Thank
You, America
DOW
– 55 = 13,328
SPX – 4 = 1457
NAS – 7 = 3091
10 YR YLD -.03 = 1.87%
OIL +.06 = 93.25
GOLD + 13.20 = 1661.10
SILV + .24 = 30.50
SPX – 4 = 1457
NAS – 7 = 3091
10 YR YLD -.03 = 1.87%
OIL +.06 = 93.25
GOLD + 13.20 = 1661.10
SILV + .24 = 30.50
Some
people have debated what we should do if the banks get into trouble
again; should they be bailed out? The Too Big to Fail Banks of 2008
are even bigger today, and if one collapses, then there would likely
be a cascading effect through the global financial system. So, if a
big financial institution gets into trouble, should there be a
bailout, or do we just say “tough luck”? You probably have an
opinion, and reasonable people can debate the issue, or at least
there could be room for reasonable debate, until now. As of today,
there is no more debate.
If
you go to Webster's Dictionary and look up the word “ingrate”,
you will find a picture of Maurice “Hank” Greenberg; the guy who
founded American International Group, AIG, the huge insurance company
that in 2008 accepted a $182 billion dollar bailout from the
Treasury. Hank Greenberg, the former CEO of AIG is
contending in a lawsuit that the government treated the company’s
shareholders too harshly when carrying out its 2008 rescue of the
insurance giant. AIG is weighing whether to join the lawsuit, filed
by Mr. Greenberg’s investment firm, Starr International Company,
which owns about 12% of AIG. In addition to founding AIG, Greenberg
gained notoriety for a high profile fraud case in 2005 that pushed
him out of his CEO role at AIG. Greenberg was accused of using sham
transactions to mask the company's financial position.
So
far, AIG has not joined in the suit with Greenberg. The choice is not
a simple one for the insurer. Its board members, most of whom joined
after the bailout, owe a duty to shareholders to consider the
lawsuit. If the board does not give careful consideration to the
case, Mr. Greenberg could challenge its decision to abstain. Should
Mr. Greenberg snare a major settlement without A.I.G., the company
could face additional lawsuits from other shareholders. In other
words, the board of directors may have a fiduciary duty to sue the
government.
One
of Starr International’s major arguments is that AIG’s bailout
terms were far tougher than those granted to other large financial
firms. Greenberg has accused the New York Fed of using the rescue to
bail out Wall Street banks at the expense of shareholders, and of
being a "loan shark" by charging exorbitant interest of
14.5 percent on the initial loan.
The Treasury did force AIG to do
things which were against their very nature. AIG was forced to pay
full settlement on credit default swaps; one-hundred cents on the
dollar, to the tune of more than $12 billion to Goldman Sachs alone.
Now remember these credit default swaps were a form of insurance but
they weren't insurance, and they were and remain largely unregulated.
CDS is not like insurance in that it does not require reserves be
held to pay off claims. The whole idea behind CDS was to collect
premiums without ever paying claims. To force AIG to make full
payment on a CDS claim was unprecedented and now Greenberg claims it
was cruel and unusual punishment.
AIG’s
cash needs and internal failings were in many ways far more serious
than those of other institutions. In fact, the company was in such
dire straits after the rescue that the government eased up on the
terms. The concessions were considerable.
In
early 2009, the Federal Reserve cut the interest rate on a big loan
to AIG, saving the company about $1 billion a year in interest. Then
the Treasury exchanged $40 billion of preferred shares for new ones
that effectively paid no cash dividends to taxpayers. If it had paid
the originally agreed 10 percent dividend on all these and other
preferred shares, the insurer would have paid roughly $20 billion
from the beginning of 2009 to the end 2012. Instead, the preferred
shares were converted into common stock, which the government later
sold, purportedly turning a profit of about $22 billion.
The
bailout eventually worked out for AIG. After losing half its value in
2011, the stock rose more than 52 percent in 2012, tripling the gains
of the broader S&P insurance index. Things worked
out so well for AIG that they are now running a television ad
campaign called “Thank You, America” in which it offers its
gratitude for the bailout.
Mark
Twain was right; truth is stranger than fiction because fiction is
obliged to stick to possibilities.
Seriously,
thank you, America.
There
has been a lot of talk about breaking up the big banks, cutting them
down into smaller banks that don't threaten the global financial
system. The Dallas Federal Reserve has called for breaking up the
biggest banks. Texas Republican Jeb Hensarling, the new Chairman of
the House Financial Services Committee has expressed concern about
the Too Big to Fail banks. Elizabeth Warren was elected in
Massachusetts and she will sit on the Senate Banking Committee. Even
Sandy Weill and John Reid, co-founders of Citigroup, which originally
pushed through legislation which destroyed Glass-Steagall; they are
now proposing that Glass-Steagall be reinstated and the biggest banks
be broken up. The timing would seem to be right. Don't hold your
breath.
The
bank lobby will fight any attempts to break up the banks. Eventually,
we will come back around to a big bank or insurance company on the
verge of collapse and begging for a bailout; it's inevitable; the
banksters continue to gamble in the derivatives markets, and
eventually all gamblers lose, and when they lose.., please, please
remember the story of Hank Greenberg and AIG.
Alcoa
has kicked off the fourth quarter earnings reporting season by
posting a profit of $242
million, or 21 cents per share, compared with a net loss of $191
million, or 18 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Excluding
one-time items, net income was $64 million, or 6 cents per share, in
line with average analysts' expectations of 6 cents.
Alcoa
is supposed to provide clues about earnings, but I've never found a
good correlation. Instead the earnings season has become little more
than an exercise in obfuscation. Take the phrase “excluding
one-time items”; that means the cost of doing business. Lucy
Kellaway at Financial Times has come up with what she calls the
Golden Flannel Awards, a mock celebration of corporate malarkey.
Here's an example from one annual report: “In the wholesale
channel, Burberry exited doors not aligned with brand status and
invested in presentation through enhanced assortments and dedicated
customised real estate in key doors.” I don't know what that means,
but it might surprise you to learn that Burberry sells raincoats and
they don't manufacture doors. Another company, called Record, does
manufacture doors, which they call “entrance solutions”.
Sometimes
companies create new words, such as: solutioneering, sustainagility,
or innovalue. Sometimes, companies say things that are just designed
to hide reality; for example, Citigroup issued a press release that
talked about “optimizing the customer footprint across
geographies,” which means they fired 1,100 workers. Citigroup also
got the top prize by declaring that from now on they would offer
“client-centric advice”. Sounds good until you think about what
they've been offering up to now.
I
still think it will be hard to top AIG's “Thank you, America.”
Anyway,
welcome to earnings reporting season.
So,
I was away on vacation over the holidays, but I'm catching up on the
fiscal cliff deal. It has some interesting provisions; lots of little
and not so little special deals, especially in the form of tax
breaks. For a bunch of lawmakers who were supposedly so busy and so
involved in "negotiations," they were remarkably productive
when it came to special interests.
There's
$9.7 billion over the next 10 years on additional subsidies for
student loans or $5.6 billion for adoptions, although both those
figures seem like a lot considering that employer-provided childcare
is getting only $209 million. More money is at stake in subsidies for
various businesses, $46 billion, and $18 billion for alternative
energy.
There's a special 50% tax credit for maintaining railroad tracks is projected to cost $331 million over the next two years.
Tax
benefits for certain motorsport racing track facilities, such as
Nascar, will cost more than $100 million over the next seven years.
Business
property on Indian reservations will receive $660 million in tax
breaks over the next three years. Indian employment tax credits will
total $119 million over the next four years. Tax breaks for Alaskan
Natives receiving trust income will add up to $46 million over 10
years.
More
favorable deductions for contributions of food to charities will cost
$314 million over two years. For contributions of property, the
benefit will be $225 million over a decade.
Film
and television production got the last-minute extension of tax
write-offs worth $430 million over the next two years.
Businesses
in Puerto Rico will receive $358 million over the next two years. In
addition, a temporary increase in the excise tax rebate on rum
production will give Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands $222
million, much of which will go to benefit local rum distillers.
Regulated
Investment Companies, such as mutual funds and real estate investment
trusts, are to receive $211 million in tax benefits over the next two
years. Some of that pertains to dividends paid to foreign investors.
Over
the next two years, additional economic development credits for
American Samoa will cost $62 million.
Over
the next three years, $7 million will go to expand credits for
plug-in electric vehicles to include motorcycles. That's a 10%
rebate, up to $2,500 for buying an electric scooter.
$59
million in credits
for fuel made from algae and expanding benefits for certain other
biofuels.
Tax
credits for renewable diesel fuel and small agricultural producers of
biodiesel will total $2.2 billion over the next five years.
Asparagus
growers will get $15 million.
There’s
a provision that allows workers to convert conventional 401(k)s into
Roth 401(k)s at a cost of $12.2 billion over the coming decade.
There
were big breaks for private equity firms and hedge funds, including
the
the
continuation of the “carried interest” which in effect allows
sophisticated investment managers to postpone their earnings from a
deal and then often pay taxes at capital gains rates that are lower
than the rates for fee income.
And a $9 billion tax break for big banks and manufacturers related to "active financing." Active financing is a special transaction tax break that specifically allows multinational companies to avoid paying US taxes on foreign earnings if those profits resulted from "actively" financing a deal or activity on foreign soil. Not surprisingly, big businesses claim it helps them be more competitive abroad.
Thank
you, America.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.