How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 185 = 12,570
SPX – 19 = 1355
NAS – 37 = 2846
10 YR YLD un = 1.59%
OIL + 1.10 = 86.48
GOLD + 2.70 = 1728.60
SILV + .24 = 32.84
President Obama held his first post-election news conference today. I was a little surprised when he announced the presidential pardon for Big Bird.
SPX – 19 = 1355
NAS – 37 = 2846
10 YR YLD un = 1.59%
OIL + 1.10 = 86.48
GOLD + 2.70 = 1728.60
SILV + .24 = 32.84
President Obama held his first post-election news conference today. I was a little surprised when he announced the presidential pardon for Big Bird.
Then
he moved on to the more serious issues, like the sex life of
generals.
In
addition to addressing the Petraeus scandal, Mr. Obama used the
opportunity to broach a far more expected crisis; the looming "fiscal
cliff." He stressed that unless Congress acts to avert the
"fiscal cliff" all Americans could see their taxes could go
up and the economy could fall back into a recession, and he insisted
that the top 2% of income earners see a tax increase.
So,
that's where it stands. Both sides digging in their heels.
Everyone
is afraid of falling off the fiscal cliff, but there's another
dangerous countdown clock about hit to zero and no one is talking
about it, even though it will spell even more financial problems for
us all.
At midnight on December 31, 2012, we'll get tagged; the Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program will expire. The TAG program was initiated at the height of the crisis when depositors were fleeing banks for fear they would go under. So, the FDIC upped regular deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 and under the TAG banner initiated unlimited insurance for all non-interest bearing transaction accounts.
At midnight on December 31, 2012, we'll get tagged; the Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program will expire. The TAG program was initiated at the height of the crisis when depositors were fleeing banks for fear they would go under. So, the FDIC upped regular deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 and under the TAG banner initiated unlimited insurance for all non-interest bearing transaction accounts.
If or when the unlimited insurance expires, corporations, businesses and depositors will be looking for a safe place to park their cash, and there is quite a bit of parking; those soon-to-be-uninsured deposits total some $1.4 trillion. Where will the money go? Likely to the biggest banks, money market funds and the safety of short-term U.S. Treasuries. This will create serious negative repercussions.
First,
the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) banks that created the credit crisis and
spawned the Great Recession are much bigger now than they were in
2008, and are about to get even bigger.
Because the failure of any one of America's big five banks would implode the global financial system, they will never be allowed to fail. That makes them a fortress for depositors, regardless of expiring guarantees. The same isn't true for the smaller banks that will start disappearing.
Because the failure of any one of America's big five banks would implode the global financial system, they will never be allowed to fail. That makes them a fortress for depositors, regardless of expiring guarantees. The same isn't true for the smaller banks that will start disappearing.
The
problem for the economy is that TBTF banks are going to have to make
bigger and bigger loans and orchestrate far-reaching lending schemes
that encompass wide swaths of the population (as they did with
mortgages) to accommodate the greater economies of scale their huge
size demands. That's going to lead to massive concentrations of risk,
which the TBTF banks have proven has been, and will be, their
downfall. The counterparties on these deals are the other TBTF banks.
And for the average consumer that means less competition, higher fees
and transaction costs, and less access to credit at the local level,
or at least a big risk premium for stooping down to deal with a small
local business.
Next,
when businesses and corporations can't justify the risk of parking
money in cash, they'll start chasing yield. Money market funds will
be the preferred parking place for a lot of that cash. Even though
money market funds don't pay much, they allow quick withdrawals and
are considered a good substitute for non-interest bearing checking
accounts at banks, but there's a problem with money market funds.
They aren't guaranteed. They were back when the Federal government
was guarantying all financial parking lots at the time of the crisis,
but no more.
What's
potentially problematic is that if billions of dollars of cash goes
seeking some yield in money market funds, fund managers are going to
have to put those new monies to work. And where do a lot of money
market funds go to buy short-term interest bearing instruments so
they can offer the best yields to potential billion-dollar customers?
Too often they turn to European banks issuing short-term paper.
And
then a lot of the cash coming out of bank checking accounts is going
to go into short-term Treasury bills and notes. Right now the
Treasury issues about $30 billion of one-month T-Bills every week. If
the majority of the $1.4 trillion sitting in banks in soon to be
uninsured accounts heads into these most liquid instruments it would
take a year of issuance to satisfy that demand. Now, don't forget,
the Federal Reserve is buying some $45 billion a month of Treasuries
and agency paper. And, what about money market funds? If they get
flooded with cash, they too will be buying the short- term issues
spit out by the Treasury. What happens if there is actually some deal
on the fiscal cliff that results in smaller deficits? The Treasury
wouldn't have to issue as much new debt as it does now. The demand
for short-term Treasuries could very conceivably turn their yields
negative.
What happens then? As if corporations, pension funds, and people aren't yield starved enough. Will the further implosion of yields and the continuing destruction of fixed income cause everyone to reach further and further out on the risk curve? It's already happening. Junk bond funds are seeing record inflows as investors are clamoring for yield.
What happens then? As if corporations, pension funds, and people aren't yield starved enough. Will the further implosion of yields and the continuing destruction of fixed income cause everyone to reach further and further out on the risk curve? It's already happening. Junk bond funds are seeing record inflows as investors are clamoring for yield.
And
the TAG is just a very small part of the fiscal cliff.
Meanwhile,
we saw the minutes of the Federal Reserve's October 23 & 24 FOMC
meeting. The Fed has been selling $45 billion a month in short-term
Treasurys and using the proceeds to buy an equal amount of
longer-term securities. When Operation Twist ends after December, the
Fed will run out of short-term investments to sell. The minutes show
support among “a number of” Fed policymakers to replace Twist
with another program of long-term bond purchases. The Fed heads also
confirmed they plan to keep interest rates near zero for a few more
years, and there was some talk of establishing numerical targets for
the economy. Nothing earth-shattering here, but I'm willing to wager
there were some off the record discussions about the fiscal cliff.
The economy has been hooked up to the anesthetic drip of low interest rates and cheap money. Cheap money that caused the crisis has been replaced by even cheaper money to prevent a worse one. The chances of a rapid recovery are a good deal less than anyone wants, and a fair chunk of that is due to the global economic situation. Today, the Bank of England issued its most pessimistic outlook since the financial crisis. The economy will not recover its pre-recession peak for another three years as Britain faces a “period of persistently low growth” and sticky inflation.
In
Euro-land, a popular backlash is building against cuts to public
services and the “internal devaluation” policies that have
targeted wages and Europe’s high levels of social protection with
the aim of restoring competitiveness to the EU’s highly indebted
economies. This year unemployment is expected to reach record levels
of more than 11% in the eurozone and 10.5% in the EU. Taking a step
away from the statistics, it means that more than 25m Europeans will
be unemployed this Christmas. It is going to get worse. EU forecasts
predict that joblessness rates will climb even further.
In
Spain, once an EU pin-up for growth and a country that was not in
debt before the banking crisis, youth unemployment has hit 55% and
the recession is still deepening. There have been general strikes
across Europe; hundreds of thousands participated. Tens of thousands
took to the streets in Madrid. Protesters burned things; police fired
rubber bullets.
Tens
of millions of Europeans blame austerity for suppressing demand and
acting as a dampener on growth at a time of economic recession
triggered by the financial crisis. The deadly combination of slowdown
plus austerity, compounded by economic imbalances built into the EU’s
single currency, has pushed countries, especially the southern
European economies at the heart of the eurozone debt storm, into what
looks like a deep and protracted slump; and it is bad enough to drag
down even the most powerful Euro-economies, and don't think it won't
affect the US economy.
Europe
has had much more austerity in aggregate than we have
and it isn't working for them. And for all the people who are so
scared about the fiscal cliff, what they're are really arguing is
that
slashing spending and raising taxes on ordinary workers is
destructive in a depressed economy, and that we should actually be
doing the opposite.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.