emerge from bankruptcy by fall and begin remaking itself.

The blight study, which is perhaps the most elaborate survey of decay conducted in any large America city, found that 30% of buildings, or 78,506 of them, scattered across the city’s 139 square miles, are dilapidated or heading that way. It found that 114,000 parcels — about 30% of the city’s total — are vacant. And it found that more than 90% of publicly held parcels are blighted. The report also made several recommendations for preventing blight in the future, including changes to property tax and foreclosure laws, and heavy fines for scrap metal theft.

The basic plan is to clean up the city, but nobody really knows how to go about the task. Do you clean up by tearing down or do you clean up by building or rebuilding? For years, some have contemplated consolidating some of the city’s neighborhoods to allow the city to provide services to a smaller area, more suited to its shrunken population; Detroit has gone from 1.8 million to about 800,000. And if they don’t get this right this time, it will likely revert to farmland. 

Thursday, May 15, 2014 - A Calm Port in a Stormy World

A Calm Port in a Stormy World

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 167 = 16,446
SPX – 17 = 1870
NAS – 31 = 4069
10 YR YLD - .04 = 2.50%
OIL - .81 = 101.56
GOLD – 8.90 = 1297.80
SILV - .29 = 19.56

Today, it seems there is a lot going on. Let’s start with international hotspots.

Turks are angry following a deadly mine explosion that has killed at least 300 miners and trapped possibly 100 more; thousands of workers joined a protest strike, demonstrators clashed with security forces, and the discontent threatens the government. An aide to the prime minister was photographed assaulting a protester and there are claims that Prime Minister Erdogan himself struck a teenage girl; that after he was forced to flee an angry crowd and seek safety in a nearby grocery store. Turkish trade unions held a one-day strike over safety standards in the mining industry. Security forces deployed tear gas and water canons against protesters.

Meanwhile, reports of dozens of deaths from an explosion along the border between Syria and Turkey. Also, further allegations of ongoing chemical attacks by the Syrian government. Speaking in London today, Secretary of State John Kerry announced the US, Britain, and European and Arab states are increasing efforts to support rebels fighting to overthrow President Assad. Assad still has the backing of Russia, and that makes already tense relations with Russia even more edgy.

Fears of a civil war in Ukraine are mounting. Nobody wants to jump in with troops, and so there are clandestine forays by unidentified groups or squads of soldiers. And the major powers are only explicit with sanctions. Today, Russia announced it will halt the export of rocket engines crucial to US military defense and space programs. It must be very uncomfortable on the International Space Station these days.

Anti-Chinese sentiment has been running high in Vietnam ever since Beijing deployed an oil rig into disputed waters in the South China Sea on May 1st. There have been encounters including ramming and exchanges of water cannon between Chinese vessels operating near the rig and boats from Vietnam, which wants China out of the area. Today, Cambodia reports hundreds of Chinese nationals had poured across the border from Vietnam to escape riots.

Also, Japan’s Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, has called for a review of how Japan interprets its pacifist constitution to allow its military to participate in conflicts beyond its borders for the first time since the end of the second world war; this in response to a growing conflict between China and Japan over islands claimed by each country; of course, it’s not just islands but the oil reserves around the islands.

Meanwhile, China issued a bunch of economic data this week, and it mostly points to a real estate slump; home sales fell 18%; housing starts were scaled back by 25%. Moody’s Analytics estimates that the building, sale and outfitting of apartments accounted for 23% of Chinese gross domestic product last year. That is higher than in the US, Spain or Ireland at the peaks of their housing bubbles. The scale of China’s building boom and the country’s reliance on infrastructure investment for growth is unprecedented. In just two years, from 2011 to 2012, China produced more cement than the US did in the entire 20th century, and it all seems to be on shaky ground these days. Each attempt to rein in China’s $25 trillion credit bubble seems to trigger wider tremors.

Brazil has sent army troops to Recife, the capital of the northeastern state of Pernambuco, after strikes lead to riots. State police walked off the job Tuesday. Schools and universities also closed down because of concerns for student safety. Today, further protests in Sao Paolo and Rio de Janeiro drew tens of thousands to the streets. The protests are centered on cities that will host the upcoming World Cup, the quadrennial global soccer championship games. Huge anti-government protests across Brazil last year overshadowed the Confederations Cup, a warm-up tournament for the World Cup. Some of the demonstrations saw clashes between activists and police, and at least six people were killed.

Many Brazilians are angry at the billions spent to host the World Cup. Protesters have said the government should focus spending instead on improving Brazil's woeful health, education, security, housing, and infrastructure systems. The World Cup starts in less than 30 days, and the whole world will be watching.

In one week, Europeans will elect a European Parliament. It’s the second biggest election in the world, after India. Voters look set to choose more assorted extremists, anti-Europeans and oddballs than ever. The Euroland economy is going nowhere, and with the razor thin exception of Germany, most countries are seeing economic contraction; that tends to lead to strange election results.

There are other hotspots around the World. The president of Yemen has declared all-out war on Al Qaeda militants and army troops are now trying to dislodge Al Qaeda from the Arabian Peninsula. Political violence returned to Bangkok Thailand, and the Thai army killed a handful of protesters and threatened more military action if the protests continue. And of course, the Nigerian crazies, Boko Haram, and the kidnapping of hundreds of schoolgirls. And of course, all the old seething conflicts that haven’t been resolved. And don’t forget, the US is still at war in Afghanistan. I know, it’s easy to forget. Apparently, it’s even easier to forget the veterans that have served our country.

Today, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, General Eric Shinseki went before the Senate Veterans Committee to explain the mess that is the VA; this following revelations that as many as 40 veterans died while waiting for medical care at the VA facility in Phoenix.

Since the allegations arose last month that veterans were forced to wait months for appointments at the Phoenix VA medical center and that VA officials were covering up the problem, Shinseki said he has asked the VA's inspector general to investigate. He said he has also launched an intense investigation of scheduling practices at the VA's other 151 medical centers. Shinseki said he was “mad as hell” and the various Senators all acted very indignant. Of course, it wasn’t very believable theatre.

One of the documents brought forth today was an internal VA memo, written in 2008 by a team of VA managers, listing 25 ways that VA scheduling clerks were cooking the books to make it appear that veterans waiting for medical care actually were being seen on time, when in fact they were being made to wait weeks or months.

And then, 2 years ago, the Government Accountability Office reported that VA schedulers were fudging wait times for veterans seeking outpatient care and avoiding using the electronic waitlist as required. The GAO report includes a response from Shinseki's chief of staff at the time, writing that the VA has "proactively taken steps in response to GAO's findings." Clearly that didn’t happen.

Meanwhile, Southern California is on fire. Actually nine fires are burning in the greater San Diego area and they have already destroyed more than 10,000 acres, forcing evacuation of about 125,000 residents. California Governor Jerry Brown has declared a state of emergency to free up resources. It’s hot, it’s dry, and it’s just the start of the fire season.

The 2014 fire season is repeating a pattern of destruction established over the past decade by a combination of high temperatures, parched vegetation and more people living in wooded areas. Fires feeding on plentiful dry grass, brush and hardwood are requiring more personnel and money to bring them under control. More than twice as many acres burned across the US through May 9 this year than during the same period in 2013.

Last week, 96% of California was considered to be under “severe” or worse drought conditions, with about 4% of the southeastern tip of the state still in “moderate” drought conditions. A year ago, only 46% of the state suffered from “severe” or worse conditions. As of today, the National Drought Mitigation Center reports severe drought conditions now engulf 100% of California.

Meanwhile, former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is trying to polish his tarnished image; he’s on a book tour peddling the notion that the Wall Street bailout was a huge success. And while it might be argued it prevented a Great Depression, it is delusional to consider it a success. It was at best an experiment that did not result in a worse catastrophe. It did little or nothing for the tens of millions of Americans who lost billions of dollars in home equity and savings, and the millions more who lost their jobs. The toll was greatest on the poor and the middle class. Nor have reforms been enacted that will help the middle class and the poor the next time Wall Street implodes.

Economic data today showed industrial production in the US unexpectedly declined in April, held back by a plunge in utilities as temperatures warmed and a broad-based decrease in manufacturing. That contrasted with a higher-than-forecast reading on the Fed Bank of New York’s gauge of regional manufacturing, which climbed to 19.01 this month, from 1.29 in April.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits declined 24,000 to a seasonally adjusted 297,000 last week. It was the lowest reading since May 2007.

Consumer prices recorded their largest increase in 10 months in April. The Consumer Price Index increased 0.3% last month as food prices rose for a fourth consecutive month and the cost of gasoline surged. In the 12 months through April, consumer prices rose 2.0%. Stripping out food and energy prices, the so-called core CPI rose 0.2% after advancing by the same margin in March. In the 12 months through April, the core CPI increased 1.8%, the biggest gain since August last year.

Normally you might expect higher inflation numbers to result in lower bond prices, which means bond yields would move higher; not today. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note dipped below 2.5% intraday. Of course, Treasuries are considered a safe haven investment, and it seems a lot of people are looking for a calm port in a stormy world.

Monday, October 28, 2013 - Markets Are All About the Fed

10282013 Script

Markets Are All About the Fed

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 1 = 15,568
SPX + 2 = 1762
NAS – 3 = 3940
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.51%
OIL + .69 = 98.54
GOLD + .30 = 1354.20
SILV - .09 = 22.61

The Federal Open Market Committee, the FOMC, is the Fed's policy making arm; they will meet on Tuesday and Wednesday to determine possible changes or adjustments to monetary policy. The broad consensus right now is that nothing will change. The government shutdown and a mixed batch of economic data convinced many the Fed would delay any move to begin trimming its stimulus into next year.

The longer the Fed keeps its policy loose, the longer US yields will stay low, making the dollar less attractive. The dollar index was just a smidge higher today, but still trading very close to a 9 month low just under 79, reached on Friday, while the euro has been trading near 2 year highs. As long as the Fed's easy money policy remains in effect it provides abundant liquidity for Wall Street. Last week the S&P 500 hit records and many global stock markets were also near record highs. The MSCI world equity index has been moving higher for 4 consecutive sessions and is near records of January 2008. The Fed's easy money policy has served to support gold and other metals markets. After all the recent bullish movement, you might think the Fed's dovish policy stance has been well priced into the markets. Maybe.

If you want to see the graphic definition of an uptrend, just look at the S&P 500 chart over the past year. With the exception of a few minor whipsaws, the chart is a good progression of higher highs and higher lows depicting a gain of more than 400 points. It hit record highs, at least on a nominal basis, but if you look at the index in inflation adjusted terms, the high was in August 2000, and the purchasing power of a dollar invested in the S&P 500 is still more than 12% below the August 2000 level; and to get to a new high, we would need to top 2000 on the index. The price to earnings back in 2000 were much higher than today, meaning relative valuations today are more justifiable, but that doesn't tell us whether or not we'll advance to a new high in this cycle. There are some positive, almost bullish considerations: Corporate balance sheets are in excellent shape, which could prompt elevated returns for shareholders; shareholder-friendly M&A driven by still low borrowing costs could add another boost to the market rally.

And there is still cash on the sidelines. Plenty of people burned back in 2008 have been parked in cash reserves, but every now and then the market temptation becomes too great. The rotation from cash to stocks typically takes longer than most people imagine, and just about the time that cash comes back into the markets, we might expect yet another rotation; after all, earnings have a lot of work to catch up to valuations, and there are still strong fiscal headwinds. Plus, it's been about 6 years since the start of the last recession and about 4 years since the recovery (if we can call it a recovery), and these things tend to repeat with regularity; it's called a business cycle.

Today, we had economic reports showing manufacturing output inching slightly higher in September, while contracts to buy previously owned homes posted the biggest drop in more than 3 years. Manufacturing production edged up 0.1% last month after advancing 0.5% in August. The National Association of Realtors said its Pending Homes Sales index, based on contracts signed last month, dropped 5.6% to the lowest level since December. The decline was the largest since May 2010.

The index, which leads home resales by a month or two, has now dropped for four straight months. Realtors believe home resales, which dropped in September, peaked in July and August. The reports come on the heels of data last week showing a gauge of business spending tumbled in September. That data, combined with a disappointing reading on hiring released earlier this month, has offered a dull picture of economic activity.

Rates on 30-year fixed rate mortgages rose to an average of 4.49 percent in September from an average of 3.54 percent in May, according to Freddie Mac. But a surprise decision by the central bank in mid-September not to cut its purchases and soft economic data have pulled rates lower since then. With politicians in Washington still to agree on a budget, uncertainty over fiscal policy may also continue to hinder growth

Over the next couple of days we'll see reports on producer prices and consumer prices, retail sales and home prices, the ISM manufacturing report and more. It probably won't matter. The Fed's keeping the digital printing press running and the economic data is not compelling enough to change the QE, not yet, likely not this year.

Quantitative Easing, the Fed's $85 billion a month debt purchase program has has caused significant inflation (even if the inflation isn't reported in the official economic reports) and made national debt soar (even if much of that debt now rests on the Fed's balance sheets); it has made the bond markets fragile and volatile. The value of bonds look nice on balance sheets but unless one plans to cash them in like growth play stocks, their worth as income producers has been lousy. Income investors look for “risk-free returns” but QE creates a "return-free risk" scenario. If you are heavily weighted in fixed income, it is with a grip white-knuckled by the real, perhaps inevitable fact that at some point QE will end or simply fail to keep yields low and asset values high. And the whole idea of income investing is a stable buy and hold approach that makes it difficult to pare gains, just as it is painful to accept losses. Classical measures of value have been destroyed. It is very difficult to find true price discovery or a reasonable degree of certainty about these markets except that they are artificial and fragile, and increasingly vulnerable to exogenous influences. Just as the Fed force-feeds liquidity to the equity markets, it also provides the essential sustenance for the bond markets, and this seems the major lift, maybe the only justification for rising markets.

In this context, if you "buy the market" you're betting on continuing QE and an absence of crises that have lingering effects. While QE is likely to continue so long as policy-makers prefer to keep the markets climbing for whatever reasons happen to suit them, and remember policy-makers change from time to time, we still have geopolitical, and economic, and fiscal, and political crises ready to explode. So if you simply develop an allocation, buy and mainly forget about it, the chances for painful surprises are high.

And the longer the markets rally without a pullback, the more delicious that uptrend chart looks, the more the warning signs point toward the latter stages of a bull market. There is for instance the narrowing of the rally to a handful of 'story stocks' that trade at ever more absurd valuations and seem to be able to inexorably rise into the stratosphere, discounting a glorious future that may or may not arrive. Similarly, the pace of IPOs has vastly increased. Whereas IPOs were in 'slumber mode' for much of 2009-2012, issuance has really taken off this year and is at the highest level since 2007. Not only that, but many stocks are once again soaring by up to 100% on their first trading day, which is strongly reminiscent of the insanity that reigned in 1999 to early 2000.

And as we look at earnings, don't forget the buyback effect, which helps earnings per share to increase even as revenues slip. In fact, since corporate leverage is often increased in order to finance buybacks, shareholders in many cases will ultimately end up worse off. In the short term everybody loves the effects of buybacks of course, but be warned: buybacks tend to peak when stock prices are near a peak.

And one more consideration is margin debt, which provides leverage to increase profits in a bull market but is worse than salt on a wound in a bear downturn. NYSE margin debt has soared to a new record high, exceeding $400 billion for the first time ever. The risk-reward situation in the market is dangerously skewed toward risk. Investors are skating on ever thinner ice. Once the risk becomes manifest, forced selling will exacerbate the decline in prices. The stock market keeps levitating on the promise of more money printing. It remains possible that the advance will enter a blow-off stage or a panic buying type advance during which prices rise almost vertically, increasing considerably in a very short time. That would be a clear indicator to take profits and run, but there is no guarantee of a parabolic chart pattern; a 'blow-off' doesn't have to happen. Whether or not it happens misses the point, which is that risk has increased enormously.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013 - The Real Question on the Economy

The Real Question on the Economy

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 128 = 14, 802
SPX + 19 = 1587
NAS + 59 = 3297
10 YR YLD +.06 = 1.80%
OIL +.35 = 94.55
GOLD – 25.70 = 1560.30
SILV - .33 = 27.75

The Federal Reserve released the minutes of their Federal Open Market Committee meeting held March 19-20. The minutes leaked out 5 hours early. The Fed inadvertently sent the report to congressional aides and trade organizations yesterday, and since the details are actually trade-able information, they had to make it public quicker than not. Make no mistake, this was a serious breach of protocol.

Once the minutes were made public, it depressed bond prices, mainly because of disagreements among the Fed's 19 policymakers about carrying on with buying $85 billion in Treasury and mortgage bonds per month to stimulate the economy. Of the 12 officials who have a vote on monetary policy this year, "a few" expected to taper the purchases around midyear and to end them later this year. "Several others thought that if the outlook for labor market conditions improved as anticipated, it would probably be appropriate to slow purchases later in the year and to stop them by year-end.” Proving once again that the prognosticating skills of the Federal Reserve are roughly equal to the singing skills of a fish on a bicycle.

Just like the release of the minutes, their ideas about exiting QE seem a bit premature, especially in light of last week's jobs report, which you recall, was a stinker. And yesterday we talked about job cuts at the big banks; here's the actual quote from a Bloomberg news article: “Rising stock prices, rebounding profits, restored dividends and a growing economy are signaling to US banks it's time for more job cuts.”

The FOMC did have a revelation; for the first time they recognized that $1.1 trillion in unpaid student loans might just constitute a wee bit of a problem for the economy. Rates on the majority of student loans taken out by undergraduates from the Education Department have remained since 2006 fixed by law at 6.8 percent. The spread between the two, which is an appropriate way to measure relative rates, since student loans are generally repaid in about 10 years, has ranged from 4.5 percentage points to 5.27 percentage points since August 2011, the highest gap on record.

And the final report from the FOMC is to stay the course of Quantitative Easing until unemployment hits 6.5% or inflation hits 2.5%; so, nothing really changed. What it reveals is the Fed is getting nervous about watching their balance sheet balloon to $4trillion or more; they're nervous about asset bubbles; they're nervous about how to exit without crashing the party; and they're nervous because this really is a grand experiment in central banking.

Anyway, the stock market moved higher today, and perhaps the best reason I can offer for the big, record breaking day on Wall Street is just that the trend is up.

President Obama sent a $3.8 trillion budget to Congress today calling for more tax revenue and slower growth for Social Security benefits. The president is proposing to replace across-the-board sequester cuts with $1.8 trillion in additional specific deficit reduction over 10 years that includes collecting more taxes from the wealthy and trimming some federal programs. For the first time, Obama is including in his budget an offer made last year to congressional Republicans to change the cost-of-living calculation to a Chained CPI formula for Social Security and tax brackets, which would increase benefits more slowly and subject more income to taxation.

The president’s plan to raise taxes on wealthy individuals and to close loopholes for corporations drew immediate condemnation from Republicans. Actually, the Republicans are licking their chops at the Chained CPI on Social Security. They're already characterizing the President's plan as a way to "save” Social Security, they're just not going to go along with his tax increases. And the plan to change the Social Security formula drew fire from fellow Democrats. I'm not sure what classes Obama actually took at Harvard, but I think he missed Negotiating 101. He apparently wants to show a willingness to compromise, but the Republicans seem unwilling to take yes for an answer.

Now, I'm thinking back to maybe last week, when Obama sent new Treasury Secretary Jack Lew to Brussels to tell the Europeans to ease up on austerity because its bad for growth; or at least it's bad for growth in Europe but apparently it's good for the US. Austerity is an anti-growth policy. It frequently makes the debt-to-GDP ratio larger because it causes such a large fall in GDP, but it's bad for Europe and good for the US. Must have missed that class on Consistency 101.

Now, if you're neck brace hasn't already gone flying off due to the tremendous torque exerted by today's news, let's put a cherry on top. Obama is proposing a new $2 billion infrastructure investment or jobs program that can overcome the damage to the economy caused by austerity in the form of a combined $300 billion in reduced spending and increased tax revenues.

Anyway, let's get back to the Federal Reserve minutes on how they will continue to juice the economy and the president's budget, which nobody likes and is likely DOA, and let's ask – what's wrong with this picture?

If the economy is getting better, then why does poverty in America continue to grow so rapidly?  Yes, the stock market has been hitting all-time highs recently, but also the number of Americans living in poverty has now reached a level not seen since the 1960s.  Yes, corporate profits are at levels never seen before, but so is the number of Americans on food stamps.  Yes, housing prices have started to rebound a little bit, but there are also more than a million public school students in America that are homeless.  That is the first time that has ever happened in U.S. History. Do we measure our economic progress by the false stock market bubble that has been inflated by the Fed's money dump on their Wall Street cronies, or should we measure our economic progress by how the poor and the middle class are doing?

Even as the markets hit new highs, the most explosive growth is in poverty; now at the highest levels since the 1960s. One out of every six Americans now live in poverty; 146 million are considered poor or low income; one in every five children live in poverty; one in five households with children are considered food insecure – meaning the kids are going hungry; and nearly 3 million children in this country live on less than $2 dollars a day, which is the global standard for extreme poverty.

At some point, maybe the President and the Republicans and the Federal Reserve could just stop for a moment and ask the question: What's the economy for anyway?

A side note: I've been talking about cyber attacks as a major trend for a couple of years now. Obama's budget proposes to boost Defense Department spending on cyber efforts to $4.7 billion, $800 million more than current levels, even as it plans to cut the Pentagon's overall spending by $3.9 billion; the idea is to protect computer networks from internet base attacks. Intelligence officials said last month that cyber attacks and espionage have supplanted terrorism as the top security threat facing the United States.

This was one of the trends I talked about at the recent Wealth protection Economic Conference. If you would like to hear the entire Conference, including nine CDs, or the MP3 recordings are now available. Contact Resource Consultants at 800-494-4149 for purchase information.