Showing posts with label food prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food prices. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

Friday, April 18, 2014 - Yes, We Have No Avocados

Yes, We Have No Avocados
by Sinclair Noe


The markets are closed today in observance of Good Friday.

No economic reports today.

Let’s take a look at next week’s economic calendar. On Wednesday, we’ll get reports on new and existing home sales. New home sales are expected to be up slightly, while existing home sales are expected to post a decline for the third consecutive month. Higher mortgage rates and rising prices have pushed some potential buyers out of the market. The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage is up almost a full percentage point from its recent low one year ago.

The softness in home prices in the first quarter has also hurt homeowners struggling with negative equity. The pool of underwater borrowers peaked at 12.8 million, or 29% of all properties with a mortgage, in the second quarter of 2012. Rising prices have lifted millions back above water. As of the first quarter of this year, some 9.1 million homes (or 17% of homes with mortgages) were "seriously" underwater, owing at least 25% more than property's estimated market value.

Next Friday, we’ll see the Consumer sentiment index, which has been showing a lack of enthusiasm reflecting the weak pace of hiring and meager pay raises for most households, which in turn results in sluggish consumer spending.

Thursday, we’ll get a report on durable goods orders. If economic growth is finding traction, you would expect to see businesses spending more on equipment, which should show up in the nondefense goods excluding aircraft, subcategory of the durable goods report. If businesses are seeing an increase in demand for their products, they would be expected to ramp up production. You can’t boost profits forever by just cutting costs.

Earnings season kicks into high gear next week. Apple, Microsoft, AT&T, McDonald’s, Netflix, and Facebook all report next week. S&P 500 companies' first-quarter earnings are projected to have increased 1.7% from a year ago. The forecast is down sharply from the start of the year, when profit growth was estimated at 6.5%, but has climbed from a low of 0.6% reached on Wednesday.

Yesterday, an international deal was announced in Geneva to defuse the East-West crisis in Ukraine; the pro-Russian separatists occupying buildings in Eastern Ukraine apparently didn’t get the memo. Leaders of gunmen who have taken over city halls and other sites in and around Donetsk this month in pursuit of demands for a Crimea-style referendum on union with Russia, rejected the agreement struck in Geneva.

Moscow renewed its insistence that it has no control over the "little green men" who, as before Russia annexed Crimea last month, appeared in combat gear and with automatic weapons to seize public buildings - a denial that Western allies of those who overthrew the pro-Russian president in Kiev do not accept. The White House renewed President Barack Obama's demands that the Kremlin use what Washington believes is its influence over the separatists to get them to vacate the premises. It warned of heavier economic sanctions than those already imposed over Crimea if Moscow failed to uphold the Geneva deal.

There’s no question the US can inflict great financial damage on the Russian economy, and there are indications that the Russian economy is already experiencing the early stages of a recession, but all is fair in love and war. And Russia can fight back with more than just restricting nat gas exports.  Russia's cyber-warfare experts are among the best, and they have already attacked – trial runs if you will – even though that information wasn’t really mainstream news. And the US is vulnerable, mainly because we are so dependent on technology.

So, let’s take a look at what’s on the menu for the holiday weekend. Higher prices, at least for food.

Almost everything you eat is costing more, or will. The US Department of Agriculture had been projecting about a 3% rise in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables this year; they will have to revise higher. The CRB Food Index takes a look at commodity prices for a range of foods; that index is up 20% since the start of the year. And it will likely get worse.

California has suffered a double hit: very little rain in the lowlands and a lack of snow in the mountains in the north and east. Snowmelt provides water for many of the state's farmers during the growing season and for the huge population centers in the south. Snow this year was only about 30% of the historical average. Now, the snow is melting, and in some streams and rivers there is so little water that wildlife crews have had to truck stranded salmon downstream so they could make it out to sea. This likely means some waterways will dry out this summer.

And while the West has been dry, the Midwest and Northeast had one of the harshest winters in more than 3 decades. So far this year, corn and soybean futures prices have increased 15%, and wheat prices are up 20%. Last year, high prices for corn saw farmers respond by planting the most acreage in 70 years, which in turn pushed prices down by about 40%. The USDA says farmers will plant just a little less corn this year and just a little more soybeans. Market conditions favor less corn, so other crops picked up acres from corn.

As always, the growing season is subject to weather, and the past 4 years have not been normal; either too dry or too wet to be ideal. Some farmers are expecting a return to normal, or at least hoping. And even if crop harvests are abundant, prices will be underpinned by exports. Of course, the weather might not be normal.

We seem to be undergoing a change in climate that resulted in Vermont posting its coldest month of March ever; while nearly two-thirds of the Great Lakes remained frozen by early April, impacting commercial shipping; the Northwest and Northern Rockies were wet – too wet, resulting in a fatal landslide in Washington state; and California and Arizona had a record warm start to the year, with temperatures in the first 3 months of the year more than 5 degrees above average. If you are looking for normal weather, that doesn’t seem to be the direction.

After a drought in 2012, farmers slaughtered huge numbers of cattle and hogs as feed costs soared. All that extra meat on the market helped keep a lid on prices in 2013, and now, the US cattle herd is at a 63-year low. If you are considering ham for your Easter dinner, hog prices are at a 7 year low, but it won’t last long. The smaller supply of animals ready for slaughter plus the expectation of higher feed costs have sent prices soaring.

Meanwhile, the California drought will likely result in higher prices for many fruits and vegetables. Professor Timothy Richards at Arizona State University recently published research on which crops will likely be most affected and what the price boosts might be. He estimates the following possible price increases due to the drought:

• Avocados likely to go up 17 to 35 cents to as much as $1.60 each.
• Berries likely to rise 21 to 43 cents to as much as $3.46 per clamshell container.
• Broccoli likely to go up 20 to 40 cents to a possible $2.18 per pound.
• Grapes likely to rise 26 to 50 cents to a possible $2.93 per pound.
• Lettuce likely to rise 31 to 62 cents to as much as $2.44 per head.
• Packaged salad likely to go up 17 to 34 cents to a possible $3.03 per bag.
• Peppers likely to go up 18 to 35 cents to a possible $2.48 per pound.
• Tomatoes likely to rise 22 to 45 cents to a possible $2.84 per pound.

Industry estimates range from a half-million to 1 million acres of agricultural land likely to be affected by the current California drought, and between 10 and 20% of the supply of certain crops could be lost.

Just as farmers in the Midwest can shift acreage from corn to soybeans, we will shift our sources for food. When prices increase, farmers outside of California, including foreign suppliers, will be incentivized to ship more crops to the US. That will in turn put downward pressure on costs. But with water-supply problems expected to persist for years, California farmers will have some difficult choices to make. They’ll need to determine which crops should receive the limited amount of available water, and which should be allowed to fall away. The long term consequences for California agriculture could be profound.

The cost of growing food accounts for only about 15 cents of every $1 we spend on it. The rest goes to processing, packaging, marketing and transportation. Most US consumers are in a position to cope by spending less on other goods or switching to other types of food. In other words, going to fewer movies or purchasing less beef and more chicken, the price of which has risen much less than beef this year. However, nearly 47 million Americans rely on food stamps, or SNAP – the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and as food prices go higher the number of enrollees is likely to climb. And even with food stamps, many families will find it difficult to provide sufficient nutrition.

Keep in mind the US enjoys the world’s cheapest food prices. There are even more significant implications for poorer countries, where consumers devote a far larger share of personal income to food. Remember the Arab Spring uprisings started a few years ago with food shortages and rising prices. Food shortages also figure in the unrest in Venezuela. The US is the world's biggest food exporter by a wide margin; whatever happens to domestic prices won't be confined to our shores.


Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - Food and Oil

Food and Oil
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 88 = 16,336
SPX + 13 = 1872
NAS + 53 = 4333
10 YR YLD - .02 = 2.68%
OIL + 1.62 = 99.70
GOLD – 12.00 = 1356.50
SILV - .38 = 20.92

Let’s start with some economic news. The National Association of Home Builders housing market index increased to 47 in March, up from 46 in February. A reading below 50 means more builders view conditions as poor rather than good. Fewer homes are being started in early 2014 than at the end of 2013. Housing starts came in just slightly below economists’ expectations of 910,000 at 907,000.

Separately, a quarterly survey by the Business Roundtable found US chief executive officers somewhat more positive about the economy, including plans for hiring and capital spending over the next six months; they expect gross domestic product to advance 2.4% this year. The forecast is a slight upgrade from an expectation of 2.2% in the previous survey but still less than robust.

The Consumer Price Index, or CPI, increased a seasonally adjusted 0.1% in February, matching the increase in January. According to the Labor Department report, the increase was mainly due to higher prices for food. Energy prices decreased 0.5%. Over the last 12 months, the CPI is up 1.1%. Costs for meats, poultry, fish, dairy and eggs drove the gains. Most notably, beef and veal prices surged.

Prices for beef saw their biggest monthly change in February since November 2003; that was when fears of mad-cow disease abroad led to a spike of export demand for US beef. When the disease was later confirmed in domestic cattle, prices shot down.

So, with food, and specifically meat prices moving higher, the next logical step is that dairy prices are moving higher; up 0.7% from January to February. The price that consumers paid for a gallon of milk was more than $3.56 in February, up more than 10 cents since September. The good news is that the full impact of higher prices hasn’t hit your wallet, yet. For example, the price of a block of cheese on the wholesale market is up 35%, but this price hike hasn’t been passed on to shoppers. The bad news is that those higher wholesale food prices will slowly but surely result in higher retail prices.

Federal forecasters estimate retail food prices will rise as much as 3.5% this year, the biggest annual increase in three years. The reason is simple - drought. We’ve tried to warn you this was coming and it is. California and Texas have seen tight cattle supplies after years of drought. Prices also are higher for fruits, vegetables, sugar and beverages.

In futures markets, hogs are up 42% on disease concerns and cocoa has climbed 12% on rising demand, particularly from emerging markets; coffee prices have soared so far this year more than 70% because of a drought in Brazil.

The price increases pose a challenge for food makers, restaurants, and retailers, which must decide how much of the costs they can pass along. During previous inflationary periods, food makers switched to less-expensive ingredients or reduced package sizes to maintain their profit margins. Retailers and restaurants usually raise prices as a last resort.

In 2008, a spike in food prices caused riots from Haiti to sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In 2011, rising food prices were a factor behind the Arab Spring protests in North Africa and the Middle East that ultimately toppled governments in Tunisia and Egypt. We probably are not looking at severe shortages this year, but a lot depends on the weather. If conditions get worse; if the drought gets worse; if the corn and soybean crops in the Midwest get hit by inclement weather; if they do, then we could see significant food price increases.

California farmers say a number of products could be affected later this year, including broccoli, sweet corn and melons from growing regions in Fresno to Huron, where farmers will likely cut acreage due to water shortages. Spring and fall lettuce production in the San Joaquin Valley also could drop by 25% to 30% this year, although growers could try to make up some of that by extending the planting season in the desert and in the Salinas Valley.

Supplies of other items may be supplemented from other growing regions, but at a higher cost. For example, buyers may have to rely more heavily on Florida and Mexico for corn, and there may be more melons coming from Mexico and even offshore. California supplies nearly 90% of the nation's strawberries; growers typically plant a second crop in the summer for fall production; if we don’t see more rain, we won’t see a second planting. It’s not like somebody can step in and fill that void.

For the moment, fair weather accompanying the drought has caused vegetable crops to come to market ahead of schedule, creating an overlap from the deserts and the San Joaquin Valley, creating a temporary oversupply of some veggies. Enjoy it while you can, better yet, can it while you enjoy it.

Stocks are rallying in the wake of the latest developments in the Ukraine region. Gains were broad, with all 10 primary sectors of the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index higher. Groups tied to the pace of economic growth, including materials, were among the day’s biggest advancers.  After five days of nervous anticipation that held stocks lower last week, stocks so far this week have gone straight up, even with Russian troops massed along the eastern border of Ukraine. In an address to the Russian Parliament, Putin said Russia did not want Ukraine to be divided further, and that he did not want to seize more of the country.

According to Reuters, Crimea may nationalize oil and gas assets within its borders belonging to Ukraine, and sell them off to Russia. The ongoing political standoff in Crimea has already halted Ukraine’s oil and gas ambitions. Ukraine came close to inking a deal with a consortium of international oil companies that would have led to an initial $735 million investment to drill two offshore wells. The consortium led by ExxonMobil, with stakes held by Shell, Romania’s OMV Petrom, and Ukraine’s Nadra Ukrainy, had been particularly interested in a nat gas field in the Black Sea, which holds an estimated 200 to 250 billion cubic meters of natural gas.

If it can get the field up and running, Exxon hopes to eventually produce 5 billion cubic meters per year. Exxon’s consortium outbid Russian oil company Lukoil for the rights to the block. Exxon’s plans for Black Sea nat gas may not have a future if Russia simply takes Ukraine’s assets. The speaker of Crimea’s parliament said that its oilfields should be under the care of Moscow. After Sunday’s referendum, those reserves appear to have shifted to Russian control.

Exxon likely doesn’t see much upside in getting into a tiff with Russia over the Black Sea, especially since it hadn’t even agreed on a production sharing agreement with Kiev yet. But Exxon has billions of dollars of investments in the Russia Arctic in a co-venture with Rosneft, its largest non-US project. If the situation escalates, Rosneft might possibly be targeted with sanctions.

It’s not easy diagnosing the insanity being spouted by the media regarding Russia’s invasion of Crimea, and I don’t claim to have the answers, but it appears to be closely tied to oil interests. It certainly looks like Russia will take Crimea, won’t pay a big price for it, and there’s not a thing anyone can do about it. And the best explanation is oil. Russia is now the world’s #1 oil exporting nation, topping Saudi Arabia by more than a million barrels a day. Russia has an estimated 80 billion barrels in reserves and everybody wants some.

Wall Street has figured out that they can’t allow jingoism to affect their bets. Analysts from Goldman Sachs Group, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley have said Europe probably won’t back sanctions that limit flows of Russia’s oil and gas. European members of the Paris-based International Energy Agency imported 32% of their raw crude oil, fuels and gas-based chemical feedstocks from Russia in 2012.

Even if Angela Merkel isn’t bluffing when she says Germany is willing to suffer in the cold and dark to punish Russia, she’d have a hard time getting the less disciplined countries of the EU to participate in her stoic resistance. And even if Merkel and the EU can herd cats and present a unified front, Russia will simply sell oil out the back door. Yes, Russia now has a back door. Last year, Russia completed East Siberian-Pacific Ocean pipeline, and that connects Russian oil to China and East Asia.

This weekend on the CNN, Senator John McCain said, “Russia is a gas station masquerading as a country. It’s kleptocracy, it’s corruption, it’s a nation that is really only dependent upon oil and gas for their economy.” Yea, O.K., so what?  You could say the same thing about Saudi Arabia, that beacon of democracy and a fine American ally.

Let’s keep it simple; you probably drove a car today; the food you eat today was transported by truck; everything in this country runs on oil. It certainly isn’t the best source of energy but it is the dominant source of energy. And for a long time now, we have run our foreign policy on the idea of securing oil to keep the economic engine running. We have sent troops into harm’s way to keep the oil flowing. We have sacrificed untold bounty and blood at the altar.

You might think we would be smart enough to step back and reconsider this strategy. It might make sense to concentrate our energy and our brainpower and our capital toward developing alternatives to the insanity.

I can tell you that very soon you will be hearing about groundbreaking alternatives in energy that have the potential to break this old cycle. Energy stories that sound impossible, but just remember, something is only impossible until it is done.


Thursday, February 20, 2014

Thursday, February 20, 2014 - Searching for Inflation

Searching for Inflation
by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 92 = 16,133
SPX + 11 = 1839
NAS + 29 = 4267
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.75%
OIL + .02 = 102.86
GOLD + 12.10 = 1324.00
SILV + .29 = 21.92

The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Indicators rose 0.3% in January following no change in December. Over the six months through January, the LEI rose 3.1%. The LEI tracks 10 indicators designed to signal business cycle peaks and troughs. In the most recent report, 5 of the 10 indicators were positive, including a drop in jobless claims and a pickup in factory orders; on the negative side, declines in building permits and hours worked. Meanwhile, the Conference Board’s index of coincident indicators, a gauge of current economic activity, rose 0.1 percent for a second month. Overall, the leading indicators point to moderate expansion once the nation gets past inclement weather, with the caveat that consumer demand needs to pick up. No surprises in that report.

The Consumer Price Index rose 0.1% in January after a 0.2% gain in December. The CPI measures prices at the retail level. The core rate, excluding food and energy prices, also rose 0.1%. Over the past 12 months, consumer prices were up 1.5%, and the core CPI was up 1.6%. Energy costs increased 0.6% from a month earlier and were up 2.1% over the past 12 months. Food costs rose 0.1%. Gains in the cost of hotel rooms, medical care and rents were mostly offset by declining costs for new and used cars, clothing and airline fares.

Yesterday, Fed policymakers released the minutes of the January FOMC meeting and we learned they had expressed concern about inflation being too low. Some participants wanted an “explicit indication” in their annual statement on policy goals that prices persistently above or below their 2 percent inflation target would be “equally undesirable.”

Prices are about to move higher, at least for food. It’s pretty simple; the state that produces the most vegetables is going through the worst drought it has ever experienced. Just consider the statistics regarding what percentage of the produce you eat is grown in California: 99% of artichokes, 44% of asparagus, 66% of carrots, 50% of bell peppers, 89% of cauliflower, 94% of broccoli, 95% of celery, 90% of lettuce, 83% of spinach, 33% of tomatoes, 86% of lemons, 90% of avocados, 84% of peaches, 88% of strawberries, and 97% of plums.

If fruits and veggies don’t fill your plate, you’ll want to take note that the US cattle herd is now the smallest it has been in 63 years. The drought in California and also Texas means that there are fewer cows, as ranchers in the West sell off their livestock because grazing land has dried out and buying feed is prohibitively expensive. And you can’t just snap your fingers and have a cow ready for market; it takes a couple of years. The lower supply means higher prices; offsetting the supply is lower demand; nearly 40% of Americans say they eat less beef today than 3 years ago.  Ground beef prices were up 5% for the past year. Chicken prices up more than 18% in the past 3 years, and bacon up 23% in the past 3 years.


If there is any good news on the food front, the US Department of Agriculture today reported that corn, soybeans, and wheat prices should be lower over the next 12 months.

Anyway, no inflation on the horizon in today’s CPI report. And the reason is not just what is happening in the USA. Goods inflation is exposed to global trade. When China was flooding the world with low cost goods in the 1990s and 2000s, it put immense downward pressure on consumer goods prices and held down the overall U.S. inflation rate. Unlike the 1990s and early 2000s, the latest downdraft in goods inflation is likely being driven not so much by an influx of cheap goods produced by low-cost emerging market labor, but by a slowdown overseas driven by over investment in emerging markets during their boom. An acceleration of global growth is probably a necessary condition for headline inflation to accelerate.

That’s just a small part of the inflation picture. The service sector makes up a larger part of the US economy these days. Services inflation is highly exposed to domestic housing and the cost of domestic labor. In other words, rent and wages. The owners’ equivalent rent index had been rising at a steady pace through most of 2012 and 2013, with 12-month percent changes hovering around 2%, but toward the end of 2013, the pace picked up. By January OER was up 2.5% compared to year-ago levels. That’s not a hot pace for housing costs but it bears attention. Meanwhile, wages have been flat for what seems like forever, and that means there is no demand to push prices higher, at least for services. For that matter, we may be setting up a divergence between wages and rents. You can’t push rents higher unless people earn enough wages to pay the rent.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has issued a paper on why people are having a hard time finding a job. The old excuse was “structural unemployment.” The new excuse is a decline in “job matching efficiency.”

The White House budget to be released early next month will propose $56 billion in new spending on domestic and defense priorities and drop a proposal that was included in last year's budget as a way to attract Republican support; a plan that would have cut Social Security benefits based on a “chained CPI”. The budget would aim to reduce the emphasis on austerity that has been the preoccupation of American politics for the past four years.

A White House official said President Obama decided to release a budget that fully represents his "vision," rather than to continue to pursue a fiscal agreement, because Republicans have refused to engage in good-faith negotiations over the nation's top priorities.

The new budget is due March 4.

The protests in the Ukraine have escalated into gun battles between police and anti-government forces. The death toll has climbed to 75. Three hours of fierce fighting in Kiev's Independence Square, which was recaptured by the protesters, left the bodies of over 20 civilians strewn on the ground. Nearby, President Viktor Yanukovich was meeting with a EU delegation trying to broker a political settlement. For now, there is no agreement.

Increasingly, we’ve seen big banks involved in commodity markets, and an interesting idea was recently tossed out by Theodore Butler regarding the origins of the 2008 crash. I don’t know if it is true but it’s an interesting story.

You’ll remember that Bear Stearns imploded six years ago; JPMorgan took it over as the doors were closed. It was an unprecedented fall. As Butler said: “The cause was said to be a run on the bank as nervous investors pulled assets from the firm. Bear Stearns was said to be levered by 35 times, meaning it had equity of $11 billion and total assets of $395 billion. This is a very small cushion if something negative suddenly appears… Since Bear had a significant presence in sub-prime mortgages and that market was in distress, it is assumed the fall of the firm was mortgage related. That may be true, but there was no general stress in the stock market through mid-March 2008 reflecting a credit crisis. Was there instead some specific trigger behind the company’s sudden collapse?”

One idea is that Bear Stearns was short the silver market. The exact holdings haven’t been established but the 4 largest short traders in silver was at an extreme level of more than 300 million ounces; triple the long positions, and Bear Stearns was the largest short in COMEX gold and silver contracts.

The day of Bear Stearns demise coincides with historic high points in gold and silver. “Gold prices rose from under $800 in mid-December 2007 to $1,000 in mid-March 2008, a gain of more than $200. Silver prices rose from under $14 in mid-December to $21 when Bear Stearns failed on March 17, 2008. That was a gain of $7. This was the highest price for silver and close to the highest price of gold since 1980. Obviously, a $200 rise in the price of gold and a $7 rise in the price of silver is not good if you are the biggest gold and silver short…. Bear Stearns had to come up with $2.7 billion because gold and silver prices rose sharply in the first quarter of 2008 and the company bet the wrong way. That it couldn’t come up with all the margin money for the losses in gold and silver, is the most visible reason it went under.”

We can’t say with certainty that this is what happened to Bear Stearns, but it is probably more than mere coincidence that JPMorgan ended up acquiring Bear, and really, it makes  sense, and at the very least it’s a great story.