The Ministry of Truth is Now Accepting Job Applications
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 207 = 15,248
SPX + 20 = 1643
NAS + 45 = 3469
SPX + 20 = 1643
NAS + 45 = 3469
10
YR YLD + .08 = 2.16%
OIL + 1.17 = 95.93
GOLD – 29.10 = 1385.60
SILV - .90 = 21.79
OIL + 1.17 = 95.93
GOLD – 29.10 = 1385.60
SILV - .90 = 21.79
It's
the first Friday of the month and so today we start with the jobs
report. The economy added 175,000 net new jobs in May. The
unemployment rate moved up to 7.6% from 7.5%. I'll explain how that
works in just a moment. The March and April jobs numbers were revised
slightly, and the final numbers are 12,000 less than previously
reported. The headline number was slightly above expectations of
165,000 jobs added.
So,
another month of moderate job growth, why did the unemployment rate
go up? More people jumped into the labor pool, looking for work. The
participation rate increased to 63.4% in May from 63.3% in April.
This is a measure of the working age population in the labor force,
and historically this number is closer to 66%; some of the decline is
due to people who have dropped out of the labor pool, but some of
the decline is due to demographics. About 420,000 people got back
into the market for a job and 319,000 found a job, but the additional
101,000 who are now in the market for a job and did not find work –
that pushed the unemployment rate higher.
There
are still 7.9 million involuntary part time workers, basically
unchanged from the prior month. There are 4.3 million people who have
been unemployed for 26 weeks or more but still want a job. That
number decreased slightly last month. The U6 is an alternate measure
which includes long term unemployed and underutilized, or involuntary
part time, workers; U6 unemployment decreased from 13.9% to 13.8%.
There
are a couple of ways to consider this; first, the jobs market is
improving enough that discouraged workers are now getting back into
the labor pool, or discouraged workers have exhausted all other
options and are getting back into the labor pool. As more people look
for jobs, this is likely to make it difficult to see the unemployment
rate drop, even if more jobs are added. To absorb the people
returning to the labor force and added to the labor force as
population grows, the economy would need to add more than 250,000
jobs per month to bring the unemployment rate down, even if
incrementally.
Total
nonfarm employment is up 2.115 over the past 12 months and up 946,000
so far this year. For 2013 we are looking at an annualized pace of
2.27 million jobs. Private employment is up 2.173 million over the
last year. That means that public employment continued to shrink;
down 58,000 over the last year, part of a 4 year trend of lower
public employment.
Government
employment dropped 14,000 last month. Manufacturing lost 8,000 net
jobs. The service sector, which includes bars and restaurants and
retail, added 57,000 jobs. Temp hiring increased by 26,000 workers.
The
average workweek, meanwhile, was unchanged at 34.5 hours, just one
tick below a post-recession peak. The workweek usually rises when the
economy gets stronger. Hourly wages of American workers edged up 1
cent in May to $23.89, and they have risen 2% over the past 12
months; that is not enough to provide any real spark to consumer
spending.
The
private sector does not appear to be cutting jobs. The percentage of
the workforce losing jobs has fallen near an all-time low. Even
though companies are not hiring as many people as expected at this
stage of a recovery, they are increasingly reluctant to cut workers
loose. For the politicians, the jobs data is just
another opportunity to bash the other side, no matter what side
you're on; and nothing gets done.
Remember
the rally cry during the election? It was Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. The
manufacturing sector lost 5 million jobs between 2000 and 2010.
President Obama laid out a
specific jobs goal that he said would help rebuild the country's
struggling middle class: add 1 million new manufacturing jobs by
2016. That goal is looking less and less likely. There may come a
time where we lose so many manufacturing jobs that it destroys the
manufacturing infrastructure.
The
economy continues to add jobs, just not enough; and this has been the
pattern for the past three years. After a while, not enough causes
damage; the unemployment problems become structurally embedded in the
economy and it just means that they will be harder to solve down the
road, compared with tackling the problems head-on today.
The
reaction to the monthly jobs report is also becoming predictable. The
market traders and economists all fret and speculate about how the
Federal Reserve will respond to the jobs data. The big concern is not
about the economy but about the free flow of easy money. For the
equity markets, the data is like a light switch for risk on/risk off.
Wall Street wasn't cheering job growth today; they were cheering
weakness. The Wall Street crowd is acting like a child threatening a
full blown temper tantrum. The financiers seem to think they have a
divine right to profit from central bank largesse, even while they
claim they deserve the big bucks for risk management and investing
acumen.
So,
we're probably approaching a point where the Fed will have to break
the mold. This is not to say they will give up on their Zero Interest
Rate Policy, but it might be time to alter QE. So far, QE has
involved buying Treasuries and mortgage backed securities, to the
tune of $85 billion per month. The result has been a bigger and bigger
disconnect between weak fundamentals and more bubbly asset prices in
the bond market, the stock market, and the housing market. If the
politicians can't deliver some sort of fiscal policy to deal with
weak fundamentals, the Fed needs to. There are ways for the Fed to
provide more direct stimulus. The only question is whether they have
the guts.
Let's
look at the rest of the world.
The
National Security Agency has obtained direct access to the systems of
Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants, according to a
top secret document obtained by the Guardian, a British newspaper.
The NSA access is part of a previously undisclosed program called
PRISM, which allows officials to collect material including search
history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats, the
document says.
The
document claims "collection directly from the servers" of
major US service providers. Although the presentation claims the
program is run with the assistance of the companies, all those who
responded to a Guardian request for comment on Thursday denied
knowledge of any such program. Several senior tech executives
insisted that they had no knowledge of PRISM or of any similar
scheme. They said they would never have been involved in such a
program.
The NSA access was enabled by changes to US surveillance law introduced under President Bush and renewed under Obama in December 2012. The program facilitates extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information. The law allows for the targeting of any customers of participating firms who live outside the US, or those Americans whose communications include people outside the US. It also opens the possibility of communications made entirely within the US being collected without warrants.
Disclosure
of the PRISM program follows a leak to the Guardian on Wednesday of a
top-secret court order compelling telecoms provider Verizon to turn
over the telephone records of millions of US customers.
Some
of the world's largest internet brands are claimed to be part of the
information-sharing program since its introduction in 2007, including
Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, Skype, AOL, Apple, and
more than likely just about any of them. The extent and nature of the
data collected from each company varies. Companies are legally
obliged to comply with requests for users' communications under US
law, but the PRISM program allows the intelligence services direct
access to the companies' servers.
What
kind of data are they getting? Email, video and voice chat, videos,
photos, voice-over-IP (Skype, for example) chats, file transfers,
social networking details, and more. The
document also shows the FBI acts as an intermediary between other
agencies and the tech companies, and stresses its reliance on the
participation of US internet firms, claiming "access is 100%
dependent on ISP provisioning". In the document, the NSA hails
the PRISM program as "one of the most valuable, unique and
productive accesses for NSA".
So,
the Guardian, a British news organization published these two NSA top
secret documents and revealed that the government is tapped into
everything on the internet and probably your phone as well. But wait,
there's more. The Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald has published a
third top-secret NSA document in less than 48 hours. The third
document is entitled “Offensive Cyber Effects Operations” and it
is described as a presidential directive which can "offer unique
and unconventional capabilities to advance US national objectives
around the world with little or no warning to the adversary."
The effects of such approaches "rang[e] from subtle to severely
damaging."
The
document orders various government agencies to prepare for offensive
cyberwarfare operations and says the government will "identify
targets of national importance." The article quotes an
intelligence source with knowledge of NSA programs as saying the
directive makes US complaints about China's state-sponsored hacking
"hypocritical," because the US has "participated in
offensive cyber operations and widespread hacking."
"We
hack everyone everywhere," the intelligence source told The
Guardian.
"We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we
are in almost every country in the world."
Some
of the talking points in the directive were declassified in January,
but the emphasis on offensive hacking wasn't made public, nor was the
order to create a specific target list.
This
third leak comes at a sensitive time, as President Barack Obama
prepares to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in California today.
One of the subjects Obama is expected to bring up is Chinese
cyber-attacks. Just this morning Obama defended both
the widespread collection of call data and the PRISM program that
relates to collecting e-mails and other Internet information, saying
the government had reached the "right balance" on civil
liberties.
Your weekend reading list should include this article from Glenn Greenwald; he's the reporter at the Guardian, who broke all this top secret information about how the government has destroyed any inkling of digital privacy and is involved in cyber attacks. This is what you need to read about these three big leaks of sensitive government shenanigans. Greenwald wrote an excellent article On Whistleblowers and Government Threats of Investigation.
And
I'll remind you that the Bradley Manning trial is currently underway,
and Julian Assange is still in exile. And I'll remind you that
Assange has long promised he would have a data dump on the big
banksters. We're still waiting.
And a final note: US
and British authorities are preparing to bring criminal charges
against former employees of Barclays for their alleged roles trying
to manipulate Libor interst rates. The current probe appears to be
targeted at midlevel traders. So, the whole exercise really continues
an established pattern of sacrificing underlings as human shields for
managers and executives.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.