Unconnected Dots
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 100 = 13,235
SPX + 16 = 1430
NAS + 39 = 3010
10 YR YLD +.05 = 1.76%
OIL +.71 = 87.44
GOLD + 1.90 = 1699.10
SILV -.03 = 32.38
SPX + 16 = 1430
NAS + 39 = 3010
10 YR YLD +.05 = 1.76%
OIL +.71 = 87.44
GOLD + 1.90 = 1699.10
SILV -.03 = 32.38
President
Obama and House Speaker Boehner met at the White House today. Aides
from both parties said they were optimistic that a deal could be
reached in the coming days to avert the "fiscal cliff," as
lawmakers set the stage for action before a year-end deadline.
A
senior Republican aide said: "There's been too much progress at
this point and neither guy wants to go over the cliff."
Although both sides still had major differences, investors were
cheered by signs of progress. Major market indices moved higher in
the afternoon, and some of that was the feel good part of the news
cycle; we certainly need some good news. Now, we sit back and see
whether it was yet another rumor.
Boehner,
the speaker of the Republican-controlled House of Representatives,
has edged closer to Obama's demand to raise taxes on the wealthiest
Americans. In return, Obama is considering a measure that would slow
the rate of growth of Social Security retirement benefits by changing
the way they are measured against inflation.
Boehner
has put forward a tax increase for those earning over $1 million
annually, while Obama wants that threshold set at $250,000.
Republicans could probably stomach a tax hike on incomes above
$500,000. Boehner could float the broad outlines of a deal with
rank-and-file members on Tuesday. If there are no strong objections,
he could try to finalize the deal on Wednesday, the Republican aide
said.
Votes could be held in Congress next week. Both sides declined to say
what Boehner and Obama discussed at the meeting, which was also
attended by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
However, the
White House said Boehner's latest proposal doesn't meet its
standards. Republicans want substantial spending cuts in return for
increased tax revenue, but any proposal to trim popular benefit
programs like the Medicare health insurance plan for seniors will
face fierce resistance. Obama could also face strong opposition from
Democrats if he agrees to Boehner's proposal to slow the growth of
Social Security benefits by changing the way the cost-of-living
increases are measured against inflation, an approach that could save
$200 billion over 10 years. Obama also wants to head off another
confrontation over the government's debt limit, which will need to be
raised in the coming months. Republicans insist that any increase in
the government's $16.4 trillion borrowing authority must be paired
with an equal reduction in spending. Apparently jobs were not a big talking point in the negotiations.
The
National Credit Union Administration , the regulator of credit unions
has sued JPMorgan Securities and Bear Stearns over $3.6 billion in
mortgage securities the bank allegedly sold to credit unions that
collapsed because of losses from the securities.
The
lawsuit by the National Credit Union Administration is its second
against JPMorgan involving losses to credit unions. In June 2011 the
agency sued it over some $1.4 billion in securities in which JPMorgan
was the underwriter and seller. That suit is still pending. The
actions add to a growing list of cases JPMorgan fighting over conduct
by Bear Stearns, which JPMorgan acquired in 2008. The
New York Attorney General sued JPMorgan in October alleging that Bear
Stearns deceived investors buying mortgage-backed securities in 2006
and 2007.
In today's lawsuit, the NCUA alleged that Bear Stearns made misrepresentations in connection with the underwriting and subsequent sale of mortgage-backed securities to U.S. Central, Western Corporate, Southwest Corporate and Members United Corporate federal credit unions. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Kansas, is the largest such lawsuit the regulator has filed to date. A JPMorgan spokeswoman declined to comment.
In
the past two years the agency has brought similar actions against
Barclays Capital, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, RBS Securities, UBS
Securities, Wachovia and others. Most
of the cases are pending, but it has settled claims against
Citigroup, Deutsche Bank Securities and HSBC for around $170 million.
The
credit union regulator has been trying to recover losses related to
the failure of five institutions that it seized in 2009 and 2010
after they ran into trouble due to the crumbling housing market. The
wholesale credit unions have experienced more troubles than their
retail counterparts because they did not face the same restrictions
on permitted investments, leading to big losses during the financial
crisis.
UBS
will pay around $1.5 billion to settle charges that a group of
traders at its Japanese unit rigged Libor interest rates. The fine,
to be imposed by the United States and Britain, would be the latest
blow to UBS after a $2.3-billion rogue trading loss in London last
year, a $780-million fine after a U.S. tax investigation in 2009 and
its near collapse in 2008 under the weight of losses on U.S.
sub-prime mortgage lending.
UBS
will admit that roughly 36 of its traders around the globe
manipulated yen Libor between 2005 and 2010. The settlement talks
are reportedly now centering on a fine in the region of $1.5 billion
- somewhat higher than geusstimated last week and three times the
$450 million levied on British bank Barclays Plc in June for similar
manipulation of benchmark interest rates.
The
fine against UBS would be the second-largest ever levied against a
bank for wrongdoing, after Britain's HSBC last week agreed to pay
$1.92 billion to settle a probe in the United States into laundering
money for drug cartels.
UBS
earned $4.6 billion in net profit last
year and the bank has spent much of this year and last bolstering its
capital. Paying
$1.5 billion to settle the Libor probe would shave 50 basis points
off UBS's capital ratios, but even after the fine, UBS would still be better
capitalized than other banks.
UBS is expected admit to criminal wrongdoing by its Japanese arm, where one of
its traders manipulated yen Libor and euro yen contracts. Admitting
to criminal wrongdoing can be fatal for a bank, as it can lose its
license. But by admitting to wrongdoing only at its Japanese
subsidiary, where UBS employs 1,000 staff, it effectively ring-fences
the damage, sparing its bigger units.
Individuals
are also being targeted, mainly lower-level traders, offered up as sacrificial lambs. The UBS investigation centers on former UBS
trader Thomas Hayes, but also includes other UBS bankers. Hayes, who
joined Citigroup after leaving UBS in 2009, is one of three
British men arrested last week by London police but later released on
bail.
More
than a dozen banks have been caught in the international inquiry into
Libor rates, with most of the focus being on how rates were set
between 2005 and 2008.
Royal
Bank of Scotland is also expected to shortly reach a settlement on Libor manipulation.
The bank will receive a penalty of more than $564
million.
Morgan
Stanley,
the lead underwriter for Facebook's initial public
offering, will pay a $5 million fine to Massachusetts for violating
securities laws governing how investment research can be distributed.
Massachusetts'
top securities regulator charged that a
top Morgan Stanley banker had improperly coached Facebook on how to
disclose sensitive financial information selectively, perpetuating an unlevel playing field between Wall
Street and Main Street.
Morgan
Stanley has faced criticism since Facebook went public in May for
revealing revised earnings and revenue forecasts to select clients
before the media company's $16 billion initial public offering. This
is the first time a case stemming from Morgan Stanley's handling of
the Facebook offering has been decided.
Facebook
had privately told Wall Street research analysts about softer
forecasts because of less robust mobile revenues. A top Morgan
Stanley banker coached Facebook executives on how to get the message
out.
A
Morgan Stanley spokeswoman said the company is "pleased
to have reached a settlement" and that it is "committed to
robust compliance with both the letter and the spirit of all
applicable regulations and laws." The company neither admitted
nor denied any wrongdoing.
The investigation into the Facebook IPO is far from over and other banks were involved. Goldman Sachs and JP
Morgan also acted as underwriters. The underwriting fee for all
underwriters was reported to be $176 million.
The
state said a Morgan Stanley banker helped a Facebook executive release new
information and then guided the executive on how to speak with Wall
Street analysts about it. The banker rehearsed with
Facebook's Treasurer and wrote the bulk of the script Facebook's
Treasurer used when calling the research analysts. A
number of Wall Street analysts cut their growth estimates for
Facebook in the days before the IPO after the company filed an
amended prospectus. Facebook's
treasurer then quickly called a number for Wall Street analysts
providing even more information.
The
banker "was not allowed to call research analysts himself, so he
did everything he could to ensure research analysts received new
revenue numbers which they then provided to institutional investors." The
consent order also says that the banker spoke with company lawyers
and then to Facebook's chief financial officer about how to prove an
update "without creating the appearance of not providing the
underlying trend information to all investors."
The
banker and all others involved with the matter at Morgan Stanley are
still employed by the company.
Retail
investors were not given any similar information, just in case you
ever wondered whether the market is rigged against you.
In
light of the HSBC money laundering settlement last week it is worth
reading a report I found in the Guardian entitled Arizona
funnels business to CCA through its school-to-prison pipeline
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.