Infinite
Monkey Diplomacy Theorem
by
Sinclair Noe
DOW
+ 127 = 15,191
SPX + 12 = 1683
NAS + 22 = 3729
10 YR YLD + .06 = 2.96%
OIL – 2.29 = 107.23
GOLD – 23.20 = 1364.30
SILV - .75 = 23.07
The war hasn't started..., yet.
SPX + 12 = 1683
NAS + 22 = 3729
10 YR YLD + .06 = 2.96%
OIL – 2.29 = 107.23
GOLD – 23.20 = 1364.30
SILV - .75 = 23.07
The war hasn't started..., yet.
We
had an off the cuff comment from Secretary of State John Kerry that
set off a new peace plan. Kerry
told reporters in London that President Bashar al-Assad of Syria
could avert a strike if he turned over his chemical weapons stockpile
within a week, adding that such an outcome was
unlikely. This is apparently a new diplomatic policy based upon the
infinite monkey theorem; which postulates that if you had a roomful
of monkeys with typewriters, the monkeys would almost surely,
eventually type out the complete works of William Shakespeare.
In
this context, the monkey is not an actual monkey but a metaphor for
an abstract device or perhaps a Secretary of State, and given enough
time to talk he would almost surely, eventually stumble across a
peace plan. Last night
his apparently off-the-cuff proposal had gained broad support,
including a warm welcome from both Syria and Russia, which said it
would bring Syria’s chemical weapons under international control.
France has introduced a proposal with the UN. Kerry has denied the
whole thing, calling the remark nothing more than a rhetorical
exercise. Methinks he doth protest too much; for what is politics but
a rhetorical exercise?
If
you don't like the infinite monkey theorem, then perhaps we are
seeing an extremely impressive 3D chess match, and the Grand Masters
are trying to pass it off as a game of checkers. Remember that Obama
just returned from the G20 meeting in Russia, and there was a private
meeting between Obama and Putin. We don't know the details but it is
fairly certain the Syrian situation was discussed. We will know more
in the richness of time.
Or,
more precisely at about 6PM Pacific time. President Obama delivers a
State of the Strike Speech from the Oval Office. White
House speechwriters have been revising their drafts. Obama is now
expected to say that the threat of military action has led to the
diplomatic opening, and to urge Congress to keep the pressure on
Syria even as his administration examines whether the Russian
proposal is serious or a way to obstruct military action.
Negotiations are more effective with the threat of cruise missiles.
And this leaves fewer excuses for Congress to vote against granted
the president authority for military intervention, if Assad were to
reneg on the peace proposal. And all this may come to naught; calls
for peace so rarely silence the drums of war; but there seems to be a
moment here where sanity might prevail.
It
has been a blast to watch. On cable news, everything is breaking;
breaking news; breaking updates; breaking coverage; breaking
developments; huge developments; breaking huge developments.
While
all attention is focused on Syria, we almost forgot that this week
five years ago there was a meltdown on Wall Street. Lehman Brothers
went bankrupt. The biggest banks were so terrifyingly big that they
had to be bailed out by the US government in order to survive a
financial crisis, lest they obliterate the global financial system.
Today, the big banks are even bigger.
The
four biggest US banks (JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and
Wells Fargo) today have about $7.8 trillion in assets, or about 47
percent of U.S. gross domestic product, up from $6.4 trillion, or 43
percent of GDP, at the time of the crisis in 2008. The six biggest
banks, a group that now includes Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley,
now have $9.6 trillion in assets, or nearly 58 percent of GDP.
The
Dodd-Frank rules designed to stop banks from betting with the insured
deposits of ordinary savers are still on the drawing boards, courtesy
of the banks' lobbying prowess. The Volcker Rule has yet to see the
light of day.
JPMorgan
Chase is the biggest of the banksters, and may well be the baddest.
Last year it lost $6.2 billion by betting on credit default swaps
tied to corporate debt - and then lied about it. Evidence shows the
bank paid bribes to get certain counties to buy the swaps. The
Justice Department is investigating the bank over improper energy
trading. That follows the news that the anti-bribery unit of the
Security and Exchange Commission is looking into whether JPMorgan
hired the children of Chinese officials to help win business. The
bank has also allegedly committed fraud in collecting credit card
debt, used false and misleading means of foreclosing on mortgages,
and misled credit-card customers in seeking to sell them
identity-theft products.
They've
set aside $6.8 billion for legal; which sounds like a lot; it is a
lot. But for JPMorgan it is just the cost of doing business; they
weigh the probability of getting caught; they weigh the probability
of being prosecuted; they weigh the cost of fighting regulators; they
don't even worry about the possibility of criminal charges; they
tally the cost of penalties; and they still have a hefty profit.
That's all that matters.
And
the guys running the banks five years ago, well they got while the
getting was good. Richard Fuld presided over the collapse of Lehman.
and sent a tidal wave of panic through the global financial system,
Fuld is living comfortably.
He
has a mansion in Greenwich, Conn., a 40-plus-acre ranch in Sun
Valley, Idaho, as well as a five-bedroom home in Jupiter Island, Fla.
He no longer has a place in Manhattan, since he sold his Park Avenue
apartment in 2009 for $25.87 million. Other bankers such as Jimmy
Cayne (Bear Stearns), Stanley O’Neal (Merrill Lynch), Chuck Prince
(Citigroup) and Ken Lewis (Bank of America) are also living in quiet
luxury. The five ultra-rich former Wall Street chieftains have
simultaneously faded into luxurious obscurity while the survivors —
Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs — have
only consolidated their power.
Last
year a federal judge approved a $90 million settlement of a class
action suit brought by Lehman investors against Fuld and several
other company executives and directors. The judge, Lewis Kaplan,
questioned whether the settlement, which will be paid entirely by
Lehman’s insurers, was fair given that none of the individuals
would pay out of pocket. He agreed to the deal, however, because
litigation expenses for a trial were likely to deplete the funds
available for compensating the investors. The cost of doing business.
Five
years and the situation is more dangerous than ever. The big banks
are bigger than ever, more ungovernable than ever; and the economy
still hasn't recovered. Now, think about what might happen if we had
a repeat of five years ago; or Act II if you prefer. What happens if
there is another bank failure and we are again presented with the
option of bailing out the banks or watching our 401ks slip away like
sand through the hourglass. The big banks are ungovernable - too big
to fail, too big to jail, too big to curtail. They should be split
up, and their size capped. They should be chopped into small pieces,
easily digestible pieces. When a small bank fails, we don't even
burp. Chop them up into bite size morsels. There's no need to wait
for Congress to do it; the nation's antitrust laws are adequate to
the job. There is ample precedent. In 1911 we split up Standard Oil.
In 1982 we split up Ma Bell. The Federal Reserve has authority to do
it on its own in any event.
We
could do it. Things change. Happens all the time.
Today,
the Dow Industrial Average announced a change. In the biggest
shake-up of the Dow Jones industrial average in nearly a decade,
Goldman Sachs, Visa and Nike will join the 30-stock index, with Bank
of America, which just two years ago was the largest US bank by
assets, one of the names exiting the Dow. Also leaving the Dow,
Hewlett-Packard, and Alcoa. The changes will take effect at the
opening of trading September 23.
Bank
of America's run in the Dow was not one for the history books. The
stock joined the index in February 2008. The stock is down more than
65 percent since it joined the Dow. The company was engulfed by the
financial and housing crisis after it acquired sub-prime mortgage
originator Countrywide Financial in January 2008. The bank said being
removed from the index "has no impact on our business or our
strategy for providing solid returns to shareholders." True
enough, the moves don't affect the bottom line of the companies.
With a market value of about $157 billion, BofA becomes the biggest US company not included in the
average, other than Apple and Google
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.