Supremely Happy
by Sinclair Noe
DOW
– 32 = 15750
SPX – 4 = 1767
NAS + 0.13 = 3919
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.77%
SPX – 4 = 1767
NAS + 0.13 = 3919
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.77%
OIL
– 2.10 = 93.04
GOLD – 15.70 = 1267.20
SILV - .65 = 20.80
GOLD – 15.70 = 1267.20
SILV - .65 = 20.80
We've
been hearing from Federal Reserve big wigs about their ideas for
taper. Today, Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Dennis Lockhart said he wants to
see inflation accelerate toward the Fed’s 2% goal before the
central bank reduces $85 billion in monthly bond purchases.
Lockhart also wants to see economic growth pick up to around 3%.
In
a speech, Lockhart said: “To
achieve a faster pace of growth, it’s my opinion that we’ll need
to see” greater consumer spending and a decline in “fiscal drag.”
Even though those targets for inflation and growth are a long way
off, Lockhart says the taper, reducing bond purchases, “ought to be
on the table at upcoming meetings” by the FOMC, including the
December 17-18 meeting.
There
has been a common thread in mainstream economic forecasting lately.
It goes like this: "Yes, 2013 has been rough. But growth should
pick up in 2014." The latest example is from the OECD, the
organization of leading developed nations projecting that improvement
just around the corner, as its index of leading indicators rose.
The
same story shows up in almost any mainstream forecasters' estimates.
For example, in their last official forecasts, top Federal Reserve
economists concluded that 2013 US economic growth was on track to be
only 2 to 2.3 percent. But they forecast that would rise to the 3
percent ballpark in 2014 and as high as 3.5 percent in 2015.
The
consistent pattern for the last four years has been to project
improving growth in the year ahead, and then to mark down those
projections when the rosier future does not arrive.
Perhaps
the US economy is gathering traction, or perhaps last week's rate
cuts by the European Central Bank signal a global competition to cut
the value of currencies; the result is that the dollar is bouncing
off its lowest levels since February. Weak inflation readings offer
the Fed a rationale to continue securities purchases; it also locks
the Fed into securities purchases. Right now the PCE reading of
inflation is just below one percent and there really isn't any
indicator of a big increase in inflation; and if the Fed starts
tapering now, they run the risk of increasing deflationary pressures.
When
the Department of Justice blocked the American Airlines, US Airways
merger, we told you it was probably a negotiating tactic. It was.
DOJ has reached an agreement that will have the merged airline give
up flight slots and gates at seven different airports, the big
changes coming at Washington Reagan and New York La Guardia. So, now
that a deal has been reached, the two airlines are expected to
complete their merger in December, just in time for the holiday
travel season.
In
a settlement expected to be announced this week, Bloomberg
reports Johnson & Johnson will
pay more than $4 billion to resolve thousands of lawsuits over its
recalled hip implants in the largest settlement of US legal claims
over a medical device. The accord will resolve more than 7,500 suits
filed in federal and state courts by patients who’ve already had
defective hips removed. The company will likely pay an average of
$300,000 for each of those removals. The agreement doesn’t bar
patients whose hips fail in the future from seeking compensation from
J&J; that means the settlement is uncapped in terms of its total
value.
Timothy
Massad is expected to be picked to head the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, replacing the retiring Gary Gensler. The CFTC is the
regulator of the derivatives markets, estimated at more than $600
trillion on Wall Street; perhaps double that amount worldwide. It
might be a misnomer to say the CFTC regulates the derivatives
markets, because those markets are largely unregulated. The CFTC,
long an unexciting agency overseeing agriculture futures, has only
just been put in charge of the swaps markets, and has yet to write
some of its planned rules. Massad worked as the head of the Troubled
Asset Relief Program until 2011.
Six
years after the collapse of a couple of Bear Stearns hedge funds and
the fight continues over the cause of Bears' demise. Liquidators
seeking to recover money for investors have filed a fraud lawsuit
against three major credit rating agencies: Standard & Poors,
Fitch, and Moody's. The suit accuses the credit rating agencies of
assigning artificially high credit ratings to the mortgage bonds in
the funds. When those bonds collapsed, the funds failed, resulting in
more than $1 billion in investor losses.
The
credit rating agencies made the mistake of allowing employees to
communicate by email about the work they were sort of doing. “It
could be structured by cows and we would rate it,” an S&P
employee said to a co-worker in a text message from 2007. A Moody's
employee wrote: “We
sold our soul to the devil for revenue.” In an email, another S&P
employee called the firm’s ratings practices a “scam.”
The
lawsuit is not the first that seeks to hold the ratings agencies
accountable for losses incurred during the financial crisis. The
Justice Department filed a civil fraud action this year against S&P,
the first federal enforcement action against a credit rating firm.
It is also not the first legal action related to the two Bear funds,
which collapsed in July 2007. Federal prosecutors brought criminal
securities fraud charges against the funds’ managers, Ralph Cioffi
and Matthew Tannin. The two fought the charges and a jury found them
not guilty after a trial.
A
report by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission found the credit
ratings firms were “key enablers of the financial meltdown.”
Mortgage
bond investors have had mixed results bringing civil lawsuits against
the ratings agencies. S&P and the other agencies have argued that
their ratings are speech that is protected by the First Amendment. A
number of judges have agreed with the ratings agencies and tossed out
these lawsuits. Others have said the ratings were not opinions, but
misrepresentations that were possibly the result of negligence or
fraud.
S&P
also said its ratings were not to be relied on, in part because the
investors had the same information as it did.
In
July, a federal judge denied S&P’s motion to dismiss the
government’s case and called its defense “deeply and unavoidably
troubling.” The judge, David Carter of Federal District Court in
Los Angeles, asked, “If no investor believed in S&P’s
objectivity, and every bank had access to the same information and
models as S&P, is S&P asserting, as a matter of law, the
company’s credit ratings service added absolutely zero material
value as a predictor of creditworthiness?”
This
week, the operator of Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear plant will
begin removing 400 tons of highly irradiated spent fuel in a hugely
delicate and unprecedented operation fraught with risk. Carefully
plucking more than 1,500 brittle and potentially damaged fuel
assemblies from the plant's unstable Reactor No. 4 is expected to
take about a year. If the rods - there are 50-70 in each of the
assemblies, which weigh around 660 pounds and are 15 feet long - are
exposed to air or if they break, huge amounts of radioactive gases
could be released into the atmosphere.
When
the time comes, extracting spent fuel from the plant's other
reactors, where radiation levels are much higher because of core
meltdowns, will be even more challenging. Reactors No. 1 and No. 3
sustained heavier damage than No. 4 as a result of the March 2011
earthquake and tsunami, but Reactor No.4 is perched nearly 60 feet
high in a building that has buckled and tilted and could collapse if
another quake strikes. Also, if the pool housing the fuel assemblies
is punctured and the water drains away, there could be a fire that
releases more radiation than during the 2011 disaster
You've
heard that some retailers are trying to kill Thanksgiving; they're
moving Black Friday to Thursday, Thanksgiving Day; some are even
starting sales at 6AM on Thanksgiving Day, so as to totally ruin any
sense of the holiday. The big chain stores include: Old Navy, Kmart,
WalMart, Target, Staples, Sears, Best Buy, Toys Rus, and others.
We've been told that the reason behind the move is because of a
calendar anomaly this year that resulted in 6 fewer shopping days
between Thanksgiving and Christmas. The real reason is far more
insidious and diabolical.
It
is in fact, a socialist plot, and it started in Venezuela. About six
months ago, Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan president and dictator died;
his replacement is a man named Nicolas Maduro, and Maduro has
declared that Christmas should be celebrated earlier; he moved it to
the first Saturday in November. So, I'm a little late with the story.
And
then he ordered government employees to be paid their Christmas
bonuses in November, as he turned on the Nativity lights on the
Presidential Palace. But why did the Venezuelan president decide to
defy the calendar in such a bizarre manner? Well, Maduro announced
that he simply wanted to bring “happiness for everyone.” And it's
all part of a bigger plot.
Last week, Maduro sought to raise the level of happiness throughout the country by introducing the Deputy Ministry of Supreme Social Happiness. Maduro defended this cabinet-level creation, by remarking, “It’s provocative to make it a ministry, right?”
He
then went on to add, “That’s the main message I wanted to give
here. Let’s be happy and make others happy too.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.