by Sinclair Noe
DOW + 62 = 13,712
SPX + 6 = 1492
NAS + 8 = 3143
10 YR YLD - .01 = 1.84%
OIL + .63 =96.67
GOLD + 1.70 = 1692.80
SILV + .19 = 32.31
SPX + 6 = 1492
NAS + 8 = 3143
10 YR YLD - .01 = 1.84%
OIL + .63 =96.67
GOLD + 1.70 = 1692.80
SILV + .19 = 32.31
Yesterday was a fairly momentous day; the second inauguration of President Obama, featuring a fairly important inaugural speech laying out the major themes and vision for the next four years; it was also Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. The inauguration was fun to watch; it was also infuriating, and not just because of the hours of fawning media coverage on Michelle Obama's wardrobe. Literally, hours. Also a bit infuriating was the whole fuzzy picture of how the Inaugural was financed. The Presidential Inaugural Committee won’t say how much they have already collected or even what their goal was. Apparently these are “moving budgets,” which won’t stabilize until after the inauguration. Four years ago, promising a new openness, the president banned corporate giving to the inauguration, limited gifts from individuals to $50,000 and released a full accounting of donations. This year, the Inaugural Committee was offering packages between $10,000 and $1 million. Maybe you get a nice set of steak knives with the million dollar package. It will probably be a few months before we find out if they met their sales quota.
Still, it was a nice inauguration and the President's speech was interesting for multiple reasons. He hit on some big ideas: gay rights, climate change, immigration, and gun control. This weekend was also, by no mere coincidence, Gun Appreciation Day. A total of five people were injured in accidental shootings at gun shows in Indiana, Ohio, and North Carolina. And then today there was a shooting at a small college in Texas; three people injured.
Try to listen to the speech if you haven't, or listen to it again even if you did hear it. The speech lays out a vision, a theme for moving forward; and yesterday's speech is part of a package which includes the State of the Union Address, three weeks from today. The State of the Union will have the details. The Inaugural Speech was where Obama wants the country to be; the State of the Union speech will be the road-map to get there. Prior to today, there had been some talk that Obama would pursue deficit reduction, as part of his legacy project in his second term, but it's pretty clear that ship has sailed. During the debt ceiling fight and the fiscal cliff fight, Obama was (widely reportedly) willing to make cuts to entitlements in exchange for higher taxes from Republicans. They never found that deal.
Japan's central bank is borrowing a page from the Federal Reserve. The Bank of Japan set a target of 2% inflation and made an open-ended pledge to purchase government bonds until the economy revives or the inflation target is hit. Japan, the world's third-largest economy, saw negative growth in the third quarter of last year amid flagging exports and weak private spending, and is most likely to report further contraction for the fourth quarter. Deflation has long been a big part of Japan's economic problems, and the stimulus plan is aimed at long-running economic stagnation. The Bank of Japan's pledge to buy assets, known as quantitative easing, will involve total monthly purchases of 13 trillion yen, or about $147 billion, from January next year, most of it in U.S. Treasury bills. The Federal Reserve in December said it would continue to buy each month $45 billion of Treasury bonds as well as $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities. So, the bond market might turn some day; it might face trouble in the future, but for now, the old saying applies: don't fight the Fed, and the Bank of Japan.
There has been some economic recovery from the lows of 2008-2009, but the gains have been depressingly slow. Further fiscal expansion might be hampered by ongoing fiscal dysfunction and concerns about debt, and specifically debt to GDP. And the debate seems to be which targets to point at when creating new stimulus, rather than where the stimulus should be applied and if the stimulus will facilitate and foster long-term growth. The Bank of Japan targets inflation. The Fed targets unemployment and inflation. The Governor-elect of the Bank of England is on record as targeting nominal GDP, not necessarily GDP growth.
Just to refresh your memory; a nominal variable is one where the effects of inflation have not been accounted for. The Nominal Gross Domestic Product measures the value of all the goods and services produced expressed in current prices. On the other hand, Real Gross Domestic Product measures the value of all the goods and services produced expressed in the prices of some base year. So, the idea of a targeted nominal GDP suggests faster inflation might generate a faster, sustainable growth rate. Or it might just be acknowledgment that we haven't seen inflation in a while, and like the Bank of Japan, the worlds' economies aren't really concerned about inflation right now, rather the big concern is that economies grind to a standstill.
So, I hope this provides some background to the upcoming budgetary process. Considering the possibility of default or a potential government shutdown this spring, it is appropriate for policy to focus on reducing prospective deficits. Given all the uncertainties and current US debt levels, we should be planning to reduce debt ratios if the next decade goes well economically. Reducing prospective deficits should be a key priority but should not and probably will not, take over economic policy.
Even leaving aside any possible stimulus benefits, current economic conditions make this the ideal time for renewing the nation’s infrastructure. Such investments, borrowed at near-zero interest rates, need not increase debt ratios if their contribution to economic growth raises tax collections. We face deficits in other areas besides the debt ceiling.
Infrastructure represents what is and will become, an increasingly conspicuous deficit facing the United States. Nearly six years after the onset of financial crisis, we clearly are living with substantial deficits in jobs and growth. Consider that if an increase of just 0.15 percent in the economy’s growth rate were maintained over the next 10 years, the debt-to-GDP-ratio in 2023 would be reduced by about 2.5 percentage points. That’s an amount equal to the much debated year-end fiscal compromise that raised taxes. Increasing growth also creates jobs and raises incomes.
By all means, let’s address the budget deficit, but don't restrict the challenge to one blunt tool.
Earlier this month, a study by the World Economic Forum rated severe income inequality as the biggest risk facing the world, for the second year running. Also high on the list is climate change, which made its way into the inauguration speech yesterday; just in case you're looking for trends. The World Economic Forum is the official name of the Davos Rich Guys Conference held in Switzerland. They publish a study in the weeks before the annual conference. It is more than a little ironic that billionaires and millionaires meeting in the Swiss Alps, should make income inequality a top priority. I'm still not sure whether they consider it good or bad; only that it is a priority. Another irony is the concern about climate change from people jetting around the world in private jets.
In recent conferences, the economic health of the Euro-zone was a top priority, which is now seemingly under control. The current big concern about the Euro-zone is that leaders might become less vigilant now that the heat is off, ushering in a spate of new troubles that could dog the euro for years to come. In other words, they want the economic stimulus to continue. There is an enormous amount of global capital represented in Davos, but global capital does not solve big world issues: debt and financial crisis, political paralysis or gridlock, the transformative effects of the digital revolution, resource shortages, shifting demographics, climate change, and income inequality.
The Davos World Economic Forum is not known for transparency; in fact, it is known for a bunch of little side meetings where various deals may or may not get done; it is known for wheeling and dealing, especially among bankers. It is not known for accurate prognostications, but the itinerary of topics does tell us the issues of discussion among the rich and powerful. It is more than coincidental that the research report, which was released a couple of weeks ago, listed climate change as a major issue, and those words were uttered, for the very first time yesterday in an inauguration speech.
In 2009, Mohamed El-Erian, CEO of PIMCO, the world's largest bond fund manager, coined the term, “new normal” to describe the period of economic malaise the U.S. would experience in the wake of the biggest recession of a generation. The "new normal" was characterized by below trend growth, high unemployment, and ultra-low interest rates as the U.S. suffered the economic consequences of the crisis
Now, El-Erian says the "new normal" may soon be over. He wasn't quite ready to call the end of period, but he was getting close. Bigger picture, a lot of analysts are now calling The Big Turn. The consensus seems to be more “juice” from the Federal Reserve to propel the economy, at least in the first quarter.
Q1 GDP may be in the high 2% range, or perhaps even as high as 3%. That’s because the lifts from business investment, housing, inventories and trade may more than offset the expected hit to consumption from higher tax rates.
Of course, that is barring shocks, and shocks can happen. Barely into 2013, Mali and Algeria are new sites of hot war and chilling fear. Where the tumult that began in the Arab Spring will end is still as unclear as when it erupted — far from Davos — two years ago. The challenge posed by the free flow of information in China went to the streets to ring in the New Year in Guangzhou.
Europe seems to have averted a collapse of the euro, but even in Germany, growth is anemic. Eleven members of the Eurozone have finally agreed to adopt a financial transaction tax often referred to as a ‘Robin Hood tax’ first discussed in September 2011. The tax will apply at the rate of 0.1% on stock and bond transactions and 0.01% on derivatives trades. It looks like Estonia is not afraid of derivatives traders.
Another example of how nations in transition are going their own way is Egypt, where President Mohamed Morsi seems to seek a geopolitical mix: a dose of Turkey, an Islamist-leaning democracy, with much-needed financial aid from China, and relations with Washington warm enough to garner more aid and collaborate on diplomacy like mediating the Israeli-Palestinian fighting over the Gaza Strip last November.
Washington’s feuding politicians walked up to the brink before resolving not to jump off the so-called fiscal cliff, though they might still split their head on the debt ceiling. The political gridlock in Washington really looks ugly from an outsider’s view.”
Crisis might be the new normal. Or the new norm might be the Big Turn; take your pick.
Sales of previously owned homes fell 1.0% in December from the prior month and were up 12.8% from December 2011. In total, the National Association of Realtors estimated that 4.65 million home sold last year, up from 9.2% in 2011. It was the highest level since 2007. Housing inventory dropped 8.5% in December to reach 1.82 million homes available for sale. That represents a supply of just under 4½ months. Unsold inventory is now at its lowest level since January 2001.