Jobs Report Friday
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 149 = 14,009
SPX + 15 = 1513
NAS + 36 = 3179
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.01%
OIL + .12 = 97.61
GOLD + 3.80 = 1668.60
SILV + .37 = 31.94
SPX + 15 = 1513
NAS + 36 = 3179
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.01%
OIL + .12 = 97.61
GOLD + 3.80 = 1668.60
SILV + .37 = 31.94
Today
is a Jobs Report Friday. Total nonfarm payroll employment increased
by 157,000 in January, and the unemployment rate inched higher to
7.9%. The headline number was below expectations, which had been
running from 170,000 to 185,000 new jobs. However, employment figures
for November and December were revised up sharply. November was
revised from 161,000 to 247,000, a gain of 86,000; so it turns out
that job growth immediately before the election was actually
under-estimated; December was revised from 155,000 to 196,000, a
gain of 41,000.
In
January, job gains occurred in retail trade, construction, health
care, and wholesale trade, while employment edged down in
transportation and warehousing. Exactly what this pace of job growth
means for the unemployment rate depends on whether many of the
workers sitting on the sidelines decide to join, or rejoin, or can
find a place in the labor force. Right now, labor force participation
rates, the share of people of working age who are either working or
looking for jobs, is hovering around 30-year lows. Only those who
are actively looking for work are counted as unemployed, so if the
labor force participation stays low, even modest job growth can cause
the unemployment rate to fall quite a bit.
The
decline in the labor force participation rate brought the
unemployment rate down much faster than anyone would have thought.
The aging of America accounts for a little bit of it, but you’d
still expect that job searches would go up and participation would
rise as opportunities are opening up. For the long-term unemployed,
who now represent 40 percent of all jobless workers, the
opportunities still seem few and far between. Millions have exhausted
their unemployment benefits and many more will fall off the
government’s system in the coming months , and once the fall off,
they seem to disappear.
The
BLS report
shows the
number of unemployed persons, at 12.3 million, was little changed in
January. In January, the number of long-term unemployed (those
jobless for 27 weeks or more) was about unchanged at 4.7 million and
accounted for 38.1 percent of the unemployed. Both the
employment-population ratio (58.6 percent) and the civilian labor
force
participation rate (63.6 percent) were unchanged in January. The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons, at 8.0 million, changed little in January. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. The alternate measure of unemployment, or U6, which includes under-utilized workers was unchanged at 14.4%. That means the number of people working part-time who want to work full-time and the people who want work but are no longer counted as looking for work; that number is now 21.4 million.
In January, the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 34.4 hours. Average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 4 cents to $23.78. Over the year, average hourly earnings have risen by 2.1 percent.
State
and local governments lost 129,000 jobs in 2009, 262,000 in 2010, and
239,000 in 2011. In 2012, state and local government employment
declined by 32,000 jobs. In January 2013, state and local governments
lost another 4,000 jobs. It appears most of the state and local
government layoffs are over, however state and local government
employment is still trending down slightly. Of course. the Federal
government layoffs are ongoing with another 5,000 jobs lost in
January.
With
the November/December revisions, there were 200,000 new jobs, on
average over the past three months.The
new numbers are based on far more reliable — but slower to arrive —
counts of the the number of workers for whom unemployment insurance
premiums were paid. In
2012, employment growth averaged 181,000 per month. A month ago, we
were told the average for the year was only 153,000, basically the
same as in 2011. With the revisions, we are told that the 2011
average was really 175,000. At the end of last year, the official
figures showed employment had risen 3.7 percent from the bottom in
February 2010 to the end of 2012. Now that figure is 4.1 percent. A
year from now we will get benchmark revisions for the last nine
months of 2012. It is quite possible the 2012 annual average will
then rise further, to more than 200,000.
The
economy has added jobs for 28 straight months; just not fast enough.
Since the downturn began in December 2007, the economy has had a net
decline of about 2.3 percent in its nonfarm payroll jobs. And that
does not account for the fact that the working-age population has
continued to grow, meaning that if the economy were healthy we should
have more jobs today than we had before the downturn.
Getting
the economy to 5 percent unemployment within two years, a return to
the rate that prevailed when the downturn, would require job growth
of closer to 285,000.
So,
we slog along. The Federal Reserves QE to Infinity and Beyond just
isn't enough to get the jobs numbers improving. Maybe monetary policy
could do something, but the current efforts are misdirected. Fiscal
policy isn't helping. The Social Security Payroll Tax hike only
shrinks paychecks. States are looking to raise sales taxes. Military
spending fell 22.2% in the fourth quarter; eventually we should see a
Peace Dividend but right now it's just spending cuts. Spending cuts
won't add jobs.
The
only reason for employers too hire more workers is if they have more
customers. Where do customers come from? Well, you know the answer.
For exporting companies, the customers come from Europe, Asia and
South America. Not much growth from those areas. The government can
be a customer, but the battle in Washington these days is about
spending cuts and tax hikes. That leaves consumers; 70% of all
economic activity. And consumers have seen their purchasing power
decline. Median wages, adjusted for inflation, have been on the
decline. Many consumers are still trying to pay down debts, and
continue to keep a tight grip on dollars that do make it into their
purse. Consumer confidence hit a 12 month low. The focus should be on
moving money through the economy, in turn creating demand, and in
turn creating jobs.
Once
we get more jobs, if we get more jobs. Then everything gets easier.
The
jobs news was good enough to push the major market indices higher.
The Dow tops 14,000. The S&P 500 climbs above 1500. It was the
best January of the new century. All this market news is great,
especially if you already have a big chunk of change in the markets.
The fear is that the average investor, who isn't in the market, who
hasn't participated in the rally, will finally jump in when the
rubber band has stretched fully. Yes, stocks have become more widely
held over the past two decades. And roughly half of Americans own
some stocks through mutual funds and pension funds. But only about a
third of all Americans hold more than $10,000 in stock. So while more
Americans hold stock, they don't hold much. Wealth for most families
comes from their homes and jobs , which have not not recovered as
quickly or as strongly as stocks.
And
if you think the S&P climbed too quickly, check out Italy and
Spain. After posting modest gains during the first week of the new
year, both these markets exploded to the upside, quickly outpacing
the S&P. But both Italian and Spanish shares are rolling over a
bit. Nationalization of a Dutch bank today provided a stark reminder
that Europe is still struggling to shake off the legacy of the
financial crisis and find a way to let banks fail without loading up
governments with debt. The Dutch government was forced to rescue SNS
REALL to protect savers' deposits after the banking and insurance
group racked up huge losses on real estate lending. Attempts to find
a private buyer or investor failed.
A
couple of economic reports: the automakers posted strong sales for
January. GM sales were up 16% compared to a year ago. Ford up 22%,
Toyota up 27%, and Chrysler with a 16% gain.
The
Institute for Supply Managements manufacturing index climbed to 53.1
last month from December’s 50.2. Readings above 50 signal
expansion.
Exxon
Mobil and Chevron, the largest U.S. energy producers, are boosting
profits with oil refineries that some analysts and investors urged
them to divest as recently as last year. Earnings from processing
crude into fuels such as gasoline and diesel more than made up for
lagging returns from oil and natural gas exploration during the final
three months of 2012, Exxon and Chevron reported today. Fuel refining
helped propel fourth-quarter net income to a five-year high of almost
$9.95 billion for Exxon and a record $7.25 billion for Chevron.
Those
stories have a common thread. The price of oil has been climbing;
good news for Exxon and Chevron; drivers have been buying new cars,
which are generally more fuel efficient. For some folks the math is
simple. Say you spend $300 a month on gas, and you're driving a
vehicle that get 15 to 20 MPG. Switch that for a new car that gets 35
to 40 miles per gallon, and in many cases you pay the cost of a new
car with the gas savings. As sales of new cars increase, it ripples
through the economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.