Tuesday, August 05, 2014 - Go Firgure

Go Figure

by Sinclair Noe

DOW – 139 = 16,429
SPX – 18 = 1920
NAS – 31 = 4352
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.48%
OIL - .86 = 97.43
GOLD + .40 = 1289.60
SILV - .39 = 19.84

We start with a couple of economic reports: The Institute for Supply Management’s services index rose to 58.7 last month, the highest level since December 2005, from 56.0 in June. A reading above 50 indicates expansion. Orders jumped to a 9 year high. A sub-index gauging services industry employment also rose as did order backlogs, but export order growth moderated.

In a separate report, the Commerce Department said orders for manufactured goods increased 1.1% in June, more than reversing May's 0.6% decline. Orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft hit a record high; this might indicate a renewal in business confidence and equipment spending plans. Factory orders rose across all categories, with bookings for electrical equipment, appliances and components recording their largest gain since November 2010. In another sign of strength, unfilled orders saw their largest rise in seven months.

So, a couple of good reports on the economy, and the stock market tumbles. Go figure.

The situation in Ukraine appears headed to a tipping point. Ukrainian forces have been pushing back against Russian backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. Meanwhile, Russia is massing troops on the border. Some 20,000 troops are now stationed about 50 kilometers from the border, closer than they had been stationed previously. In April, Russian President Vladimir Putin had briefly deployed about 40,000 troops at the border. The latest troops include Russian Elite forces, armored brigades, artillery and anti-aircraft units. Poland’s foreign minister thinks Russia is preparing to invade Ukraine; he didn’t flat out say an invasion was imminent, just that the Russians are getting ready.

Putin has ordered his government to prepare retaliatory measures against US and European economic sanctions imposed on Russia. We don’t know what Putin means by retaliatory measures. Russia may limit or ban flights over Siberia by European carriers bound for Asia as a response to sanctions levied against the country. Russia has also called for the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting on the humanitarian situation in Ukraine. It isn’t a humanitarian situation when the pro-Russian rebels shoot a plane full of civilians out of the sky, but it is a humanitarian situation when the rebels start getting their butts kicked.

One thing that hasn’t happened yet is a disruption in oil and gas supplies from Russia to Europe. Russia derives half its tax revenue from the oil sector; Europe relies on Russian supplies. As the weather changes and winter sets in, Europe’s resolve, which has already been soft, will weaken further. For now, energy prices are moving lower, despite violence in Eastern Europe, Libya, and Iraq. Global oil demand has been running below supply over the last few months, building up a glut of high quality crude oil in the West African, European and Asian markets. The US Energy Information Administration reported last week that gasoline supplies rose by 400,000 barrels at a time when market bulls hoped to see a reduction. Oil prices are at their lowest levels since February.

Yesterday we told you about the collapse of Portugal’s Banco Espirito Santo; today we report on the fallout. The French bank Credit Agricole held a 14% stake in Banco Espirito Santo and two seats on its board. Crédit Agricole's ties to the Portuguese group go back to 1986 when it helped the Espírito Santo Group set up Banco Internacional de Crédito. Over the years, the French bank raised its stake in the Portuguese group, as part of a larger international expansion plan in southern Europe.The French bankers say they never detected any “slip or difficulties” at Banco Espirito Santo. The collapse of the Portuguese bank nearly wiped out all the second quarter profits at the French bank.

Standard & Poors today announced that it was dropping its 10-year estimate of annual GDP growth in the US from 2.8% to 2.5%, which over a decade amounts to a pretty significant reduction. Why are they cutting the growth forecast? Here’s what S&P says: "Our review of the data, as well as a wealth of research on this matter, leads us to conclude that the current level of income inequality in the U.S. is dampening GDP growth, at a time when the world's biggest economy is struggling to recover from the Great Recession and the government is in need of funds to support an aging population... At extreme levels, income inequality can harm sustained economic growth over long periods. The U.S. is approaching that threshold...."

S&P analysts say it basically boils down to the idea that high levels of income inequality cause more affluent households to save more of their increasing income rather than spend it, and as that cash is withdrawn the economy slows. At the other end of the economic scale, as income declines, households go into debt to try to maintain their standard of living, a strategy that is simply unsustainable over time. And when the unsustainable ceases to be sustained, you get a breakdown, much like that of 2008. In fact, S&P notes, as income inequality increases, an economic system becomes more and more vulnerable to a boom-and-bust cycle. It cites research demonstrating that income distribution plays a much more important role in sustaining long-term economic growth than any other factor.

Although the issue of income inequality is often addressed in moral terms, S&P concludes, at its foundation it is really an economic issue, saying: "A rising tide lifts all boats … but a lifeboat carrying a few, surrounded by many treading water, risks capsizing."

Earnings reporting season:

Retailer Target cut its second quarter earnings estimates due to higher promotions and more discounting; they also lost about $148 million related to that data breach, where hackers gained access to customer credit card info; that’s a small number compared to total sales at Target, but it apparently proved a costly distraction. Morgan Stanley reduced its second quarter earnings by 2 cents per share due to increased legal settlements. Disney posted better than expected earnings; shares moved just a smidge higher in after-hours trading. Cablevision cut back on its promotions and subscriber losses doubled in the second quarter. First Solar posted profits that missed estimates by a wide margin; they blamed project delays. Groupon fell in after-hours trading after posting a second quarter loss nearly triple the loss from a year ago. Zillow announced a second quarter loss, even as revenue increased; and they raised their full year revenue outlook. This was Zillow’s first quarterly report since they announced a $3.5 billion deal to acquire rival Trulia.

Time Warner and Fox both report earnings tomorrow, but the big news came today. Fox withdrew its offer for Time Warner. Game over. When Fox made the hostile bid, its stock dropped and Time’s stock soared; meanwhile Time’s board and management opposed the takeover and refused to discuss the offer. Now that Murdoch has dangled a huge windfall in front of Time Warner shareholders, only to take it away, one imagines that some of those shareholders may soon be venting their frustration to Time Warner's board and management.

Several America corporations have found a loophole in the tax code, which allows for a company to acquire a partial interest in a foreign company, and then change the address of its headquarters in order to evade US taxes; it’s called an inversion. There have been 22 such deals since 2011, most have been in the pharmaceutical industry, where overseas sales generate significant income that cannot be brought back to the US without suffering a major tax hit; but there have also been inversion deals in the media, consumer and manufacturing sectors. Some of those deals have collapsed, amid disputes over price and political scrutiny.

Walgreens was next on the list; closing in on a deal to buy the 55% of British pharmacy retailer, Alliance Boots; Walgreens already owns 45% of Alliance Boots. Walgreens will buy out Alliance Boots, but it won’t move its corporate headquarters abroad and it will not change its corporate citizenship to a lower tax country. They say they won’t do the inversion move because they would have had to renegotiate an existing agreement, and Alliance Boots wasn’t willing. There may also have been some political pressure.  President Obama has denounced tax inversions as unpatriotic and has urged Congress to stop them; which is like asking a Kleenex to stop a freight train. So, now the Treasury Department says there may be an executive order to provide a partial administrative fix, you know, until Congress gets back from its 5 week vacation.

As Ebola spreads, pharmaceutical giants are sitting this one out. That's mainly because treating a disease that affects a relatively small number of people who typically don’t have a lot of money doesn’t offer a great return on investment. It's unclear how much profit it would take to get Big Pharma interested in finding an Ebola cure, but right now such a project could well be a money-loser. Instead, small biotech firms, academics and government agencies are leading the search for an Ebola cure. And in a twist of fate, they may have found a way to treat the virus: tobacco.

A tiny San Diego-based company provided an experimental Ebola treatment for two Americans infected with the deadly virus in Liberia. The biotechnology drug, produced with tobacco plants, appears to be working. Mapp Biopharmaceutical produced an experimental drug called ZMapp, an antibody that had been tested only on infected animals; now it’s been given to human patients, and it seems to make a big difference. The antibody work came out of research projects funded more than a decade ago by the U.S. Army to develop treatments and vaccines against potential bio-warfare agents, such as the Ebola virus.

The tobacco plant production system was developed because it was a method that could produce antibodies rapidly in the event of an emergency. To produce therapeutic proteins inside a tobacco plant, genes for the desired antibodies are fused to genes for a natural tobacco virus. The tobacco plants are then infected with this new artificial virus. The infection results in the production of antibodies inside the plant. The plant is eventually ground up and the antibody is extracted. The whole process takes a matter of weeks.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014 - The Day the Net Died (Maybe)

The Day the Net Died (Maybe)

by Sinclair Noe

DOW + 115 = 16,373
SPX + 19 = 1838
NAS + 69 = 4183
10 YR YLD + .04 = 2.87%
OIL + .83 = 92.63
GOLD – 7.40 = 1246.00
SILV - .15 = 20.36

A US appeals court has rejected federal rules that required Internet providers to treat all web traffic equally. The Federal Communications Commission's open Internet rules, also known as net neutrality rules, required Internet service providers to give consumers equal access to all lawful content without restrictions or varying charges. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down the regulation, which was passed in late 2010 and challenged in court by Verizon Communications. The decision that could allow mobile carriers and other broadband providers to charge content providers for faster access to websites and products, or block content, or slow down access.

One argument is that a video and Internet provider would have an incentive to bog down a video streaming service such as Netflix in favor of its own sites. Or it could charge a toll to those who want their content delivered at a higher speed, which media watchdogs say would stifle innovation and favor big and powerful companies.

The issue of companies playing favorites with their own content came to the forefront when Comcast announced plans to acquire NBCUniversal in 2009.  Comcast, the nation's largest cable and Internet distributor, said in a statement that the court ruling would not change the company's policies. At the time of the acquisition, the Comcast agreed to abide by the FCC's open Internet rules for 7 years, even if the courts changed them. After 7 years, the gloves would likely come off.

There is big money at stake, as we were reminded today. Charter Communications wants to buy Time Warner Cable in a deal valued at more than $37 billion. Time Warner Cable's board has rejected the offer.

The FCC had classified broadband providers as information service providers as opposed to telecommunications service providers, like telephone companies, and that distinction created a legal hurdle for the FCC's authority over them. This was the second time the court struck down the FCC's net neutrality rules. The FCC now could appeal the ruling to the full appeals court or to the US Supreme Court, something FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said he is considering as he looked at "all available options" to ensure Internet networks remained free and open.

The regulators could also try to reclassify broadband providers so they fall in the same category as traditional phone companies, a step that would give the FCC more oversight power. With the agency taking its regulatory authority from the Telecommunications Act of 1996, it could go back to Congress and ask for new authority to regulate broadband. But the Republican majority in the House of Representatives has tried multiple times to repeal the FCC’s net-neutrality rules, and any legislation giving the FCC new authority over broadband providers would have little chance with lawmakers there.

One simple way, at least on its face, to get around the prohibition on applying common carrier rules to broadband would be for the FCC to reclassify broadband, subject to the common carrier rules that traditional voice service is subject to.

There will be serious push back from the phone and cable companies and their lobbyists. They will make threats, recycle all of their debunked myths about the Internet, they will claim that the internet belongs to them, and promise we can trust them not to do any of the bad things they've fought so hard to do.

Economic data today; the commerce department reported better-than-expected retail sales for December, up 0.2% versus estimates of 0.0%. Core sales, excluding the more volatile food and auto sectors, were up 0.7% for the biggest gain in almost a year. November sales numbers were revised slightly lower. These core sales correspond most closely with the consumer spending component of gross domestic product, and the increase suggested consumption accelerated in the fourth quarter from the third quarter's 2 percent annual pace.

A second report from the Commerce Department showing retail inventories, excluding autos, increased 0.6 percent in November after increasing 0.3 percent in October. The economy grew at a 4.1 percent rate in the third quarter, which was the fastest pace in almost two years. Fourth-quarter GDP growth estimates range as high as a 3.9 percent rate.

It's earnings reporting season and this week features the big banks; today featured JPMorgan and Wells Fargo. Wells reported an 11% jump in profits, thanks in large part to cost cutting, which is to say they fired people. Wells Fargo says their mortgage business is doing just about what it would be expected to do at this point in the economic cycle. The nation's biggest mortgage lender, Wells Fargo, said its mortgage volume tumbled to $50 billion in the quarter, down 60 percent from $125 billion a year ago. The second-biggest lender, JPMorgan Chase, said its mortgage originations, that includes new home purchases and refinancings, fell 54 percent to $23.3 billion from $51.2 billion a year ago.

A jump in interest rates has had a big impact on the housing market. That should be a warning sign for a Federal Reserve seemingly bound and determined to withdraw stimulus from a still-shaky economy. Higher rates have hurt demand. The average interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage has jumped to 4.5 percent from a record low of 3.3 percent in early 2013. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and others argued they weren't kicking the props out from under the bond market, but that's sort of what happened: Bond prices fell, and interest rates jumped. Of course, rates are still relatively low, and the housing market is not exactly in a panic, though sales are slowing.

The specifics of bank earnings are increasingly unimportant because nobody believes the numbers anymore; the numbers are massaged and manipulated to such a degree that they are of no value. Wells Fargo closed near an all time high. Still, the reports are fun reading, even if much is fictional.

JPMorgan met earnings expectations if you overlook the legal costs, and Wall Street seemed willing too overlook the legal costs today. Investment banking fee revenue dropped 3 percent. The bank had $1.1 billion of legal expenses in the fourth quarter, about $850 million of which was linked to a recent settlement for failing to report its suspicions of fraud at its client Bernard Madoff's fund.

The bank agreed to some $20 billion of legal settlements in 2013; almost equal to a typical year's profit. CEO Jamie Dimon indicated some investigations into JPMorgan are just beginning, so the idea is that they just treat the legal problems as the cost of doing business.

One bit of info from JPMorgan today, a key lending metric, the ratio of the bank's loans-to-deposits, hit a new low. In 2013, JPMorgan on average lent out just 57% of its deposits. That's down from 61% a year ago and the lowest that ratio has been in at least a decade. Back in 2004, JPMorgan's loan-to-deposit percentage was as high as 88%. It's also down at rivals. But not as much. The industry average is just under 70%.Traditionally, banks have lent out 80 to 90% of their deposits.

So, why isn't JPMorgan making loans? One reason is that they can make as much money, about $300 million by just buying short term, low interest rate Treasury bonds. Dimon should send a thank you note to Bernanke. The other possible explanation is that there isn't much demand for loans. Either way, this would seem to be an indicator of sluggish growth.

The bank earnings season actually kicked off on Friday when the Federal Reserve released a statement saying it made an estimated $79 billion in net interest income, driven by its $90 billion in interest income on its portfolio of Treasuries, mortgage bonds, and other securities. The Fed sent $77 billion to the US Treasury. The Federal Reserve, after operational costs, is earning double the profits of Exxon Mobil ($44 billion) and Apple ($41 billion), and those two companies are doing a combined $600 billion in global revenues. The Fed doesn't have to drill oil wells or hire Chinese kids to glue together phones, they basically print money, buy mostly risk-free bond investments and do a little research to determine what the interest payments are going to be. The Fed has built up a $4 trillion dollar portfolio, and they have sent more than $350 billion to the Treasury since 2009. By the way, the Fed sent $88 billion to the Treasury in 2012, so they were down last year. No, I don't know what that indicates.

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised its outlook on California's credit ratings to positive from stable, citing the governor's budget plan. S&P foresees raising the state's rating one notch within two years, if California follows the $107 billion budget Brown proposed last week. S&P said it is also encouraged by the proposal's emphasis on repaying debt and building reserves. While Brown did not suggest specific action for making the teachers' underfunded retirement system whole, he did highlight that the pension "is in need of a long-term funding strategy.”

In a letter issued through the Economic Policy Institute, including seven Nobel Laureates, argue that the government should hike the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour by 2016 and then peg future increases to inflation.

The effect of a minimum wage hike is one of the most hotly debated issues in economic research. Some argue that a boost in the wage floor would hurt low wage earners because employers would be hesitant to hire if they had to pay their workers more. In the letter, the economists, argue that the "weight" of the evidence indicates past minimum wage hikes haven’t hurt the job market.

However, the letter reads: "Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front."