Wednesday, April 02, 2014 - Speak Your Mind by Blowing Your Wad

Speak Your Mind by Blowing Your Wad
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 40 = 16,573
SPX + 5 = 1890
NAS + 8 = 4276
10 YR YLD + .04 = 2.80%
OIL – 33 = 99.29
GOLD + 10.10 = 1290.90
SILV + .22 = 20.08

The S&P 500 closed at another record high.

The Commerce Department reported that orders to US factories rose 1.6% in February, the most in five months. January's durable goods orders were revised to show a larger drop of 1.0% instead of the previously reported decline of 0.7%. Yesterday, the Institute for Supply Management said its manufacturing index rose in March.

A private survey showed that US companies stepped up their hiring in March. Payroll processer ADP said private employers added 191,000 jobs. ADP also revised February's job creation up to 153,000 from the 139,000 figure reported earlier. The report comes ahead of the government's monthly jobs report, scheduled to be released on Friday; the over-under number for Friday is 200,000 net new jobs.

We know the Federal Reserve will be watching the jobs report. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard speaking to reporters at his branch of the central bank, said a formal rate rise is "still a considerable distance away." Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Dennis Lockhart said today: “Based on my working medium-term outlook, I see the latter half of 2015 as the likely time frame for the first move to higher rates,” but if the economy doesn’t grow as he current expects, Lockhart thinks, “a later liftoff date… will likely be appropriate.”

Lately bad weather was cited as the reason that Walmart and FedEx and Delta’s earnings were disappointing.  If it isn't one-time charges that happen every quarter being removed from reported results, it's the weather being blamed. Of course, even if the weather truly was awful enough to prevent people from shopping, or buying a house, that demand should simply show up in a later month. A certain amount of productive capacity is lost, but pent up demand should rev things right back up again. The March jobs report won’t be the final word on the weather and the economy, but if we don’t see some sort of significant improvement, then we are running out of bad weather excuses.

Russian, American, and European diplomats continue to talk about settlement talks that might halt further Russian military action in Ukraine; Crimea is a done deal, but Ukraine is another matter. NATO will suspend "all practical civilian and military cooperation" with Russia because of its annexation of Crimea, saying it has seen no sign that Moscow was withdrawing troops from the Ukrainian border.

Meanwhile, Gazprom, the Russian energy company has fired a shot across the bow, raising the price it charges Ukraine for natural gas. The price jumped from $268 per 1,000 cubic meters of gas to $385, or about a 44% increase. Gazprom execs attributed the price increase to an unpaid debt for gas. This is not the first time energy has been used as an economic weapon, nor will it be the last.

The US has been undergoing an oil and gas renaissance; the White House has promoted exploration and drilling, and output has jumped. When it comes to natural gas, the US is being compared to Saudi Arabia, or Saudi America. Of course, that provided no advantage to thwart Putin’s aggression in Crimea. One reason Saudi America has failed to instill fear in Russia is that we lack the capacity to export LNG to Europe, and probably won’t be able to export in any significant quantities for a few more years; and then it would probably be a few more years before Ukraine could build facilities to receive such exports.

Meanwhile, we ran into a rash of reports in the past week or so, all telling us that our reliance on fossil fuels is killing us. The American Association for the Advancement of Society, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the World Meteorological Organization all confirmed that the planet is getting hotter; 13 of the past 14 years have been the hottest ever recorded. The Antarctic ice shelf is melting, Greenland too; the rain forests are dying and the Gulf Stream is collapsing. It’s not just the melting ice and the poor polar bears; the reports warn of very human problems of hunger, disease, drought, flooding, refugees, violence, and war.

Necessity is the Mother of Invention, and the time is now for innovation; and the good news is that there are inventors who have been working on these problems and have created solutions; the bad news is that the status quo and the powers that be are entrenched. This is a defining moment, and energy is being used as an economic weapon, and that weapon is pointed directly at our own foot.

And the entrenched powers just became more entrenched. The Supreme Court has struck down the aggregate campaign contribution limits, opening the gates for even more money to flood into the political system. The good news is we have the best politicians money can buy. The bad news is we have the best politicians money can buy. The 5-4 ruling in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission was penned by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia; Justice Thomas went a step further and called for a complete end to campaign finance reform.

The decision relies heavily on the assertion in the 2010 Citizens United ruling that influence and access are not a corruption concern. This means that a single donor will soon be able to contribute millions of hard dollars in limited contributions, to political parties, candidates and political action committees.

Federal law sets certain limits, so you can't just go write a candidate a check for a million dollars and call it a day. That means you can't give more than $2,600 to any one candidate per election. Even if you were to donate once in the primary election and again in the general, the absolute most you could give to an individual candidate's campaign is $5,200. And you can’t, or couldn’t just spread money across the board. For the 2013-2014 election cycle, Federal Election Commission rules state that a donor can give no more than $123,200 to all political committees, with two sub-limits of $48,600 to candidates and $74,600 to political parties and political action committees. In other words, there was a limit, a cap on aggregate spending. Those limits are no more.

 Now, a single donor can now give more than $5 million in individually limited contributions to every House candidate, every Senate candidate, every state party committee, every national party committee and every leadership PAC connected to one political party. The McCutcheon ruling also did away with the aggregate limit on donations to political action committees, or PACs, which can give money directly to candidates. While there's a limit on how much PACs can give to each candidate, there's no limit on the number of PACs that can exist. Without the aggregate limit, one donor can now give $5,000 each to 1,000 different PACs. And those 1,000 PACs can turn around and funnel that money straight to one candidate. Which means that one candidate could haul in $5 million in direct contributions from one donor, funneled through a network of PACs.

So, if you have a big wad of money that you would like to waste on buying politicians, the Supreme Court has just ruled that you can blow your wad just a freely as you can speak your mind.

The new Michael Lewis book, “Flash Boys” looks at High Frequency Traders front running trades, using technology to jump in front of a trade and skim some profits. The uproar from Wall Street has been hilarious. There are claims that front running isn’t really bad; it doesn’t hurt ordinary investors; it may actually add to liquidity, blah, blah, blah. This is kind of like saying a mafia hit man is good for the neighborhood because he spends his money at the local grocery store and he hasn’t killed anybody on my street.

As we said the other day, High Frequency traders front running the market is not new; it has been going on for years, but the book and the 60 Minutes interview and the publicity finally caught the attention of otherwise somnambulant sleuths at the FBI who are investigating front running, which is a criminal offense. Where this could get interesting is that the High Frequency Trading firms set up shop in close proximity to the stock markets in New York, and they pay for high speed access to the exchanges’ computer systems and data.

The New York Stock Exchange calls it “fully managed co-location space next to the NYSE Euronext’s US trading engines in a new state of the art data center”. The NYSE is the landlord. And they can set up the “super high density” fiber optic connections for an initial fee of $7,000, or a onetime upgrade fee of $9,200. In other words, the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq are complicit in the skimming operation. I didn’t hear Lewis or 60 Minutes talk about that, but that is the ugly truth.

The other funny thing about the Michael Lewis book and interview is the notion that some clever fellows, backed by hedge fund guru David Einhorn and a few other Wall Street big dogs, had come up with a clever technical fix in a new and better exchange called IEX.  Protected by a spool of fiber to ward off the high frequency traders like garlic against vampires. Free market triumphs, mission accomplished. Don't even think about a minimum transaction tax, a speed bump rule such as a minimum order duration, or anything more comprehensive than that.

Thursday, August 15, 2013 - Who's in Control?

Who's in Control?

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 225 = 15,112
SPX – 24 = 1661
NAS – 63 = 3606
10 YR YLD +.04 = 2.75%
OIL + .41 = 107.26
GOLD + 29.60
SILV + 1.14 = 23.11

Let's start with the economic data:

The Labor Department said its producer price index (PPI) remained flat in July, surprising economists who were expecting a rise of 0.3%. Meanwhile, core prices, which exclude food and energy costs, edged 0.1% higher -- less than the 0.2% climb projected by economists. By comparison, June saw gains of 0.8% and 0.2%, respectively.

Meanwhile, the consumer price index (CPI) showed retail prices rose a seasonally adjusted 0.2% on gains for gasoline, housing, clothing and food, among other goods. Excluding energy and food, the core consumer-price index also rose 0.2%.

The core CPI increased 1.7% in July from the same period in the prior year, slightly up from June’s annual growth. Overall consumer prices have increased 2% over the past 12 months. That year-over-year growth in the overall CPI has trended higher in recent months.

Just the other day, James Bullard,  the St. Louis Fed president said he is concerned about low inflation levels, which he said will be a factor in whether the Fed will scale back its bond-buying program. Bullard said: "There has not been much indication, so far, that it has been ticking back up toward target."

Also, the number of people who applied for new regular state unemployment-insurance benefits fell 15,000 to 320,000 in the week that ended Aug. 10, hitting the lowest level of initial claims since October 2007.

Who's in control? 

The headlines at the Wall Street Journal this morning said:  "Stock and bond prices tumbled after stronger-than-expected economic data ..." The share of our national income which goes to corporate profit is the highest it's been since they started tracking it in 1929, while the share going to people -- as salary and wages -- is the lowest. And the percentage of that corporate profit which goes to Wall Street is also the highest on record.  We're becoming a financialized economy. Never before has the manipulation of money counted for so much and the real-world economy of people and consumer goods counted for so little.

Why would good news about the economy cause the stock market to fall? The sentences continues: "... raised investor anxiety about a pullback next month in central-bank support for financial markets... "

Investors had been relying on the Federal Reserve to keep pumping up the stock market's record run, but some mildly favorable economic reports raised fears that the Fed's market-friendly interventions might come to an end.

Who's in control?

Stocks had the biggest one-day percentage drop since late June; trading volume was higher than the recent averages; there were poor results and outlooks from Dow components Wal-Mart and Cisco.

Wal-Mart Stores' shares fell on a surprise decline in quarterly same-store sales and Cisco Systems shares dropped one day after the network equipment maker announced it was cutting 4,000 jobs. The Wal-Mart earnings report could be considered a macro indicator, almost a proxy for gross domestic product data. It shows that consumer spending isn't that strong yet; inflation is rising, wages are not, and unemployment is still pretty high as witnessed by the news from Cisco.

There's a conundrum in the labor market. Over the past 3 years the number of job openings has risen by almost 50% but actual hiring has gone up by less than 5%. Companies advertise job openings but they don't fill the openings. There may be several possible reasons. Some look at the possible skills gap, the mismatch between the work companies need done and the skills the workers have. Maybe that explains a few of the unfilled job openings but not all. Openings in the retail sector have doubled over the past 3 years but hiring has been flat. They can't find someone with the skills to work at JCPenney?

A second explanation is that employers are offering jobs at wages that are too low to attract good applicants. The long term high unemployment rates have put no upward pressure on wages and companies haven't adjusted their wage offers.

And yet another explanation is that the nature of the financial crisis, rooted in the housing market crash, made it very difficult for many people to move for a job, suggesting that companies respond by filling openings from within. The jobs are advertised, but they go to people already with the company. The final explanation is that companies advertise jobs without much intent to fill the jobs; they don't have to recruit; they don't have to look for talent; it comes to them, cheap and easy.

Everybody's worried about what the Fed might do, unless you followed the “Best Six Months, Worst Six Months” plan, which called for you to get out in May and stay away through October. Actually, the refined version said to get out on May 24^th. In July, that looked like a bad move, now it looks smart. Sell In May doesn't always work, and it might not work this year, but it works with enough regularity to warrant consideration. Why does it work? Go figure.

Who's in control?

More and more the answer is not who you think.

Websites belonging to the Washington Post, CNN, and Time have been attacked, apparently by supporters of Syrian President Bashar Assad. Some links on the sites were redirecting readers to the website of the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA).

The breaches have been blamed on a third-party link recommendation service that all three sites used. The SEA has hit several media companies in recent months, mostly via social media. In this attack, the group was able to manipulate links served by content recommendation service Outbrain, which has now been taken offline.

Yesterday, the New York Times website was knocked out of service, maybe it was just a celebration of the great Northeastern Blackout of 2003, which you may recall was caused by a software bug that failed to detect and respond to a power surge when a tree limb hit a power line. Yep, 55 million people cast into darkness because a tree limb was too close to a power line.

I don't know why the Times had a problem yesterday, they say it was a problem with scheduled maintenance. Maybe. They started out by tweeting the blackout. Then they started posting stories on their Facebook page.

Facebook may have been convenient, but that meant that the Times was no longer in control of its content. Facebook is not hosting this material for the sake of the Times or for people who want quality journalism. Facebook itself is an increasingly threatening competitor to the journalism industry, and it serves its own needs first.

The situation also highlighted a reality all news organizations, and all of us who rely on the web for much of what we read and say, need to understand better. Technology can be fragile. It can be hacked. And even if you don't get your news content from the web, remember that all it takes is an unpruned tree limb, and the power could be out. In other words, we all need a Plan B.

Who's in control?

In Egypt, the control appears to be tenuously hanging with the military, at a great cost. The death toll surpassed 600 today during Egypt’s bloodiest crackdown on supporters of its deposed Islamist president, as violent new protests erupted in the country and world condemnation widened, including an angry response by President Obama and calls for a suspension of European economic aid.

Egypt’s Interior Ministry warned protesters that police officers were authorized to use lethal force to protect themselves. The ministry also promised to punish any “terrorist actions and sabotage” after at least two government buildings were burned. It was easily the most violent of the three deadly suppressions since Morsi was forcibly removed from power by the armed forces six weeks ago, plunging the country into its worst crisis since the ouster of Mr. Morsi’s authoritarian predecessor, Hosni Mubarak, in the 2011 revolution.

 Mr. Obama strongly condemned the Egyptian government’s use of brute force to crush the protests and said the United States had canceled military exercises with the Egypt’s armed forces scheduled for next month. Mr. Obama also warned of further unspecified steps if Egypt’s interim leaders continued down what he called a “more dangerous path.”

But he said nothing about cutting the $1.3 billion in annual military aid that the United States provides to Egypt and acknowledged that the United States had historically regarded the country as a friend and a “cornerstone for peace in the Middle East.”

In Europe, some officials called for a suspension of aid by the European Union, and at least one member state, Denmark, cut off funds.

So, to recap. The military staged a coup. The civilian regime was a façade. The military's attempt to destroy the Muslim Brotherhood guarantees a violent future, likely including terrorism and perhaps ending in civil war. Despite having dumped $75 billion worth of "aid" into Cairo's coffers over the years, Washington has no "leverage."

Yet the Obama administration continues to mouth meaningless platitudes. President Barack Obama said that the violence "must stop." To make that happen he said the US was pulling out of planned joint military maneuvers with Egypt. Yea, that's not going to get it done.

Who's in control?